Y’all such bunch of babies complaining about shit only your gram pa would
bother. This whole mailing list is a deception. Your quarrels are just as old
as your biology and is just a shame for your tendons to keep typing these
boomerandums. It’s been years of scrolling through these lines and all I can
find is propaganda induced paranoia. Iguess y’all fed by the same spoon, right?
>
> On Oct 18, 2023, at 11:37 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
> In the future, Crypto at the Speed of Light, will pull out
> of and bankrupt these stupid companies in less than 24hrs.
> Some wannabe UN WEF'r Pol maggot says stupid shit,
> same thing... click, poof, gone... no more paycheck for you.
>
> Turns out, nobody but the Leftist Screechers (hired tools)
> wants gay parades, trannies in schools, Antifa, BLM, etc.
>
> What fun all this U-Turn, Hypocrisy, Blowback, and
> Failed ideologies. Keynesians and Pols are next!
>
>
> Victoria's Secret Ditches 'Wokeness'; Wants To Make Sexy Great Again
>
> Victoria's Secret's shift towards "woke" trends in fashion in recent
> years, which included showcasing trans and plus-size models instead of
> their traditional sexy models, sparked a wave of discontent among
> customers, resulting in a significant revenue drop, crashing stock
> price, and Victoria's Secret Fashion Show ratings hitting rock bottom.
>
> The American lingerie chain spent the last several years
> 'Bud-Light-ing' itself with transgender models like Valentina Sampaio
> and super woke soccer player Megan Rapinoe while abandoning its iconic
> sexy models.
>
> Trans model Valentina Sampaio
>
> Soccer player Megan Rapinoe
>
> What changed in the last two decades?
>
> One can only guess who might have pushed 'wokeness' on the brand...
>
> As consumers ditched Victoria's Secret, investors panic-dumped shares
> to record low prices.
>
> ... because sales plunged a stunning $1.8 billion since 2018 (revenue
> for its last full fiscal year fell 6.5%, with net income down nearly
> half). Consumers went elsewhere - maybe there was a conservative brand
> that took market share.
>
> Earlier this year, CEO Amy Hauk was booted out of the company amid
> 'woke' controversies. Now CNN reports the brand has given up on
> out-woking others and wants to 'Make "Sexiness" Great Again.'
>
>Victoria's Secret: The Tour '23, an attempt to revive the runway
> show format that launched last month fell somewhere in between the
> personification of male lust of the brand's aughts-era heyday and the
> inclusive utopia promoted by its many disruptors.
>
>But in a presentation to investors in New York last week, it was
> clear which version of the brand Victoria's Secret executives see as
> its future.
>
>"Sexiness can be inclusive," said Greg Unis, brand president of
> Victoria's Secret and Pink, the company's sub-brand targeting younger
> consumers. "Sexiness can celebrate the diverse experiences of our
> customers and that's what we're focused on."
>
> Chief executive Martin Waters also disclosed that woke initiatives
> were not profitable for the company, stating, "Despite everyone's best
> endeavours, it's not been enough to carry the day."
>
> This comes as the ESG bubble is imploding. And Larry Fink's BlackRock
> has ditched the term ESG.
>
> BlackRock has faced intense criticism from Republican lawmakers who
> accuse the firm of violating its fiduciary duty by putting wokeness
> ahead of investment returns.
>
> BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street hold about 15 and 20% of the
> outstanding shares of S&P 500 companies and can have enormous direct
> power in corporate decision-making.
>
> Some in corporate America are beginning to realize the challenges ESG
> poses for business sustainability.
>
> However, if these companies want to go woke, and then go broke - so be
> it. There is a parallel economy that is exploding.
