Re: [amsat-bb] Telemetry freq for Ukcube-1/Funcube-2?

2014-08-02 Thread Colin Hurst
Mark,
Try 145915.2 +/- 1kHz
It is  a tad frequency agile.
Passes are very infrequent due to testing.
73
Colin VK5HI

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Mark L. Hammond
Sent: Saturday, 2 August 2014 23:46
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Telemetry freq for Ukcube-1/Funcube-2?

Hello Funcube-2 Telemetry Chasers,

What are you using as the real frequency as compared to the published
frequency of 145.915 MHz?  

I've gotten some frames from using the Funcube Dongle Pro+, but want to use
my IC-910 and I haven't been around for a pass with telemetry xmissions
active to try and tune in the actual downlink.

Thanks---



Mark L. Hammond  [N8MH] 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Cubesat 1 axis attitude control?

2014-02-20 Thread Colin Hurst
Bob,
I am not a rocket scientist but may qualify as a greybeard.
Have been an ardent follower of satellite attitudes for many years.
I would have thought that passive magnetic stabilisation would have been the
preferred option to meet your objective.

In principle your idea should work, however you would need some smart
processing on board as the Earth's Main Field inclination does not follow
the equator.
The only concern I would envisage is that if the magnetic coil is not
triggered precisely relative to the earth's magnetic field you may flip the
satellite and negate your objective.
Eastern Hemisphere passes should not present a timing issue but the Western
Hemisphere (over the Americas) may present a real timing issue thus
processing+++.

Just my two bobs worth.
73
Colin VK5HI.


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Robert Bruninga
Sent: Friday, 21 February 2014 07:58
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Cubesat 1 axis attitude control?

Need an AMSAT greybeard with attitude control experience.



We want to use only one magnetorguer coil (a Z coil) to more or less keep
our Z axis aligned with the Earth's axis (+/-30 deg)



We figure if we energize the Z coil only twice per orbit while over the
equator where the Earth's magnetic field is aligned with the poles we can
eventually bring it into alignment.  Then we maintain that alignment using
white/black differential solar radiation pressure to maintain a fractional
RPM about the Z axis.



I need help from some greybeards to prove this is possible.



Bob, WB4aPR
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Request for Solar Flux Data

2014-02-19 Thread Colin Hurst
I am looking for the 45 day Solar Flux Data (www.swpc.noaa.gov)
covering/overlapping the period 21st November to 7th January.

Please email me direct.

Thank You.

Colin VK5HI

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] 2 Metre Noise : was RE: Re: Keplerian Elements for FUNCUBE 1

2013-11-22 Thread Colin Hurst
Stefan and Mark,
90% of the crud on 2 metres comes from my Cable Modem / Router.
Lucky so far Funcube and N3XT are in the clear.
Colin VK5HI.


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Stefan Wagener
Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2013 14:24
To: Mark L. Hammond
Cc: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Keplerian Elements for FUNCUBE 1

Hi Mark,

Thank you very much! I had this nasty birdie on the Defli-Next frequency and
after reading your post, I killed my Netgear N600 and WOW, the birdie on
145.869 is gone :-)

Thank you again!

Stefan


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Mark L. Hammond
marklhamm...@gmail.comwrote:

 Jerry,

 My shack is (sadly) full of 2M birdies.  Most of them come from my 
 wireless hub...replaced it once, didn't improve.  Need one that is
silent
 on 2M, but with so many devices, changing anything on the wireless 
 gives me a migraine :)

 The SDR FCDP+ waterfall on 2M is really, really ugly here. Heh.

 73,

 Mark N8MH

 At 09:20 PM 11/22/2013 -0600, n0jy wrote:
 Well, I will third that.  I had a 2 degree pass and it worked well 
 with
 those keps.  Not a lot of TLM recovered but I could hear the between 
 frame beep for the duration of what SatPC32 said was AOS.
 
 I've got a few birdies from neighboring ?? and they can wreck the 
 FUNcube
 telemetry very easily unless FUNcube is pretty strong.  It doesn't 
 seem to take much birdie carrier to lose a frame.
 Anybody else have similar woes?
 
 Jerry
 N0JY
 
 On 11/22/2013 8:59 PM, Rick Walter wrote:
 Just copied 89 frames of telemetry from FunCube 1. I agree, the 
 13066B
 is a
 really good fit.
 
 
 FUNCUBE-1
 1 39417U 13066B   13326.90242084  .4113  0-0  57014-3 0   107
 2 39417  97.7998  39.4992 0063751 190.6311 169.3388 14.77099805   237
 
 Rick - WB3CSY
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Cornell CUSat Keps?

2013-10-08 Thread Colin Hurst
Nico,
Thanks to some good work by Tetsu JA0CAW, DANDE is currently a good fit to
Object C.
2013-055C   
1 39267U 13055C   13280.88171839  .6188  0-0  21045-3 045
2 39267  80.9931 307.0850 0796581 135.6654 231.1187 13.96656656  1151
Downlink is nominally 436748.7 MHz at my QTH.
73
Colin VK5HI.
PS: CUSAT remains a good fit with Object B.


-Original Message-
From: Nico Janssen [mailto:ham...@xs4all.nl] 
Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2013 05:59
To: bstguitar...@gmail.com
Cc: Colin Hurst; Amsat BB
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Cornell CUSat Keps?


Detailed doppler shift measurements show that CUSat is either object 39266
or object 39271. Object 39271 appears to be officially identified as the
second stage of the Falcon rocket. If that is true then object 39266,
2013-055B, is CUSat.

On October 6 around 19:30 UTC I measured a pass of CUSat and found that the
difference between CUSat and object 39266 was about 6 seconds, using the
elements set with epoch 13277.72822065.
Besides object 39271 no other objects were near CUSat.

https://thumb6.wuala.com/previewImage/SharedInfo/Space/20131006_1930_CUSat.j
pg/?key=IZKufoz9U1Uo

73,
Nico PA0DLO


On 2013-10-03 19:07, Bryce Salmi wrote:
 Looks like the DANDE website officially uses 2013-055B too!

 http://spacegrant.colorado.edu/images/DANDECelestrakTLE.txt


 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Colin Hurst cjhu...@bigpond.net.au
wrote:

 Alan  Bryce,
 2013-055B appears currently to be the best fit for both DANDE and CUSAT.
 73
 Colin VK5HI

 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] 
 On Behalf Of Alan
 Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2013 04:27
 To: bstguitar...@gmail.com; 'Amsat BB'
 Cc: CC
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cornell CUSat Keps?

 Bryce,

 I ran the Keps for all the objects.  Space-Track shows something like 
 20, which is interesting.  They are already widely dispersed, so 
 given the low transmission rate, it might be better to wait a few 
 days until at least some tentative identifications are made.  I 
 expect DK3WN is on the case.  :)

 73s,

 Alan
 WA4SCA


 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org
 [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Bryce Salmi
 Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:46 PM
 To: Amsat BB
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Cornell CUSat Keps?
 
 Does anyone know the designator and/or keps for the recently 
 launched CUSat? Maybe I should stick roughly with any of the keps 
 for the recent SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket body? My friend worked on 
 CUSat and I'd really like to catch a pass of it and show him it 
 operating in orbit!
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bryce
 KB1LQC
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
 program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Cornell CUSat Keps?

2013-10-02 Thread Colin Hurst
Alan  Bryce,
2013-055B appears currently to be the best fit for both DANDE and CUSAT.
73
Colin VK5HI

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Alan
Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2013 04:27
To: bstguitar...@gmail.com; 'Amsat BB'
Cc: CC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cornell CUSat Keps?

Bryce,

I ran the Keps for all the objects.  Space-Track shows something like 20,
which is interesting.  They are already widely dispersed, so given the low
transmission rate, it might be better to wait a few days until at least some
tentative identifications are made.  I expect DK3WN is on the case.  :)

73s,

Alan
WA4SCA
 

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org
[mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Bryce Salmi
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:46 PM
To: Amsat BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Cornell CUSat Keps?

Does anyone know the designator and/or keps for the recently launched
CUSat? Maybe I should stick roughly with any of the keps for the recent
SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket body? My friend worked on CUSat and I'd really like
to catch a pass of it and show him it operating in orbit!

Thanks,

Bryce
KB1LQC
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: cw decoding software

2013-03-30 Thread Colin Hurst
Norm,
If you have an FCD Version 1.1 try the following program.
http://www.sdr-radio.com/Download/tabid/178/language/en-US/Default.aspx
Click on the July 1st 2012 download for version 1058.
It has Doppler correction and is an excellent piece of software.
73
Colin VK5HI.

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Lizeth Norman
Sent: Sunday, 31 March 2013 06:28
To: lt,amsat-bb@amsat.orggt,
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: cw decoding software

Had to figure it out for myself!!! Not simple. There are actually two pieces
of software to be used in my situation.
Have an FCD v1.1. Am going to use dk3wn's small fcd sat control program to
control the rx freq, if I can get it to run this time, and I think fldigi to
decode the cw on the audio datastream.
probably because it's free.
Will keep the list posted.
Norm n3ykf


On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:18 PM, PE0SAT | Amateur Radio
pe0...@vgnet.nlwrote:

 MixW is doing a great job when decoding CW.

 Give it a try

 73 Jan PE0SAT


 On 30-03-2013 17:46, Lizeth Norman wrote:

 Hi all,
 My cw is pretty poor. Not up to snuff to copy the hex character 
 groups of most telemetry streams.
 Am looking to use the sound card in a computer to decode cw telemetry.

