RE: KFD co-maintainership and branch model
> -Original Message- > From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Felix > Kuehling > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 5:58 PM > To: Deucher, Alexander ; Koenig, Christian > ; Oded Gabbay ; > Dave Airlie > Cc: amd-gfx list > Subject: Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model > > On 2018-08-23 08:38 AM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Christian König > >> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 3:01 AM > >> To: Oded Gabbay ; Dave Airlie > >> > >> Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Kuehling, Felix > >> ; amd-gfx list > >> > >> Subject: Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model > >> > >> Am 23.08.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Oded Gabbay: > >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:34 AM David Airlie > wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling > >> wrote: > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super > >>>>> busy at work and less responsive than he used to be. > >>>>> > >>>>> At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to > >>>>> merge KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. > >>>>> > >>>>> With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through > >>>>> Alex's branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared > >>>>> code (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging > >>>>> branches, and make the code flow and testing easier. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please let me know what you think? > >>>>> > >>>> Works for me. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Dave. > >>> Works for me as well. > >> Sounds good to me as well. > > Works for me as well. > > Thank you. We have agreement. > > Right now KFD in amd-staging-drm-next is a bit behind what's drm-next. > Alex, are you planning to rebase amd-staging-drm-next soon? If not, I'd like > to cherry-pick the missing commits before applying anything new. > Yes. I can update it this week. Alex > Regards, > Felix > > > > > Alex > > > >> Christian. > >> > >>> Oded > >>> ___ > >>> amd-gfx mailing list > >>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > > ___ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model
On 2018-08-23 08:38 AM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Christian König >> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 3:01 AM >> To: Oded Gabbay ; Dave Airlie >> >> Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Kuehling, Felix >> ; amd-gfx list >> Subject: Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model >> >> Am 23.08.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Oded Gabbay: >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:34 AM David Airlie wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling >> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy >>>>> at work and less responsive than he used to be. >>>>> >>>>> At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge >>>>> KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. >>>>> >>>>> With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's >>>>> branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code >>>>> (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, >>>>> and make the code flow and testing easier. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know what you think? >>>>> >>>> Works for me. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dave. >>> Works for me as well. >> Sounds good to me as well. > Works for me as well. Thank you. We have agreement. Right now KFD in amd-staging-drm-next is a bit behind what's drm-next. Alex, are you planning to rebase amd-staging-drm-next soon? If not, I'd like to cherry-pick the missing commits before applying anything new. Regards, Felix > > Alex > >> Christian. >> >>> Oded >>> ___ >>> amd-gfx mailing list >>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
RE: KFD co-maintainership and branch model
> -Original Message- > From: Christian König > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 3:01 AM > To: Oded Gabbay ; Dave Airlie > > Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Kuehling, Felix > ; amd-gfx list > Subject: Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model > > Am 23.08.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Oded Gabbay: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:34 AM David Airlie wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling > wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy > >>> at work and less responsive than he used to be. > >>> > >>> At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge > >>> KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. > >>> > >>> With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's > >>> branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code > >>> (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, > >>> and make the code flow and testing easier. > >>> > >>> Please let me know what you think? > >>> > >> Works for me. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Dave. > > Works for me as well. > > Sounds good to me as well. Works for me as well. Alex > > Christian. > > > > > Oded > > ___ > > amd-gfx mailing list > > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model
Am 23.08.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Oded Gabbay: On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:34 AM David Airlie wrote: On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote: Hi all, Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy at work and less responsive than he used to be. At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, and make the code flow and testing easier. Please let me know what you think? Works for me. Thanks, Dave. Works for me as well. Sounds good to me as well. Christian. Oded ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:34 AM David Airlie wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy at > > work and less responsive than he used to be. > > > > At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge KFD > > and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. > > > > With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's > > branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code > > (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, and > > make the code flow and testing easier. > > > > Please let me know what you think? > > > > Works for me. > > Thanks, > Dave. Works for me as well. Oded ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model
On 08/23/2018 06:25 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote: Hi all, Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy at work and less responsive than he used to be. At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, and make the code flow and testing easier. Please let me know what you think? Shall we share the same style as DC upstream in amdgpu? For the common code like amdgpu_vm.c, it's ideally to work for both KFD and amdgpu gfx. If a patch impacts gfx performance but improves compute ability, we may reserve that as a hybrid patch for production release only. Regards, Jerry Regards, Felix ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote: > Hi all, > > Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy at > work and less responsive than he used to be. > > At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge KFD > and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. > > With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's > branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code > (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, and > make the code flow and testing easier. > > Please let me know what you think? > Works for me. Thanks, Dave. ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
KFD co-maintainership and branch model
Hi all, Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy at work and less responsive than he used to be. At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, and make the code flow and testing easier. Please let me know what you think? Regards, Felix -- F e l i x K u e h l i n g PMTS Software Development Engineer | Linux Compute Kernel 1 Commerce Valley Dr. East, Markham, ON L3T 7X6 Canada (O) +1(289)695-1597 _ _ _ _ _ / \ | \ / | | _ \ \ _ | / A \ | \M/ | | |D) ) /|_| | /_/ \_\ |_| |_| |_/ |__/ \| facebook.com/AMD | amd.com ___ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
