Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposals 7758-7762

2015-07-19 Thread omd
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 I'll opine on the effect in Rulekeepor's Notes this week, at least (I
 haven't reviewed votes so no idea if it's controversial or not at
 the moment).  -G.

A quick check shows:

voted FOR with pseudo-acronym (2): ais523 Warrigal
voted FOR without pseudo-acronym (4): omd Tiger Tekneek Roujo

G. attempted to be ambiguous about it, but either way, pseudo-acronym
wouldn't hit 50%.


Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposals 7758-7762

2015-07-19 Thread Ørjan Johansen

On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:


Also add Joe Piercy and aranea to without column.  And confirming no
overly-clever Distributor slipped it into the raw headers ;).  -G.


Do you really need special list admin powers for that? Testing...

Greetings,
Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposals 7758-7762

2015-07-19 Thread omd
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
 Do you really need special list admin powers for that? Testing...

You don't, but a quick archive grep suggests that nobody tried this in
a voting message.  I also doubt it would work legally, any more than
you can publish something by putting it in a header.

(Protip: Raw, download-resumable archives are still available at
http://agoranomic.org/archives/ - though the authentication has been
broken for the last few days, which I just fixed.)


Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposals 7758-7762

2015-07-19 Thread Kerim Aydin


On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, omd wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
  Do you really need special list admin powers for that? Testing...
 
 You don't, but a quick archive grep suggests that nobody tried this in
 a voting message.  I also doubt it would work legally, any more than
 you can publish something by putting it in a header.
 
 (Protip: Raw, download-resumable archives are still available at
 http://agoranomic.org/archives/ - though the authentication has been
 broken for the last few days, which I just fixed.)

What Ørjan means (Testing...) is that e slipped it into a field of 
that last email...

I just thought there was something odd about the wording of your 
proposal clause surrounding Messages, probably nothing, but enough 
that I took the abundance of caution that nothing fiddly was in there.
:)




Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposals 7758-7762

2015-07-19 Thread Kerim Aydin


On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
 On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, omd wrote:
  On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
   I'll opine on the effect in Rulekeepor's Notes this week, at least (I
   haven't reviewed votes so no idea if it's controversial or not at
   the moment).  -G.
  
  A quick check shows:
  
  voted FOR with pseudo-acronym (2): ais523 Warrigal
  voted FOR without pseudo-acronym (4): omd Tiger Tekneek Roujo
  
  G. attempted to be ambiguous about it, but either way, pseudo-acronym
  wouldn't hit 50%.
 
 Also add Joe Piercy and aranea to without column.  And confirming no
 overly-clever Distributor slipped it into the raw headers ;).

Oh silly me I hadn't cross-referenced with the FOR votes yet.  Got it
now.  Agree with your pseudo-assessment.  -G.





Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposals 7758-7762

2015-07-19 Thread omd
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
 What Ørjan means (Testing...) is that e slipped it into a field of
 that last email...

Yeah, I know.  But I checked the aforementioned archive to verify that
nobody did the same in a message actually containing a vote.


Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposals 7758-7762

2015-07-19 Thread Kerim Aydin


On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, omd wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
  I'll opine on the effect in Rulekeepor's Notes this week, at least (I
  haven't reviewed votes so no idea if it's controversial or not at
  the moment).  -G.
 
 A quick check shows:
 
 voted FOR with pseudo-acronym (2): ais523 Warrigal
 voted FOR without pseudo-acronym (4): omd Tiger Tekneek Roujo
 
 G. attempted to be ambiguous about it, but either way, pseudo-acronym
 wouldn't hit 50%.

Also add Joe Piercy and aranea to without column.  And confirming no
overly-clever Distributor slipped it into the raw headers ;).  -G.