 What are people using?
 Thanks,
 Norm n3ykf
 __**_
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
 Subscription settings: 
 http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bbhttp://amsat.org/mailman
 /listinfo/amsat-bb


 --
 With regards PE0SAT
 Internet web-page http://www.pe0sat.vgnet.nl/

 __**_
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: 
 http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bbhttp://amsat.org/mailman/
 listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Xatcobeo Pass 0922utc 14th February

2012-02-14 Thread Colin Hurst
CW only sending xatcobeo 8.24v -137dbm 33c

 

Colin VK5HI.

 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 Telemetry

2011-11-25 Thread Colin Hurst
Carl,
You are there with 3862 packets.
73
Colin VK5HI


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Guy Mallery
Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2011 11:06
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 Telemetry

 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:48:11 -0500
 From: Carl Rimmer W8KRF w8...@w8krf.net
 
 How do I know whether or not the data I have been submitting has in 
 fact been received?  I noticed my call sign does not appear in the 
 list on DK3WN SatBlog and I am sure I have submitted more frames than 
 some of those listed.  Up until now, I was not interested in a 
 certificate but after seeing a copy of one, I would now like to get one.
I have all my
 CSV files so I can send them in, if necessary.   I also have several wav 
 files of the Voice transmissions.  I have SSTV images and wav files 
 posted on my website at www.w8krf.net.  Is there something else I need 
 to do to get the certificate?
 
 73,
 
 http://www.dk3wn.info/p/
 *Carl W8KRF*

Hi Carl,

   Sure, You're in there (along with the 250 others...):
http://www.dk3wn.info/files/arissat/submitters.txt

GL

73,
Guy - W6MSU
http://www.twitter.com/w6msu

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: OSCAR or not OSCAR ?

2011-11-12 Thread Colin Hurst
Stefan,
I wholeheartedly support your comments.
We made a conscious decision many years ago, that in retirement, we would
support the Cubesat Program by downloading their telemetry, to give
something back to the hobby.
Being licensed nigh on 50 years ago and being part of the Amateur Satellite
Service for most of those, I would like to think that these young Cubesat
designers may become the Amateur Satellite builders of the future, but I
doubt I that may be around to reap their rewards. Then again I have been
mistaken before.
Personally I do not care if a satellite has an OSCAR moniker, we just
download whatever telemetry is available from the current Cubesat satellites
to assist them in their ongoing analyses.

This is not the first time this has been raised, as I remember a few years
back, Bob Bruninga raising the topic in respect to one of the satellites he
was involved in.

Best regards,
Colin VK5HI.





-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Stefan Wagener
Sent: Sunday, 13 November 2011 13:14
To: William Leijenaar
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: OSCAR or not OSCAR ?

Thanks,

Cubesats working within the amateur radio frequency spectrum are commanded
by licensed ham radio operators with the same rights and requirements as all
of us. Many of them use the frequencies to downlink vital satellite
information as well as scientific experiment data. All of this is well
within the amateur radio service rules and a very positive contribution by
our community to science and education.
Your question are valid and they need to be addressed in a constructive,
supportive environment where the community works together. I would encourage
you attend one or more of the many annual cubists conferences and engage
these folks. You certainly have enough to offer!

Now having said that, cubesats are a wonderful addition, not a threat and
show the diversity of our community. I am always amazed by the ignorance
displayed and self-proclaimed expert label used by some as an argument to
deny parts of our community their right to use small satellites with amateur
radio on board. Interestingly, none of the amateur radio operators working
with cubesats have ever argued against HEOs or denied the rest of us that
right by questioning how and why we use the spectrum!

Fortunately, AMSAT NA and AMSAT UK and many others have recognized the
potential and the inclusiveness of the community.

Enough said,

Stefan, VE4NSA



On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 3:34 PM, William Leijenaar pe1...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi Stefan,

 So the answer on my question if my 433MHz toy car, when I put it into
space, can get an OSCAR number is YES!
 According to the AMSAT website you mentioned of course... :-P
 - My question was not specific if these satellites can or can't get an
OSCAR number.
 My intention was more if they should be scheduled as a ham-sat (and with
that using ham frequencies).

 I would recommend you to read the following IARU website!
 http://www.iaru.org/satellite/prospective.html
 (especially section VI. OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES) It says the following:

 Organisations building satellites should compare their mission plans 
 to the requirements of the amateur-satellite service. Then, they 
 should determine if it is possible to comply with the requirements of 
 the amateur-satellite service or if licensing and operation should be 
 in some other radio service which is more consistent with the nature 
 and requirements of the mission.

 A. The purposes of an amateur satellite should be:
 (1) To provide communication resources for the general amateur radio 
 community and/or
 (2) To conduct technical investigations in all respects consistent with
the Radio Regulations. [See RR S1.56 and RR S1.57.]

 I have great doubts with many off those CubeSats, if they comply to number
(1)
 The only communication resources they provide is for themselves by a cheap
downlink system, by using hams to receive data for them. This is not for the
general amateur radio community as mentioned in number (1)...

 The option they have is to go to some other radio service which is more
consistent with the nature and requirements of the mission.

 73 de PE1RAH, William




Would recommend reading the info on AMSAT's website!
 http://www.amsat.org/amsat/amsat-na/oscar.html 
Stefan, VE4NSA
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions 

[amsat-bb] Re: Has the ARISSat-1 CW-2 frequency shifted?

2011-08-31 Thread Colin Hurst
Alan,
For the last week or so we have been observing it come out of eclipse.
I have noted at worst, a very slow 40Hz shift as ARISSAT1 warms up.
I update the TLE's every day for ARISSAT1 (possibly an overkill) but it is
always within +/-20 Hz at AOS that you quoted.
73
Colin VK5HI.

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Alan P. Biddle
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2011 07:01
To: 'Ronald G. Parsons'; 'AMSAT-BB'
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Has the ARISSat-1 CW-2 frequency shifted?

Ron,

I have been catching a couple of passes a day for TLM since deployment.
After the initial tweaks, is has been consistently within +/ 20 Hz of the
predicted value.  I haven't seen a large jump, though I did tweak it down 20
Hz yesterday to refine my initial values.

73s,

Alan
WA4SCA



-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Ronald G. Parsons
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:15 PM
To: AMSAT-BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Has the ARISSat-1 CW-2 frequency shifted?

A couple days ago, I noticed that to get a 500 Hz signal for CW-2 (nominally
145.9190 MHz) to decode the BPSK-1000 signal, I had to change the
unDoppler-shifted frequency on my USB receiver from 145.918500 MHz to
145.918280 MHz, a change of 220 Hz.

This new value have been consistent over a couple days of careful watching.
I don't believe it to be an error in the keps or clock as it has been true
both at the beginning and end of the pass. My receiver has been on for over
a month, so unless a component changed value suddenly, 

Has ARISSat-1 changed, has my radio changed, or does only my hairdresser
know for sure?

Ron W5RKN
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters

2011-08-17 Thread Colin Hurst
Alan,
The last KURSK segment I received were 741858 on the 12th August.
My educated guess is that because ARISSAT1 is resetting during every eclipse 
the KURSK experiment is not able to obtain the MET and use it as a file name.
Hence it is defaulting to 944. 
73
Colin VK5HI


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf 
Of Alan Cresswell
Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2011 05:49
To: 'Ben Bishop'; 'AMSAT'
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters

Hi all,
According to my logs the last Kursk frame I received on the 0405UT pass on 12 
August was 720206.  The first Kursk frame on the 12 August 2035UT pass was 944. 
The interesting thing was that it apparently treated this as a valid frame.  
i.e it  accumulated and combined all five parts.  All Kursk frames from that 
point onward have been treated as exists and ignored.

2011/08/12-20:36:44 Received Kursk frame 5 with MET=944 len=48. Do we have 
C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5?
2011/08/12-20:36:44 No. Saving to C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 Checking for all five parts.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.2: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.4: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 Combining KURSK parts into 
C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.EXP.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 Done combining.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame 
type E
2011/08/12-20:36:50 Received telemetry frame with MET=1589 Len=371
2011/08/12-20:36:50 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame 
type T
2011/08/12-20:36:58 Received Kursk frame 1 with MET=944 len=516. Do we have 
C:\\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1?
2011/08/12-20:36:58 Yes. C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1 exists.
2011/08/12-20:36:58 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame 
type E

73
Alan
ZL2BX


 

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf 
Of Ben Bishop
Sent: Wednesday, 17 August 2011 14:36
To: AMSAT
Cc: n...@lavabit.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re:ARISSat-1 – telemetry top submitters

G'day Jerry,

I don't think there's anything wrong with your ARISSatTLM, as I've
only been getting KURSK-944s since the 13th.

My last 'proper good' experiment frame was:
2011/08/11-08:12:48 Received Kursk frame 2 with MET=650105 len=516.

Satellite MET around then was:
2011/08/11-08:12:54 Received telemetry frame with MET=653412 Len=371


I missed the 12th, and on the 13th the telemetry and experiment MET had reset:
2011/08/13-04:34:16 Received telemetry frame with MET=2514 Len=371

2011/08/13-04:34:24 Received Kursk frame 3 with MET=944 len=516. Do we
have C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3?
2011/08/13-04:34:24 No. Saving to
C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3.


And from that point on, I have only received KURSK-944 frames (which
are still auto-forwarding).

2011/08/17-05:30:04 Received Kursk frame 5 with MET=944 len=48. Do we
have C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5?
2011/08/17-05:30:04 Yes.
C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5 exists.


73,
Ben VK2FBRB


On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:08 PM,  n...@lavabit.com wrote:
 A question for all, for a few days now my ARISSatTLM has been reporting
 the Kursk as being (I believe, I'm not at home to check right now)
 something like Kursk-944.x or perhaps it was Kursk-444.x (some real low

 perhaps hung up on that and needs a restart?  Anyone else, what are the
 latest Kursk frames that you are seeing?

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3840 - Release Date: 08/17/11


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters

2011-08-17 Thread Colin Hurst
Alan,
I noted that yesterday as well.
73
Colin.

-Original Message-
From: Alan Cresswell [mailto:alancressw...@xtra.co.nz] 
Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2011 11:16
To: 'Colin Hurst'; 'Ben Bishop'; 'AMSAT'
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters

Hi Colin,

Yes, the other interesting thing is that recently ARISsat has been coming out 
of eclipse not too long before the start of my morning passes.  On those 
occasions I have received anything up to 19 consecutive data frames (or about 3 
minutes) before I receive the first Kursk frame.  

73
Alan
ZL2BX

-Original Message-
From: Colin Hurst [mailto:cjhu...@bigpond.net.au] 
Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2011 01:21
To: 'Alan Cresswell'; 'Ben Bishop'; 'AMSAT'
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters

Alan,
The last KURSK segment I received were 741858 on the 12th August.
My educated guess is that because ARISSAT1 is resetting during every eclipse 
the KURSK experiment is not able to obtain the MET and use it as a file name.
Hence it is defaulting to 944. 
73
Colin VK5HI


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf 
Of Alan Cresswell
Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2011 05:49
To: 'Ben Bishop'; 'AMSAT'
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 telemetry top submitters

Hi all,
According to my logs the last Kursk frame I received on the 0405UT pass on 12 
August was 720206.  The first Kursk frame on the 12 August 2035UT pass was 944. 
The interesting thing was that it apparently treated this as a valid frame.  
i.e it  accumulated and combined all five parts.  All Kursk frames from that 
point onward have been treated as exists and ignored.

2011/08/12-20:36:44 Received Kursk frame 5 with MET=944 len=48. Do we have 
C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5?
2011/08/12-20:36:44 No. Saving to C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 Checking for all five parts.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.2: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.4: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5: OK.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 Combining KURSK parts into 
C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.EXP.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 Done combining.
2011/08/12-20:36:44 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame 
type E
2011/08/12-20:36:50 Received telemetry frame with MET=1589 Len=371
2011/08/12-20:36:50 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame 
type T
2011/08/12-20:36:58 Received Kursk frame 1 with MET=944 len=516. Do we have 
C:\\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1?
2011/08/12-20:36:58 Yes. C:\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.1 exists.
2011/08/12-20:36:58 Forwarding from ZL2BX to telemetry.arissattlm.org frame 
type E

73
Alan
ZL2BX


 

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf 
Of Ben Bishop
Sent: Wednesday, 17 August 2011 14:36
To: AMSAT
Cc: n...@lavabit.com
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re:ARISSat-1 – telemetry top submitters

G'day Jerry,

I don't think there's anything wrong with your ARISSatTLM, as I've
only been getting KURSK-944s since the 13th.

My last 'proper good' experiment frame was:
2011/08/11-08:12:48 Received Kursk frame 2 with MET=650105 len=516.

Satellite MET around then was:
2011/08/11-08:12:54 Received telemetry frame with MET=653412 Len=371


I missed the 12th, and on the 13th the telemetry and experiment MET had reset:
2011/08/13-04:34:16 Received telemetry frame with MET=2514 Len=371
.
2011/08/13-04:34:24 Received Kursk frame 3 with MET=944 len=516. Do we
have C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3?
2011/08/13-04:34:24 No. Saving to
C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.3.


And from that point on, I have only received KURSK-944 frames (which
are still auto-forwarding).

2011/08/17-05:30:04 Received Kursk frame 5 with MET=944 len=48. Do we
have C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5?
2011/08/17-05:30:04 Yes.
C:\Users\Ben\Desktop\ARISSatTLM\Kursk\KURSK-944.5 exists.


73,
Ben VK2FBRB


On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:08 PM,  n...@lavabit.com wrote:
 A question for all, for a few days now my ARISSatTLM has been reporting
 the Kursk as being (I believe, I'm not at home to check right now)
 something like Kursk-944.x or perhaps it was Kursk-444.x (some real low

 perhaps hung up on that and needs a restart?  Anyone else, what are the
 latest Kursk frames that you are seeing?

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3840 - Release Date: 08/17/11


___
Sent via

[amsat-bb] 2317utc Pass over VK

2011-08-14 Thread Colin Hurst
The 2317UTC 14th August 2011 pass over VK, was Continuous for the whole pass
on High Power

Last frame shows Battery Voltage at 35.977

73

Colin VK5HI

 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ARRISAT1 pass over VK 0017utc

2011-08-13 Thread Colin Hurst
ARISSAT1 was on for the whole pass.
Strangely no 1000 baud packets were decoded, which is a disappointment.
CW copied is as follows.

