On 28/04/17 11:12 PM, Xie, AlexBin wrote: >> Am 28.04.2017 um 10:47 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> >>> >>> Some of these paths probably cannot be interrupted by a signal anyway. >>> Those that can would fail to clean up things if they actually got >>> interrupted. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> >> >> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com> > > Alex X: Just a reminder: amdgpu_unpin_work_func is called by work queue. > Signal is blocked already. un-interruptible waiting might slow thing > down very slightly.
How so? Alex X: I said "might". If you think it is not slower, it is fine for me. My real concern is that the signals are blocked for work queue already. We don't need this change to avoid unnecessary risk. In theory, I am not against this change. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
