special AMANDA-infos

2005-03-08 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger

Hey amanda-users,

see this: http://wiki.kldp.org/wiki.php/DocbookSgml/Amanda-KLDP

-- 
Bye,
Stefan



Re: special AMANDA-infos

2005-03-08 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 09:31, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hey amanda-users,

see this: http://wiki.kldp.org/wiki.php/DocbookSgml/Amanda-KLDP

What is that, kanji?  It displays ok, but I don't read that language.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


Exclude list syntax.

2005-03-08 Thread Erik P. Olsen
Is it possible to use todays date as element in a filename in an exclude
list? 

-- 
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen



Re: Exclude list syntax.

2005-03-08 Thread Michael Loftis
exclude list syntax depends on your dump/tar/smbtar...usually, no.  All you 
get is wildcards pretty much.

--On Tuesday, March 08, 2005 22:09 +0100 Erik P. Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Is it possible to use todays date as element in a filename in an exclude
list?
--
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen


--
GPG/PGP -- 0xE736BD7E 5144 6A2D 977A 6651 DFBE 1462 E351 88B9 E736 BD7E 


spanning patch

2005-03-08 Thread Peter Kunst
Hi,
sorry for the delay, don't wonna break our production setup, so i've
setup another Solaris9 box together with a spare dds4x6 changer connected
to it for some testing. here we go...
1st of all, spanning of a single DLE over two tapes works fine, using
 http://www.cs.umd.edu/~building/span_split_V7.0-2.4.5b1-20050214.patch.gz
against
 http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~martinea/amanda/amanda-2.4.5b1-20050214.tar.gz
i haven't tested recovering yet.
John Stange wrote:
 Gene Heskett wrote:
I'm afraid that the results of the spanning patch by John
Stange (Hi John) are a bit less than optimum in some regards.
it's a patch, leading us to some kind of fine release later on, so let's
test it :-)
using amverify mysetup, i've got this when the next tape is a fresh tape:
$ amverify mysetup
Tape changer is chg-zd-mtx...
2 slots... (should read: 6 slots ?)
Verify summary to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Defects file is /tmp/amanda/amverify.17109/defects
amverify mysetup
Loading current slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume mysetup07, Date 20050308
End-of-Information detected.
Loading next slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume mysetup08, Date X
Fresh tape. Skipping...
$
..whereas mysetup07 is the 2nd tape of the last run. mysetup06 would be
the 1st tape of this run. never used amverify before anyways... just tested
it because of Gene's hint.
after loading the 1st tape of this run, i get:
Loading current slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume myetup06, Date 20050308
End-of-Information detected.
Loading next slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume mysetup07, Date 20050308
End-of-Information detected.
$
mail report says:
Tapes: mysetup07
No errors found!
...seems as amanda thinks only mysetup07 was written by this run.
don't know if this happens using 2.4.5b1-20050214 also... haven't tested.
...will give you more results when i've checked recovery, or should i
switchover to the hackers list ?
 Cheers, Peter
--
read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html before replying


Re: Exclude list syntax.

2005-03-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:09:04PM +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
 Is it possible to use todays date as element in a filename in an exclude
 list? 

You can have multiple exclude statements, IIRC, at most one can omit the
append argument.  Given that, you could have one exclude statement
read a file created at the start of your amdump run with an appropriate
pattern.

   echo ./###$(date +%Y%m$d)###  /path/to/exclude/pattern/of/the/day/file
   amdump 

Replace the ###'s with whatever constant or filename pattern you need
and the date command with whatever syntax your date string needs demand.

Then your dumptype might have something like

   exclude list append optional /path/to/exclude/pattern/of/the/day/file

The path could be absolute or relative to the root of the DLE.

jl
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road(609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322  (609) 683-7220 (fax)


Re: Exclude list syntax.

2005-03-08 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 17:13 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:09:04PM +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
  Is it possible to use todays date as element in a filename in an exclude
  list? 
 
 You can have multiple exclude statements, IIRC, at most one can omit the
 append argument.  Given that, you could have one exclude statement
 read a file created at the start of your amdump run with an appropriate
 pattern.
 
echo ./###$(date +%Y%m$d)###  /path/to/exclude/pattern/of/the/day/file
amdump 
 
 Replace the ###'s with whatever constant or filename pattern you need
 and the date command with whatever syntax your date string needs demand.
 
