[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME| --- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 26 12:11:28 + 2010 --- Yes, it still happens. See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187#desc8. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 User oj changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Wed Nov 24 10:08:39 + 2010 --- @ameliab: Could you please check if this work for you in OOo 3.3 RCx. Thanks. Feel free to reopen this issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 3 11:37:58 + 2010 --- ah, I used the wrong version! In fact, in OOo 3.2.1, for both HeadsOrTails-NoSort-DirectSQL and Query_DirectSQL, the filter/sort buttons are enabled when opening the queries by double-clicking them. In OOo 3.3 Beta 1, this is fixed - so seems this issue is gone meanwhile. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Additional comments from amel...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 2 17:26:28 + 2010 --- quote: Do you say that the filter/sort buttons are enabled when viewing the *_DirectSQL queries? Or are those two paragraphs unrelated? As atjensen noted in a comment that unfortunately got appended to the wrong issue, the buttons are disabled if you run the query while in edit mode, but not if you just open the saved query. In that case, the buttons and dialogs can be used, they just don't have any effect. Although it would be ideal in the long wrong to enable sorts and filters on these results, in the short term at least it would be expected to have these buttons disabled if they aren't going to do anything. Similarly, in the case of queries run through the OO SQL parser, I would suggest that even if the user cannot *change* the original sort or filter stored in the query, they should be able to at least have some feedback to know what is going on. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Additional comments from amel...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 2 17:35:21 + 2010 --- in the long *term* that should read. Not sure how Freud would interpret that slip! As for the long term, my first instinct is that it shouldn't be too complicated to implement it. Instead of sending a revised version of the original query (which OO wouldn't be able to do, since it isn't parsing the original query), OO could create a new query that selected from the original as a subquery -- SELECT * FROM (original query) WHERE (new filter conditions) ORDER BY (new sort order). You wouldn't be able to remove existing filter conditions, only filter amongst the results you have, but I think that is a reasonably intuitive behaviour. There's just one difficulty -- issue 114188 , at least when dealing with the embedded DB. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 2 05:33:31 + 2010 --- cite: When viewing the results of a query that uses direct SQL (i.e., the run SQL command directly button is checked), neither sort *nor* filter commands work. This is true even if there is no order by clause or conditions on the query. Again, there is no feedback to the user that these options aren't available -- you can press the buttons and fill in the dialog boxes, but nothing happens. Do you say that the filter/sort buttons are enabled when viewing the *_DirectSQL queries? Or are those two paragraphs unrelated? (Here, the buttons are disabled, which is the expected situation for a Direct SQL query.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value OS/Version|Mac OS X, 10.5|All Platform|Macintosh |All --- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 2 05:40:26 + 2010 --- So basically this issue boils down to: If you have a query containing an ORDER BY clause, say, SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY column , and display this query's data, then - the sort order dialog doesn't give you any clue that there already is a sort order applied - applying sort orders via the dialog might lead to confusing results, since the new explicit sort order is subordinate to the existing, implicit sort order, which the user might not know about I agree that this is a usability problem, though I am not sure how one would solve this. Giving the user control over the existing implicit sort orders is non-trivial, UX-wise, since then the Remove Filter/Sort button would need attention then (is this expected to remove only the implicit, or the implicit and the explicit sort orders?). Also, the sort order dialog would need an extension then, so it is not limited to three entries anymore (this would be a Good Thing (TM), anyway). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 Issue #|114187 Summary|Cannot see/remove query sorts from order by statemen |t in query view Component|Database access Version|OOo 3.2.1 Platform|Macintosh URL| OS/Version|Mac OS X, 10.5 Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|ameliab --- Additional comments from amel...@openoffice.org Sun Aug 29 21:36:24 + 2010 --- When viewing the results of a query, any sort order created in the query definition is applied invisibly -- it does not show up in the sort order dialog, you cannot remove it, and if you sort by any other column the new sort is added as a secondary sort (i.e., it often doesn't appear to do anything). The only sort that actually works as expected is if you reverse the original sort. Otherwise, it just appears to a user that the sort function doesn't work. It doesn't matter whether the order by function was added through the OpenOffice query design or by direct SQL to the underlying database (embedded HSQL in my case). The same problem does not exist with table views that contain order by statements -- you can sort the results normally when viewing data. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Additional comments from amel...