[Fwd: little question]

2001-04-04 Thread Gonzalo Arana

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
 
 On Apr  4, 2001, Gonzalo Arana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It says 'waiting for dump' on all hosts/directories.
 
 All of them?  What is the reason it claims for being idle?

Where may I see a reason? on the amstatus output?
It began to work right now (?)
I still have the logs of the freezed runs of amdump.
Where may I look for?

 
 Also, please note the last line of my signature.

ups! Sory!

 
 --
 Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
 Red Hat GCC Developer  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
 CS PhD student at IC-Unicampoliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
 Free Software Evangelist*Please* write to mailing lists, not to me



Re: [Fwd: little question]

2001-04-04 Thread Alexandre Oliva

On Apr  4, 2001, Gonzalo Arana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Where may I see a reason? on the amstatus output?

Yep.  At the end of the report, it was why each dumper is idle; before
that, it prints the main reason why the whole process is idle, if it
is.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicampoliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist*Please* write to mailing lists, not to me



Re: [Fwd: little question]

2001-04-04 Thread Gonzalo Arana

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
 
 On Apr  4, 2001, Gonzalo Arana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Where may I see a reason? on the amstatus output?
 
 Yep.  At the end of the report, it was why each dumper is idle; before
 that, it prints the main reason why the whole process is idle, if it
 is.

Sorry, but I can't see any info:
amstatus config --file /usr/local/var/amanda/config/amdump.2
Usign ...

hostn:/dir1   0 160k wait for dumping
hostn:/dir2   0   20150k wait for dumping

SUMMARY  part real estimated
  size  size
partition   : 191
estimated   : 191   11697412k
failed  :   0  0k   (  0.00%)
wait for dumping: 191   11697412k   (100.00%)
dumping to tape :   0  0k   (  0.00%)
dumping :   00k0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
dumped  :   00k0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
wait for writing:   00k0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
writing to tape :   00k0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
failed to tape  :   00k0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
taped   :   00k0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
all dumpers active
taper idle

and thats it.
It did keep as this for 20 minutes and I got tired of waiting.
I cancelled that backup.

Sorry again!!
 
 --
 Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
 Red Hat GCC Developer  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
 CS PhD student at IC-Unicampoliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
 Free Software Evangelist*Please* write to mailing lists, not to me



Re: [Fwd: little question]

2001-04-04 Thread Gonzalo Arana

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
 
 On Apr  4, 2001, Gonzalo Arana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  dumping to tape :   0  0k   (  0.00%)
  dumping :   00k0k (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
 
  all dumpers active
 
 Hmm...  This is very odd.  What is `inparallel' set to, in amanda.conf?

8

 
  and thats it.
 
 I assumed you had 2.4.2.

You are absolutely right.

 
 --
 Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
 Red Hat GCC Developer  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
 CS PhD student at IC-Unicampoliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
 Free Software Evangelist*Please* write to mailing lists, not to me