Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9068-9069
On 3/3/24 17:22, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: > Would this perhaps allow it to merit a non-AGAINST vote? My fingers are > crossed. I'll think about it, but I'm still concerned about the CFJ load. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
DIS: Re: BUS: ѕёѦѤ ѦѯќѤѦі (ѯѴњѩћѰ ђѨѯ ѕёѪѐ ѥѰ)
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 18:19 +, Goren Barak via agora-business wrote: > ѣѧѤѴ ѩќѹѩ, > Ѳ ћѧђѤѺ ѝѦђёѹѰ њѲ ѨѐѩєѰ ѓ ·њѧѯ ѯ ·ќѹѧѯ > ё ѳњѡѧђё, ѮѲё "Ѳ ѳњѡѧђё ё ѝѦђёѹѰ њѲ > ѨѐѩєѰ" > > ќѫћњѲ ѩќѹѩ I haven't even tried to translate this yet, but my immediate reaction was that, based on contents and on there apparently being a double- quoted statement, it at least contains an attempt to call a CFJ. (Posting this now in case it ends up being relevant for evidence.) -- ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: ѕёѦѤ ѦѯќѤѦі (ѯѴњѩћѰ ђѨѯ ѕёѪѐ ѥѰ)
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 13:48 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> Transliterated from the Shavian alphabet to standard English:
>
> {
> Hello Agora,
> I declare victory by apathy for Ben and Goren. To object, write "I
> object to victory by apathy"
>
> Goodbye Agora
> }
>
> This wasn't reasonable effort, by our precedents, almost surely does
> nothing. In any case, can you point to any prior intent made?
I suspect this was (intended to be) the intent, rather than the actual
action, despite the wording forgetting to use the word "intend".
--
ais523
DIS: Re: BUS: ѕёѦѤ ѦѯќѤѦі (ѯѴњѩћѰ ђѨѯ ѕёѪѐ ѥѰ)
On 3/4/24 12:19, Goren Barak via agora-business wrote: > ѣѧѤѴ ѩќѹѩ, > Ѳ ћѧђѤѺ ѝѦђёѹѰ њѲ ѨѐѩєѰ ѓ ·њѧѯ ѯ ·ќѹѧѯ > ё ѳњѡѧђё, ѮѲё "Ѳ ѳњѡѧђё ё ѝѦђёѹѰ њѲ ѨѐѩєѰ" > > ќѫћњѲ ѩќѹѩ A few notes on this, besides the fact it probably doesn't work for effort reasons: I assume you meant to make an intent here, you first need to publish something to the effect of "I intend to declare apathy..." and then do the "I declare apathy" after the intent has been around and un-objected long enough. Even if the intent was written correctly, the second sentence doesn't do anything. You cannot add a non-rule-defined restriction on objections, so objections like Janet's (where e objected without even being sure there's an intent) still work. -- nix