@openoffice.org Sun Aug 29 22:29:20 + 2010 --- Clarification: When viewing the results of a query that uses direct SQL (i.e., the run SQL command directly button is checked), neither sort *nor* filter commands work. This is true even if there is no order by clause or conditions on the query. Again, there is no feedback to the user that these options aren't available -- you can press the buttons and fill in the dialog boxes, but nothing happens. This may be a separate issue from the above issue with order by, but it seems related. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Additional comments from amel...@openoffice.org Sun Aug 29 22:47:30 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=71467) Test DB created when exploring this issue and issue 114188 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Additional comments from amel...@openoffice.org Sun Aug 29 23:57:50 + 2010 --- Explanation of the test database: The same test database is relevant for issue 114187 (re-sorting sorted queries), issue 114188 (syntax errors in queries that reference a sorted query) and issue 114189 (Base crashes when using filters on columns created by correlated subqueries). (A) There is one original table, named Numbers. It consists of: PrimaryKey, an auto-generated primary key, and RandNumber, a series of random numbers 0 = RandNumber 1 (B) There are three different versions of queries that operate directly on this table: Query_OOSQL runs through the OpenOffice SQL parser Query_DirectSQL has the run SQL command directly button selected View is a table view copy of Query_DirectSQL All three create three columns: ID, the primary key repeated, MoreThanHalf, a boolean based on whether or not RandNumber is greater than 0.5 (Side note -- I had to use some math and data type casting to recreate this result with the OpenOffice SQL parser, which doesn't accept a simple boolean statement as a column definition. Annoying.) and ThrownNum which uses a correlated subquery to determine the rank of this record when the records are sorted by primary key (i.e., counts the number of records with a smaller or equal primary key). These are the queries that are relevant to issue 114189 -- arguably the most important issue, since its the one that results in crashes (although probably fewer people are using correlated subqueries than are sorting queries!) Applying a filter to the results of Query_OOSQL causes a crash. Applying a filter or sort to the results of Query_DirectSQL causes a crash or hang. No problems when using the view. (C) Then, there are a series of queries and one view named HeadsOrTails etc., which basically regenerate the above results with different column alias, and various sort options. These are the queries that are relevant to (this) issue 114187, about being unable to sort already sorted results. Note that sorting/filtering these queries doesn't cause crashing, even though they are actually submitting a query with a subquery with a nested correlated subquery to the database. (The exception is the DirectSQL query, which of course can't reference another query, and so is based on the View defined above.) HeadsOrTails-HeadsSort is a query ordered by the boolean column Heads. When viewing the results, sorting by the count column ThrowNum adds a secondary sort. Filtering works properly. HeadsOrTails-ThrowSort is a query ordered by the count column ThrowNum. Trying to sort the results based on Heads appears to have no effect, since ThrowNum values are all unique. Again, filtering works properly. HeadsOrTails-NoSort is the same query without an ordered by clause. It can be sorted and filtered no problem. HeadsOrTails-NoSort-DirectSQL is an unsorted query, but run directly by the embedded database instead of using the OpenOffice SQL parser. Results cannot be sorted or filtered. View_HeadsOrTails is a sorted table view. Data can be re-sorted and filtered no problem. (D) The final set of queries filter the HeadsOrTails queries to only list those where Heads is true. These are the queries relevant to issue 114188 -- syntax errors when OpenOffice tries to use a sorted query as a subquery. HeadsOnly-UsingUnsortedQuery is defined based on the HeadsOrTails-NoSort query. It works fine. HeadsOnly-UsingSortedQuery is the same, but it is based on the HeadsOrTails-HeadsSort query. OpenOffice parses the query no problem, you can edit it in design mode, but when you actually try to view data the embedded database issues an error. HeadsOnly-UsingView is again the same idea, but based on the (sorted) View_HeadsOrTails. It works fine. All in all, a couple examples of unexpected behaviour and one dangerous crash when using queries. I think I'll be using mostly views from now on, but that's not always an option when using an external database! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 --- Additional comments from amel...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 30 00:07:23 + 2010 --- Re-reading this sentence I realize it isn't very clear without actually opening the database: Then, there are a series of queries and one view named HeadsOrTails etc., which basically regenerate the above results with different column alias, and various sort options. What I meant is that the HeadsOrTails queries are created in design view by selecting the columns from the first set of queries / views. ThrowNum is selected and MoreThanHalf is selected and aliased as Heads. No functions or new subqueries are defined, although OpenOffice of course creates a nested sub-query by substituting one query into the FROM clause of the other. But that doesn't seem to cause problems. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 114187] Cannot see/remove query s orts from order by statement in query view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114187 User atjensen changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm |oj Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Additional comments from atjen...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 30 00:44:35 + 2010 --- Confirmed w/ go-00 3.2.1 Windows and Linux - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