hi this is arissat1 rs01s ct1xi phi met 25 m ihu +41 c cp +47 c bat 36.09 v
-12 ma rf 369 ma 
hi this is arissat1 rs01s ct1zx phi met 27 m ihu +41 c cp +48 c bat 36.05 v
+0 ma rf 317 ma
hi this is arissat1 rs01s dj4zc phi met 28 m ihu +41 c cp +48 c bat 36.13 v
+0 ma rf 370 ma
hi this is arissat1 rs01s f6bvp phi met 30 m ihu +41 c cp +48 c bat 36.05 v
+0 ma rf 291 ma
hi this is


73
Colin VK5HI

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ARISSat1 2338UTC 12th August 2011 Pass over VK

2011-08-12 Thread Colin Hurst
1000 baud telemetry showing


Clock has been reset

Last frame 1565 seconds

Voltage 35.549

LOW POWER

 

From memory copied 8 frames from AOS then it went off (low voltage).

When it came back on the 1000 baud sounded very raucous and was difficult
copy, just 2 frames.

CW copy was good.

 

73

Colin VK5HI

 

 

 

 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ARISSat 0116 UTC 13th August

2011-08-12 Thread Colin Hurst
Reasonably confident pass was on for full pass on HIGH POWER.

7 Degree pass passing behind an 80 foot gum tree.

Managed 16 frames until beam went through 180 degrees, which is good
considering copy with other sats is not good behind that gum tree. Copied
continuously till the beam started to rotated. LOS was at end of rotation

73

Colin VK5HI

 

 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Telemetry from ARISSat 0116 UTC 13th August

2011-08-12 Thread Colin Hurst
Telemetry captured using parallel decoder (CWGet) during the 0116 UTC pass.

 

-16 ma rf 431 ma hi this is arissat1 rs01s f6bvp phi met 31 m ihu +37 c cp
+26 c bat 35.78 v +4 ma rf 460 ma hi this is arissat1 rs01s g3ior phi met 33
m ihu +38 c cp +26 c bat 35.65 v -8 ma rf 435 ma hi this is arissat1 rs01s

 

73

Colin VK5HI

 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ARISSat over VK

2011-08-11 Thread Colin Hurst
ARISSat was in low power mode during the pass commencing at 0628UTC in full
sunlight.

 

73

Colin VK5HI

 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ARISSat Telemetry 0529utc 12th August 2011

2011-08-11 Thread Colin Hurst
ARISSat in Low power mode, 45 minutes after exiting eclipse.

Managed to catch the following telemetry, alas no 1000 baud telemetry.

 

su +36 c cp +28 c bat 35.86 v +12  ma

 

470 ma hi this is arissat1 rs01s

 

73

Colin VK5HI

 

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: New Control Software

2010-02-19 Thread Colin Hurst
Angelo,
Further to Drew's comments I would confirm the 1268.703 uplink.
One further hint besides deviation and frequency, is to set the TXDelay to
1000 milliseconds.
This will ensure all the switches or relays in the system have settled
prior to issuing the uplink packet.
If you find this to be the issue, reduce the TXDelay in 50 or 100
milli-second increments till you have reliable acks.

When AO-51 was flipped and favoured the Southern Hemisphere I was able to
get acks from horizon to horizon and rarely did it double request. I use 25
watts output via about 12 metres of 5/8 inch hard-line to a 15 turn
helical.
With your system you should do just fine.

The other issue that Drew commented on was deviation.
In the absence of test gear, a method I have used, is to listen to the
audio level on the downlink, then preferably compare your TX signal level
in the same Transceiver, but a separate RX will suffice. It will be very
apparent if you are under or over deviating.
Not very scientific, but when you have limited test gear, its a way
forward.
73
Colin VK5HI.

 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org]on
 Behalf Of Angelo Glorioso
 Sent: Friday, 19 February 2010 14:07
 To: Andrew Glasbrenner
 Cc: AMSATBBS
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Control Software


 I appreciate the helpful hints. I will try it again once it comes back
 up on 1.2.

  Again, thanks for all your efforts in keeping AO-51 one of the leading
 satellites to use.

  My hat off to you!! :-)


 - Original Message -
 From: Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com
 To: Angelo Glorioso n5...@hotmail.com
 Cc: AMSATBBS amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New Control Software


  Angelo Glorioso wrote:
 
  I see! As for low usage of the BBS, well, most of the folks that used
  GO-32
  either don't have 1.2g or have not been able to get into the
 AO-51 BBS
  at all
  since the new configuration was put in place. I have been unable to
  use AO-51 BBS with
  a 70 watts brick on 1.2g, a directives system 23 cm RHCP 12
 turn helix
  14.5 dBic gain,
  1/4 inch heliax coaxial cable after many days of trying. I can into
  AO-51 using voice with
  no problem. I know the frequency is a little off and have tried
  adjusting but no luck.
 
  I just wonder if the BBS was in V/U mode how many more users would
  show up.
  Can a schedule mode be requested for the BBS for V/U???
 
   Oh well, as you said, it is a low priority.
 
  V/U BBS was discontinued because it interfered with control of the
  satellite, so no, we won't be scheduling it without the
 upgrade even if
  requested. We have many L/U users on several continents, but it does
  require a very good station. The equipment you describe should be
  adequate...it's similar to what I use. The deviation and frequency is
  very important to be successful. My uplink is about 3 khz high than
  listed. Since you have an excellent L/U analog uplink, I'm
 confident the
  devil is in the details with your digital setup.
 
  We've had a lot of other challenges to keep AO-51 running and healthy
  this year and last. I'm sorry if you don't agree with our
 priorities. I
  was working on a more comprehensive explanation to the separate
  identical email you sent this morning. You'll have to excuse
 me if I was
  a little kurt in my answer after you pressed the question via -bb.
 
  73, Drew KO4MA
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
 satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: How to add Moon Keps to SatPC32

2010-02-17 Thread Colin Hurst
Michael,
From memory there is a limit on the number of Groups.
I suggest you select a Group that you do not use and select the Moon within
that group.
73
Colin VK5HI.

 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org]on
 Behalf Of Dale Hershberger
 Sent: Thursday, 18 February 2010 09:33
 To: mlengrues...@aol.com
 Cc: amsat bbs
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: How to add Moon Keps to SatPC32


 mlengrues...@aol.com wrote:
  Hi all.
  to work with planets in main SatPC32 with footprints, create
 this 2 files
  below.
 
  select in main menue  bottom satellite , group , planets  ok
  and work like normal satellites
 
 
  C:\Dokumente und
  Einstellungen\admin\Anwendungsdaten\SatPC32\Kepler\moon.txt
 
  C:\dokuments and adjustments\admin\userdata\SatPC32\Keps\moon.txt
 
 
  C:\Dokumente und
 Einstellungen\admin\Anwendungsdaten\SatPC32\planets.SAT
 
  C:\dokuments and adjustments\admin\userdata\SatPC32\planets.SAT
 
 
 
  moon.text file:
 
  MOON
  1 0U 0A   10019.90529622  .   0-0  0-0 0  0004
  2 0  25.1631 348.5977 0637000  142.8591 221.8486 00.0366009966
 
 
  planets.SAT file:
 
  MOON
  +
 
 
 
  73
  Michael, DD5ER
  Amsat - DL
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of
 the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
 satellite program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 Hi,
 I have tried to follow your instructions and am unsuccessful.
 I can get into satellite, group, but there is now Planets.
 What am not doing correctly?

 Dale/kl7xj
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
 satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 reception report

2009-12-06 Thread Colin Hurst
Reid,
I refer you to ANS-340 posted recently to the -bb.
The FLIP experiment has been a success.
Additionally,
A number of positives and negatives have resulted from the experiment.
Positives.
AO-51 has increased its spin rate.
Reception in the Southern Hemisphere is much improved.
Negatives
The antennae are not favouring the Northern Hemisphere, hence signals are
down.
The flip  has introduced a significant precession component that is
affecting reception in the Northern Hemisphere, through fading and
polarisation changes.

The Command Team are waiting for AO-51 to stabilise, prior to executing
another FLIP, to return AO-51 to its normal attitude.

73
Colin VK5HI.
Member - AO51 Control Team.



 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org]on
 Behalf Of w4upd
 Sent: Sunday, 6 December 2009 09:11
 To: amsat-bb
 Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-51 reception report


 Since the changes made to AO-51 the other day, it appears I am having
 more difficulty in copying the bird than others on this list server.
 Tonight during the 22:22UTC pass which was at an maximum elevation of 60
 degress I was not able to hear the bird as well as I have in the past.
 The signals had more fade and were about 1/3 of what they use to be.
 Again, my present antennas have a lot to be desired as I am using a 2
 meter homebrew ground plane for the 435.300 reception. Before the
 changes, this worked reasonable well, now it appears I'll need to do
 something different and improve the reception antenna. I am assuming the
 downlink power is still reasonable.

 Just a report of how I seem to fair (or not) with the recent orientation
 changes of AO-51.

 Reid, W4UPD

 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
 satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 S band off

2009-11-02 Thread Colin Hurst
Luc,
I am not too sure what you are attempting to imply in your post.

First up there are 8 members of the operations group.
Their task is to analyse the numerous requests that are submitted to
ao-51modes at amsat.org and prepare a schedule in conjunction with the
command stations. On occasions it becomes nigh on impossible to facilitate
all the requests, so some are held over to the following month.
As you are aware that schedule is posted to the Amsat-NA site at
http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/echo/CTNews.php
OR
If there is a delay in posting to the Amsat-NA site, a post is made to the
amsat-bb, which Drew did on this occasion.

In respect to command stations there are currently two, plus and one in
training.
Operating a command station is a dedicated and responsible task.
It also requires a commitment to be able to drop tasks at hand and attend
to daily commanding tasks and analysis, not to mention the training to
become a command station.

Your assertion that if Drew is not available, then the World stops is
totally incorrect.
In Drew's post that you have misunderstood, is that he was responsible for
executing the new mode changes. He stated that he encountered an equipment
problem and the remainder of the tasks would be executed over subsequent
passes. This was a totally responsible action on his behalf. The tasks that
were not fulfilled did not place AO-51 in jeopardy.

What you overlooked is that the Operations Group and the Command Stations
are all dedicated volunteers, and most work for a living. However we do
work as a team, day in, day out.

Best regards,
Colin VK5HI
Member AO-51 Operations Group.


 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org]on
 Behalf Of Luc Leblanc
 Sent: Monday, 2 November 2009 19:41
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Cc: eu-am...@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 S band off


 On 1 Nov 2009 at 19:44, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:

 Date sent:Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:44:38 -0500
 From: Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com
 Subject:  [amsat-bb]  AO-51 S band off
 To:   Amsat-BB amsat-bb@amsat.org, AO51 Modes
 ao51-mo...@amsat.org

  The S band transmitter is now off, and 435.150 telemetry is
 back on. The
  L uplink is not yet back on for the PBBS. I had some temporary
 equipment
  problems here and instead of risking getting halfway through
 some steps
  and failing, I am stretching the mode change out over a few passes.
 
  435.300 is back up to over 500 mw.
 
  The L uplink for the PBBS should be back on tomorrow, and the new
  schedule should be posted by tomorrow night. Sorry for the delay.
 
  73, Drew KO4MA

 As we can read on the AMSAT-NA web site there is an operation
 group who is supposed to create the monthly schedule for the
 satellite. AO-
 51 But who is on this command team? Why it take's on paper 5
 folks to create a schedule? Is theses same folks cannot also be able to
 command the satellite? It will reduced the work load for Drew as
 he seems to be the only one to cope with the all work load and
 if he's not
 available the world stops until he can resume his work on the satellite.

 Here is what it is written on AMSAT-NA web page

 The AO-51 Operations Group is made up of Amsat Members who are
 also AO-51 users. The Operations Group works with the Command Team to
 create the monthly schedule for the satellite. AO-51 Operations
 Group is KO4MA, N8MH, OZ1MY, VK5HI, WA4SXM, N8BBQ, KD8CAO.



 PS. A team is normally made with 2 and more:)


 -


 Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
 Skype VE2DWE
 www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
 DSTAR urcall VE2DWE
 WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE


 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
 satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: [ao51-modes] AO-51 S band off

2009-11-01 Thread Colin Hurst
Drew,
Thanks for that.
Better to be safe than sorry.
73
Colin VK5HI.


 -Original Message-
 From: ao51-modes-boun...@amsat.org
 [mailto:ao51-modes-boun...@amsat.org]on Behalf Of Andrew Glasbrenner
 Sent: Monday, 2 November 2009 11:15
 To: Amsat-BB; AO51 Modes
 Subject: [ao51-modes] AO-51 S band off


 The S band transmitter is now off, and 435.150 telemetry is back on. The
 L uplink is not yet back on for the PBBS. I had some temporary equipment
 problems here and instead of risking getting halfway through some steps
 and failing, I am stretching the mode change out over a few passes.

 435.300 is back up to over 500 mw.

 The L uplink for the PBBS should be back on tomorrow, and the new
 schedule should be posted by tomorrow night. Sorry for the delay.

 73, Drew KO4MA
 ___
 Via the AO51-modes mailing list courtesy of AMSAT-NA
 ao51-mo...@amsat.org
 http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/ao51-modes

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: CP6 Decoding

2009-06-16 Thread Colin Hurst
Jim,
Mike DK3WN and I have done some work evaluating CP6 Decoding.
Like you we have difficulty decoding CP6 with hardware TNC's.
Best performance is to use MixW, with audio from the data port.
We have passed this information to the CP6 Team who are investigating the
TNC Header that CP6 sends.
It is also important that you tune the lower tone to 1200 Hertz.
In my case I use Spectran to monitor the audio.
I will forward you a small .wav file separately that has two good
decodeable bursts that you can use to evaluate your system.
Best regards,
Colin VK5HI.


 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org]on
 Behalf Of James Denneny
 Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2009 00:53
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] CP6 Decoding


 I am troubleshooting a CP-6 decoding problem.  I have excellent copy on
 CP-6.  Keps are good.  Signal is strong but no decode.



 Equipment is IC-910H and AEA DSP2232.  I checked everything out
 with APRS FM
 copy on 144.390 using hyperterminal - good copy in FM packet.



 PC  TNC use com 3 - 9600,8.N,1 to communicate. PC flowcontrol
 is hardware.
 DSP2232 is set for MOD p12 (p1 1200bps). I do not see any TNC
 lockup during
 data bursts.  Radio is set for LSB when tracking CP-6.



 I even tried using hyperterminal connection in lieu of CP-6
 decoder.  NADA



 What am I missing?



 Jim

 K7EG



 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
 satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb