Re: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery
On 1 Oct 2008, at 04:16, Ed Murphy wrote: I need to check the exact details of Goethe's and BobTHJ's sell tickets. I have the votes as 15F / 16A without those. Will take care of it later tonight. Haha. It is all for naught. ais523 was trying to continue eir long-running streak of winning once a month. Since e failed to remember to actually Monster-deputize for the Assessor, that streak is now over. Way to be careful in the final moments, ais...
RE: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery
That isn't a miswording, I sent the message but I had to send it from a different address, and it seems not to have arrived. H. Distributor Taral, can you check a-o to see if something got stuck there? Note that it's worth 8VP to you, quite possibly, as arguably if my deputisation doesn't arrive some time the proposal didn't technically pass. -- ais523 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of comex Sent: Wed 01/10/2008 03:30 To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal 5707 has been adopted Not until the Assessor determines the option selected by Agora. Uh... how silly, to miss a monthly win because you misworded a message. winmail.dat
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery
On 1 Oct 2008, at 17:07, Alexander Smith wrote: That isn't a miswording, I sent the message but I had to send it from a different address, and it seems not to have arrived. H. Distributor Taral, can you check a-o to see if something got stuck there? Note that it's worth 8VP to you, quite possibly, as arguably if my deputisation doesn't arrive some time the proposal didn't technically pass. -- ais523 I'm sorry, but _actions only happen when a majority of the list sees it_. See: comex's ratification scam from a while back. You're too late.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote: On 1 Oct 2008, at 17:07, Alexander Smith wrote: That isn't a miswording, I sent the message but I had to send it from a different address, and it seems not to have arrived. H. Distributor Taral, can you check a-o to see if something got stuck there? Note that it's worth 8VP to you, quite possibly, as arguably if my deputisation doesn't arrive some time the proposal didn't technically pass. -- ais523 I'm sorry, but _actions only happen when a majority of the list sees it_. See: comex's ratification scam from a while back. You're too late. Hold on here. Now we get to the point where a legitimate communication is held up. Does this violate R101 participation rights? -Goethe
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 12:53:00 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Hold on here. Now we get to the point where a legitimate communication is held up. Does this violate R101 participation rights? -Goethe On the other hand, in a case where the sender of the message didn't take the reasonable step of sending email from an address that was subscribed to the mailing lists, I don't think eir rights are being violated by bouncing the message. It's trivial to subscribe the new address to the list and of course e retains the right, if not the ability, to send from eir previously-subscribed address. ... Maybe. I believe the precedent is that the message counts iff it was made in a good faith attempt to communicate with the other list subscribers. Pavitra
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal 5707 has been adopted Not until the Assessor determines the option selected by Agora. Uh... how silly, to miss a monthly win because you misworded a message.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Proposal 5707 has been adopted, awarding a win to ais523. Therefore, by rule 2188, ais523 satisfies the Winning Condition of Legislation. Therefore, by rule 2186, as ais523 satisfies a Winning Condition but no Losing Conditions, ais523 wins. I need to check the exact details of Goethe's and BobTHJ's sell tickets. I have the votes as 15F / 16A without those. Will take care of it later tonight. I think I voted 2xFOR directly in satisfying the ticket... -G.
