Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

I still do that in my Monthly report.

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Nov 26, 2017, at 1:43 AM, Aris Merchant 
>  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Owen Jacobson  wrote:
>> I vote as follows:
>> 
>>> ID Author(s)AI   TitlePender  Pend 
>>> fee
>>> ---
>>> 7973*  Aris 1.0  Sky Pillars  ArisOP [1]
>> 
>> AGAINST. A permanent monument to every departed player is a cute idea, but 
>> probably impractical.
>> 
>> Besides, it should be the Herald, not the Registrar.
> 
> Actually, all I wanted was to restore the Registrar tradition of
> tracking the way each player was deregistered. A pillar in the sky
> would be represented as a row on a list. Probably best that it failed
> though, given how ambiguous it was.
> 
> -Aris



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

[Alexis Hunt]

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 00:20 Ørjan Johansen  wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >> 7880*  ATMunn, [5]  1.0  [6]  Alexis  1
> AP
> > AGAINST.  If you deserve it, claim it right away.
>
> Three of the reward conditions may be triggered by _other_ people's
> actions, so this is not always possible, and Agora has a tradition of
> avoiding having less than 4 days to respond to other people's actions.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>

Yeah, the main reason I support this is that it's not fair for someone to
have to respond within 24 hours of a proposal resolution, in particular, to
gain rewards.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

[VJ Rada]

Ya I was just going to give myself a win and put Smash Mouth All Star
in the ruleset for a while for that exact reason: an absurd
dictatorship would be disastrous at this point.

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Owen Jacobson  wrote:
>
>> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada  wrote:
>>
>>> AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction
>>
>>>6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision.
>>
>>> to
>>
>>>6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision.
>>
>>> which is obvious nonsense.
>>
>> DARN. Knew I should have bribed you again.
>> Alright show's over boys vote against this proposal.
>
> Wouldn’t have helped.
>
> The last voting scam is how Alexis got eir Princess title, and a Dictatorship 
> that heralded a multi-month lapse in the game. I wouldn’t have taken that 
> bribe - I like playing too much.
>
> Looking at the votes, though, you came impressively close to sneaking this in.
>
> -o
>



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

[Owen Jacobson]

> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, VJ Rada  wrote:
> 
>> AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction
> 
>>6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision.
> 
>> to
> 
>>6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision.
> 
>> which is obvious nonsense.
> 
> DARN. Knew I should have bribed you again.
> Alright show's over boys vote against this proposal.

Wouldn’t have helped.

The last voting scam is how Alexis got eir Princess title, and a Dictatorship 
that heralded a multi-month lapse in the game. I wouldn’t have taken that bribe 
- I like playing too much.

Looking at the votes, though, you came impressively close to sneaking this in.

-o



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

[Alexis Hunt]

Thankfully the expedition only needs to back to last year, when the ruleset
was ratified.

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017, 20:40 VJ Rada,  wrote:

> I'm simply taking the current ruleset as authoritative and realizing that
> nobody's exactly going on a decade-old digging expedition to fix the typos.
> You're right, I could have phrased a bit better. But the worst that happens
> is that, when the rulekeepor miraculously checks all typos in my fixes, a
> couple of minor typos are added. It's still better to vote for it.
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Ørjan Johansen 
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> >
> > 7974*  V.J. Rada3.0 [2]  Really minor fixes   V.J. Rada   1
> AP
> >>>
> >>> FOR. Note that some of these may be Rulekeepor typos; I will do my best
> >> to
> >> investigate and determine which ones are.
> >>
> >
> > Some of the changes are equivalent to "replace text A with some text
> > containing A", so if any of those are actually Rulekeepor typos, the
> > proposal would end up duplicating stuff that wasn't really missing.
> >
> > In particular, most of the period additions.  Some of the plural
> > corrections might count as well if quoted text is allowed to end inside a
> > word.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Ørjan.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7973-7880

[VJ Rada]

I'm simply taking the current ruleset as authoritative and realizing that
nobody's exactly going on a decade-old digging expedition to fix the typos.
You're right, I could have phrased a bit better. But the worst that happens
is that, when the rulekeepor miraculously checks all typos in my fixes, a
couple of minor typos are added. It's still better to vote for it.

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Ørjan Johansen  wrote:

> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> 7974*  V.J. Rada3.0 [2]  Really minor fixes   V.J. Rada   1 AP
>>>
>>> FOR. Note that some of these may be Rulekeepor typos; I will do my best
>> to
>> investigate and determine which ones are.
>>
>
> Some of the changes are equivalent to "replace text A with some text
> containing A", so if any of those are actually Rulekeepor typos, the
> proposal would end up duplicating stuff that wasn't really missing.
>
> In particular, most of the period additions.  Some of the plural
> corrections might count as well if quoted text is allowed to end inside a
> word.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>



-- 
>From V.J. Rada