Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP 2.1 released

2022-08-07 Thread Stefan Steiniger via Jump-pilot-devel
Congrats to all who have been working on it!!! :)

On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 9:29 AM Giuseppe Aruta 
wrote:

> Thank Ede!
>
> Il ven 5 ago 2022, 22:18  ha scritto:
>
>> without further ado, we released a new OpenJUMP versioned 2.1 with some
>> fixes and upgrades. notably you may want try the new GDAL-driver for
>> windows to enable more image formats, especially JPEG2000. find the changes
>> listed below, on the download page
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP/2.1/ and of
>> course in the distro's Changes.txt.
>>
>> sunny regards.. ede
>>
>>
>> Changes in OpenJUMP Version 2.1 release rev.5126[8c611f4] (released on
>> 01. August 2022)
>>
>> New Features
>>- prj file for shapefile: use the string from http://epsg.io when
>> possible
>>
>> Improvements
>>- upgrade JTS to 1.19 and postgresql driver to 42.4
>>- upgrade postgres jdbc to latest
>>- upgrade Xerces to latest
>>- NoderPlugIn, preserve first point of linear rings where nodes are
>> added
>>- upgrade imageio-ext to 1.4.5, gdal to 3.5.0
>>  updated windows GDAL driver available on
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP_plugins/Drivers/GDAL-win-x86x64-3.5.0stable-20220620.zip
>>
>> Bug Fixes (tickets on either
>>https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/bugs/ or
>>https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump/issues )
>>- Fix z interpolation in NoderPlugIn
>>- fix #52 "Geometry converter turns valid polygons into invalid ones"
>>- fix "panning with shortcuts (Ctrl+Cursor keys)" died with error stack
>>- issue #55: java17+ jaxb related stack trace during start
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>

-- 
No sienta la obligación de contestar este mail fuera de horario laboral.
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] mirror on Gitlab

2022-04-20 Thread Stefan Steiniger via Jump-pilot-devel
nice Ede! Have fun too and stay safe too. Got my 4th vaccine shot today
(Moderna).

cheers from Santiago (yes, still there).
stefan

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:11 AM  wrote:

> just because (you never know;)), i set up a git mirror on Gitlab of the
> Openjump repo
>   https://gitlab.com/openjump-gis/openjump
>
> will document it later in the README. have fun, stay safe ..ede
>
>
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>

-- 
No sienta la obligación de contestar este mail fuera de horario laboral.
Dirección de Personas UC

___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ2 virtually on debian cinnamon arm64(!)

2022-02-25 Thread Stefan Steiniger via Jump-pilot-devel
ahhh... good to hear ede that your are doing well despite Covid!

thanks for testing with Arm (considering the OSGeoLive threads...)!
cheers from the (still) summer in Santiago,
Stefan


On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:17 PM  wrote:

> hey All,
>
> because i was playin around with arm emulation on x86 platforms i wanted
> to share these snaps ;=)
>
> ..positively ede
>
> ps. indeed i was tested positive (rapid,pcr), but maybe because or just
> with the vaccinations it turned out to be a very mild
> flu___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] How to avoid non-noded intersection error in Overlay?

2021-05-18 Thread Stefan Steiniger via Jump-pilot-devel
Hi Jukka,

I guess the lines are almost parallel of you zoom in : or parallel for the
observer - but indeed are not. They could also be a duplicate. So, the
option would be to change precision of evaluation, I believe or delete one
or separate them? At least manual intervention seems necessary.

Perhaps not so useful but usually this was the case in the past :)

Cheers,
Stefan

On Tue., May 18, 2021, 13:13 Rahkonen Jukka (MML), <
jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I tried to run the Overlay function for this heavy dataset
> https://we.tl/t-gshlI4TbCU
>
> Both layers seem to have no topology errors but the Overlay function fails
> with an error
>
>
>
> org.locationtech.jts.geom.TopologyException: found non-noded intersection
> between LINESTRING ( 95.49610823093388 4.949137070569244, 95.49623518653348
> 4.948912456969601 ) and LINESTRING ( 95.4962351860291 4.948912457861983,
> 95.49623518653348 4.948912456969593 ) [ (95.49623518627793,
> 4.948912457421728, NaN) ]
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.noding.FastNodingValidator.checkValid(FastNodingValidator.java:140)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.geomgraph.EdgeNodingValidator.checkValid(EdgeNodingValidator.java:81)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.geomgraph.EdgeNodingValidator.checkValid(EdgeNodingValidator.java:46)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.overlay.OverlayOp.computeOverlay(OverlayOp.java:231)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.overlay.OverlayOp.getResultGeometry(OverlayOp.java:183)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.overlay.OverlayOp.overlayOp(OverlayOp.java:86)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.overlay.snap.SnapIfNeededOverlayOp.getResultGeometry(SnapIfNeededOverlayOp.java:75)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.overlay.snap.SnapIfNeededOverlayOp.overlayOp(SnapIfNeededOverlayOp.java:37)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.geom.GeometryOverlay.overlay(GeometryOverlay.java:76)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.geom.GeometryOverlay.union(GeometryOverlay.java:157)
>
>   at
> org.locationtech.jts.geom.Geometry.union(Geometry.java:1367)
>
>   at
> org.openjump.core.geomutils.algorithm.IntersectGeometries.nodeLines(IntersectGeometries.java:478)
>
>   at
> org.openjump.core.ui.plugin.tools.IntersectPolygonLayersPlugIn.runIntersectionNew(IntersectPolygonLayersPlugIn.java:205)
>
>   at
> org.openjump.core.ui.plugin.tools.IntersectPolygonLayersPlugIn.run(IntersectPolygonLayersPlugIn.java:127)
>
>   at
> com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.task.TaskMonitorManager$TaskWrapper.run(TaskMonitorManager.java:151)
>
>
>
> What does this error mean, in which part of the operation it happens, and
> is there any way to get over it? I also tried a GDAL/GEOS based utility but
> it fails with similar error “TopologyException: found non-noded
> intersection between LINESTRING (104.098 0.627591, 104.098 0.627447) and
> LINESTRING (104.098 0.627484, 104.098 0.627447) at 104.09781931770398
> 0.62748351910904443".
>
>
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] Do we have a tool "create a linestring from ordered set of points"?

2020-01-10 Thread Stefan Steiniger via Jump-pilot-devel
Hi Jukka,

the HomeRange Analysis toolbox /extension has something similar to load GPS
tracks [1]. But I don't know of any functionality directly within OJ.

cheers,
stefan

[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/HEAD/tree/plug-ins/horae/

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:21 PM Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <
jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I can do what I want in PostGIS with
> https://postgis.net/docs/ST_MakeLine.html but that is an extra step for
> my purpose that is to check if points are ordered correctly and if there
> are outliers. Natural order by feature ID would be enough for my immediate
> use case but a more universal tool could offer an option to sort point set
> by a selected attribute, that quite often is something related to time.
>
>
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ starts with openjdk14

2019-10-08 Thread Stefan Steiniger via Jump-pilot-devel
Nice!

:)

On Mon., Oct. 7, 2019, 14:17 ,  wrote:

> hey All,
>
> out of interest i tried starting the current release with the latest
> openjdk-14-ea+17_windows-x64 . it started up fine and didn't throw any
> exceptions. didn't try to anything more though.
>
> just fyi.. ede
>
>
> ___
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
___
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel