Re: [PATCH] gpu: drm: radeon: radeon_test: Replace mdelay() with msleep()

2018-08-06 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Jia-Ju Bai  wrote:
> radeon_test_ring_sync() and radeon_test_ring_sync2() are never
> called in atomic context.
> They call mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary.
> mdelay() can be replaced with msleep().
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai 

Applied.  thanks!

Alex

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c | 10 +-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c
> index f5e9abfadb56..411efa303f54 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ void radeon_test_ring_sync(struct radeon_device *rdev,
> if (r)
> goto out_cleanup;
>
> -   mdelay(1000);
> +   msleep(1000);
>
> if (radeon_fence_signaled(fence1)) {
> DRM_ERROR("Fence 1 signaled without waiting for 
> semaphore.\n");
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ void radeon_test_ring_sync(struct radeon_device *rdev,
> goto out_cleanup;
> }
>
> -   mdelay(1000);
> +   msleep(1000);
>
> if (radeon_fence_signaled(fence2)) {
> DRM_ERROR("Fence 2 signaled without waiting for 
> semaphore.\n");
> @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static void radeon_test_ring_sync2(struct radeon_device 
> *rdev,
> if (r)
> goto out_cleanup;
>
> -   mdelay(1000);
> +   msleep(1000);
>
> if (radeon_fence_signaled(fenceA)) {
> DRM_ERROR("Fence A signaled without waiting for 
> semaphore.\n");
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static void radeon_test_ring_sync2(struct radeon_device 
> *rdev,
> radeon_ring_unlock_commit(rdev, ringC, false);
>
> for (i = 0; i < 30; ++i) {
> -   mdelay(100);
> +   msleep(100);
> sigA = radeon_fence_signaled(fenceA);
> sigB = radeon_fence_signaled(fenceB);
> if (sigA || sigB)
> @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static void radeon_test_ring_sync2(struct radeon_device 
> *rdev,
> radeon_semaphore_emit_signal(rdev, ringC->idx, semaphore);
> radeon_ring_unlock_commit(rdev, ringC, false);
>
> -   mdelay(1000);
> +   msleep(1000);
>
> r = radeon_fence_wait(fenceA, false);
> if (r) {
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


[PATCH] gpu: drm: radeon: radeon_test: Replace mdelay() with msleep()

2018-08-06 Thread Jia-Ju Bai
radeon_test_ring_sync() and radeon_test_ring_sync2() are never 
called in atomic context.
They call mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary.
mdelay() can be replaced with msleep().

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c | 10 +-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c
index f5e9abfadb56..411efa303f54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_test.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ void radeon_test_ring_sync(struct radeon_device *rdev,
if (r)
goto out_cleanup;
 
-   mdelay(1000);
+   msleep(1000);
 
if (radeon_fence_signaled(fence1)) {
DRM_ERROR("Fence 1 signaled without waiting for semaphore.\n");
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ void radeon_test_ring_sync(struct radeon_device *rdev,
goto out_cleanup;
}
 
-   mdelay(1000);
+   msleep(1000);
 
if (radeon_fence_signaled(fence2)) {
DRM_ERROR("Fence 2 signaled without waiting for semaphore.\n");
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static void radeon_test_ring_sync2(struct radeon_device 
*rdev,
if (r)
goto out_cleanup;
 
-   mdelay(1000);
+   msleep(1000);
 
if (radeon_fence_signaled(fenceA)) {
DRM_ERROR("Fence A signaled without waiting for semaphore.\n");
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static void radeon_test_ring_sync2(struct radeon_device 
*rdev,
radeon_ring_unlock_commit(rdev, ringC, false);
 
for (i = 0; i < 30; ++i) {
-   mdelay(100);
+   msleep(100);
sigA = radeon_fence_signaled(fenceA);
sigB = radeon_fence_signaled(fenceB);
if (sigA || sigB)
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static void radeon_test_ring_sync2(struct radeon_device 
*rdev,
radeon_semaphore_emit_signal(rdev, ringC->idx, semaphore);
radeon_ring_unlock_commit(rdev, ringC, false);
 
-   mdelay(1000);
+   msleep(1000);
 
r = radeon_fence_wait(fenceA, false);
if (r) {
-- 
2.17.0

___
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx