Re: tapedev=otherhost:/dev/nst0 ?

2002-03-08 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002 at 4:23pm, Jordi Vidal wrote

 Can I build amanda server in a host without tape and use some other
 host tapes?
 
 The goal is to save the tapeserver (the machine that has the tape device)
 from CPU load when using compression best
 
Why not just use compress client best?  That makes the clients do the 
compression, not the tape server.

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University




Re: tapedev=otherhost:/dev/nst0 ?

2002-03-08 Thread Jordi Vidal

Thank for your reply

I know the client best option but it dont fit my needs. The clients are
Windowses, and I have a spare Linux not in production to carry the load
compression.

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:

  Can I build amanda server in a host without tape and use some other
  host tapes?
  
  The goal is to save the tapeserver (the machine that has the tape device)
  from CPU load when using compression best
  
 Why not just use compress client best?  That makes the clients do the 
 compression, not the tape server.




RE: tapedev=otherhost:/dev/nst0 ?

2002-03-08 Thread Bort, Paul

Then make the spare Linux box the one that uses the Samba client to pull
data from the Windows boxes. We've been doing that here for a while with no
problems. 

Sample disklist

amandaserver /dev/hda1
amandaserver /dev/hda2

spareserver /dev/hda1
spareserver //win1/cshare
spareserver //win1/dshare



 -Original Message-
 From: Jordi Vidal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:39 PM
 To: Joshua Baker-LePain
 Cc: Amanda List
 Subject: Re: tapedev=otherhost:/dev/nst0 ?
 
 
 Thank for your reply
 
 I know the client best option but it dont fit my needs. The 
 clients are
 Windowses, and I have a spare Linux not in production to 
 carry the load
 compression.
 
 On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
 
   Can I build amanda server in a host without tape and use 
 some other
   host tapes?
   
   The goal is to save the tapeserver (the machine that has 
 the tape device)
   from CPU load when using compression best
   
  Why not just use compress client best?  That makes the 
 clients do the 
  compression, not the tape server.