Re: [PATCH libdrm 0/9] amdgpu:
On 2019-06-25 11:44 a.m., Koenig, Christian wrote: > Am 25.06.19 um 10:02 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> On 2019-06-24 7:31 p.m., Christian König wrote: >>> Patches #1 - #3 look good to me, but I'm not sure if the rest is such a >>> good idea. >>> >>> Basically you not only want to use the same FD for CS, but also for >>> basically all buffer functions and as far as I can see we break that here. >> How so? The core FD is used for everything except flink and >> amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user. > > IIRC in the Mesa winsys we compare the amdgpu_device and amdgpu_bo > pointers to figure out if an opened device or imported BO is the same as > one we already know. > > With this patch that won't work any more and for example OpenGL and > VA-API could potentially use separate amdgpu_bo pointers for the same > underlying buffer. That in turn would break synchronization. Hmm, I was hoping patch 6 would cover this, but it looks like OpenGL and VA-API pass file descriptors referencing different file descriptions to amdgpu_device_initialize, so you're right. :( >>> I would rather add a new function to export the KMS handle for a certain >>> BO/FD pair. I'll try this approach then. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [PATCH libdrm 0/9] amdgpu:
Am 25.06.19 um 10:02 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > On 2019-06-24 7:31 p.m., Christian König wrote: >> Patches #1 - #3 look good to me, but I'm not sure if the rest is such a >> good idea. >> >> Basically you not only want to use the same FD for CS, but also for >> basically all buffer functions and as far as I can see we break that here. > How so? The core FD is used for everything except flink and > amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user. IIRC in the Mesa winsys we compare the amdgpu_device and amdgpu_bo pointers to figure out if an opened device or imported BO is the same as one we already know. With this patch that won't work any more and for example OpenGL and VA-API could potentially use separate amdgpu_bo pointers for the same underlying buffer. That in turn would break synchronization. Additional to that we potentially could keep a bunch of file descriptors around which we don't necessary want. In other words we previously closed the extra file descriptors, but now we keep them open as well. But that should probably be only a minor problem. >> I would rather add a new function to export the KMS handle for a certain >> BO/FD pair. Exporting the handle based on a type was also like trying to >> squeeze a round pig through a square hole in the first place. >> >> KMS, flink and DMA-buf fd are fundamentally different and shouldn't be >> handled by the same function in the first place. > I don't really see the problem. radeonsi & RADV are using > amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms to get handles for command stream submission, > so those handles have to be valid for the core FD. Now there's > amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user to get a handle valid for the FD passed > to amdgpu_device_initialize. Can you describe a scenario where a handle > valid for yet another file description is needed? Not yet another file descriptor, but the underlying problem here seems to be that we don't tell libdrm in which domain/file descriptor the KMS should actually be valid in. Regards, Christian. ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [PATCH libdrm 0/9] amdgpu:
On 2019-06-24 7:31 p.m., Christian König wrote: > Patches #1 - #3 look good to me, but I'm not sure if the rest is such a > good idea. > > Basically you not only want to use the same FD for CS, but also for > basically all buffer functions and as far as I can see we break that here. How so? The core FD is used for everything except flink and amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user. > I would rather add a new function to export the KMS handle for a certain > BO/FD pair. Exporting the handle based on a type was also like trying to > squeeze a round pig through a square hole in the first place. > > KMS, flink and DMA-buf fd are fundamentally different and shouldn't be > handled by the same function in the first place. I don't really see the problem. radeonsi & RADV are using amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms to get handles for command stream submission, so those handles have to be valid for the core FD. Now there's amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user to get a handle valid for the FD passed to amdgpu_device_initialize. Can you describe a scenario where a handle valid for yet another file description is needed? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: [PATCH libdrm 0/9] amdgpu:
Patches #1 - #3 look good to me, but I'm not sure if the rest is such a good idea. Basically you not only want to use the same FD for CS, but also for basically all buffer functions and as far as I can see we break that here. I would rather add a new function to export the KMS handle for a certain BO/FD pair. Exporting the handle based on a type was also like trying to squeeze a round pig through a square hole in the first place. KMS, flink and DMA-buf fd are fundamentally different and shouldn't be handled by the same function in the first place. The only tricky part in this scenario is to know when to close the KMS handle again. Christian. Am 24.06.19 um 18:53 schrieb Michel Dänzer: From: Michel Dänzer The motivation for these patches is https://bugs.freedesktop.org/110903 . Patches 1-3 are preparatory. Patches 4 & 5 are the core patches allowing the issues discussed in the bug report to be fixed. Patches 6-8 are further optimizations / cleanups. Patch 9 is the Mesa patch making use of the new amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user API to fix the user visible problem. Note that the libdrm patches need to land first, a libdrm release needs to be made, and the Mesa patch needs to bump the libdrm_amdgpu version requirement to that release's version before it can land. Michel Dänzer (9): amdgpu: Pass file descriptor directly to amdgpu_close_kms_handle amdgpu: Add BO handle to table in amdgpu_bo_create amdgpu: Rename fd_mutex/list to dev_mutex/list amdgpu: Add struct amdgpu_core_device and amdgpu_core_bo amdgpu: Add amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user amdgpu: Re-use an existing amdgpu_device when possible amdgpu: Use normal integers for device / core BO reference counting amdgpu: Drop refcount member from struct amdgpu_core_bo/device winsys/amdgpu: Use amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user for API KMS handles amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 14 +- amdgpu/amdgpu_asic_id.c | 4 +- amdgpu/amdgpu_bo.c| 367 ++ amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c| 64 +++--- amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c| 281 +- amdgpu/amdgpu_gpu_info.c | 35 ++-- amdgpu/amdgpu_internal.h | 31 ++- amdgpu/amdgpu_vamgr.c | 9 +- amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c| 4 +- tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c| 2 +- tests/amdgpu/bo_tests.c | 2 +- tests/amdgpu/cs_tests.c | 8 +- tests/amdgpu/deadlock_tests.c | 8 +- tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c | 2 +- tests/amdgpu/vce_tests.c | 12 +- tests/amdgpu/vcn_tests.c | 4 +- tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c | 2 +- 17 files changed, 500 insertions(+), 349 deletions(-) ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
[PATCH libdrm 0/9] amdgpu:
From: Michel Dänzer The motivation for these patches is https://bugs.freedesktop.org/110903 . Patches 1-3 are preparatory. Patches 4 & 5 are the core patches allowing the issues discussed in the bug report to be fixed. Patches 6-8 are further optimizations / cleanups. Patch 9 is the Mesa patch making use of the new amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user API to fix the user visible problem. Note that the libdrm patches need to land first, a libdrm release needs to be made, and the Mesa patch needs to bump the libdrm_amdgpu version requirement to that release's version before it can land. Michel Dänzer (9): amdgpu: Pass file descriptor directly to amdgpu_close_kms_handle amdgpu: Add BO handle to table in amdgpu_bo_create amdgpu: Rename fd_mutex/list to dev_mutex/list amdgpu: Add struct amdgpu_core_device and amdgpu_core_bo amdgpu: Add amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user amdgpu: Re-use an existing amdgpu_device when possible amdgpu: Use normal integers for device / core BO reference counting amdgpu: Drop refcount member from struct amdgpu_core_bo/device winsys/amdgpu: Use amdgpu_bo_handle_type_kms_user for API KMS handles amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 14 +- amdgpu/amdgpu_asic_id.c | 4 +- amdgpu/amdgpu_bo.c| 367 ++ amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c| 64 +++--- amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c| 281 +- amdgpu/amdgpu_gpu_info.c | 35 ++-- amdgpu/amdgpu_internal.h | 31 ++- amdgpu/amdgpu_vamgr.c | 9 +- amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c| 4 +- tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_test.c| 2 +- tests/amdgpu/bo_tests.c | 2 +- tests/amdgpu/cs_tests.c | 8 +- tests/amdgpu/deadlock_tests.c | 8 +- tests/amdgpu/uvd_enc_tests.c | 2 +- tests/amdgpu/vce_tests.c | 12 +- tests/amdgpu/vcn_tests.c | 4 +- tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c | 2 +- 17 files changed, 500 insertions(+), 349 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1 ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
