Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add VISIBLE info in amdgpu_bo_print_info

2023-06-26 Thread Pelloux-Prayer, Pierre-Eric
[Public]

Thanks Christian for the review. I'll remove the leading blanks before 
submitting the patch.

Pierre-Eric

From: Koenig, Christian 
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 5:00 PM
To: Pelloux-Prayer, Pierre-Eric ; 
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org 
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add VISIBLE info in amdgpu_bo_print_info

Am 21.06.23 um 16:35 schrieb Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer:
> This allows tools to distinguish between VRAM and visible VRAM.
>
> Use the opportunity to fix locking before accessing bo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 33 ++
>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> index ff73cc11d47e..f12f019d7f99 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> @@ -1583,18 +1583,27 @@ u64 amdgpu_bo_print_info(int id, struct amdgpu_bo 
> *bo, struct seq_file *m)
>unsigned int pin_count;
>u64 size;
>
> - domain = amdgpu_mem_type_to_domain(bo->tbo.resource->mem_type);
> - switch (domain) {
> - case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM:
> - placement = "VRAM";
> - break;
> - case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT:
> - placement = " GTT";
> - break;
> - case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU:
> - default:
> - placement = " CPU";
> - break;
> + if (dma_resv_trylock(bo->tbo.base.resv)) {
> + unsigned int domain;
> + domain = amdgpu_mem_type_to_domain(bo->tbo.resource->mem_type);
> + switch (domain) {
> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM:
> + if (amdgpu_bo_in_cpu_visible_vram(bo))
> + placement = "VRAM VISIBLE";
> + else
> + placement = "VRAM";
> + break;
> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT:
> + placement = " GTT";

We can probably drop the leading blank here and

> + break;
> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU:
> + default:
> + placement = " CPU";

here when we don't keep the strings at the same length anyway.

With that fixed the change is Reviewed-by: Christian König


Regards,
Christian.

> + break;
> + }
> + dma_resv_unlock(bo->tbo.base.resv);
> + } else {
> + placement = "UNKNOWN";
>}
>
>size = amdgpu_bo_size(bo);



Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sdma5: do not execute 0-sized IBs (v2)

2019-10-23 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric
Hi Alex,

On 23/10/2019 14:50, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: amd-gfx  On Behalf Of
>> Christian König
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 3:33 AM
>> To: Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric ; amd-
>> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sdma5: do not execute 0-sized IBs (v2)
>>
>> Am 22.10.19 um 19:22 schrieb Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric:
>>> This seems to help with
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111481.
>>>
>>> v2: insert a NOP instead of skipping all 0-sized IBs to avoid breaking older
>> hw
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer > pra...@amd.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König 
> 
> Do nop packets have any alignment requirements on SDMA?  Some of the other 
> packets do.

There's no alignment requirements for nop packets.

Pierre-Eric

> 
> Alex
> 
>>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
>>> index fb48622c2abd..6e1b25bd1fe7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
>>> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ static void gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>>>
>>> job->vm_pd_addr = amdgpu_gmc_pd_addr(adev->gart.bo);
>>> job->vm_needs_flush = true;
>>> +   job->ibs->ptr[job->ibs->length_dw++] = ring->funcs->nop;
>>> amdgpu_ring_pad_ib(ring, >ibs[0]);
>>> r = amdgpu_job_submit(job, >mman.entity,
>>>   AMDGPU_FENCE_OWNER_UNDEFINED, );
>>
>> ___
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: call amdgpu_vm_prt_fini before deleting the root PD

2019-10-23 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric
amdgpu_vm_prt_fini uses "vm->root.base.bo" so it must still be valid when
we call it.

Fixes: b65709a92156 ("drm/amdgpu: reserve the root PD while freeing PASIDs")
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 19 ++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index d9bece987e60..c8ce42200059 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -2975,6 +2975,16 @@ void amdgpu_vm_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct 
amdgpu_vm *vm)
vm->pasid = 0;
}
 
