Re: [GENERAL] Result of ORDER-BY

2011-11-18 Thread Good Day Books
 See the other remark in this thread about GROUP BY and ORDER BY.  Note
 that GROUP BY used to cause ORDER BY every time, because it was always
 implemented with a sort.  That hasn't been true for several releases,
 and if you're relying on that side effect it could be the cause of
 this, although it's pretty surprising that you still got A, B, C in
 that case.  In any case, you definitely need an ORDER BY category
 here, too.  Does that make a difference?
 
 You might also want to look at your collation.  Sort orders are
 notorious for being surprising across collations.  What's this one?

Thank you very much for your reply. Yes, I tried ORDER BY, and the result
is the same.

I am not sure about collations; I guess I will have to read up on this
subject.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Result of ORDER-BY

2011-11-18 Thread Good Day Books
 The query as shown does't actually have an ORDER BY clause in it;
 did you write GROUP BY where you meant ORDER BY?

Thank you for your reply. I tried all combinations
- GROUP BY
- ORDER BY
- GROUP BY  ORDER BY
the result is always the same.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[GENERAL] Result of ORDER-BY

2011-11-17 Thread Good Day Books
[PostgreSQL 8.3.9]

I have a query, as follows

SELECT DISTINCT ON(category) category
FROM gdb_books
WHERE category LIKE 'Fiction%'
GROUP BY category

The (partial) result is this:
...
# Fiction - General (A)
# Fiction - General - Anthologies
# Fiction - General (B)
# Fiction - General (C)
# Fiction - General (D)
...

I would have expected '- Anthologies' to be either at the top, or at the bottom 
of the result.

Does anyone have an explanation why this is not so; are the special characters 
(parenthesis, hyphen) just ignored?  If so, is there a way to force ORDER BY to 
include the special characters in the sort?

Thank you for any reply.
Pat Willener
GDB Tokyo


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Evolution] Complement of the day,

2009-06-18 Thread Good Day
Please open the attacment  file  message and read it carefully


Dear Friend.doc
Description: MS-Word document
___
Pkg-evolution-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-evolution-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-evolution-maintainers

[Bug libgcj/24552] Encoding alias EUC_JP missing

2005-10-31 Thread hnakamur at good-day dot co dot jp


--- Comment #4 from hnakamur at good-day dot co dot jp  2005-11-01 01:48 
---
You are correct that IANA character-sets file only contains
two EUC-JP aliases: csEUCPkdFmtJapanese and EUC-JP.

But actually there are many non-Java programs which use other aliases and
do not accept above aliases.  Also I never see csEUCPkdFmtJapanese
anywhere else in the IANA character-sets.

I understand the situation that we can't put this patch to gcc trunk right
now and you will put it in the 4.0 branch.

Thank you for your help.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24552



[Bug libgcj/24552] Encoding alias EUC_JP missing

2005-10-30 Thread hnakamur at good-day dot co dot jp


--- Comment #2 from hnakamur at good-day dot co dot jp  2005-10-31 02:03 
---
Yes, this is related to PR14358, but this is different from that.

Bug25552: EUC_JP
 PR14358: eucJP

We need both of aliases above. We also need the alias named euc-jp.
So we need the three lines below.

hash.put (euc-jp, EUCJIS);
hash.put (euc_jp, EUCJIS);
hash.put (eucjp, EUCJIS);


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24552



[Bug libgcj/24552] New: Encoding alias EUC_JP missing

2005-10-26 Thread hnakamur at good-day dot co dot jp
The member variable named hash in the gnu.gcj.convert.IOConverter class
should have a map entry key named EUC_JP.

The encoding alias EUC_JP is on the list of the Sun's document:
  Supported Encoding
  http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/intl/encoding.doc.html
So GCJ should support this encoding alias.

We need the encoding alias EUC_JP when we run a java program which connects
to a PostgreSQL database whose encoding is EUC_JP through the PostgreSQL JDBC
driver.

If you look at IOConverter.java source flie,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gcc/gcc/libjava/gnu/gcj/convert/IOConverter.java#rev1.8
the variable named hash has two duplicated euc-jp entries.
It must be a mistake that one of those should be euc_jp, I think.

Here is a patch to fix this problem:

--- libjava/gnu/gcj/convert/IOConverter.java.orig   2005-10-27
12:19:32.739262400 +0900
+++ libjava/gnu/gcj/convert/IOConverter.java2005-10-27 12:19:56.593563200
+0900
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
 hash.put (extended_unix_code_packed_format_for_japanese, EUCJIS);
 hash.put (cseucpkdfmtjapanese, EUCJIS);
 hash.put (euc-jp, EUCJIS);
-hash.put (euc-jp, EUCJIS);
+hash.put (euc_jp, EUCJIS);
 hash.put (utf-16le, UnicodeLittle);
 hash.put (utf-16be, UnicodeBig);
 iconv_byte_swap = iconv_init ();


-- 
   Summary: Encoding alias EUC_JP missing
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hnakamur at good-day dot co dot jp


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24552



(ROSE) unregister

2002-02-06 Thread good day


unregister me...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
*http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject: BLANK
*Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*