Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0: Reorder the gfx, kiq and kcq rings test sequence

2018-12-28 Thread Deucher, Alexander
Acked-by: Alex Deucher 


From: amd-gfx  on behalf of Zhou, 
Tiecheng 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 12:36:17 AM
To: Zhou, Tiecheng; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0: Reorder the gfx, kiq and kcq rings 
test sequence

Ping...

-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx  On Behalf Of Tiecheng Zhou
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 4:15 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhou, Tiecheng 
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0: Reorder the gfx, kiq and kcq rings test 
sequence

The kiq ring and the very first compute ring may fail occasionally if they are 
tested directly following kiq_kcq_enable.

Insert the gfx ring test before kiq ring test to delay the kiq and kcq ring 
tests will fix the issue.

Signed-off-by: Tiecheng Zhou 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 48 +--
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
index 381f593b..164ffc9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
@@ -4278,9 +4278,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume(struct amdgpu_device 
*adev)
 amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
 gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_start(adev);
 ring->sched.ready = true;
-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);

-   return r;
+   return 0;
 }

 static void gfx_v8_0_cp_compute_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool 
enable) @@ -4369,10 +4368,9 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kiq_kcq_enable(struct 
amdgpu_device *adev)
 amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, upper_32_bits(wptr_addr));
 }

-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(kiq_ring);
-   if (r)
-   DRM_ERROR("KCQ enable failed\n");
-   return r;
+   amdgpu_ring_commit(kiq_ring);
+
+   return 0;
 }

 static int gfx_v8_0_deactivate_hqd(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 req) @@ 
-4709,16 +4707,32 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kcq_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 if (r)
 goto done;

-   /* Test KCQs - reversing the order of rings seems to fix ring test 
failure
-* after GPU reset
-*/
-   for (i = adev->gfx.num_compute_rings - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+done:
+   return r;
+}
+
+static int gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(struct amdgpu_device *adev) {
+   int r, i;
+   struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
+
+   /* collect all the ring_tests here, gfx, kiq, compute */
+   ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[0];
+   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
+   ring = &adev->gfx.kiq.ring;
+   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
+   for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
 ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
 }

-done:
-   return r;
+   return 0;
 }

 static int gfx_v8_0_cp_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) @@ -4739,6 +4753,11 
@@ static int gfx_v8_0_cp_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 r = gfx_v8_0_kcq_resume(adev);
 if (r)
 return r;
+
+   r = gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(adev);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
 gfx_v8_0_enable_gui_idle_interrupt(adev, true);

 return 0;
@@ -5056,6 +5075,7 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_post_soft_reset(void *handle)  {
 struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
 u32 grbm_soft_reset = 0;
+   struct amdgpu_ring *ring;

 if ((!adev->gfx.grbm_soft_reset) &&
 (!adev->gfx.srbm_soft_reset))
@@ -5086,6 +5106,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_post_soft_reset(void *handle)
 REG_GET_FIELD(grbm_soft_reset, GRBM_SOFT_RESET, SOFT_RESET_GFX))
 gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume(adev);

+   gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(adev);
+
 adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->start(adev);

 return 0;
--
2.7.4

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0: Reorder the gfx, kiq and kcq rings test sequence

2018-12-27 Thread Zhou, Tiecheng
Ping...

-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx  On Behalf Of Tiecheng Zhou
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 4:15 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhou, Tiecheng 
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0: Reorder the gfx, kiq and kcq rings test 
sequence

The kiq ring and the very first compute ring may fail occasionally if they are 
tested directly following kiq_kcq_enable.

Insert the gfx ring test before kiq ring test to delay the kiq and kcq ring 
tests will fix the issue.

Signed-off-by: Tiecheng Zhou 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 48 +--
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
index 381f593b..164ffc9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
@@ -4278,9 +4278,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume(struct amdgpu_device 
*adev)
amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_start(adev);
ring->sched.ready = true;
-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
 
-   return r;
+   return 0;
 }
 
 static void gfx_v8_0_cp_compute_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool 
enable) @@ -4369,10 +4368,9 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kiq_kcq_enable(struct 
amdgpu_device *adev)
amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, upper_32_bits(wptr_addr));
}
 
-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(kiq_ring);
-   if (r)
-   DRM_ERROR("KCQ enable failed\n");
-   return r;
+   amdgpu_ring_commit(kiq_ring);
+
+   return 0;
 }
 
 static int gfx_v8_0_deactivate_hqd(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 req) @@ 
-4709,16 +4707,32 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kcq_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
if (r)
goto done;
 
-   /* Test KCQs - reversing the order of rings seems to fix ring test 
failure
-* after GPU reset
-*/
-   for (i = adev->gfx.num_compute_rings - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+done:
+   return r;
+}
+
+static int gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(struct amdgpu_device *adev) {
+   int r, i;
+   struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
+
+   /* collect all the ring_tests here, gfx, kiq, compute */
+   ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[0];
+   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
+   ring = &adev->gfx.kiq.ring;
+   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
+   for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
}
 
-done:
-   return r;
+   return 0;
 }
 
 static int gfx_v8_0_cp_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) @@ -4739,6 +4753,11 
@@ static int gfx_v8_0_cp_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
r = gfx_v8_0_kcq_resume(adev);
if (r)
return r;
+
+   r = gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(adev);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
gfx_v8_0_enable_gui_idle_interrupt(adev, true);
 
return 0;
@@ -5056,6 +5075,7 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_post_soft_reset(void *handle)  {
struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
u32 grbm_soft_reset = 0;
+   struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
 
if ((!adev->gfx.grbm_soft_reset) &&
(!adev->gfx.srbm_soft_reset))
@@ -5086,6 +5106,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_post_soft_reset(void *handle)
REG_GET_FIELD(grbm_soft_reset, GRBM_SOFT_RESET, SOFT_RESET_GFX))
gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume(adev);
 
+   gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(adev);
+
adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->start(adev);
 
return 0;
--
2.7.4

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0: Reorder the gfx, kiq and kcq rings test sequence

2018-12-27 Thread Tiecheng Zhou
The kiq ring and the very first compute ring may fail occasionally
if they are tested directly following kiq_kcq_enable.

Insert the gfx ring test before kiq ring test to delay the kiq and kcq
ring tests will fix the issue.

Signed-off-by: Tiecheng Zhou 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 48 +--
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
index 381f593b..164ffc9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
@@ -4278,9 +4278,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume(struct amdgpu_device 
*adev)
amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_start(adev);
ring->sched.ready = true;
-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
 
-   return r;
+   return 0;
 }
 
 static void gfx_v8_0_cp_compute_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
@@ -4369,10 +4368,9 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kiq_kcq_enable(struct amdgpu_device 
*adev)
amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, upper_32_bits(wptr_addr));
}
 
-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(kiq_ring);
-   if (r)
-   DRM_ERROR("KCQ enable failed\n");
-   return r;
+   amdgpu_ring_commit(kiq_ring);
+
+   return 0;
 }
 
 static int gfx_v8_0_deactivate_hqd(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 req)
@@ -4709,16 +4707,32 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kcq_resume(struct amdgpu_device 
*adev)
if (r)
goto done;
 
-   /* Test KCQs - reversing the order of rings seems to fix ring test 
failure
-* after GPU reset
-*/
-   for (i = adev->gfx.num_compute_rings - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+done:
+   return r;
+}
+
+static int gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
+{
+   int r, i;
+   struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
+
+   /* collect all the ring_tests here, gfx, kiq, compute */
+   ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[0];
+   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
+   ring = &adev->gfx.kiq.ring;
+   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
+   for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
-   r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
+   amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring);
}
 
-done:
-   return r;
+   return 0;
 }
 
 static int gfx_v8_0_cp_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
@@ -4739,6 +4753,11 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_cp_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
r = gfx_v8_0_kcq_resume(adev);
if (r)
return r;
+
+   r = gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(adev);
+   if (r)
+   return r;
+
gfx_v8_0_enable_gui_idle_interrupt(adev, true);
 
return 0;
@@ -5056,6 +5075,7 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_post_soft_reset(void *handle)
 {
struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
u32 grbm_soft_reset = 0;
+   struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
 
if ((!adev->gfx.grbm_soft_reset) &&
(!adev->gfx.srbm_soft_reset))
@@ -5086,6 +5106,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_post_soft_reset(void *handle)
REG_GET_FIELD(grbm_soft_reset, GRBM_SOFT_RESET, SOFT_RESET_GFX))
gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume(adev);
 
+   gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(adev);
+
adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->start(adev);
 
return 0;
-- 
2.7.4

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx