[amsat-bb] Re: Funcube Donlge SDR

2013-11-26 Thread Alex Deligiannis

On 26/11/2013 12:56 πμ, Kevin Deane wrote:

I thought there would be more users out there with all these new Baby Monitor 
Sats.

  


I was hoping to use this for working AO-7, VO-52, FO-29. Anyone with some 
experience and a little detail would be much appreciated.



Kevin
KF7MYK

I had to put a FM broadcast reject filter to see some usable 2 m signals.

Funcube-1 and VO52 are loud and clear with a Ternstyle antenna.

A 2 m band bass filter may be a good idea. In any case filtering is a must.

73s
Alex KM39gc
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ARISS contact planned February 19, 2013 with school in Greece

2013-02-19 Thread Alex Deligiannis
OR4ISS heard laud  and clear calling J41ISS many times but the ground 
station was absent...


I have the wav from the pass for anyone interesting.

73s
Alex
SV8QG KM39gc
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Fwd: This weekends ISS Shadow-Beacon Plasma Experiment

2011-11-14 Thread Alex Deligiannis



 Original Message 
Subject:[amsat-bb] This weekends ISS Shadow-Beacon Plasma Experiment
Date:   Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:11:47 + (GMT)
From:   Trevor . m5...@yahoo.co.uk
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org



Only just seen this, hadn't realised there was a Space Plasma experiment using 
the 145.825 MHz packet system

Space plasma experiment Shadow onboard International Space Station (ISS) with 
participation of radio amateurs
http://knts.tsniimash.ru/Shadow/en/Overview.aspx

Schedule
http://knts.tsniimash.ru/Shadow/en/NewView.aspx?NewId=6ad52670-4421-4860-934b-2722cab3c97c

73 Trevor M5AKA



___

 Unfortunately I didn't received anyTo SHADOW packets during the November 13^th  


73's Alex


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: [YCCC] Netbooks

2011-08-13 Thread Alex Malyava
What's the benefit of net-books?
Size, weight, battery life?
they are cheaper, but not that much - cheapest 15 notebooks are $280...320.
CPU and memory are also not as good as in notebooks.

Where you gonna use it?

If someone tested net-book+radio configuration and it runs no problem 100% -
I can be convinced that there is no reason to pay more for notebook and
carry more weight to some DX country.

AM

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:05 AM, ANTHONY JAPHA tjja...@earthlink.netwrote:

 All,
 Mni tnx for the responses about netbooks.  Generally, a lot of satisfaction
 with them, with concerns abt. speed and keyboard size.  In my application,
 neither should be a problem.  ASUS was highly recommended.
 73,
 Tony, N2UN
 ___
 YCCC Reflector mailto:y...@contesting.com
 Yankee Clipper Contest Club  http://www.yccc.org
 Reflector Info: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/yccc


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Netbooks?

2011-08-11 Thread Alex

Tony,

I have SatPC32 running perfectly on my MSI U130 netbook – 2GB RAM 
Windows 7 – driving my IC910H.
Digital stuff like Fldigi and MMSSTV work just fine and it has all the 
guts needed to drive my Signalhound spectrum analyser and MiniVNA Pro 
using the inbuilt Bluetooth.
I haven't tried it with HRD, mainly because the Sat Tracker still 
doesn't work with the Icom IC910H.

The MSI packs a lot of punch in a small package.

Cheers, Alex VK5ALX


 
___

Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ARISSat-1 transponder worked over Australia

2011-08-05 Thread Alex
Worked VK2ZAZ briefly around 0144UTC 
Signals quite weak but readable. A couple of other stations heard but 
too noisy to get call signs.
Nothing heard on the following (low) pass.
Alex / VK5ALX
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] VK/WD9EWK in late May 2011

2011-04-17 Thread Alex
Actually  VK is the suffix so the call will be WD9EWK/VK
  
Cheers, enjoy your visit.
Alex / VK5ALX
  While I am in Australia, I plan on doing some satellite operating in
  FM and SSB as VK/WD9EWK.  If asked, I will also operate as VK/VA7EWK.
  Both callsigns are legal in Australia under the class license that
  covers operating by foreign hams for short visits.

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat Deactivation

2011-04-13 Thread Alex
Yes, I had 3 radios going with one listening on 437.550 MHz. Nothing 
heard on any frequency.
  
Alex VK5ALX
  
  this is why we did not hear itthey had the 430mhz transmitter turned
  on... was anyone listening to the 70cm frequency? all the preparations
  on 2m and we were in the wrong place.

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: VO-52 - OK to Work in FM?

2010-06-12 Thread Alex
Hi Clint.
Check out this page on the Amsat India web site
  
http://www.amsatindia.org/payloads.htm
  
Alex / VK5ALX
  
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Ongoing Spacecraft Systems RD @ BU

2010-01-17 Thread Alex, N3SQ
Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:

 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:11:46 -0500
 From: Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 feat!
 To: Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL vlfis...@mcn.net
 Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org

 Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL wrote:
   
 Well, it certainly wasn't on FM.  Why couldn't the next LEO be like a new 
 AO-7 with modern technology?  Why does the Board insist on cramming another 
 single channel bird down our throats?
   
 
 We also have a university in the Northeast working on a 3U cubesat that 
 will support a transponder powerwise. This was all laid out in the 
 donation letter, as well as Barry's Apogee View in the Journal.

   
As Andrew mentioned, here at the State University of New York @ 
Binghamton we've been working along on our goals as outlined at the 
Symposium and in the latest edition of the Journal:

(a) We have revised the ARISSat Power Supply Unit, Backplane and Solar 
Panel Charge Controller designs to use Pseudocapacitors instead of 
traditional batteries.
  Based on a worse-case, 600km orbit, we can produce a whole-orbit 
power budget of 7.5 watts using a 3U CubeSat design.
  If a spacecraft is launched into a more optimal orbit, like a 
sun-synchronous orbit, one of the two Pseudocapacitor banks can be removed.
  The design can be scaled to be used with other classes of 
spacecraft - 2U/1U CubeSat, Microsats, etc.
  The design has gone through two reviews with AMSAT Engineering. 
(Thanks Lou, Barry  Tony!)

(b) We have a light-weight deployable solar panel design with integral 
magnetorquer coils for attitude control.
  The design contains original research and integrates CubeSat 
research from:
* University of Delft (hinge concepts  use of Dyneema wire)
* University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (flex-circuit 
magnetorquers  carbon-fiber substrate)
* the Aerospace Corporation (thin-film attachment of solar 
cells)
   The design will produce about 12-15 watts per minute in any 
orientation (worse-case) for 3U, less with 2U or 1U
   If a spacecraft is launched into a more optimal orbit the number 
of solar cells can be reduced while maintaining the power budget

(c) We have analyzed the existing AMSAT spacecraft modules (from ARISSat 
 P3D) and determined that:
  * We can fit the SDX and U/V Linear Transponder systems from 
ARISSat into a 2U or 3U CubeSat Chassis without significant re-design
  * The IHU is going to be slightly redesigned to incorporate 
the Command Decoder board functions
  * We can reuse the base concepts from P3D for the Sun  Earth 
Sensor Systems
  * We can reuse a 3-axis Magnetometer design (Honeywell)
  * If the ARISSat boards were redesigned/repackaged they could 
fit within a 1U Chassis.

(d) Things to do between now and Dayton:
  * Complete thermal analysis of a baseline 3U spacecraft
  * Antenna design (based on U of Delft's spring steel U/V 
antenna deployment system)
  * Complete Attitude Determination  Control (ADAC) integration 
(magnetorquers, sun/earth sensors  magnetometer)
  * Finish building engineering model
  
This RD, being performed by Engineering Students for their Senior 
Design projects (8 ME's/EE's + 26 SE's), is being sponsored by AMSAT.

So I encourage everyone to contribute what you can to AMSAT to help fund 
spacecraft systems development and launch opportunities.
If we have reliable, lower-cost, modular systems, then AMSAT can be more 
responsive to any launch opportunity.

We'll have more info on the research we're doing in the next issue of 
the Journal and look for us at the AMSAT table in Dayton!

Alex Harvilchuck, N3NP
NextGen CubeSat Program Manager
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT, ITAR, More AMSAT-NA Volunteers Such .

2009-11-17 Thread Alex, N3SQ
Michael, W4HIJ wrote:
Interesting stuff Alex.
 I'm currently working on an FM satellite station as that's all I can 
afford at present but I hope some of the NextGen birds will carry linear 
transponders too. At any rate, it all sounds very exciting.
73,
Michael W4HIJ


ARISSat-1 is flying a V/U Linear transponder with the 10.7MHz IF SDX board, the 
NextGen bus will fly the same equipment.
I'm hoping that we can fly an L/S Linear transponder  10.7MHz IF Matrix as 
payload on the NextGen satellites.

They're not going to be the most powerful transmitters nor the largest antennas 
flown, since we've got a limited power, mass, and volume budget.

Remember, we're talking about a 3kg mass budget, a 3 liter (10cm x 10cm x 30cm) 
volume budget and an 8w DC power budget for the spacecraft 
. . . Think the size of a loaf of bread.

Alex, N3NP



___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] AMSAT, ITAR, More AMSAT-NA Volunteers Such . . .

2009-11-16 Thread Alex, N3SQ
Ladies  Gentlemen,

Here's the main thing to think about ITAR. ITAR regulates OUTFLOW of 
information, it doesn't care about INFLOW of information. If you build 
or design it by a non-US Person (Citizen or Legal Permanent Resident) 
and you bring it INTO the US, ITAR does not care. So AMSAT-NA can use 
designs from P3E, but cannot design parts of P3E.

So the logical thing to do is have all major future AMSAT spacecraft 
be AMSAT-NA managed spacecraft with design elements (camera systems, 
experiments, etc.) contributed by other AMSAT organizations. The only 
main technical interaction between the AMSATs would be via a standard, 
open-sourced, well-published-in-technical-journals interface 
specification. Money could be contributed from other AMSATs to fund 
launch  development costs.

As for the mantra of no one being able to develop the equipment in the 
US . . . The volunteer base is not capped, just expand the size of the 
volunteer base and organize it better. None of the experienced engineers 
should be directly building hardware, we should all be supervising teams 
of engineering students who actually build the equipment. There are over 
250 University Engineering programs in the US. Each of those programs 
have at least 50 students in each graduating class. Let's say that we 
can get 15% of the students interested in working on a satellite 
project  (my personal observations  are more like 75% of the students 
are interested).

Let's do the Math:
Worse Case: 250 Schools x 50 students per graduating class x 15% =  1875 
  POTENTIALLY INTERESTED STUDENTS IN THE US
Best Case: 250 Schools x 50 students per graduating class x 75% =  9375  
POTENTIALLY INTERESTED STUDENTS IN THE US
And this is just talking about COLLEGE SENIORS - EE's, ME's, CE's, CS's, 
SE's . . . double the number if you include the Juniors.

Anywhere near this load of students would completely overload the 
current AMSAT-NA volunteer base. But talk about the potentially 
available volunteer base!

With Binghamton University, I had 7 Hardware Engineering slots available 
on the team. There are 200 Hardware Engineers in the BU graduating class 
- about 168 of the students wanted to be on the Satellite Project Team, 
a 24x over-subscription. That's pretty impressive. I could have had more 
teams, but we need to crawl, the walk, then run with this activity - 
EVOLUTIONARY not REVOLUTIONARY (but let's just make sure evolution works 
quickly . . .)

The current BU student team is stoked, they are really excited to be 
working the project. Every week I get thanked by the students for 
bringing the project to their attention. They have done some really 
great work and they have a great faculty advisor, Dr. Roger Westgate. I 
expect that there will be more than 1 project team next year working on 
an AMSAT satellite, assuming AMSAT is interested in sponsoring more.

So stop crying into your beer over ITAR. The world is not coming to an 
end. Let's work to launch spacecraft within the ITAR limits.
In the meantime, let the AMSAT-NA BoD navigate it's way through the 
byzantine structure of the US Govt to try to bring about change in ITAR.

Alex Harvilchuck, N3NP

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] AMSAT NextGen Program Progress

2009-11-11 Thread Alex, N3SQ
Just to give everyone a little update on how the AMSAT NextGen Program 
is doing @ Binghamton University . . .

(a) CONTROL  EXPERIMENT SYSTEMS
- The Systems Engineering students are doing well analyzing the ARISSat 
documentation and will be scheduling meetings with the primary AMSAT 
engineering contact to discuss documentation questions.

- Identified Design Changes Needing to Occur for NextGen:
* The Control/Safety Timer needs to be adapted to conform with the 
CubeSat deployment switch standard
* Consolidation of Camera functionality into a separate camera payload 
board (functionality is currently spread across a number of boards in 
the stack)


(b) RF SYSTEMS
- The Systems Engineering students are doing well analyzing the ARISSat 
documentation and will be scheduling meetings with the primary AMSAT 
engineering contact to discuss documentation questions.

- Identified Design Changes Needing to Occur for NextGen:
* Antenna design choice - single dual-band vs dual mono-band
*  New RF container design needed


(c) POWER  STRUCTURE SYSTEMS
- The Systems Engineering students are doing well analyzing the ARISSat 
documentation and will be scheduling meetings with the primary AMSAT 
engineering contact to discuss documentation questions.
- The Hardware Engineering students have been busy creating a 
preliminary design for solar panel deployment and use of supercapacitors 
to replace the battery. A Preliminary Design Review is being scheduled 
in mid-November with the AMSAT Engineering Team.

- Identified Design Changes Needing to Occur for NextGen:
* Replace Battery with modular stacks of Supercapacitors in parallel to 
the Solar Panels
* Shrink ICB (Interconnect Board) to fit within CubeSat frame
* Reduce PSU footprint by moving camera power function to a Camera 
Payload Board (CPB)
* Slight PSU voltage supply design change
* Remove test/program load functionality from ICB to external test board 
(XTB) via standard CubeSat  PPOD maintenance ports (per CubeSat spec.)


We are still on-target to have an engineering model ready for the AMSAT 
table at the 2010 Dayton Hamvention with readiness for launch later in 2010.


Alex Harvilchuck, N3NP
NextGen Program Manager

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] The Next Generation of Amateur Radio Satellites

2009-10-18 Thread Alex, N3SQ
Robert,
Congratulations for volunteering to organize development of an analog 
linear transponder.
Please contact me and the AMSAT Systems Engineering team for mass, 
volume, power consumption, and heat generation requirements for your 
linear transponder board. We will provide you the interface 
specification to the IHU for control and ICB (Interconnect Control 
Board) for power distribution.

Oh, and they're not 10 year olds, they are 22 year olds who are about 8 
months away from receiving their Electrical Engineering or Computer 
Engineering or Mechanical Engineering or Systems Engineering or 
Industrial Engineering Degree from the State University of New York 
system. And there are 34 (thirty-four) of them working on the NextGen 
Project for AMSAT.

I will gladly set up a conference call next week at 6PM EDT  on 
Wednesday where you can talk with the Systems Engineering team to 
discuss the details of the requirements. We are scheduling the CDR 
(Critical Design Review) for the last week in January 2010. I expect you 
will be ready for this design review because since such people exist 
and they will have designs that meet the spacecraft's requirements. You 
must have the board ready for Systems Integration Test in Mid-March 
2010. We will be putting the system on AMSAT's table at the Dayton 
Hamvention. Please have your prototype board budget and schedule ready 
for PDR (Preliminary Design Review) during the 2nd week of December, 2009.

They are tight time frames but we are just doing evolutionary, not 
revolutionary changes to the design. We also have a team of 27 
upper-division undergraduate senior Systems Engineers, university System 
Engineering professors and experienced professional Systems Engineers 
with multiple decades of industry experience working on the project.

I suggest, you and anyone else who wishes to declare their intension to 
volunteer on a board project should read our presentation from the AMSAT 
Symposium.

Alex Harvilchuck, N3NP/SO4NNP
Program Manager,
AMSAT NextGen Program

--

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:37:44 -0500
From: Rocky Jones orbit...@hotmail.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Why do hamsats? (Or anything else...)
To: b...@innismir.net
Cc: Amsat BB amsat-bb@amsat.org, k...@arrl.net
Message-ID: col106-w45fa0985c6ee33197b1b54d6...@phx.gbl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1





  Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:57:34 -0400
  From: b...@innismir.net
  To: orbit...@hotmail.com
   


I wrote:

  
   
   In my view better engineering doctrine would imply that we try and
   put the digital transponder ON ISS and let it cook there for a bit.
 
  
   

you replied

  Yup, that would be ideal, I'm nominating you to head that project. This
  is right up your alley, as since you and your friends within the JSC
  can navigate the political process easily. Lets run this in tandem with
  the ARISSSat project.
  
  Thanks for volunteering!
  
  -- 
  Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA
  bbj at innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/
   

one has to wonder Ben why didnt they try it?  There would have been a few more 
issues involved in terms of operating the thing on ISS other then just 
deploying it (mostly RF work)...

but...

as for me heading the project.  I'd deep six the entire software defined 
transponder, put it on a development effort with some heavy program 
guidance...find some people who wanted to build linear transponders even if 
they were overseas (such people exist already) and start flying as many of 
those as possible.

Right now what in my view the satellite community needs is a 100 percent Oscar 
7 or 10...not some technological development issues.

If I were king we would have something to offer the USAF if they had spare lift 
on a Centaur as they just had...remember the original Oscar's flew on USAF 
vehicles.

in the meantime I will continue to keep my technical skills sharp (grin) by 
helping the 10 year olds put together a buoy that is going to float in Clear 
Lake...

Robert WB5MZO


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Not everyone is working on ARISSat-1 . . . . The AMSAT NextGen Spacecraft Bus

2009-10-12 Thread Alex, N3SQ
As I mentioned a few weeks ago . . . Not all of us are focused on ARISSat-1.

I left everyone with two thoughts:
* Look to the Empire State near the Harvest Moon
* A gift may arrive near the ides of May

At the AMSAT Symposium (which happens to be occurring near the Harvest 
Moon) a paper was presented on behalf of a team of students from the 
State University of New York at Binghamton (Binghamton University), 
Thomas J Watson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. The students 
form, as part of their Senior Design Projects, the core of an AMSAT  
volunteer team to modify the ARISSat-1 design into the Next Generation 
of OSCARs using the CubeSat specification, i.e. the NextGen Project. It 
will be an OPEN, modular design in furtherance of the decision at last 
year's symposium to create a building block architecture for future 
satellites.

The core student team consists of 27 Systems Engineering students who 
are focusing on requirements analysis of ARISSat-1, documenting the 
ARISSat-1 systems, and analyzing the lessons learned from ARISSat-1 / 
other prior spacecraft.  The goal is to have a modular, evolutionary 
design ready for NextGen's presentation at the 2010 Dayton Hamvention. 
(which happens to be occurring near the ides of May . . . ). There are 
also 7 Mechanical, Electrical and Computer Engineers working together 
with the Systems Engineers on the Power and Structure Systems of 
NextGen. The EEs will be focusing on redesigning the ARISSat-1 Power 
Systems to use Supercapacitors instead of batteries and reducing the 
footprint of some of the boards (ICB especially). The MEs  will be 
focused on modifying the structure to incorporate deployable solar 
panels with a scalable design that will work for 1U, 2U and 3U sizes.

So that's a total core team of 34 Students . . . plus advisers, mentors 
and volunteers

The goal is for NextGen to be a Picosat-class bus structure that AMSAT, 
or any other University, can use for 1U, 2U, or 3U CubeSat  spacecraft.  
We will be  using good Industrial Engineering concepts to drive the unit 
cost down while maintaining reliability. If we can get the cost low 
enough to mass produce the NextGen bus, AMSAT could make the bus 
available at low-to-no-cost to qualified University groups - AMSAT would 
handle spacecraft operations during the primary mission, but when the 
primary mission is complete, the satellite is turned over to AMSAT for 
it's secondary mission as a new Amateur Radio Satelite - an OSCAR in 
every CubeSat.
Now the satellite, given the right conditions, could have a lifetime 
equivalent to AO-7. This will allow Universities and Schools to focus on 
developing the payload and experiments to fit within the integrated and 
proven spacecraft bus.

An Engineering Model of the NextGen CubeSat spacecraft bus will be on 
display at the Dayton Hamvention AMSAT Booth for everyone to study.

The BU team is the core of the AMSAT team, but we are looking for other 
individuals and University/School teams to participate in all aspects of 
the spacecraft design - RF Systems - Guidance, Navigation, Control  
Experiment Systems - Power  Structure Systems. This is an ongoing 
effort, it is not a one time event, but the start of a stable, 
evolutionary design process that will further STEM (Science, Technology, 
Engineering  Mathmatics) with the Next Generation of engineers and 
amateur radio operators.

We're going to do Evolutionary Change, not Revolutionary Change.
We're going to utilize, modify and develop Reusable Modules
We're going to start with Picosat-class and work our way up
We're going to use good Systems Engineering standards and practices 
WITHOUT stifling creativity and the need to have FUN
We're going to all LEARN something from each other

Volunteers are needed, the adventure awaits! Time to stop talking and 
time to get working.

There have been lots of posts on this list (AMSAT-BB) about not having 
enough of in-orbit spacecraft, - well now is your chance to make a 
difference.

V  O  L  U  N  T  E  E  R !

Even if you only have an hour a week, you can mentor a student over the 
phone or you can peer review a document that the students(or someone 
else) are working on.
If you have more than an hour a week, you can implement a small design 
change to an existing subsystem; you could respin the board layout to 
meet a reduced form factor; you could redesign a module to use different 
technology (there are lots of ways to do an SDX and lots of ways to do 
an IHU).
If you are working with a University/School who is working on a CubeSat 
or thinking about it, talk to me, we're looking for other teams to 
contribute. Your students will get experience dealing with 
geographically-distributed virtual teams.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions, comments or offers to 
volunteer.

Alex Harvilchuck, N3NP
NextGen Program Manager

Alex, N3SQ wrote:
 There are some of us out here who are trying to bring a little order 
 to the chaos and help

[amsat-bb] Not everyone is working on ARISSat-1

2009-09-14 Thread Alex, N3SQ
There are some of us out here who are trying to bring a little order to 
the chaos and help AMSAT, but we are all not working on ARISSat-1.

Our effort lies in the following vectors and scalars:
- Change needs to be EVOLUTIONARY not REVOLUTIONARY.
- Chaos can be harnessed with the correct application of traceability.
- The future leads through the correct application of effort

There are clouds of dust on the horizon . . . . . with the sound of many 
hoof-beats in the distance . . . . . is that a bugle call-to-arms I hear 
on the wind?
Those who know, understand. Those who need to know will find out soon 
enough.

I will leave you with these two thoughts until next time . . . 

*  Look to the Empire State near the Harvest Moon.
*  A gift may arrive near the ides of May.
 
*Dobranocz*
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb