Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: The PBA didn't have a 4 crop, but I'm considering your harvesting of 2314 a success as 231X - so the above conditional action fails. He specified exact crops of X314... -- Taral tar...@gmail.com Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you. -- Unknown
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, farming
On 29 Oct 2008, at 20:48, Roger Hicks wrote: ehird, you missed this Thanks. -- ehird
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 16:40, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I withdrew ^250 from the RBoA, withdrew 2 1-crops for ^23, withdrew 6 VP for ^63, deposited several note credits for ^168, withdrew 2 5-crops for ^39, withdrew 7 1-crops for ^112, and finally withdrew a 2-crop for ^27. That adds up to ^154. ehird, this is the message of root's I am referring to. BobTHJ
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On 27 Oct 2008, at 18:17, Roger Hicks wrote: ehird, this is the message of root's I am referring to. OK. Will process On 27 Oct 2008, at 01:34, warrigal wrote: I do this 30 times: if I have more than 50 VP, I deposit 1 VP for at least 15 coins. bobthj, please tell me how many vp warrigal had before this transaction. -- ehird
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Ian Kelly wrote: I withdrew ^250 from the RBoA, withdrew 2 1-crops for ^23, withdrew 6 VP for ^63, deposited several note credits for ^168, withdrew 2 5-crops for ^39, withdrew 7 1-crops for ^112, and finally withdrew a 2-crop for ^27. That adds up to ^154. BobTHJ... this was posted to a-d, it's a clarification of previous actions. -- ehird
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:23, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Ian Kelly wrote: I withdrew ^250 from the RBoA, withdrew 2 1-crops for ^23, withdrew 6 VP for ^63, deposited several note credits for ^168, withdrew 2 5-crops for ^39, withdrew 7 1-crops for ^112, and finally withdrew a 2-crop for ^27. That adds up to ^154. BobTHJ... this was posted to a-d, it's a clarification of previous actions. Oops...you are right. However, e got the number of 250 coins because that's as many as e could afford to withdraw at that point. BobTHJ
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On 27 Oct 2008, at 18:26, Roger Hicks wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:23, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Ian Kelly wrote: I withdrew ^250 from the RBoA, withdrew 2 1-crops for ^23, withdrew 6 VP for ^63, deposited several note credits for ^168, withdrew 2 5-crops for ^39, withdrew 7 1-crops for ^112, and finally withdrew a 2-crop for ^27. That adds up to ^154. BobTHJ... this was posted to a-d, it's a clarification of previous actions. Oops...you are right. However, e got the number of 250 coins because that's as many as e could afford to withdraw at that point. BobTHJ Processed, new proto-PBA report online. Is it correct? Does the RBoA still have too many coins? is the comex stuff right? -- ehird
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:41, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Processed, new proto-PBA report online. Is it correct? Does the RBoA still have too many coins? is the comex stuff right? comex seems to have way too many coins after buying all eir assets back (1468?). Since Warrigal potentially deposited as many as 23 VP in the PBA (a transaction that is missing from your report) prior to comex's withdrawing as many as possible, it is possible comex may have withdrawn more than 7. I also have discrepancies as to the number of crops owned by the PBA for 4, 6, and 9 crops. Since I haven't published an AAA report yet for you I'll try and work these out. In addition, the RBOA should still have only 260 coins. We differ by an amount of 168...you say ais523 deposited 719 coins in the bank across the various bank run scam messages, but I only show 551 coins. IMHO, we need to work everything out so asset holdings are in agreement for all contracts and then ratify it all. I also don't think it works well to have multiple recordkeepers for contracts whose currencies are traded around a bit. Perhaps we should amend all the contracts to make the Accountor be the recordkeepor. If we did so I would be happy to write automation to keep track of all the various transactions that occur. BobTHJ
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On 27 Oct 2008, at 19:54, Roger Hicks wrote: comex seems to have way too many coins after buying all eir assets back (1468?). Since Warrigal potentially deposited as many as 23 VP in the PBA (a transaction that is missing from your report) prior to comex's withdrawing as many as possible, it is possible comex may have withdrawn more than 7. I also have discrepancies as to the number of crops owned by the PBA for 4, 6, and 9 crops. Since I haven't published an AAA report yet for you I'll try and work these out. In addition, the RBOA should still have only 260 coins. We differ by an amount of 168...you say ais523 deposited 719 coins in the bank across the various bank run scam messages, but I only show 551 coins. IMHO, we need to work everything out so asset holdings are in agreement for all contracts and then ratify it all. I also don't think it works well to have multiple recordkeepers for contracts whose currencies are traded around a bit. Perhaps we should amend all the contracts to make the Accountor be the recordkeepor. If we did so I would be happy to write automation to keep track of all the various transactions that occur. Please see my recent a-d thread. I f*cked up. Majorly. -- ehird
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking/Farming
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22 Oct 2008, at 23:21, Ian Kelly wrote: I PBA-withdraw a 2 crop for 27 coins (and could somebody verify that my coin holdings are now 153? the web report claims I only have 93 before this transaction). Why would you have that many? You now have ^66. I withdrew ^250 from the RBoA, withdrew 2 1-crops for ^23, withdrew 6 VP for ^63, deposited several note credits for ^168, withdrew 2 5-crops for ^39, withdrew 7 1-crops for ^112, and finally withdrew a 2-crop for ^27. That adds up to ^154. -root
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, Farming, and RBoA amendment
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:17, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: X crops - 135 chits (no previous rate) This should probably be higher What would you suggest? - woggle
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, Farming, and RBoA amendment
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:17, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: X crops - 135 chits (no previous rate) This should probably be higher What would you suggest? - woggle The price of an X crop should always be 1.x times the most expensive crop. 1.1 times might be good, but i'm not sure.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, farming
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:28 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:54 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mill 5547, 5548, and 5549 (using X crops as 5s), Democratic proposals, for a total of 12 points. BobTHJ, did you forget to process this? Just haven't got there yet. Sorry, it looked like you had processed all the other actions, so I thought you might have forgotten. You see, I want to spend my points ;).
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, farming
Quazie wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BobTHJ wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I rename land #75 to Union Train Depot Fails. A land already exists with that name. I rename land #75 to The Courthouse. This fails as the last one didn't. ?
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, farming
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quazie wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BobTHJ wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I rename land #75 to Union Train Depot Fails. A land already exists with that name. I rename land #75 to The Courthouse. This fails as the last one didn't. ? The first attempt to change the name of land #75 was successful unless proven otherwise,. land isn't a rule defined entity, so nothing forbids lands from having the same name. As a result the second attempt to change the name of land #75 failed because no land was named land #75.