+   list_for_each_entry_safe(mapping, tmp, >freed, list) {
+   if (mapping->flags & AMDGPU_PTE_PRT && prt_fini_needed) {
+   amdgpu_vm_prt_fini(adev, vm);
+   prt_fini_needed = false;
+   }
+
+   list_del(>list);
+   amdgpu_vm_free_mapping(adev, vm, mapping, NULL);
+   }
+
amdgpu_vm_free_pts(adev, vm, NULL);
amdgpu_bo_unreserve(root);
amdgpu_bo_unref();
@@ -2994,15 +3004,6 @@ void amdgpu_vm_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct 
amdgpu_vm *vm)
list_del(>list);
kfree(mapping);
}
-   list_for_each_entry_safe(mapping, tmp, >freed, list) {
-   if (mapping->flags & AMDGPU_PTE_PRT && prt_fini_needed) {
-   amdgpu_vm_prt_fini(adev, vm);
-   prt_fini_needed = false;
-   }
-
-   list_del(>list);
-   amdgpu_vm_free_mapping(adev, vm, mapping, NULL);
-   }
 
dma_fence_put(vm->last_update);
for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_VMHUBS; i++)
-- 
2.23.0

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sdma5: do not execute 0-sized IBs (v2)

2019-10-22 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric
This seems to help with https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111481.

v2: insert a NOP instead of skipping all 0-sized IBs to avoid breaking older hw

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
index fb48622c2abd..6e1b25bd1fe7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
@@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ static void gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device 
*adev, uint32_t vmid,
 
job->vm_pd_addr = amdgpu_gmc_pd_addr(adev->gart.bo);
job->vm_needs_flush = true;
+   job->ibs->ptr[job->ibs->length_dw++] = ring->funcs->nop;
amdgpu_ring_pad_ib(ring, >ibs[0]);
r = amdgpu_job_submit(job, >mman.entity,
  AMDGPU_FENCE_OWNER_UNDEFINED, );
-- 
2.23.0.rc1

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: do not execute 0-sized IBs

2019-10-03 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric
On 03/10/2019 15:12, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> Does some variant of the patch on this thread help?
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/333068/

Hi Alex,

The added condition in this patch is:

   !(adev->asic_type >= CHIP_NAVI10 && adev->asic_type <= CHIP_NAVI12) ||

which will evaluate to "false ||" on Navi10 so I don't think it'll help.

I'll send an updated version of my patch that will only modify 
gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb
to not send a 0-sized IB.

Thanks,
Pierre-Eric


> 
> Alex
> 
> ------
> *From:* amd-gfx  on behalf of 
> Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric 
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 3, 2019 4:25 AM
> *To:* Koenig, Christian ; 
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org 
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: do not execute 0-sized IBs
>  
> 
> On 03/10/2019 10:09, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 03.10.19 um 10:03 schrieb Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric:
>>> This can be safely skipped entirely.
>>> This seems to help with https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111481.
>> 
>> NAK, please instead fix gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb to include at least some NOP 
>> in the submitted IBs.
> 
> Is there any interest in executing an empty (or only filled with NOPs) IB?
> 
> Anyway I can modify the patch to do this.
> 
> Thanks,
> Pierre-Eric
> 
>> 
>> Christian.
>> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 5 +
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
>>> index 60655834d649..aa163e679f1f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
>>> @@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, 
>>> unsigned num_ibs,
>>>   !amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) /* for SRIOV preemption, Preamble CE 
>>> ib must be inserted anyway */
>>>   continue;
>>>   +    if (ib->length_dw == 0) {
>>> +    /* On Navi gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb emits 0 sized IB */
>>> +    continue;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>   amdgpu_ring_emit_ib(ring, job, ib, status);
>>>   status &= ~AMDGPU_HAVE_CTX_SWITCH;
>>>   }
>> 
> ___
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: do not execute 0-sized IBs

2019-10-03 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric

On 03/10/2019 10:09, Christian König wrote:
> Am 03.10.19 um 10:03 schrieb Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric:
>> This can be safely skipped entirely.
>> This seems to help with https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111481.
> 
> NAK, please instead fix gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb to include at least some NOP 
> in the submitted IBs.

Is there any interest in executing an empty (or only filled with NOPs) IB?

Anyway I can modify the patch to do this.

Thanks,
Pierre-Eric

> 
> Christian.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 
>> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 5 +
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
>> index 60655834d649..aa163e679f1f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
>> @@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, 
>> unsigned num_ibs,
>>   !amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) /* for SRIOV preemption, Preamble CE 
>> ib must be inserted anyway */
>>   continue;
>>   +    if (ib->length_dw == 0) {
>> +    /* On Navi gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb emits 0 sized IB */
>> +    continue;
>> +    }
>> +
>>   amdgpu_ring_emit_ib(ring, job, ib, status);
>>   status &= ~AMDGPU_HAVE_CTX_SWITCH;
>>   }
> 
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: do not execute 0-sized IBs

2019-10-03 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric
This can be safely skipped entirely.
This seems to help with https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111481.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 5 +
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
index 60655834d649..aa163e679f1f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
@@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned 
num_ibs,
!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) /* for SRIOV preemption, Preamble 
CE ib must be inserted anyway */
continue;
 
+   if (ib->length_dw == 0) {
+   /* On Navi gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb emits 0 sized IB */
+   continue;
+   }
+
amdgpu_ring_emit_ib(ring, job, ib, status);
status &= ~AMDGPU_HAVE_CTX_SWITCH;
}
-- 
2.23.0.rc1

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix gfx9 soft recovery

2019-08-07 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric
The SOC15_REG_OFFSET() macro wasn't used, making the soft recovery fail.

v2: use WREG32_SOC15 instead of WREG32 + SOC15_REG_OFFSET

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
index bcd0301eee1e..1a2963e4bc68 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
@@ -5375,7 +5375,7 @@ static void gfx_v9_0_ring_soft_recovery(struct 
amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid)
value = REG_SET_FIELD(value, SQ_CMD, MODE, 0x01);
value = REG_SET_FIELD(value, SQ_CMD, CHECK_VMID, 1);
value = REG_SET_FIELD(value, SQ_CMD, VM_ID, vmid);
-   WREG32(mmSQ_CMD, value);
+   WREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmSQ_CMD, value);
 }
 
 static void gfx_v9_0_set_gfx_eop_interrupt_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
-- 
2.23.0.rc1

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix gfx9 soft recovery

2019-08-06 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric
The SOC15_REG_OFFSET() macro wasn't used, making the soft recovery fail.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
index bcd0301eee1e..ff87f6ea5cd6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
@@ -5375,7 +5375,7 @@ static void gfx_v9_0_ring_soft_recovery(struct 
amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid)
value = REG_SET_FIELD(value, SQ_CMD, MODE, 0x01);
value = REG_SET_FIELD(value, SQ_CMD, CHECK_VMID, 1);
value = REG_SET_FIELD(value, SQ_CMD, VM_ID, vmid);
-   WREG32(mmSQ_CMD, value);
+   WREG32(SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmSQ_CMD), value);
 }
 
 static void gfx_v9_0_set_gfx_eop_interrupt_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
-- 
2.23.0.rc1

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Re: [PATCH 10/10] drm/amdgpu: stop removing BOs from the LRU v3

2019-05-29 Thread Pelloux-prayer, Pierre-eric
Hi Christian,

The series is:

Tested-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer 


Pierre-Eric



On 29/05/2019 14:27, Christian König wrote:
> This avoids OOM situations when we have lots of threads
> submitting at the same time.
> 
> v3: apply this to the whole driver, not just CS
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c| 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c| 4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> index 20f2955d2a55..3e2da24cd17a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(struct amdgpu_cs_parser 
> *p,
>   }
>  
>   r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(>ticket, >validated, true,
> -, true);
> +, false);
>   if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
>   if (r != -ERESTARTSYS)
>   DRM_ERROR("ttm_eu_reserve_buffers failed.\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c
> index 06f83cac0d3a..f660628e6af9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int amdgpu_map_static_csa(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
> struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>   list_add(_tv.head, );
>   amdgpu_vm_get_pd_bo(vm, , );
>  
> - r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(, , true, NULL, true);
> + r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(, , true, NULL, false);
>   if (r) {
>   DRM_ERROR("failed to reserve CSA,PD BOs: err=%d\n", r);
>   return r;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> index d513a5ad03dd..ed25a4e14404 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void amdgpu_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>  
>   amdgpu_vm_get_pd_bo(vm, , _pd);
>  
> - r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(, , false, , true);
> + r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(, , false, , false);
>   if (r) {
>   dev_err(adev->dev, "leaking bo va because "
>   "we fail to reserve bo (%d)\n", r);
> @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ int amdgpu_gem_va_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
> *data,
>  
>   amdgpu_vm_get_pd_bo(>vm, , _pd);
>  
> - r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(, , true, , true);
> + r = ttm_eu_reserve_buffers(, , true, , false);
>   if (r)
>   goto error_unref;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
> index c430e8259038..d60593cc436e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static inline int amdgpu_bo_reserve(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, 
> bool no_intr)
>   struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
>   int r;
>  
> - r = ttm_bo_reserve(>tbo, !no_intr, false, NULL);
> + r = __ttm_bo_reserve(>tbo, !no_intr, false, NULL);
>   if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
>   if (r != -ERESTARTSYS)
>   dev_err(adev->dev, "%p reserve failed\n", bo);
> 
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx