Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Result for Proposal 7740
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Sean Hunt wrote: I believe that aranea has won, but there will be no official record because the rules don't provide for an award of Champion at the moment. By the way, this win had a clever bit... it wasn't just semi-apathetic voting. Aranea noticed (after voting periods ended) that the vote leader in the PM election had voted AGAINST the win. The PM has a voting strength of 2 on proposals. If the PM election had been resolved before proposal, the proposal wouldn't have passed. Aranea quietly took control of the IADoP to make sure this didn't happen. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Result for Proposal 7740
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Henri Bouchard wrote: Text of adopted proposals: === Proposal 7740 (Foo Bar Baz by aranea, AI=1) aranea wins the game. === aranea won the game? Well, no one's claimed otherwise, yet... -G.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Result for Proposal 7740
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Sean Hunt wrote: On May 8, 2015 6:00 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Fri, 8 May 2015, Henri Bouchard wrote: Text of adopted proposals: === Proposal 7740 (Foo Bar Baz by aranea, AI=1) aranea wins the game. === aranea won the game? Well, no one's claimed otherwise, yet... -G. I believe that aranea has won, but there will be no official record because the rules don't provide for an award of Champion at the moment. I was waiting a couple days to see if anyone thought it didn't work... I've got some ideas about this point. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Result for Proposal 7740
On May 8, 2015 6:00 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Fri, 8 May 2015, Henri Bouchard wrote: Text of adopted proposals: === Proposal 7740 (Foo Bar Baz by aranea, AI=1) aranea wins the game. === aranea won the game? Well, no one's claimed otherwise, yet... -G. I believe that aranea has won, but there will be no official record because the rules don't provide for an award of Champion at the moment. -scshunt
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Result for Proposal 7740
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I was waiting a couple days to see if anyone thought it didn't work... I've got some ideas about this point. -G. The only possible rationale I could think of is that the rules specifying how to win the game thereby make it impossible to win the game through any other mechanism, as a standard principle of legal interpretation. But I didn't want to go to the effort of writing up the CFJ and figured someone else would. Sean
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Result for Proposal 7740
On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Fri, 8 May 2015, Sean Hunt wrote: I believe that aranea has won, but there will be no official record because the rules don't provide for an award of Champion at the moment. By the way, this win had a clever bit... it wasn't just semi-apathetic voting. Aranea noticed (after voting periods ended) that the vote leader in the PM election had voted AGAINST the win. The PM has a voting strength of 2 on proposals. If the PM election had been resolved before proposal, the proposal wouldn't have passed. Aranea quietly took control of the IADoP to make sure this didn't happen. To be honest, I only figured this out after I had deputized for IADoP (while preparing the PM election resolution). -- aranea
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Result for Proposal 7740
On Thu, 7 May 2015, Luis Ressel wrote: On Wed, 6 May 2015 16:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: FOR/AGAINST 3/2 VI1.5 AI 1 VOTERS 7 QUORUM 2 ENDING QUORUM 3 Umm, not that it makes the resolution invalid, but VOTERS = 6. (...) right. addition. did i mention i'm just a statistician? this is bias-corrected.
