[gsl-issues] [Issue 94045] [a11y] valgrind warnings

2008-10-09 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94045


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|VERIFIED  |CLOSED





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct  9 09:51:19 + 
2008 ---
seen m33

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[gsl-issues] [Issue 94045] [a11y] valgrind warnings

2008-09-24 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94045


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  Status|RESOLVED  |VERIFIED





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 24 07:37:33 + 
2008 ---
verified

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[gsl-issues] [Issue 94045] [a11y] valgrind warnings

2008-09-23 Thread pl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94045


User pl changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

 Assigned to|pl|cmc





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 23 15:42:14 + 
2008 ---
please verify in CWS vcl94

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[gsl-issues] [Issue 94045] [a11y] valgrind warnings

2008-09-18 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94045
 Issue #|94045
 Summary|[a11y] valgrind warnings
   Component|gsl
 Version|DEV300m30
Platform|All
 URL|
  OS/Version|Linux
  Status|NEW
   Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
  Resolution|
  Issue type|PATCH
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
 Assigned to|pl
 Reported by|cmc





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 18 15:07:43 + 
2008 ---
With a11y enabled I get a lot of the following valgrind trace.
I don't really know what it is, or really care all that much :-)
But the patch attached makes them all go away, and should be very safe.

==6243== Invalid read of size 1
==6243==at 0x4A08110: memcpy (mc_replace_strmem.c:402)
==6243==by 0x3A4182AB8C: giop_send_buffer_append_string (in
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A41839568: ORBit_marshal_value (in 
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A41839807: ORBit_marshal_any (in 
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A41839536: ORBit_marshal_value (in 
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A418395F0: ORBit_marshal_value (in 
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A41839807: ORBit_marshal_any (in 
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A41839536: ORBit_marshal_value (in 
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A418395F0: ORBit_marshal_value (in 
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A4182F86B: (within /usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x3A41830E13: ORBit_small_invoke_stub (in
/usr/lib64/libORBit-2.so.0.1.0)
==6243==by 0x380F02AFCB: Accessibility_EventListener_notifyEvent (in
/usr/lib64/libspi.so.0.10.11)
==6243==  Address 0x17428bde is 14 bytes inside a block of size 15 free'd
==6243==at 0x4A0609F: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:323)
==6243==by 0xFB7B5F6: wrapper_get_name (atkwrapper.cxx:347)
==6243==by 0x106BA5E0: (within /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so)
==6243==by 0x106BA671: (within /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so)
==6243==by 0x106BBAA5: (within /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so)
==6243==by 0x3A3E020F7E: (within /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1800.0)
==6243==by 0x3A3E022B67: g_signal_emit_valist (in
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1800.0)
==6243==by 0x3A3E023092: g_signal_emit (in 
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1800.0)
==6243==by 0x32A9C0EC3F: (within /usr/lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0.2314.1)
==6243==by 0x3A3E00B7BC: g_closure_invoke (in 
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1800.0)
==6243==by 0x3A3E020DD7: (within /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1800.0)
==6243==by 0x3A3E022B67: g_signal_emit_valist (in
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1800.0)

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[gsl-issues] [Issue 94045] [a11y] valgrind warnings

2008-09-18 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94045


User cmc changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

 Attachment is patch|  |Created an attachment (id=
|  |56616)
patch to make warni
|  |ngs go away






--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 18 15:08:16 + 
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=56616)
patch to make warnings go away


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[gsl-issues] [Issue 94045] [a11y] valgrind warnings

2008-09-18 Thread pl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94045


User pl changed the following:

What|Old value |New value

  CC|''|'obr'

  Status|NEW   |RESOLVED

  Resolution|  |FIXED

Target milestone|---   |OOo 3.1





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 18 15:57:34 + 
2008 ---
If that patch fixes anything, it probably just shows that we should not touch
atk_obj-name at all. However I can see no harm in the patch, so I'm going to
commit most of it to CWS vcl94 (g_strcmp0 is 2.16 upwards, way to new).

obr: do you have an opinion on this ?

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[gsl-issues] [Issue 94045] [a11y] valgrind warnings

2008-09-18 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94045





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 05:04:50 + 
2008 ---
The reason not to use atk_object_set_name here is that it generates 
name-changed events, which should 
not be send from get_name. OTOH we need to cache the name as the object will be 
asked for it when it 
goes to DEFUNCT state where any call to the wrapped UNO object will just throw 
a disposed exception. 

I would expect obj-name to be initialized with NULL when the object gets 
created, but maybe that is no 
longer valid ? Anyway, the patch can' t do any harm AFAICT.

-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]