Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7905-7907

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

The automatic place of response for all messages is a-d.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:46 PM, ATMunn .  wrote:
> 
> Oops, I don't know how that got sent here...
> 
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM, ATMunn .  wrote:
> I vote the same as PSS does.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> > On Sep 25, 2017, at 1:01 AM, Aris Merchant 
> >  wrote:
> >
> > [The Office of the Promotor frowns on having to do extra work for no good
> > reason. Expect much Malevolent Paper Shuffling.]
> >
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> > quorum is 2.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
> > also a valid vote).
> >
> >
> > ID Author(s) AI   TitlePender  Pend fee
> > ---
> > 7905*  CuddleBeam1.0  Shiny Love   CuddleBeam  1 AP
> 
> If voting against would cause this not to pass, I vote AGAINST. Otherwise, I 
> vote FOR. If my vote would be AGAINST and it would be adopted, I vote against.
> 
> > 7906*  Gaelan1.0  Happiness has a cost.Gaelan  1 AP
> 
> I vote FOR.
> 
> > 7907*  CuddleBeam1.0  make Cuddlebeam happy.   CuddleBeam  1 AP
> 
> I vote FOR.
> 
> >
> >
> > Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
> >
> > In order to reduce confusion, the shiny pend price is being removed from 
> > this
> > report. A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating Value
> > in shines (see the Secretary's report).
> >
> > The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
> >
> > //
> > ID: 7905
> > Title: Shiny Love
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: CuddleBeam
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > Upon enactment of this proposal, for each player who voted AGAINST
> > this proposal and in alphabetical (and transliterated) order, have 10 of 
> > their
> > shinies transferred to Agora. Then, for each player who voted FOR this 
> > proposal
> > and in alphabetical (and transliterated) order, have Agora transfer to them 
> > 10
> > Shinies.
> >
> > //
> > ID: 7906
> > Title: Happiness has a cost.
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: Gaelan
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > Create a rule titled “Careful what you wish for”, power 1, text: "All 
> > players
> > designated as happy have their voting power reduced by one. When this joke 
> > has
> > run its course, any player CAN cause this rule to repeal itself With 2 
> > Support.”
> >
> > //
> > ID: 7907
> > Title: make Cuddlebeam happy.
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: CuddleBeam
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > Upon enactment of this proposal, make Cuddlebeam happy.
> >
> > //
> 
> 
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7905-7907

[ATMunn .]

Oops, I don't know how that got sent here...

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM, ATMunn .  wrote:

> I vote the same as PSS does.
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> 
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 25, 2017, at 1:01 AM, Aris Merchant <
>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > [The Office of the Promotor frowns on having to do extra work for no
>> good
>> > reason. Expect much Malevolent Paper Shuffling.]
>> >
>> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
>> > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
>> > quorum is 2.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
>> > also a valid vote).
>> >
>> >
>> > ID Author(s) AI   TitlePender  Pend
>> fee
>> > 
>> ---
>> > 7905*  CuddleBeam1.0  Shiny Love   CuddleBeam  1 AP
>>
>> If voting against would cause this not to pass, I vote AGAINST.
>> Otherwise, I vote FOR. If my vote would be AGAINST and it would be adopted,
>> I vote against.
>>
>> > 7906*  Gaelan1.0  Happiness has a cost.Gaelan  1 AP
>>
>> I vote FOR.
>>
>> > 7907*  CuddleBeam1.0  make Cuddlebeam happy.   CuddleBeam  1 AP
>>
>> I vote FOR.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Legend: * : Proposal is pending.
>> >
>> > In order to reduce confusion, the shiny pend price is being removed
>> from this
>> > report. A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating
>> Value
>> > in shines (see the Secretary's report).
>> >
>> > The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below.
>> >
>> > //
>> > ID: 7905
>> > Title: Shiny Love
>> > Adoption index: 1.0
>> > Author: CuddleBeam
>> > Co-authors:
>> >
>> >
>> > Upon enactment of this proposal, for each player who voted AGAINST
>> > this proposal and in alphabetical (and transliterated) order, have 10
>> of their
>> > shinies transferred to Agora. Then, for each player who voted FOR this
>> proposal
>> > and in alphabetical (and transliterated) order, have Agora transfer to
>> them 10
>> > Shinies.
>> >
>> > //
>> > ID: 7906
>> > Title: Happiness has a cost.
>> > Adoption index: 1.0
>> > Author: Gaelan
>> > Co-authors:
>> >
>> >
>> > Create a rule titled “Careful what you wish for”, power 1, text: "All
>> players
>> > designated as happy have their voting power reduced by one. When this
>> joke has
>> > run its course, any player CAN cause this rule to repeal itself With 2
>> Support.”
>> >
>> > //
>> > ID: 7907
>> > Title: make Cuddlebeam happy.
>> > Adoption index: 1.0
>> > Author: CuddleBeam
>> > Co-authors:
>> >
>> >
>> > Upon enactment of this proposal, make Cuddlebeam happy.
>> >
>> > //
>>
>>
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7905-7907

[Kerim Aydin]

On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I strongly encourage everyone to vote FOR both "Happiness has a cost."
> and "make CuddleBeam happy." Someone needs to teach em to stop
> annoying other people for no reason, and the penalty is very fitting.

I should say I particularly like Shiny love.  We used to have these sort 
of game theory bribe-the-voters proposals all the time (esp when we had
prisoners' dilemma style scoring for proposals).  -G.