 Then your dumptype might have something like
 
exclude list append optional /path/to/exclude/pattern/of/the/day/file
 
 The path could be absolute or relative to the root of the DLE.

Beautiful!

Thanks a lot.
-- 
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen



Re: spanning patch

2005-03-08 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 16:42, Peter Kunst wrote:
Hi,

sorry for the delay, don't wonna break our production setup, so i've
setup another Solaris9 box together with a spare dds4x6 changer
 connected to it for some testing. here we go...

1st of all, spanning of a single DLE over two tapes works fine,
 using

 
 http://www.cs.umd.edu/~building/span_split_V7.0-2.4.5b1-20050214.pa
tch.gz

against

 
 http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~martinea/amanda/amanda-2.4.5b1-2005021
4.tar.gz

i haven't tested recovering yet.

John Stange wrote:
  Gene Heskett wrote:
 
I'm afraid that the results of the spanning patch by John
Stange (Hi John) are a bit less than optimum in some regards.

it's a patch, leading us to some kind of fine release later on, so
 let's test it :-)

using amverify mysetup, i've got this when the next tape is a
 fresh tape:

$ amverify mysetup
Tape changer is chg-zd-mtx...
2 slots... (should read: 6 slots ?)
Verify summary to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Defects file is /tmp/amanda/amverify.17109/defects
amverify mysetup
Loading current slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume mysetup07, Date 20050308
End-of-Information detected.
Loading next slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume mysetup08, Date X
Fresh tape. Skipping...
$

..whereas mysetup07 is the 2nd tape of the last run. mysetup06
 would be the 1st tape of this run. never used amverify before
 anyways... just tested it because of Gene's hint.

after loading the 1st tape of this run, i get:

Loading current slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume myetup06, Date 20050308
End-of-Information detected.
Loading next slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume mysetup07, Date 20050308
End-of-Information detected.
$

mail report says:

Tapes: mysetup07
No errors found!

This would seem to be the default, since amrecover has not yet been 
patched to behave itself when doing the spanned tapes.

I had a bit of trouble switching it back after the 2 day test, so my 
stuff is now out of numerical synch, but thats not a showstopper by 
any means.

...seems as amanda thinks only mysetup07 was written by this run.
don't know if this happens using 2.4.5b1-20050214 also... haven't
 tested.

No, thats amverify only, since it hasn't been patched yet according to 
John. That (2.4.5b1-20050214) also is the version I patched.

...will give you more results when i've checked recovery, or should
 i switchover to the hackers list ?

  Cheers, Peter

--
read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html before replying

-- 
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


Re: spanning patch

2005-03-08 Thread Peter Kunst
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 16:42, Peter Kunst wrote:((read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html before replying
(this is Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:55:05 +0100 (CET) :-)
Loading current slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume myetup06, Date 20050308
End-of-Information detected.
Loading next slot...
Using device /dev/rmt/0cbn
Volume mysetup07, Date 20050308
[..]
mail report says:
Tapes: mysetup07
No errors found!
This would seem to be the default, since amrecover has not yet been 
patched to behave itself when doing the spanned tapes.

I had a bit of trouble switching it back after the 2 day test, so my 
stuff is now out of numerical synch, but thats not a showstopper by 
any means.
that's why i have _not_ touched production setup o)
just joined amanda hackers... give me some days to wait for
something like a howto-amanda-hackers, if there is one, like on
sunmanagers.org, and i'll join testing, now that i've spent some
hours to setup a working test-setup.
John, cc: me for updates, please :o)
 Cheers, Peter
--
read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html before replying


single drive optimizations

2005-03-08 Thread Nick Jones
I've been wondering what the best option is for me to backup tape size
amounts of data (potentially) with only a single drive and without a
automated tape changer.  Right now I'm using the following:

runtapes 1
tpchanger chg-manual

All level zero runs total to approximately 60GB on DDS3 tapes (12GB native).
Each level zero fits on a tape with some extra room and is staggered from
the rest.  Thanks for any suggestions on how to improve my setup.

--
Nick Jones