[framework-issues] [Issue 109910] AOT-Compilation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109910 User mechtilde changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from mechti...@openoffice.org Sat May 22 08:48:47 + 2010 --- invalid - closed - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 109910] AOT-Compilation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109910 User kr changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Tue May 4 06:22:05 + 2010 --- I don't see a chance to realize this for now. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 109910] AOT-Compilation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109910 --- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Sun Mar 14 15:59:44 + 2010 --- Well, I can't! I am no prgrammer and have no idea about compiling it that way. The point of my idead was to have all basic functions of OOo working independent from the JRE, while the JRE could still be an optinal requirement for Java based extensions. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 109910] AOT-Compilation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109910 --- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 9 11:20:56 + 2010 --- uhm, and what AOT compiler do you suggest to use? the only free one is gcj, but afaik that has the distinct disadvantage that libgcj changes incompatibly in just about every release. so effectively this would require bundling libgcj, just as we bundle STLport today. furthermore probably nobody uses gcj on platfroms other than gnu/linux, so it probably doesn't work there. in other words, this would give us all the disadvantages of C++ for the java code as well, with even more regularly broken ABI on top. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 109910] AOT-Compilation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109910 --- Additional comments from k...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 9 11:50:45 + 2010 --- There is some functionality in OOo based or implemented in Java, see: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Java_and_OpenOffice.org Additionally skipping Java (JRE) means, that Java extensions wouldn't work anymore. Native extensions is no real solution, as an extension would need to carry binaries for all target platforms. Other things, like adding JDBC drives dynamically, would stop working as well. Did you measure any performance advantage while leaving out Java? AFAIR Java is not pulled in during startup (if accessibility has not turned on). You could simply build OOo without Java and see how it behaves. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 109910] AOT-Compilation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109910 Issue #|109910 Summary|AOT-Compilation Component|framework Version|1.0.0 Platform|Unknown URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|ENHANCEMENT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|tm Reported by|j2k --- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 8 09:18:39 + 2010 --- Because of the fact, that Java is only required for a handful features and OOo runs mainly on ins own, without the requirement of a JRE, why not make the few Java dependent functions work natively by compiling via ahead-of-time? Not only it could increase the performance as the start-up time, also a JRE wouldn't be required anymore. And because of the fact, that every platform has its own compiled version of OOo, there is also no problem with the platform independency, which means there would be no disadvantages (in my eyes). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 109910] AOT-Compilation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109910 User of changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|tm|kr Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 8 09:55:06 + 2010 --- @ kr: Please have a look. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
