[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 12 15:54:20 + 2008 --- Checked fix in OO 2.4 RC2 build and DEV300m1 build. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 11 10:13:43 + 2007 --- Verified fix in CWs sw8010bf02. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User od changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|od|mru --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 4 15:01:14 + 2007 --- OD-MRU: Checked in internal installation set of cws sw8u10bf02 - please verify. Note: Please check again issue 76409 and internal issue b6521322 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User od changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 30 15:24:30 + 2007 --- fixed in cws sw8u10bf02 - changed file: /sw/source/core/docnode/section.cxx, 1.28.8.1 solution: update links in extern linked document/document section, if the destination section is protected. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 14 11:28:18 + 2007 --- OD-kow500: I've found a solution without introducing a new property at the section or enhancing the update link dialog. I could implement a deep update depending on the protection flag of a section with violating the request, that the resulting document have to contain only direct links. Thus, as long as the linked sections are protected in the built document hierarchy using linked sections, the links are updated. Would this ok for you? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 11 07:06:16 + 2007 --- OD-kow500: I've discussed this problem with MBA. He has made another suggestion. What about a new option in the Update Links dialog? The Update Links dialog is the dialog, which pops up during load of a document and asks for updating the links. Enabling this new option would perform a deep update of the included links. Would this help in your document process? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 11 13:20:58 + 2007 --- kow500-od In our Environment the configuration is links are always updated on loading so no Dialog pops up and it is not the decision of our users if the links are updated. For us an option on creating the link would be helpful which defines if it is an deep link or not. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User kow500 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 8 08:24:37 + 2007 --- In my opinion this Issue isn't resolved. In my attached Sample all linked sections are write protected so no comment can be manually inserted in the linked section. If linked Sections are write proteced it dos not make sence that the Links are broken to preserve manually inserted Comments because in this case no comment can be manually inserted. We are using these write protected linked sections to produce dynamicaly generated Documents which the user can only print and where the linked parts can not be changed nor can there be an inserted comment. In this Senario if one of the linked Documents are centrally changed these changes dosn't have any effect on the dynamicaly generated document if the write protected links are broken. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User kow500 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|mru |od Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 8 08:27:43 + 2007 --- forgot to assign to od - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 8 09:44:52 + 2007 --- OD-kow500: I understand your problem. But, we don't want that a document A, which links a document B gets a direct link to a document C, which is linked in document B. If document A links document B, it should only contain a link into document B and it should show the *actual* content of document B. It should *not* show the content of document B after all links are updated in document B. Your argument about protected linked section is only partly correct, because nothing prevents somebody to unprotect a linked section, add a comment and protect it again. The problem in the scenario, which you have described, is that the intermediate documents (TestDoc5, TestDoc4, TestDoc3 and TestDoc2) are not up-to-date. Do you have the possibility in your process to update these intermediate documents? Currently, I don't know how to solve this situation. There is one request, which have to be hold: - document A does *not* link document C through a document B. But, the second request, that a document A, which links to document B, shows the *actual* content of document B, seems not to be right in all scenarios. Probably, we should introduce a new property for linked sections with the possible values: - actual content link - insert the actual content of the linked document - or - deep link - insert the content of the linked document after updating its links. If these nested links are also deep links, the update chain continues. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 8 14:41:01 + 2007 --- In my attached Sample the included Sections are only write Protected, in our production usage these are write protected and password secured so a normal user is prevented from unprotecting a linked section. We use this scenario to produce dynamically generated Documents in an Insurance Company for our local Dealer. So we must change single Textphrases in some intermediate documents regulary wich are linked in many other documents. In this case it is not possible to update all intermedite documents in all link chains. Then a change of a single Textphrase can result in a deployment of many many intermediate documents wich before all must be updated. In our senario this is automatically done when the dynamically generated document is generated and all links are updated. An implementation of a new property deep link or actual content link with the possibility that they can also be password secured are a way that can solve our problem and gives us the possibility to update to a recent version. If you know another way we can do the same thing of dynamically producing a document with the actual Textphrases without changing many documents all the time your help is appreciated. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User od changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 08:13:29 + 2007 --- This is corrected behavior changed by issue 76409 If a document contains a linked section to another document respectively a part of another document, the content, which is shown, is the *actual* content of the referenced document. Thus, linked section inside this linked document/part of this linked document aren't processed. These links are broken, thus the actual content, which is stored in this referenced document is shown. It doesn't make sense that e.g., a document A, which links to document B, should contains links to documents, which are linked in document B. Think of the following scenario: Some one has a document B with a linked part to a document C. After updating this link in document B a comment is manually inserted in the linked section. Now the document B is linked from document A. In this case document A should *not* link directly to document C, because in this case the comment added in linked section of document B would be lost. Thus, we decided that links in linked section have to be broken in order to achieve the main purpose, that document A contains the actual content of linked document B. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 08:14:41 + 2007 --- OD-MRU: Please take over for closing this issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User od changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|od|mru --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 08:15:39 + 2007 --- forgot to assign to MRU - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User kow500 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Version|OOo 2.2.1 |OOo 2.3 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|mru |od Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target milestone|--- |OOo 2.4 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 18 11:05:22 + 2007 --- MRU-OD: see the attached archive. Open the testdok1.odt and try to update all links - the nested sub sections will not appear anymore. This worked fine in OO 2.1 (as already mentioned above) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 12:38:53 + 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=48279) Sample for nested sections - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 81653] nested Sections in OO-Writ er 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 Issue #|81653 Summary|nested Sections in OO-Writer 2.2.1 and 2.3.0 Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.2.1 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows XP Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|kow500 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 12:36:59 + 2007 --- If using Sections in Writer and this Sections are nested i.e. Testdoc1 includes Testdoc2, and that includes Testdoc3, and that includes Testdoc4, and that include Testdoc5, and that include Testdoc6. In this Example opening Testdoc1 and refreshing the Links only works correct in Openoffice 2.1. OOo 2.2.1 and 2.3.0 doesn't refresh the nested Links. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
