[amsat-bb] W1AW/8 Ohio Satellite Operation

2014-08-19 Thread john
K8YSE will be operating as W1AW/8 beginning at 0001z 20 August 2014
on SO-50 as well as the linear birds.  There was no satellite operation
during
the previous Ohio week in the first half of 2014.  This will be the last
chance
to work this special event station in Ohio.  I will operate on as many passes
as my schedule permits.  This will include FO-29 and AO-7B passes that
cover Europe.  Hope to work you.
73,
John K8YSE

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions 
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of 
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna for sale

2014-08-12 Thread John / NS1Z

Selling my satellite antennas priced at 1/2 original selling price.

M2 440-18  $85
M2 2M9SSB $110
Directive systems DSE2345LY $95

These are local pickup in EL99 or Ocala, FL area.



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] AO-73 Telemetry Question

2014-08-12 Thread John Becker
I will not suggest that you move. But did you check the restrictions 
before moving there?

Seems a no brainier for any ham.

W0JAB
On 8/12/2014 4:18 PM, Thomas Doyle wrote: IN PART

Due to deed restrictions no outside antennas are allowed


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] AO-73 Telemetry Question

2014-08-12 Thread John Becker

it was not a answer but rather a question.
Plain and very simple.


On 8/12/2014 5:02 PM, Thomas Doyle wrote:

John,

Thanks so much for that answer.  It was a big help.

73 W9KE


On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, John Becker w0...@big-river.net 
mailto:w0...@big-river.net wrote:


I will not suggest that you move. But did you check the
restrictions before moving there?
Seems a no brainier for any ham.

W0JAB
On 8/12/2014 4:18 PM, Thomas Doyle wrote: IN PART

Due to deed restrictions no outside antennas are allowed




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Grid Map Updates - CQ Europe/South America

2014-08-09 Thread John Papay

Thanks to the following operators who sent updates and/or
provided data for a new gridmap on my satellite website.

W0DHB
N8HM
KB1PVH
WA7ETH
AC0RA
W5PFG
WD9EWK
KO4MA
PD4KH
F6GLJ

These maps show that there continues to be activity on the birds
despite there being fewer to work through.  I'm especially happy
that we now have two gridmaps from Europe.  Grid maps from European
operators are always welcome.  We could use some from Op's in South
America as well.

If you are looking for a rare grid to operate from, these maps will
help you make a selection. It can be fun to operate on the other end
of a pileup.

Please continue to update your maps.  If you haven't created a map yet
please consider doing so.  If you want me to create it for you just send
two .txt files, one with your confirmed grids and one with the grids
you have WORKED BUT NOT CONFIRMED, one 4 character grid per line.

No amount of grids worked is too small.
Every grid list started with the first grid confirmed!

Website:  http://www.papays.com/sat

73,
John K8YSE




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SO-50 QSO's

2014-08-03 Thread John Belstner
I heard lots of new calls on SO-50 today and I really wanted to give them a 
shout back and say welcome.
Unfortunately, that's about all I heard was a bunch of folks throwing their 
call sign out.
Is there some transmit only mode that I'm not aware of?   ;-)

On a more serious note, try to hear the downlink first before transmitting.  It 
reduces QRM and greatly increases your chances of making a QSO!

Thanks and 73,
John W9EN

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] satellite grid map reqeust

2014-08-03 Thread John Papay

Several years ago I started posting grid maps on my
website so that grid chasers and grid expeditioners
could get an idea of what was needed by active satellite
operators.  However, some of these maps have not been
updated in quite a while.  And there are many new grid
chasers that have not submitted their maps for posting.

If you have a map that is currently posted and has not
been updated recently please send me an updated map(s)
or just send me a text file of the grids you have confirmed,
one 4 character grid square per line And another text file
of grids you have worked but are not yet confirmed using
the same format of one grid per line.  I will generate the
maps from these files and you can download and print the
resulting map that will be posted.

If you have never submitted a map, please consider doing so.
Knowing who has what is very helpful to potential grid
expeditioners and it is a nice way to keep track of what you
need and where that grid is located with respect to grids
you already have.  It's a lot easier for someone in a grid
adjacent to one you need to go there compared to someone who
might live hundreds of miles away doing the same.  If you
send me your grid lists as specified above, I will generate
the maps for you.

Here's a list maps on my website and the date they were updated:

AA4QE 5/11/2012
AC0RA 8/26/2013
CO6CBF 11/22/2011
K6YK 4/26/2011
KB1PVH UNKNOWN
KB1RVT 9/6/2013
KB9RID 1/8/2011
KC0YBM 12/31/2011
KD8CAO 10/8/2011
KD8KSN 8/2/2011
KI6YAA 11/30/2010
KK5DO 4/21/2012
KO4MA 10/28/2013
N5AFV 2/25/2012
VA3OR 3/22/2012
W5PFG 9/16/2012
WA4NVM 2/27/2012
WD9EWK 3/4/2012

Info on how to make the maps is on the grid map page:
http://www.papays.com/sat/gridmaps/gridmaps.html

73,
John K8YSE

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Current Launch Costs From Spaceflight

2014-08-01 Thread John Becker

Can some explain to me and others the big deal about cube sats?
I just dont get it.

John
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] AO-7 CW Telemetry

2014-07-31 Thread John Papay

It is very rare to hear clear CW from the AO-7B
telemetry beacon around 145.972.  Most of the time
there is no beacon at all.  Sometimes there is
jibberish.  Usually the signal is very weak.

With AO-7 going through eclipse on every orbit, the
satellite can come out of eclipse in different modes/
options.  Recently there have been times where the
beacon has transmitted clear CW over North America,
something I have not heard over the years.

According to the DK3WN website, there was some cw
telemetry back in 2002 when the satellite was discovered
to be working again.  And there was some discussion about
what is valid data based on the last 3 digits sent in the
24 group block of data.  If the value is 649, 650, or 651,
the data is likely valid.

I first heard the image of the cw signal around 958.  It was
so loud I thought it was a valid user at first.  But since
the cw was all numbers I tuned up to the beacon frequency and
there the signal was louder than anything I have ever heard
on AO-7.  It took a while for me to get the recorder running
but I managed to capture some data.  After playing it back I
found that there was only one block of data where the last
group was valid, a 649.  Other later transmissions were loud
but the data was much different and the last group was not
correct.

I couldn't locate a telemetry calculator at first so I decided to
build one on Excel using the formulae provided by DK3WN.  The
data follows:

AO-7B Telemetry 24July2014   2318UTC
POS  ParameterRange Raw  Real

1A Total Solar Array Current  0-3000ma  171 2094.5ma
1B +X Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  193  110ma
1C -X Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  157  830ma
1D +Y Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  108  1810ma
2A -Y Solar Panel Current 0-2000ma  286  250ma
2B RF Power Out 70/2  0-8watts  204 7.3728W
2C 24 Hour Clock Time 0-1440min 201 15.16min
2D Batt Ch/Discharge Current-2000/+2000 207  -1720ma
3A Batt Voltage   6.5-16.4  361  12.7V
3B Half Batt Voltage  0-10v 397   9.7V
3C Batt Charge Reg #1 0-15v 340   6V
3D Batt Temperature -30 to +50C 300   95.8C
4A Baseplate Temperature-30 to +50C 446   27.72C
4B PA Temperature 2/10  -30 to +50C 401   94.32C
4C +X Face Temperature  -30 to +50C 430   51.4C
4D +Z Face Temperature  -30 to +50C 498  -49.24C
5A PA Temp 70/2 -30 to +50C 545   29.2C
5B PA Emitter Current 2/100-1167ma  502   92.84MA
5C Module Temp 70/2 -30 to +50C 543   32.16C
5D Inst. SW Regulator 0-93ma527   33.14MA
6A RF Power Out 2/10 0-10,000mw 606   23.076MW
6B RF Power Out 435   0-1000mw  643   219.9MW
6C RF Power Out 2304  0-100mw   679   255.881MW
6D Midrange Telemetry Cal 0-.5v 649   0.49

There are some values which are obviously not correct.
Some sensors might not be working properly since some
values are out of range.  However, the solar panel numbers
might be somewhat correct.  I wouldn't doubt it if the
transmitter was putting out 7 watts at the time.

Perhaps there are those who are familiar with the AO-7
telemetry that can make some sense out of the data.
Unfortunately we don't have multiple blocks of good data
to compare readings.  Maybe some have recorded recent CW
data and can find some good blocks that can be shared here.

The data was copied on my Arizona remote and Skype was being
used to listen.  But I am fairly confident that the cw copied
is correct.

73,
John K8YSE






___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Yaesu G-5500 AZ/EL rotor for sale

2014-07-27 Thread John / NS1Z
This rotor is less than a year old. It works perfectly and is in very good 
condition. Works with any
of the ST series interfaces (ST-1 and ST-3). Selling the rotor, control box, 
Satellite serial port interfaces ST-3 and SAT668.

It really is Plug and Play

$450 plus shipping

Thanks

-Original Message- 
From: Phil Karn

Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 1:12 AM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] going digital

On 07/22/2014 07:27 AM, JoAnne Maenpaa wrote:


When thinking of projects to enter into the digital communication
world plan on building or buying that digital interface to connect
your radio to the soundcard.


Soundcard interfaces to existing voice radios were a good start, but
it's time to move past them. I've designed several modulation and coding
schemes to fit existing radios, and their inherently limited bandwidth
is a major pain. For ARISSat-1 I agreed to cram everything through a SSB
filter, and I'm not doing that again.

Not only does the narrow bandwidth often limit the data rate to much
less than what the link budget could actually support, but it enormously
aggravates the Doppler problem. It doesn't help that there are no
industry-wide standards for SSB phase response or computer tuning, or
that every time you retune one (which is often) there is a poorly
characterized phase jump.

Doppler is much easier to handle at high data rates because it's the
ratio of the symbol rate to the Doppler that matters, not the absolute
amount of Doppler.

Now that we have a variety of pure digital radio front ends to choose
from, it's time to set aside the voice radio + soundcard model. Not only
do the SDRs support wider bandwidths but they tend to be considerably
smaller, lighter and easier to work with in software. Some, like the
Funcube dongle, are even considerably cheaper than conventional radios.

--Phil

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Lituanicasat-1 not heard

2014-07-25 Thread john
Lituanicasat-1 was not heard on the 1245utc pass over the SW
United States.  It was on for that pass yesterday and N5HYP was
worked from DM43.  The current keps had it at 234KM.
73,
John K8YSE/7


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Round-world balloon approaching Noth America M0XER-3

2014-07-23 Thread John Mac
Hi all...

Andy VK3YT has a pico balloon that was launched from Melbourne
Australia and was last spotted using APRS  flying over Brazil, still
at over 8000m alt...with any luck it may end up back in
Australiaby the weekend...

John
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] ZF2CD on SO-50 today

2014-07-23 Thread John Becker


On 7/23/2014 10:25 AM, James Huhta wrote:

Please listen for me with 5 watts to a handheld log periodic on 1225 pass
Cayman Is time today
Jim
AA4MD


Would that be your time zone, my time zone, GMT or Hong Kong ?

JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] ZF2CD on SO-50 today

2014-07-23 Thread John Becker

never mind got it. Cayman time what ever zone that is in.


On 7/23/2014 11:07 AM, John Becker wrote:


On 7/23/2014 10:25 AM, James Huhta wrote:
Please listen for me with 5 watts to a handheld log periodic on 1225 
pass

Cayman Is time today
Jim
AA4MD


Would that be your time zone, my time zone, GMT or Hong Kong ?

JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
program!

Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] I want this. I want that. Here comes another FM LEO sat.

2014-07-22 Thread John Becker

I dont keep up with these things at all but what happen to the others?
failed, dropped out of orbit, what?

One day someone is going to be saying   sorry, ghost rider the pattern 
is full


JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] going digital

2014-07-20 Thread John / NS1Z
Is there some reason why a digital signal cannot be passed thru an 
analog/linear transponder? What goes in is what comes out. It seems the lack 
of transponder bandwidth limits the digital signal experimenter...
Maybe that is why commercial transponders on satellites are linear. They can 
take any modulation and retransmit it : AM, FM, PM or CB


The biggest problem would be the taxi-cabs etc

-Original Message- 
From: Phil Karn

Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 4:24 PM
To: Paul Stoetzer
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ANS-199 AMSAT News Service Special Bulletin - AMSAT 
Fox-1C Launch Opportunity Announced


On 07/19/2014 12:28 PM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:

Are FM repeater satellites what we all want in orbit? No. Personally,
I'd like a Mode J linear transponder in a sun synchronous circular
orbit of about 2,000km (if we can't get anything to HEO).


Getting a launch opportunity is difficult and expensive. Going digital
is not.

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] ANS-199 AMSAT News Service Special Bulletin - AMSAT Fox-1C Launch Opportunity Announced

2014-07-20 Thread John Becker


On 7/20/2014 12:00 PM, Paul Stoetzer wrote: IN PART

The bottom line is that AMSAT-NA needs a significant boost in
membership and visibility and that boost needs to be soon.

I gave up on AMSAT when it seemed that the main afford was put into
FM in and FM out satellites. Membership ran out many (15) years ago.

John
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] ANS-199 AMSAT News Service Special Bulletin - AMSAT Fox-1C Launch Opportunity Announced

2014-07-19 Thread John Becker


On 7/19/2014 1:54 PM, it was wrote:

YET ANOTHER analog satellite? I'm not interested.

I hear yeah !




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] [Starcom-bb] On Ebay : Yaesu-G-5400B AZ/EL Rotor unused NOS only$550

2014-07-17 Thread John / NS1Z
If you miss out on that one contact me, I have the same rotor, controller 
and PC interface with digital readout.


-Original Message- 
From: Les Rayburn

Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 12:20 PM
To: AMSAT Mailing List ; Star-Com BB
Subject: [Starcom-bb] On Ebay : Yaesu-G-5400B AZ/EL Rotor unused NOS 
only$550


Not associated with the seller, but this is a great deal. Especially
since it contains the computer interface too.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Yaesu-G-5400B-AZ-EL-Rotator-/291192259873?ssPageName=ADME:B:SS:US:1123

Hope this helps another satellite operator out.

--
--
73,

Les Rayburn, N1LF
121 Mayfair Park
Maylene, AL 35114
EM63nf

6M VUCC #1712
AMSAT #38965
Grid Bandits #222
Southeastern VHF Society
Central States VHF Society Life Member
Six Club #2484

Active on 6 Meters thru 1296, 10GHz  Light

___
Starcom-bb bulletin board
starcom...@star-com.net
http://lists.star-com.net/listinfo/starcom-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] L-Band (1260) signals on CO-65

2014-07-16 Thread John / NS1Z
Can anyone report activity on CO-65 satellite? I am looking for a satellite I 
can test my TS-2000X  on and optimize its performance.
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] LO-78 Decay Date

2014-06-30 Thread John Fickes
Steve
  Yes, I heard it and called cq,thought I heard someone at the end but to
low for good copy.

 73 John  KC0BMF  EN31


On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Steve May steve.w5...@gmail.com wrote:

 Did anyone hear the satellite on the NA pass a few minutes ago. I never
 heard it, but that could be due to incorrect keps.

 Steve
 W5IEM
 On Jun 30, 2014 11:26 AM, Paul Stoetzer n...@arrl.net wrote:

  I noticed that AMSAT-UK and the ARRL have both published posts that
  state that LO-78 will decay by the end of this week.
 
  That's probably based in part by information I posted on the BB from
  satflare.com, which predicts decay on July 2nd
  (http://www.satflare.com/track.asp?q=39571#TOP)
 
  However, the keps they are using appear to be incorrect. They are
  showing an altitude of just 226 km. Celestrak keps are showing an
  altitude of 317 km. Interestingly, the map view of the satellite's
  current position appears to be correct.
 
  SATVIEW's decay predictions seem to be based on the 317 km current
  altitude and show a predicted reentry of August 5th.
  (http://www.satview.org/decay.php)
 
  I think SATVIEW's prediction is more accurate. Anyone else have any
 input?
 
  73,
 
  Paul, N8HM
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] LO-78 is ON

2014-06-29 Thread John Becker

I was just listing on a pass of one of the satellites the other day.
One station was calling a CQ and up the band there was someone answering.
they never did make contact. I was trying to think it  out why.
Maybe no computer control. Maybe wrong data entered for the sat.

John


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] M2 loops with sats

2014-06-28 Thread John Becker


On 6/28/2014 1:24 PM, Ted wrote:

Very pricey and not at all ideal for ssb.

Very happy with my M2 antennas.
42 element UHF 22 VHF both crossed element with pre amp

Grandpa always saidyou get what you pay for
Why I use them and  FT847 (2) and not some HT from the backyard.

JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] FT 847 help

2014-06-28 Thread John Becker


On 6/28/2014 5:43 PM, Ted wrote:

Did a full reset on the radio but must have lost a setting.



Years ago I had a bad problem with static electric.
Put a strip of grounded copper 4in X 6in  on the outside of the shack door.
Just about chest hi one touch on the way in and never had a problem.
That was back in the days of the 7400 type IC's. My heating A/C man
said that adding a humidifier would help also and it did.

John
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] DIGEST readers

2014-06-22 Thread John Becker

Please guys edit you digest reply to only what you are replying to.
Those of us that live in the rural area only have 3 ways of getting email

1. dial up - only good to 1 mile or so from the phone company office.
2. satellite - fast but has a daily limit. once that limit is reach either
must pay more or the download speed is slowed way down.

Option 3 is to block offenders. and I have not problem doing so.
Your choice.

John
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Hotmail Rejecting Amsat

2014-06-19 Thread John Becker

Guys
check with your ISP. mine will let me have 4 different address.
removing the  need for a web based service.  But only need 2.
One for general email and the other for HAM related list.

plus can better control spam by blocking anything sent direct from
a web based address due to the never ending hijacking of those
accounts. Very helpful on a satellite internet system with a daily
bandwidth limit.

John, W0JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Hotmail Rejecting Amsat

2014-06-19 Thread John Becker


On 6/19/2014 11:06 AM, Bruce wrote:
what happens when you move? can you keep the same email addresses even 
with another provider?
Yep sure can and I do. My ISP is via a satellite service WILDBLUE Their 
web based email sucks real bad. Refuse to use it.
So when we moved out of town to the country I kept my BIG-RIVER dot NET 
email account. And it will show if you go

searching the IP address in my email headers.

John
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] ARISS

2014-06-08 Thread John Becker


On 6/8/2014 9:58 AM, Dave Webb KB1PVH wrote:

Kelley,

  One of the other problems is all the unattended beacons that are firing
away every 30 seconds which make it extremely difficult for people that are
at the radio trying to make actual contacts.

Dave-KB1PVH


I agree and those that try working DX via the VHF band.

I have said it before and I'll say it again. Look up some of the calls 
you copy

and you will see the reason very fast.

John, W0JAB




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler.sqf Editor for SatPC32 - update

2014-05-29 Thread John Fickes
Tom
  Thank you. I downloaded it on my XP, thinking I'm good. Nope, had 10
problems. I don't think they were causing me any troubles as they all were
after the last 0 I had forgotten a coma before description on some and no
space after last comma on others before description. This will come in
handy.

 Thank You 73 John   KC0BMF


On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Thomas Doyle tomdoyle1...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi,

 Thanks to Alan WA4SCA for doing exhaustive testing and letting me know the
 program had a very subtle and almost imperceptible problem on Windows 7 (it
 did not work at all). I believe the problem has been fixed - sorry about
 that.

 I also tested it on the only working XP computer I have - A MacBook Pro
 running XP on a Virtual Machine under MacParallels 9. It worked there so I
 am guessing it may work on an real XP computer with .Net 4.0 installed.

 http://www.tomdoyle.org/dopplerSqfEditor

 tnx  73
 W9KE Tom Doyle
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SatPC32

2014-05-29 Thread John Becker

Old dell computer had a complete melt down everything lost.
I now can not find the SATPC 32 CD.

How hard is it to get a replacement?

John, W0JAB

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] bounces

2014-05-28 Thread John Becker


On 5/28/2014 9:34 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:

Are you using Gmail?

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:32 AM, John Becker w0...@big-river.net 
mailto:w0...@big-river.net wrote:


what arrow, what list? not on my screen.


no I still use my old ISP account for email via satellite.



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] bounces

2014-05-27 Thread John Becker
Just a guess but was there not something about this some years ago that 
had something
to do with the posting of HTML message to a plain text list or am I 
thinking of something

else. I myself have never had a problem.

John
W0JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Re: [amsat-bb] Wheeler Says FCC Needs More Engineers

2014-05-21 Thread John Becker

Agree .

it's now top heavy with lawyers.

W0JAB





___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Freq at satellite

2014-05-12 Thread John / NS1Z
Running 12.8.B after many months and now I cannot remember how to get the 
boxes under UPlink and DOWNline to show the frequency 
“AT THE SATELLITE”. I seem to remember seeing it in one of the boxes above the 
Earth window. 

Thanks for the help.
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] SATPC32 - Freq at satellite

2014-05-12 Thread John / NS1Z
I left out one little detail...

I have SatPC32 12.8.B running and I would like to change the freq display to 
show frequency at satellite. 
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Update 12.8.B tp 12.8.C

2014-05-12 Thread John / NS1Z
I guess I am alittle blind. Have been to AMSAT UK, NA and DL – can’t seem to 
find 12.8.c upgrade program. 

Would someone send me the update URL?

Thanks.
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Is anyone hearing LITSAT-1

2014-05-04 Thread John / NS1Z
I am looking for reception reports on LITSAT-1 if it is operational. Not 
hearing anything here
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] LITSAT-1

2014-05-03 Thread John / NS1Z
Looking for reality check. Haven’t been able to hear anything yet. I have 
verified tracking comparing my SatPC32 to an online tracking site. 
The two agree or at least seem to. 

Any suggestions 
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FUNcube telemetry performance?

2014-04-19 Thread John Becker

I guess I was lucky I dont recall any fading with AO 40.

On 4/19/2014 4:33 AM, Phil Karn wrote:

I haven't done anything with AO-73, but I understand it's transmitting
the FEC format I originally designed for AO-40.

How well is it working? What fraction of the frames are successfully
decoded? How bad is the fading? I designed my format specifically for
the spin fading on AO-40, and if the fading due to the tumbling of a
cubesat is too slow my format won't be able to fix it.

Phil



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Configuring a pair of IC-706MKIIG's for satellites

2014-04-12 Thread John / NS1Z

The only problem left is to remember which microphone for each satellite

-Original Message- 
From: Erich Eichmann

Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 3:28 AM
To: Ronald G. Parsons
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Configuring a pair of IC-706MKIIG's for satellites

Hi Ron,
You can steer both IC-706MKIIGs without switching the antennas, I think.
You will have changed the Icom address of one of the radios to allow control
of  both radios..
If the program starts - for example - with FO-29 choose the address of the
radio at the 70cm antenna (downlink) as the first address value in the
Radio 1  section of menu Radio Setup. and the address of the radio at
the 2m antenna (uplink)  as the 2nd address value.  Uncheck the option
Satellite mode and check the option Autotmatic Rx/Tx change.
Withh FO-29 (v/u) the program will then steer the radio at the 70cm antenna
as RX and the other at the 2m antenna  as TX with FO-29. You can tune the
VFO dial  of the RX around the passband and the TX will follow. When  you
switch to VO-52 (u/v) the program will  exchange the roles  of the radios as
RX and TX. You can tune the dial of the radio at the 2m antenna and the
other will follow.

73s, Erich, DK1TB

- Original Message - 
From: Ronald G. Parsons w5...@w5rkn.com

To: AMSAT-BB AMSAT-BB@amsat.org
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 1:46 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Configuring a pair of IC-706MKIIG's for satellites



I am in the process of configuring a pair of Icom IC-706MKIIG transceivers
for Full Duplex U/V and V/U satellite service. They will be controlled by
SatPC32 with one being the transmitter and the other the receiver.

This will require switching the duplexer-separated UHF and VHF
input/output between the UHF and VHF antennas. I would like to control the
coax switches automatically to avoid human error. I am looking for a
signal, either from SatPC32 or the transceivers to switch the relays
between U/V and V/U modes.

The transceivers have a signal on the 13-pin DIN ACC socket pin # 5
labeled BAND with the description “Band voltage output. (Varies with
amateur band)  0 – 8.0 V” No other details.

Does anyone have any additional information on this signal?

Is there another signal available from SatPC32 or the transceivers that
would enable automatic switching between U/V and V/U?

Ron W5RKN
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Wouxun KG-UV8D

2014-04-12 Thread John Geiger
Which current HT models do perform full duplex without any desense on the 
receive side?


73 John AF5CC

- Original Message - 
From: Clint Bradford clintbra...@earthlink.net

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 5:03 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Wouxun KG-UV8D


If Alinco couldn't get true, full-duplex ops for working the U/V - V/U 
birds right at the $250 price point,

I am not holding my breath for release of the new Wouxun.

Wouxun brought a couple demo models to IWCE last month. They slapped FCC 
ID numbers on them

from another radio ...

The only dealer on the planet that I would personally purchase anything 
Wouxun is Powerwerx.com.
Rn by hams, and they care. And they have the clout with Wouxun to get 
things done (like firmware
updates, cosmetic and other improvements). The fact that they - at least 
at this time - are not excited

about this ris in interesting.

And, of course, I do not see this rig on the FCC's OET site for 
certification for anything.


Clint K6LCS
http://www.hamradioprogramming.com



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow and ELK antennas

2014-04-03 Thread John Becker


On 4/3/2014 3:30 PM, Clint Bradford wrote:

I just had someone privately email me, berating me for making him click a link 
for
background info on this topic, instead of simple posting it here. OK, here we 
go ...


Let them click. Hand broke or just lazy?

Those of us on a satellite system have a daily bandwidth unless
one can afford unlimited service. (price that sometime)
I would rather see a link the driving up my daily bandwidth usage.

John, W0JAB


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Conflicting Predictions.

2014-03-24 Thread John Fickes
Along with the satellites that others have listed you can also add the ISS
as an FM bird, using AX.25 ( packet )

  73  John  KC0BMF


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Joe n...@mwt.net wrote:

 I was very active in the 70's and 80's on the Birds.

 And now am attempting to try to help some new folk get into them.

 A local Newbie has been trying AO-51 with no luck,  So I volunteered to
 see what he is doing and where he needs help.

 BUT  And there always seems to be a BUT isnt there?

 I am getting HUGE discreptencies on Pass times.  My location is at,


 Latitude: *43.61°*
 Longitude: *-90.08°*
 Local time zone: GMT -5

 And every source I have tried does not give the same time for my next
 available Pass.

 Orbitron,
 Amsat web page,  http://www.n2yo.com/passes/?s=28375
 And Heavens Above.

 All three aren't even close to each other. My location is dead on with all
 of them.  So I am confused as to why each source is sooo different from the
 other.
 \
 Anyone?

 Joe WB9SBD
 --
 Sig
 The Original Rolling Ball Clock
 Idle Tyme
 Idle-Tyme.com
 http://www.idle-tyme.com
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: [CAUTION] The Satellite ID of CelesTrack is wrong!

2014-03-22 Thread John Fickes
Which is correct,SHINAISAT or SHINDAISAT

Thanks John KC0BMF


On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Akihiro Kubota akihiro.kub...@nifty.comwrote:

 Hello,

 The TLEs of
 http://www.celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/tle-new.txt
 is corrected.

 INVADER
 1 39577U 14009F   14080.20550761  .00084749  0-0  89605-3 0   404
 2 39577  65.0104 346.3137 0004867 306.8385  53.2339 15.63695874  3343

 all the best,

 akihiro kubota, ARTSAT project

 On Mar 17, 2014, at 6:43 AM, Francisco Jim〓nez-Mart〓n S〓nchez 
 ea1jm.f...@gmail.com wrote:

  Yes, lithuanicasat, artsat invader and uapsat are wrong as well
  El 16/03/2014 21:06, Roland Zurmely py4...@yahoo.com escribi〓:
 
  Another error of Celestrak:
  The correct TLE for LitSat-1 are those with NORAD # 39568 (not 39570)
  The TLE for UAPSAT are actually the TLE for LitSat-1 !
 
  73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
 author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ROCKET MAN

2014-03-18 Thread John Geiger

Clint,

Guess we also forgot 2 songs by the Grateful Dead off of their Built to Last 
Album


Standing on the Moon
Picasso Moon

The Rolling Stones have Moonlight Mile

And some horrible song that my daughter listens to, which has the line 
Starships were meant to fly


John AF5CC
- Original Message - 
From: Gordon JC Pearce gordon...@gjcp.net

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 9:49 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ROCKET MAN



On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 02:41:48AM -, John Geiger wrote:

Clint,

You forgot Pink Floyd's Interstellar Overdrive and anything by
Jefferson Starship or Starship. Also, Neil Young's Harvest Moon

73 John AF5CC


Nick Drake - Pink Moon

--
Gordonjcp MM0YEQ/A

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: JUNK

2014-03-18 Thread John Wright

At 18:49 17/03/2014, you wrote:
I thought this BB was for making satellite contacts on ham birds, I 
see everything but that on here.
Come on guys lets work the birds and make grid trips and things like 
that , Leave the spam off.

Support AMSAT NA not cube sats that we cant work


Seems to me that a big part of these posts is about the capabilities 
of satellite communication,  whilst not really amateur related, it 
is satellite related  


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: grid locator program

2014-03-18 Thread John Fickes
Here is yet another to try. TinyLocator
http://users.belgacom.net/hamradio/tinylocator.htm

   73 John  KC0BMF


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:33 PM, george hinkle gwhin...@msn.com wrote:

 I'm planning a trip this spring and plan on working some of the hard grids
 west of me. I'm in EM59.
 I'm looking for a program that I can figure the grids both ways. Type in
 my longitude and latitude and get the grid. Type in the grid and know the
 longitude and latitude of that grid. If anyone knows of a program it sure
 would help me. I have a Mac or PC would prefer using the Mac.
 george wi9i
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ROCKET MAN

2014-03-17 Thread John Geiger

Clint,

You forgot Pink Floyd's Interstellar Overdrive and anything by Jefferson 
Starship or Starship. Also, Neil Young's Harvest Moon


73 John AF5CC




essage - 
From: Clint Bradford clintbradf...@mac.com

To: AMSAT BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 2:09 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ROCKET MAN


OK, Les, YOU started this ... (grin)

Here's my partial PlayList from my Yuri Gagarin party ...

The Beatles, Across the Universe

Creedence Clearwater Revival, “Bad Moon Rising”

Elton John, “Bad Side of the Moon”

Emerson, Lake and Palmer, “Black Moon”

Marcels, “Blue Moon”

Ella Fitzgerald, “Blue Moon”

Diana Krall Fly Me to the Moon

Pink Floyd, “Dark Side of the Moon”

Jamiroquai, “Cosmic Girl”

Dinah Washington, “Destination Moon”

The Byrds, “Eight Miles High”

Duran Duran, “Electric Barbarelle”

Neil Young, “Falling Off the Face of the Earth”

Sinatra, “Fly Me to the Moon”

The Doors, Moonlight Drive

Duran Duran, Electric Barbarella

ELO, Ticket to the Moon

Jimi Hendrix, 3rd Stone from the Sun

Elton John, Rocket Man

Led Zeppelin, Stairway to Heaven

Julie London ,Fly Me to the Moon

The Marcels, Blue Moon

Louis Philippe, Yuri Gagarin

Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon

The Police, Walking on the Moon

Will Smith, Men in Black

Richard Strauss, Also Sprach Zarathustra, theme to 2001: A Space Odyssey

Feist, “My Moon, My Man”

Van Morrison, Moondance”

Dinah Washington, Destination Moon

John Williams, “Theme to Star Wars”

Zager and Evans, In the Year 2525

Elton John, “Rocket Man” (a live version)

Nick Reece’s NEW album, “Gagarin - Son of the earth”

Clint
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ROCKET MAN

2014-03-17 Thread John Fickes
Major Tom - Shiny Toy Guns

73 KC0BMF   John


On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Clint Bradford clintbradf...@mac.comwrote:

 OK, Les, YOU started this ... (grin)

 Here's my partial PlayList from my Yuri Gagarin party ...

 The Beatles, Across the Universe

 Creedence Clearwater Revival, Bad Moon Rising

 Elton John, Bad Side of the Moon

 Emerson, Lake and Palmer, Black Moon

 Marcels, Blue Moon

 Ella Fitzgerald, Blue Moon

 Diana Krall Fly Me to the Moon

 Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon

 Jamiroquai, Cosmic Girl

 Dinah Washington, Destination Moon

 The Byrds, Eight Miles High

 Duran Duran, Electric Barbarelle

 Neil Young, Falling Off the Face of the Earth

 Sinatra, Fly Me to the Moon

 The Doors, Moonlight Drive

 Duran Duran, Electric Barbarella

 ELO, Ticket to the Moon

 Jimi Hendrix, 3rd Stone from the Sun

 Elton John, Rocket Man

 Led Zeppelin, Stairway to Heaven

 Julie London ,Fly Me to the Moon

 The Marcels, Blue Moon

 Louis Philippe, Yuri Gagarin

 Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon

 The Police, Walking on the Moon

 Will Smith, Men in Black

 Richard Strauss, Also Sprach Zarathustra, theme to 2001: A Space Odyssey

 Feist, My Moon, My Man

 Van Morrison, Moondance

 Dinah Washington, Destination Moon

 John Williams, Theme to Star Wars

 Zager and Evans, In the Year 2525

 Elton John, Rocket Man (a live version)

 Nick Reece's NEW album, Gagarin - Son of the earth

 Clint
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Predict for LINUX notes

2014-03-11 Thread John Magliacane
 Hello
 
 I re-discovered predict for LINUX and wrote some notes 
 
 http://tech-software.net/predict/Predict_for_LINUX.pdf
 
 Andrew VK4TEC

Well done!


73, de John, KD2BD

--
Visit John on the Web at:

http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] FS: Jetstream 9913F 50 feet coax with PL259s

2014-03-11 Thread John Geiger
In case anyone needs some coax for their satellite antennas-I have for sale a 
50 foot role of Jetstream 9913 flex low loss cable with 
PL259s on each end. Never used, still in its package.

 I am asking $52 shipped and can take paypal/check/MO.

73 John AF5CC
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-DL and Bochum Observatory receive signal from retired NASA spacecraft

2014-03-09 Thread John Spasojevich
Outstanding achievement!

John - AG9D


On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Peter Guelzow peter.guel...@kourou.dewrote:



 see also:

 http://www.amsat-dl.org/index.php/news-mainmenu-97/199-ice-satellite-received-in-bochum

 -

 AMSAT-DL and Bochum Observatory receive signal from retired NASA spacecraft

 On March 1st and 2nd, 2014 radio amateurs were able to detect the beacon
 signal from the retired NASA deep space probe ICE (International
 Cometary Explorer) at the Bochum Observatory (Germany). After some
 changes to the ground equipment and aligning the receive antenna to the
 predicted position in the sky, the beacon signal could positively be
 identified due to its frequency, the position in the sky and the
 frequency shift due to the radial velocity (Doppler shift).

 For this detection the 20m radio telescope from the Bochum Observatory
 was used. In 2003, AMSAT-DL converted this former industrial monument
 into a fully functional groundstation for deep space probes. Since 2009
 the facility is being used by volunteers almost full time as ground
 receive station for data from the STEREO mission with its two
 spaceprobes monitoring the sun from different viewing angles.

 The International Sun-Earth Explorer 3 (ISEE-3) was launched in 1978 and
 became the first spacecraft to orbit the Earth-Sun L1 Lagrange point,
 measuring the interaction between the Earth's magnetic field and the
 Sun. It was the first spacecraft to detect the stream of particles
 (solar wind) approaching Earth. In 1982, the spacecraft was renamed
 the International Cometary Explorer (ICE) and diverted to the Moon,
 where its gravitational pull placed ICE on a heliocentric orbit. In
 1985, the comet Giacobini-Zinner was visited (the first time a comet had
 been encountered by a spacecraft), followed by observation of Halley's
 Comet in 1986. While the instrumentation on board was still functional
 and fuel for more trajectory maneuvers was available, support for the
 ICE mission was terminated in 1997, though the spacecraft transmitter
 was left on. It was last detected by the NASA Deep Space Network in
 2008. Its orbit however results in the spacecraft returning to
 Earth-Moon space in August of 2014. A small propulsive maneuver and
 lunar flyby could allow ICE to be directed into an Earth-Sun L1 halo
 orbit and perhaps resume a science mission, depending on instrument
 health. However in February 2014 a NASA study determined that the
 required resources to contact the spacecraft were not available anymore
 and due to budgetary constraints no further contact attempts were
 planned. In light of the recent observations and the available
 facilities in Bochum, additional studies about the economic feasibility
 to add a suitable uplink are being done.

 We would like to thank Jeremy Bauman from KinetX Aerospace (Tempe AZ,
 USA) for providing the ICE trajectory solution which was essential in
 finding the spacecraft and Jon D. Giorgini from the Jet Propulsion
 Laboratory (Pasadena CA, USA) for his support.



 About AMSAT-DL:

 AMSAT-DL (short for AMSAT-Germany) is an organization consisting of
 engineers, scientists, students, radio amateur operators and space
 enthusiasts. They design, develop, build, operate and use satellites in
 their spare time. In addition to ca. 600 members of AMSAT-DL other
 national AMSAT organizations count in total about 6000 members. AMSAT-DL
 is one of the few space organizations which lead satellite projects from
 the drawing board through design stage and construction into the
 operative service. AMSAT-DL projects strictly follow the open-source
 principle so technologies and procedures can be used by third parties.
 This includes also lessons learned and scientific results obtained
 during the satellite's operation.

 About the Bochum Observatory:

 The Bochum Observatory is a recognized and sponsored higher-education
 institution of the state Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany) and is also
 funded by the 'Landeszentrale für politische Bildung NRW'. Next to
 optical sky surveys the focus of the current work is the recording of
 earth monitoring data from satellites. The main task is the scientific
 analysis and the public presentation of this data to understand the
 function of the 'earth system' and to characterize the effects and risks
 of human actions in the context of globalization.



 contact AMSAT-DL: Dr. Achim Vollhardt, icet...@amsat-dl.org

 contact Sternwarte Bochum: Thilo Elsner, i...@iuz-bochum.de
 mailto:i...@iuz-bochum.de, +49 177 50 70 797



 ---


 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support

[amsat-bb] Re: Tracker for use with Arrow

2014-02-27 Thread John Becker


On 2/27/2014 10:06 AM, Burns Fisher wrote:

I just went to get the link to give you in order to register as a guest,
and I found this: . . . .

Like the credit card ad says:membership has it's privileges !


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Mode A activity

2014-02-22 Thread John Geiger
My current radio is an Icom 706MKII which is a HF/6/2m rig so my satellite 
activity would be limited to AO7 Mode A. What is the currently activity level 
on Mode A?  I am working on improving my 10 meter antenna to receive AO7 better.

73 John AF5CC
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] EL96 SO-50 15-16Feb2014

2014-02-13 Thread John Papay

I will try to operate on SO-50 from EL96 on Saturday
and Sunday, 15 and 16 February as follows:

15Feb2014   1302-1315utc  46deg elev max
15Feb2014   2322-2334utc  31deg elev max

16Feb2014   1149-1201utc  36deg elev max
16Feb2014   2209-2221utc  53deg elev max

The morning passes will have limited visibility to
the north,  however, I will try to operate from a
better location on the late afternoon passes.

I cannot promise that I will be on all passes but I
will try.

If you work me and need a card, please send an email
to my qrz.com address with qso details.
Do not send any SASE's.

73,
John K8YSE

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW

2014-02-07 Thread John Becker


On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng, Peter wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections dynamically 
change your frequency to compensate for doppler?  Would this mean anyone 
engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a stable frequency?


by stable do you mean a freq already being used?

John, W0JAB


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Celestrak down??

2014-02-05 Thread John Becker

Its a site problem. Timed out  twice for me.

John, W0JAB


On 2/5/2014 11:00 AM, Ken Swaggart wrote:
Trying to download keps from Celestrak this morning, but the site 
times out. Is this a local issue for me or are others having problems 
(at 1700Z).

http://celestrak.com/

Tnx,
Ken, W7KKE


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: status

2014-01-25 Thread John Becker

gordon...@gjcp.net
has been added to the delete from server with reading or downloading file.
Dont need a smart ass like that.



On 1/25/2014 2:34 PM, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
Sure, I'll have one up by the end of August for you. That'll be 15 
million quid please, cash up front. 




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: LOL

2014-01-25 Thread John Becker


On 1/25/2014 4:02 PM, Kevin Deane wrote:

HA HA

Kevin
KF7MYK




Text of what you are replying to would be very helpful.
Those of us the get a large amount of email every day could or
may have no clue what you are replying to or care for the fact.
If I'm correct this has been mention to you in the past.
Disregard if if your ISP charges by the word.

JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] OZ/KO4MA

2013-12-30 Thread John Papay

Drew, OZ/KO4MA, was worked this morning at 0841utc
on AO-7B.  He had a nice signal from JO45.  He was
worked last year on the 31st of December from the same
grid.
73,
John K8YSE


John Papay
j...@papays.com

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] UT1FG/MM Christmas Greetings

2013-12-24 Thread John Papay

Yuri, UT1FG/MM, asked me to send his Christmas Greetings
to everyone on the satellites.  He is
spending his Christmas in port at Constanta Romania and
expects to be loaded and sailing 28 or 29 December.  His
next port will be in France.  He will continue to listen
for North America on FO-29 and AO-7B.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
John K8YSE

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: why not to buy an M2 antenna

2013-12-10 Thread John Becker


On 12/10/2013 1:22 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:

I am breaking with my normal practise of not posting to the amsat-bb:

I have a M2 436CP42 which is even larger than the 436CP30.  I have had 
it since about 1999 as it was used for AO-40 uplink.  I wired mine in 
RHCP without the optional polarity switching relay so I have no direct 
experience with the relay.  My antenna has performed just fine in the 
14-years it has been mounted outside so the antenna is certainly of 
good construction.  I made no extra protection other than good sealing 
of coax lines.

You and me both. As well as many others.

John W0JAB


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: keps

2013-11-25 Thread John Fickes
Jerry just change the name to what you want
73  John   KC0BMF

0 DNEPR OBJECT B

1 39417U 13066B   13329.40886455  .3740  0-0  51943-3 0   189
2 39417 097.7994 041.9224 0062719 182.7913 177.2957 14.77118474   607



On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Jerry Ehlers w0s...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is the keps available in the AMSAT Format not  the 2 line for
 AO-73 ???
   Jerry w0sat
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Multiple satellite launches

2013-11-25 Thread John Fickes
Bob
  The following link is of Picodragon and 2 other satellites being released
or launched. There is a picture and short video.
http://amsat-uk.org/tag/picodragon/

  73 John   KC0BMF


On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Robert Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu wrote:

 Ø  When there is a launch of several satellites in a single payload,
 several cubesats for example,  I assume they release each at
 different locations on the deployer trajectory.  Preliminary keps are based
 on the trajectory when each is released?

 Ø  Otherwise if they were released all at once, how would NORAD know which
 is which?


 Doesn’t much matter when they are released, they still are all in the same
 orbit more or less for quite a while.  Even if the springs release them at
 1/2 meter per second, they are all going at 7000 meters per second so it
 takes days for them to separate very much.



 Let’s see,  at ½ meter per second separation, then they are 100’ apart
 after the first minute, 1 mile after the first hour.  And not until they
 are a few miles apart can NORAD distinguish them enough to start getting
 good tracks on them.  By then it is impossible to know which is which.
 Hence the guessing game until each owner decides which object best fits his
 downlink experience.



 Continuing on, they will be 24 miles apart after the first day where they
 will be about 5 seconds apart when tracked from the ground.  After a week,
 then maybe 175 miles and ½ minute apart.  After a month, maybe 750 miles
 and 2 minutes apart.  After a year, maybe 9000 miles and 30 minutes apart.
 And finally, after about a year and a half, they will be half an orbit or
 about 45 minutes apart, beyond which, they start getting closer again…



 Something like that unless I screwed up…



 Bob
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Keplerian Elements for FUNCUBE 1

2013-11-22 Thread John Fickes
Rick
   Thank you for the keps.  I was having same problem as others, in that I
wasn't matching up with N2YO's web. But after I loaded your keps I see that
N2YO still is'nt matching up, but I'll go with yours since you decoded.
Thanks John   KC0BMF


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Rick Walter wb3...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just copied 89 frames of telemetry from FunCube 1. I agree, the 13066B is a
 really good fit.


 FUNCUBE-1
 1 39417U 13066B   13326.90242084  .4113  0-0  57014-3 0   107
 2 39417  97.7998  39.4992 0063751 190.6311 169.3388 14.77099805   237

 Rick - WB3CSY

 --
 Sent from Rick's gmail account
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Minotaur Launch seen in FN42fs.

2013-11-20 Thread John Magliacane
I took my electronics students to the top floor of the Advanced Technology 
Center at Brookdale Community College in Lincroft, NJ to see the launch.

The elevation was a lot higher than I expected.  The flares that occurred 
between rocket stages got some of the most O's.  :-)

Very cool.


73, de John , KD2BD


  Easily seen in FN42fs, Nashua, NH.
 
  As Mark said, very cool.
 
  73,
  Bill
  NJ1H
 
  I got to see it clearly from North Carolina!
 
  Very cool.
 
  73,
 
  Mark N8MH

--
Visit John on the Web at:

http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: NASA-TV coverage of tonight's launch of multiple student CubeSats begins at 6:30 PM

2013-11-19 Thread John Becker


On 11/19/2013 3:04 PM, Jari Koivurinne wrote:

That's 11:30 UTC... ??

-jari oh3uw


There you go no confusion or even guessing daylight savings or not.
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ISS and the TS 2000

2013-11-11 Thread John Fickes
Rich
  SATPC32ISS should fix you up. Look at SATPC32 in your programs folder, it
should be there.
I'm not sure about the TS 2000, I use Icom 910 but that shouldn't matter.
With SATPC32ISS it
should set your radio int  split mode with the 2 frequencies that you need
for voice. However if
you are trying for the 145.825 simplex if you have it input in the Doppler
Sqf in Auxiliary Files
under the question mark on the tool bar of Satpc32 it should show up in the
CAT, then click
on the frequency.  Clear as mud isn't it ? I may not of described it very
well but if you look in
these areas it may help you out. If you need more help just ask

   73  John   KC0BMF


On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com wrote:

 ISS voice contacts are NOT simplex.  They are just not cross-band.  You
 have a different uplink and downlink frequency but within the same band
 similar to a conventional repeater.

 You should be able to set both the software and the radio to the correct
 frequencies.

 7 3

 Jeff Moore  --   KE7ACY


 On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Rich/wa4bue richard.s...@verizon.net
 wrote:

  Hi all,
 
  The K4AMG CLUB is using the TS 2000 and SATPC32.
 
  In SAT mode the program or the transceiver gives an uplink and down link
  frequency.  The ISS is simplex.  Is it possible to work a simplex mode to
  the ISS with this configuration?
 
  God Bless
 
  R
 
  W4BUE
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: RF, another alternate energy technology (hogwash)

2013-11-09 Thread John Floyd
The Science Daily article quote...

to convert microwaves into 7.3V of electrical energy. By comparison, Universal 
Serial Bus (USB) chargers for small electronic devices provide about 5V of 
power.

...Should be enough to set off the BS detector. First energy is measured in 
volts and then power. The volt is suddenly a very versatile unit.


John kn4ge

___
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org on behalf of Jim 
Wright wrightj...@verizon.net
Sent: 08 November 2013 14:40
To: Simone; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RF, another alternate energy technology (hogwash)

Theoretically,
1.Wouldn't these meta antennae act like the high rise building built
between you and your favorite repeater.  Absorbing/blocking your
signal down range from the source transmitter?
2.Wouldn't all that RF building up inside the room act like the
story we have all heard about the cat came in from outdoors wet, so I
tossed him into the microwave!?

Years ago when a building was being built near the phone company
building where I worked, the microwave signals would fade for no
apparent reason.  As the building, a block away, started to appear above
the nearer buildings, we saw the crane used to raise material for the
construction rising up in height, also.  It turns out the crane cab was
at the 250 height of our tower antenna. Whenever the cab swung into
position to put it's load on the new building, we lost signals to/from
our next relay tower, a major route node.

Using a bit of hype, we told the crane operator that he would become
sterile if he kept getting in the beam between towers. They moved the
crane to another location.  Both parties were happy.

Jim WA4IVM

ps:  23 mile path length, 2 degree beam width, 1/2 watt ERP.

On 11/8/2013 11:35 AM, Simone wrote:
 Bob,

 I agree with you on the fact that RF energy harvesting is not practical for
 high powers, but I think we should re-locate these devices into their
 context: rectantennas and similar devices are designed to power extremely
 low power devices, in places where there is no access to sun light.

 Think for example to tyre pressure monitoring sensors: some types of
 devices harvest power from the transponder used to communicate with them.

 Still we are far from energy harvesting houses, where walls and tiles are
 made of antennas that sucks all the incident RF power... in any case, as
 you pointed out, even in the case such a scenario would work, people living
 inside would have no radio and no cellphone working!

 73

 Simone - IU1AFY/F4VPY




 2013/11/8 Robert Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu

 A fellow came to me convinced that capturing RF energy from cell phones,
 and radio and TV waves was free energy.  He couldn’t wait to invest in
 these pocket sized antennas that have achieved the same 37% energy
 reception efficiencies as do the most expensive solar cells:.



 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131107154818.htm



 I told him to not believe everthing he hears  and  you Amsat radio guys
 might get a kick out of my response:

 --



 Thanks for sending me this interesting example of hype gone ridiculous.  I
 was glad to receive it.



 The problem is apples and oranges.  Yes, they got ”37% efficiency, similar
 to the most expensive solar cells”, but the difference is that solar energy
 imparts about 100 watts of energy per square foot on a solar panel –
 remember, ONE HUNDRED WATTS/sqft.



 The amount of energy from a Cell tower onto a small antenna  1 mile away
 from the cell tower (typical) is only 0.0004 Watts.  So there is
 about a one hundred trillionth of the practicality.



 Or another way to look at it.  If you could hold their RF energy collecting
 antenna 1 inch from the cell phone tower (not one mile), to get more power,
 then the most power he could get would be only 3 watts.  Still nothing
 close to what the sun provides.  Plus, he would be absorbing all the power
 from the cell phone tower making it useless, plus the energy is not free.
 SO to get the same power as a palm sized solar panel, his RF capture
 antenna would have to be ONE INCH away from THIRTY cell phone towers.



 And,  to generate that same 100 watts worth of RF energy, it takes about
 300 watts of electrical power. (1 inch away)



 All to deliver about 1 Watt of power compared to the Sun which is free.



 Thanks.  A great lesson in hype!



 Bob Bruninga, WB4APR
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http

[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 Mode A

2013-11-06 Thread John
When I started, I had a hand me down beat up yaesu ft-221R 2m all mode with an 
old cb mic with a mag mount antenna and a realistic 10m all mode radio that 
didn’t transmit and a dipole but almost everyday I was either listening to or 
working someone on RS-10…. a the life…. it was so good with those russian 
leo sats, all you needed was a tickle of a signal to work some folks, now today 
with a TS-2000LE with 23cm, all I see is that fm sats are always clobbered by 
over-powered users and transponder HOGS, no room to even try to make a contact, 
what with everyone in my area trying to over-power each other to have control 
of what little transponder room there is. What a person wouldn’t give for an 
“A” mode bird or 2 again….  sure do miss those RS birds, they were so much fun…


On Nov 6, 2013, at 7:51, Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL vlfis...@mcn.net wrote:

 At 06:48 PM 11/5/2013 -0800, R.T.Liddy k...@ameritech.net wrote:
 I've tried AO7-A a number of times, but there's never anyone there to work.
 
 Back in the glory days of the RS Birds, Mode A was very active. I sure do
 miss them. They worked very well!
 
 73,Bob K8BL
 
 
 I loved the RS satellites. They're what got me hooked.  I wish
 the plan for the next LEO was a new linear mode Mode A bird for
 a starter satellite not another FM 'Grid-Lock' sat.
 
 KB7ADL
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: TARDIS in Space.

2013-10-23 Thread John Stephensen

You could donate to the FOX-2 project.

73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 


$33,000 isn't a lot of money  I mean for a community project ... no I
don't have $33K to kick in ... but maybe I have $100 for LEO cube sat with
a linear transponder  in an orbit that lasts more than 3 weeks 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu G-5400B Rotor Update

2013-10-17 Thread John Fickes
Les
  If your looking for a AZ EL rotor, there is an Alfa Spid on ebay now.
That has a very good price. This is the same one I have and it, in my
opinion, is a much better rotor than the Yaesu. The starting price is about
a third of a new one. And they state it's never been outside.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Antenna-Rotator-RAS-1-/190933751489?pt=US_Radio_Comm_Antennashash=item2c7489d6c1

Good Luck 73
   John  KC0BMF


On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Les Rayburn l...@highnoonfilm.com wrote:

 Update on the Yaesu G-5400B rotor. It turned out that only the rotor
 controller and cable was available. It appears that the rotor itself may
 have gone with the tower whenever it was disassembled during removal. It's
 from an estate sale, so hard to be sure.

 Any value to the rotor controller? Or perhaps someone has the rotor but is
 in search of a new box?


 --
 --
 73,

 Les Rayburn, N1LF
 121 Mayfair Park
 Maylene, AL 35114
 EM63nf

 6M VUCC #1712
 AMSAT #38965
 Grid Bandits #222
 Southeastern VHF Society
 Central States VHF Society Life Member
 Six Club #2484

 Active on 6 Meters thru 1296, 10GHz  Light

 __**_
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: 
 http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bbhttp://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: 2m-- 10.7Mhz downconverter

2013-10-04 Thread John Stephensen
For a demonstration, the easiest route would be to modify a 2-meter 
receiving downconverter from Down East Microwave or another supplier. Change 
the crystal oscillator frequency and retune the IF output to 10.7 MHz. If 
you have a choice of IF frequencies use 21.4 MHz as this would be closer to 
the usual 28 MHz output.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Andy Brian briaa...@gmail.com

To: AMSAT-BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 04:45 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] 2m-- 10.7Mhz downconverter



Hi,


I need help to find any good design for the 2m to 10.7MHz downconverter
which I'll try to use for presentation linear transverter.
Please if you have any or point me to any good books where to find?

Thanks for all answers,


BR Andy
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Phase 3

2013-09-20 Thread John Stephensen


The problem is that the government is no longer paying for those expenses 
as
they did in the past. The $8,000,000 is the incremental cost not the cost 
of the

entire launch.

73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Rob pabut...@gmail.com

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 15:54 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Phase 3



I don't think we'll ever be in a position to buy a launch the most we
will ever be able to do  is hope to piggy-back with a paying customer and
possibly contribute to expenses.

Maybe having a payload on the shelf ready isn't such a bad plan  if 
a
short window of opportunity were to open up ... and we had nothing 
ready

that would be an opportunity lost. Maybe we should have various payloads
sitting on the shelf (cube, micro, mini, P3) just in case.

Piggy-back rides is how Amateur Radio Satellites got their start  
it's

the only way to continue.

-- Rob, KA2PBT


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:27 PM, John Stephensen kd6...@comcast.net 
wrote:



AMSAT-DL was the lead for phase 3 because they were able to get
almost-free launches from ESA. However, ESA terminated that policy 10 
years

ago and AMSAT-DL has been trying to get government funding through their
Mars program. That was rejected a year or two ago. Private launch 
companies

are asking for $8,000,000..The world-wide fund raising by AMSAT-DL,
AMSAT-UK, AMSAT-NA, AMSAT-Japan, ARRL and RSGB for each of the phase 3
launches acheived less than 10% of what is now required for a launch.

In the past, a launch opportunity was identified by ESA and then a
satellite was built by AMSAT. P3E did the reverse -- building a 
satellite

and hoping for a launch. I brought up AMSAT-DL because someone was
complaining that AMSAT-NA was leading them on about HEO possibilities. 
They
should review videos of the AMSAT-DL presentations at the annual 
AMSAT-UK

meetings. AMSAT-NA has been much more realistic.

73,

John
KD6OZH



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
program!

Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Phase 3

2013-09-20 Thread John Stephensen
The problem is that the government is no longer paying for those expenses as 
they did in the past.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Rob pabut...@gmail.com

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 15:54 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Phase 3



I don't think we'll ever be in a position to buy a launch the most we
will ever be able to do  is hope to piggy-back with a paying customer and
possibly contribute to expenses.

Maybe having a payload on the shelf ready isn't such a bad plan  if 
a

short window of opportunity were to open up ... and we had nothing ready
that would be an opportunity lost. Maybe we should have various payloads
sitting on the shelf (cube, micro, mini, P3) just in case.

Piggy-back rides is how Amateur Radio Satellites got their start  it's
the only way to continue.

-- Rob, KA2PBT


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:27 PM, John Stephensen kd6...@comcast.net 
wrote:



AMSAT-DL was the lead for phase 3 because they were able to get
almost-free launches from ESA. However, ESA terminated that policy 10 
years

ago and AMSAT-DL has been trying to get government funding through their
Mars program. That was rejected a year or two ago. Private launch 
companies

are asking for $8,000,000..The world-wide fund raising by AMSAT-DL,
AMSAT-UK, AMSAT-NA, AMSAT-Japan, ARRL and RSGB for each of the phase 3
launches acheived less than 10% of what is now required for a launch.

In the past, a launch opportunity was identified by ESA and then a
satellite was built by AMSAT. P3E did the reverse -- building a satellite
and hoping for a launch. I brought up AMSAT-DL because someone was
complaining that AMSAT-NA was leading them on about HEO possibilities. 
They

should review videos of the AMSAT-DL presentations at the annual AMSAT-UK
meetings. AMSAT-NA has been much more realistic.

73,

John
KD6OZH



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Phase 3

2013-09-20 Thread John Stephensen
AMSAT-DL was the lead for phase 3 because they were able to get almost-free 
launches from ESA. However, ESA terminated that policy 10 years ago and 
AMSAT-DL has been trying to get government funding through their Mars 
program. That was rejected a year or two ago. Private launch companies are 
asking for $8,000,000..The world-wide fund raising by AMSAT-DL, AMSAT-UK, 
AMSAT-NA, AMSAT-Japan, ARRL and RSGB for each of the phase 3 launches 
acheived less than 10% of what is now required for a launch.


In the past, a launch opportunity was identified by ESA and then a satellite 
was built by AMSAT. P3E did the reverse -- building a satellite and hoping 
for a launch. I brought up AMSAT-DL because someone was complaining that 
AMSAT-NA was leading them on about HEO possibilities. They should review 
videos of the AMSAT-DL presentations at the annual AMSAT-UK meetings. 
AMSAT-NA has been much more realistic.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Rob pabut...@gmail.com

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:34 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Phase 3



Wait  wasn't AMSAT-DL always the lead when it came to Phase-3
satellites ???

Also, AMSAT-DL has a platform already constructed awaiting launch
opportunity.

http://amsat-uk.org/2013/02/25/the-next-amsat-phase-3-satellite/

Issues with ITAR aside, why can't we just support our international
partners ... somehow ... ???

Getting an amateur radio satellite into orbit costs real green dollars
(Euros, GBP, whatever) we would do better pooling resources for the good 
of

all.

There are all kinds of players in the launch market these days  US,
ESA,  Russia, China, Japan, India  and a lot of up and coming private
launch vendors  call me naive but I think conditions are BETTER now
(ITAR aside) than they were in the days of AO-10 

Why can't we focus on the possibilities  

de KA2PBT



On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:30 AM, John Stephensen kd6...@comcast.net 
wrote:



AMSAT-NA abandoned the Eagle project years ago. Only AMSAT-DL has an
active HEO project. with P3E.

73,

John
KD6OZH


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: so long

2013-09-19 Thread John Stephensen
AMSAT-NA abandoned the Eagle project years ago. Only AMSAT-DL has an 
active HEO project. with P3E.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Michael mat...@charter.net

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 21:06 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: so long


I said this a couple of weeks back but since reading all the responses in 
this thread, I think I'll say it again.  I'm almost fifty one years old. I 
highly doubt that I will ever see an HEO bird launched in my remaining 
lifetime. The economic realities of this day and time make the possibility 
of a launch extremely remote and I don't see that changing in the near 
future.  I can't understand why AMSAT continues to string people along with 
promises of  maybe someday if you donate. Why can't they just be upfront 
about it and tell people,   Hey it aint going to happen.  There is 
absolutely nothing wrong with the new direction AMSAT has taken in pursuing 
cubesat technology and launches, I applaud them for it  but the continued 
lip service to the   we want an HEO crowd  gets old.  I for one am not 
that gullible. Quit telling people what they want to hear and tell them the 
truth.

73,
Michael, W4HIJ
On 9/17/2013 7:02 PM, i8cvs wrote:

- Original Message -
From: John Becker w0...@big-river.net
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:58 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] so long


I have decided to leave the list till something changes with this FM
only satellite attitude only changes. That was the reason for me as
well as other joining AMSAT in the first place.

Please inform me if anything such as a replacement for AO 40
  happens.

John


Hi John,W0JAB

I was AMSAT member numbar 798 since OSCAR-6 but I decided
to live my membership after AO40 died because AMSAT changed
his policy with only FM satellites.

I remember that OSCAR-10,OSCAR13 and AO40 where called
the satellites for all and I invested a lot of money for equipments
and antennas dedicated for HEO satellites for nothing in the near
future.

In my opinion the satellite operation is not only an activity to collect
grids but it is mostly experimentation in the VHF/UHF/SHF and
particularly into microwave as it was with AO40 Mode-S/K and
it was very nice until lasted.

As soon AMSAT-NA will work or cooperate with AMSAT-DL
to built a new HEO satellite I will call Martha and I will pay all
my old duties to cover my previous not covered years of
membership.

By the way I am not against  AMSAT-NA because I understand
the ITAR and during the last 10 years I have cooperate to write
many technical articles for the AMSAT Journal without any
money reward.

If Martha says that the actual AMSAT members are in the order
of 3,000. and if Les Rayburn, N1LF claim to be member of
AMSAT #38965 it means that in the last 10 years many
members abandoned AMSAT because of no future with no
HEO satellites and only the FM LEO cubesat for no two
ways communications between continents was not a
satisfactory task.

Many years ago early in 1972 I joined AMSAT because they
promised us to communicate worlwide much better than using
the HF but things changed and our antennas are becaming
rusty over the roof for very small or for nothingSorry !

73 de i8CVS Domenico


___



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: 2013 AMSAT Board of Directors Election Results Announced

2013-09-17 Thread John Becker
And if you let membership run out for a few years do you get your old 
number again?







___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] so long

2013-09-17 Thread John Becker
I have decided to leave the list till something changes with this FM 
only satellite
attitude only changes. That was the reason for me as well as other 
joining AMSAT

in the first place.

Please inform me if anything such as a replacement for AO 40 happens.

John
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: so long

2013-09-17 Thread John Spasojevich
Stefan, I second the comments .

I brace myself every time I go to a hamfest to represent AMSAT.  I would
say I spend 75% of my time getting told that we are a bunch of morons and
how the person complaining used to be a member but will never join again
because we don't have a HEO bird. I spend time, politely too, with them
explaining the world has changed in terms of launch cost and ask them if
they have any ideas on how we can raise the money, that usually sends them
on their way.

I came to a great revelation this year looking back on my time as a club
president, secretary and one of the 10% that actually does something other
than complain and came to the conclusion that 75% of the rank and file hams
want to open a box, sit in a chair, plug it in and yak in a microphone and
complain. The other 25% are involved in experimentation, construction,
education and pushing the service forward.

The last time I checked, moaning and complaining to another ham who does
nothing but complain doesn't get anything done. I should think that if
there was anyone reading this mail service that had $10M to spare, they
would have bought the launch by now. But go ahead and keep crying to the
same group, maybe there's a recent lottery winner here.

John AG9D


On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Stefan Wagener wagen...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Domenico,

 I am not sure if I understand your post:

 As soon AMSAT-NA will work or cooperate with AMSAT-DL to built a new HEO
 satellite I will call Martha and I will pay all my old duties to cover my
 previous not covered years of membership.

 As a matter of fact we don't need a new HEO, we have one or more accurate
 AMSAT-DL has one. It is called Phase 3E! What we need is $10million+ to fly
 it.

 during the last 10 years I have cooperate to write many technical articles
 for the AMSAT Journal without any money reward.

 Well, many folks volunteer and work hard and no, we actually pay to
 volunteer and help and no, we don't expect to get paid!

 So, how about you help AMSAT-NA, AMSAT-DL and AMSAT-IT in their efforts to
 find a potential source of money to make that satellite fly.

 To quote Clayton (W5PFG) from an earlier post:

 Some of the loudest whining voices are from the non-voting community.
 I've observed this behavior in civic organizations, technical societies,
 fraternities, etc. Usually these are the same people who gripe about how an
 organization spends its money though the complainer never donates a dime.

 Rest my case,

 Stefan VE4NSA




 On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:02 PM, i8cvs domenico.i8...@tin.it wrote:

  - Original Message -
  From: John Becker w0...@big-river.net
  To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
  Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:58 PM
  Subject: [amsat-bb] so long
 
   I have decided to leave the list till something changes with this FM
   only satellite attitude only changes. That was the reason for me as
   well as other joining AMSAT in the first place.
  
   Please inform me if anything such as a replacement for AO 40
happens.
  
   John
  
  Hi John,W0JAB
 
  I was AMSAT member numbar 798 since OSCAR-6 but I decided
  to live my membership after AO40 died because AMSAT changed
  his policy with only FM satellites.
 
  I remember that OSCAR-10,OSCAR13 and AO40 where called
  the satellites for all and I invested a lot of money for equipments
  and antennas dedicated for HEO satellites for nothing in the near
  future.
 
  In my opinion the satellite operation is not only an activity to collect
  grids but it is mostly experimentation in the VHF/UHF/SHF and
  particularly into microwave as it was with AO40 Mode-S/K and
  it was very nice until lasted.
 
  As soon AMSAT-NA will work or cooperate with AMSAT-DL
  to built a new HEO satellite I will call Martha and I will pay all
  my old duties to cover my previous not covered years of
  membership.
 
  By the way I am not against  AMSAT-NA because I understand
  the ITAR and during the last 10 years I have cooperate to write
  many technical articles for the AMSAT Journal without any
  money reward.
 
  If Martha says that the actual AMSAT members are in the order
  of 3,000. and if Les Rayburn, N1LF claim to be member of
  AMSAT #38965 it means that in the last 10 years many
  members abandoned AMSAT because of no future with no
  HEO satellites and only the FM LEO cubesat for no two
  ways communications between continents was not a
  satisfactory task.
 
  Many years ago early in 1972 I joined AMSAT because they
  promised us to communicate worlwide much better than using
  the HF but things changed and our antennas are becaming
  rusty over the roof for very small or for nothingSorry !
 
  73 de i8CVS Domenico
 
 
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

[amsat-bb] Re: S band LEO Sat tracking

2013-09-06 Thread John Becker

On 9/5/2013 9:56 PM, Greg D wrote:
Bob, for comparison, I used a 30 x 24 grill for AO-40.  I found that 
moving the dish +/- one click on my controller (10 degrees) would 
make a just-audible difference in the received signal strength.  So, I 
figure 10 degrees is the 3db beam width, not good enough, apparently, 
for the ISS TV...


Greg  KO6TH

Explain one click at a time

A rotor such as the Yeasu G5500  is a must.
A step rotor (moves X degs at a time)  just is not that good for a 
moving target.


John, W0JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: A0 40 replacement (PSK31-Best of FM and Linear!)

2013-09-05 Thread John Stephensen
The FM PA can be more efficient than the linear PA. If you constrain the FM 
deviation to be very narrow you can get 6 dB greater power efficiency for FM 
given a fixed peak envelope power (HF Radio Systems and Circuits, page 
59).


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:44 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] A0 40 replacement (PSK31-Best of FM and Linear!)



As long as AMSAT-NA needs to concentrate on... Cubesats...
I would really like to see the pursuit of linear transponders...
on them instead of single-channel FM repeaters.


We can have the best of BOTH FM and Linear!


But we used to use a ucc1 in the navy to receive messages.
http://www.virhistory.com/navy/rtty-mux-ucc1.htm
It would allow us to receive something like 16 or 32 separate traffic

channels on one frequency.

We have that now in PSK31.  Up to 30 channels in a single audio channel.
So the ideal AMSAT transponder is a linear receiver (on 28.120 MHz) and an
FM downlink of that single channel on UHF.  This has the advantage of 30
individual linear uplinks to share amongst everyone, and the advantage of
FM downlink so that everyone gets the same waterfall without added
Doppler.

It's a win/win.  And it is FULL duplex so that everyone can transmit
simultaneously and everyone can receive everyone simultaneously.  What
more fun can that be!!!

See the design: http://aprs.org/psk31uplink2.html

And it all fits on a single 3.4 circuit board. Easy to fit in any
Cubesat.  Two such flight ready boards are ready by the Brno University in
the CZECH Republic.

Bob, WB4APR
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement

2013-09-05 Thread John Stephensen
New equipment wouldn't be needed. The concept is to use the PCs that 
amateurs already have to fit more QSOs into the downlink. Uplink frequency 
coordination isn't any harder than on AO10, 13 or 40.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Virgil Bierschwale vbier...@gmail.com
To: 'John Stephensen' kd6...@comcast.net; 'Clint Bradford' 
clintbra...@earthlink.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org

Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 03:13 UTC
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement



You also could develop a whole new line of amateur radio equipment.

By that, I mean that ham's could use existing transceivers, and for
satellites that were equipped, they could buy this box that would allow 
them

to transmit on channel ?? of frequency ?? and the same on receive.

Of course, that might present a co-ordination nightmare...

Virgil
N5IVV


-Original Message-
From: John Stephensen [mailto:kd6...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 9:25 PM
To: Virgil Bierschwale; 'Clint Bradford'; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement

The satellite could collect the individual uplink signals and package them
in one downlink. One TDM downlink would use much less power than FDM
downlinks and would fit in the bandwidth of existing amateur receivers. 
Once

you have DSP in the satellite, there are a lot of possibilities.

73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message -
From: Virgil Bierschwale vbier...@gmail.com
To: 'John Stephensen' kd6...@comcast.net; 'Clint Bradford'
clintbra...@earthlink.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 01:52 UTC
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement


I've enjoyed reading this segment and I wasn't going to touch it, but 
this

one makes me want to chip in my two cents.

Granted, I'm not up to speed on what ya'll have done or what you haven't
done.

But we used to use a ucc1 in the navy to receive messages.

http://www.virhistory.com/navy/rtty-mux-ucc1.htm

It would allow us to receive something like 16 or 32 separate traffic
channels on one frequency.

Wouldn't it be possible to develop something like that in satellite
communications?

I ask because if you were to do it, you could substantially increase the
amount of channels that you could process?

Virgil
N5IVV


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of John Stephensen
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 8:31 PM
To: Clint Bradford; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement

If we want the most bang for the buck, it would be something that
supports
the most QSOs per watt of solar power. Since most hams have computers,
something that supports half a dozen PSK31 sessions would suffice. Given
the
new open-source voice codec you could also make something that supports
multiple digital voice QSOs with less power than now required for analog
FM
or SSB.

73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message -
From: Clint Bradford clintbra...@earthlink.net
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 00:27 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement



... launch opportunities are so rare that we ought to

fly the most capable equipment we can on those rare
occasions when we can get a launch ...

Perhaps we should define, most capable equipment. And
we also need to define bang for the buck.


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
program!

Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb





___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: S band LEO Sat tracking

2013-09-05 Thread John Becker

Back when I found one like this -

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833997212

If I recall it was only about 45 bucks.
from a company that I no longer remember their name (input welcomed)
who was located in Florida someplace.  Never had a problem once I got the
VHF and UHF and it all lined up on a 10 feet boom.

Had a downeast microwave pre amp on it.

John, W0JAB

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: A0 40 replacement

2013-09-04 Thread John Stephensen
The AMSAT-DL presentation at the AMSAT-UK meeting was that their goverment 
decided not to fund their HEO project and they are still looking for a 
source of money. AMSAT-NA and AMSAT-UK are concentrating on LEO projects 
that they can pay for via members and alliances with universities and 
government agencies.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: John Becker w0...@big-river.net

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 19:32 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] A0 40 replacement



Anything new on a replacement.
Have not see a thing myself.

John


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: A0 40 replacement

2013-09-04 Thread John Becker

On 9/4/2013 12:43 PM, Gus wrote:

Truly.

However, to include operators with modest shacks, you need to allow 
operation on modes A, B and/or J.  A satellite operating on 24.0 GHz 
won't be of interest to the average ham.  Not until the average ham 
has 24.0 GHz capable antennas, feedlines, amplifiers, transceivers, 
etc, in his shack.
Are you trying to say that if one can not stand in their yard with a HT 
they will not use it?

If that is the case go for it. (that would be fine with me)

I would like to see A B J and A as well as 24GHz.

I had not problem using AO 40 as many many other did.
I will 'never support another FM only sat.

My reason for dropping out of AMSAT was no direction other then just that.
I put together not one but two stations equipment with FT847.
If your saying it's a money thing. You have got to pay to play.
Everyone should know it's not or ever has been a poor man's hobby.
You cant get a toy-auto to go 120 but my mustang will.

John, W0JAB
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement

2013-09-04 Thread John Stephensen
If we want the most bang for the buck, it would be something that supports 
the most QSOs per watt of solar power. Since most hams have computers, 
something that supports half a dozen PSK31 sessions would suffice. Given the 
new open-source voice codec you could also make something that supports 
multiple digital voice QSOs with less power than now required for analog FM 
or SSB.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Clint Bradford clintbra...@earthlink.net

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 00:27 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement



... launch opportunities are so rare that we ought to

fly the most capable equipment we can on those rare
occasions when we can get a launch ...

Perhaps we should define, most capable equipment. And
we also need to define bang for the buck.


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement

2013-09-04 Thread John Stephensen
The satellite could collect the individual uplink signals and package them 
in one downlink. One TDM downlink would use much less power than FDM 
downlinks and would fit in the bandwidth of existing amateur receivers. Once 
you have DSP in the satellite, there are a lot of possibilities.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Virgil Bierschwale vbier...@gmail.com
To: 'John Stephensen' kd6...@comcast.net; 'Clint Bradford' 
clintbra...@earthlink.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org

Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 01:52 UTC
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement



I've enjoyed reading this segment and I wasn't going to touch it, but this
one makes me want to chip in my two cents.

Granted, I'm not up to speed on what ya'll have done or what you haven't
done.

But we used to use a ucc1 in the navy to receive messages.

http://www.virhistory.com/navy/rtty-mux-ucc1.htm

It would allow us to receive something like 16 or 32 separate traffic
channels on one frequency.

Wouldn't it be possible to develop something like that in satellite
communications?

I ask because if you were to do it, you could substantially increase the
amount of channels that you could process?

Virgil
N5IVV


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of John Stephensen
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 8:31 PM
To: Clint Bradford; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement

If we want the most bang for the buck, it would be something that 
supports

the most QSOs per watt of solar power. Since most hams have computers,
something that supports half a dozen PSK31 sessions would suffice. Given 
the

new open-source voice codec you could also make something that supports
multiple digital voice QSOs with less power than now required for analog 
FM

or SSB.

73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message -
From: Clint Bradford clintbra...@earthlink.net
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 00:27 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-40 Replacement



... launch opportunities are so rare that we ought to

fly the most capable equipment we can on those rare
occasions when we can get a launch ...

Perhaps we should define, most capable equipment. And
we also need to define bang for the buck.


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Slightly OT

2013-09-03 Thread John Fickes
 What does one do thats call sign ends with F ???

  73 John  KC0BMF


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Glenn AA5PK aa...@suddenlink.net wrote:

 Say Hi to Juno

 NASA's Juno spacecraft will fly past Earth on October 9, 2013 to receive a
 gravity assist from our planet, putting it on course for Jupiter. To
 celebrate this event, the Juno mission is inviting amateur radio operators
 around the world to say HI to Juno in a coordinated Morse Code message.
 Juno's radio  plasma wave experiment, called Waves, should be able to
 detect the message if enough people participate. So please join in, and
 help spread the word to fellow amateur radio enthusiasts!

 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/**hijuno/ http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/hijuno/


 __**_
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: 
 http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bbhttp://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] A0 40 replacement

2013-09-03 Thread John Becker

Anything new on a replacement.
Have not see a thing myself.

John


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: So50

2013-09-02 Thread John - VE7JZ
My daughter, who is a new ham has just given up on trying SO-50. 5 times now 
she has set up the station to work someone and the moment she unkeys, there is 
someone calling and not listening. We here, have a TS-2000 with az-el setup and 
2 yagis with auto tracking. I totally agree with the comments here on this 
subject of wild west operations on SO-50.  It is out of control. Here on the 
wet coast there is a WA6 ( wont say his call here ) every day that is 
constantly either ruining qso's or using way too much power and wiping out 
transponders completely. And if you call this LID, he either cannot hear you or 
ignores you and continues his ignorant disregard for other users so HE can get 
HIS contacts and to heck with anyone else. A constant and rather rude 
transponder HOG that is on almost every pass of every voice satellite. So as of 
today, we (my daughter and I) will go back to weak signal work and drop off 
satellite use until these LIDS either disappear or
 something. Our 2 cents worth.  Everyone have a great day wherever you might 
be. 73.br/br/Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] The USA Lower 48 Worked all 488 Grids non-Award

2013-08-23 Thread John Papay
 in 2013.  Eight of those final 9 grids were
handed out by Tom KA6SIP.  He heard about the need and decided to make a
grid expedition to put them on the air.  He did 7 of them in one trip.
Then Bob W7LRD went to the beach in CN77, operating away from home for
the first time.  That left CN72.  Tom just got back from Hawaii and quickly
made plans to camp out in CN72 and gave me the final grid on AO-7B, 20 August
2013 at 2332z.  Then he put CN71 on the air on 22-23August, also a very
rare grid square but one that I already had.  Many others worked him there.

There is no award for working all 488 grids on satellites as there is
for six meters (FFMA).  The ARRL awards committee has looked at it and will
implement it if someone on the Board of Directors brings it up for a vote
and it passes.  Hopefully that will happen soon.  Having that type of award
gives everyone something to work for.  It promotes grid expeditions and
interest in working through the satellites.  If we all contact our
ARRL Director, it might just happen.

There may be others who have already worked all 488 grids on satellites.
K6YK might be one of them.  I know there are several others who are
getting close.  It is not any easy thing to accomplish even if you operate
every day.  It is something you can work towards over the years.

I want to thank everyone that made satellite contacts with me that ultimately
led to working all 488.  Many went out of their way to put on a grid.  Over
half of the grids worked were from grid expeditions!  If you haven't 
experienced

operating away from home, please consider it.  With new operators showing up
on the birds every day, there is always a need for an uncommon grid.  And you
will have a lot of fun doing it!  Just ask anyone on my list.

73,
John K8YSE

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] 2U0SQL Guernsey IN89

2013-07-26 Thread John Papay

From the OPDX Bulletin by KB8NW, Nr. 1121 dated 29July2013:

2U, GUERNSEY (Satellite Op!) Peter, 2E0SQL, is now active as 2U0SQL from
Guernsey (IN89RL) until July 30th. Activity will be sporadic on the satel-
lite passes. He will be focusing on FO-29 and SO-50 passes. Peter states,
... no firm pass times, but hopefully will have internet access and will
try posting on Twitter (@2E0SQL) when I'll be on. Due that he is camping,
Peter will be battery powered using a FT-817 and a Arrow antenna. QSL via
his home callsign, direct or by the Bureau.

73,
John K8YSE

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Antenna direction calibration

2013-07-14 Thread John Fickes
Bob
  What I do ( and I'm not sure I'm right,but seems to work ) is to use the
North star to calibrate. I live at 41.2* latitude, so if I crank my
antennas to 41* elevation and point north 0* azimuth I should be pretty
close. I also live at 1* magnetic declination, not much so I don't worry
much about that. Now I don't do much EME as I don't have any power, but
I've monitored EME and this seems to get me pretty close. I will also be
glad to see what others do to calibrate.

 73 John  KC0BMF
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] K2BSA/W4UOO-EM97 West Virginia FO-29 1500z 13July2013

2013-07-13 Thread John Papay

W4UOO is operating as K2BSA from Beckley West Virginia
EM97.  West Virginia is a rare state on satellites.  It's
small and very mountainous and most places are down in the valleys
such that they don't have a low horizon.  I drove down to Beckley
several years ago to hand out EM97.  It was 300 miles one way.  Now
is your chance to work this grid and state.  Mike was able to work
down pretty low.  This is a great opportunity.  He was worked on FO-29.
73,
John K8YSE

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Sub orbital launch from Wallops Island Virgina

2013-06-18 Thread John Floyd
A Sub orbital launch from Wallops Island Virgina will carry a payload built by 
students from Eastern Shore Community College as a RockSat-c project. I am 
posting to this group in hopes that some of you mid-Atlantic hams with high 
gain 2 meter antennas and possibly elevation control (depending on where you 
are- approx 70 miles elevation at apogee) will give a listen for it. Due to 
antenna constraints it will have a very low eirp. It will be transmitting 
standard aprs packets on 144.390 Look for kn4ge-12 or kk4pgr -12 as the profile 
changes. Launch is scheduled for 5 am EST on June 20th. Keep abreast of any 
delays or follow the launch at:


https://www.facebook.com/NASAWFF?fref=ts


Also, you can watch the launch live from Ustream when the time comes.

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/nasa-tv-wallops

Any reception reports are invited, even partially decoded packets at 
thomas.c.ri...@nasa.gov

Of interest to many hobbyist, it will carry the first Raspberry Pi into space 
and also a nooelec SDR dongle that may possibly also be a first.

I apologize in advance for any flooding of aprs that it causes but promise you 
it is a very fast flight. The profile change above 15k is intended to minimize 
potential for flooding.

Thank You
John KN4GE
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] WINAOS error message

2013-06-18 Thread John Kopala

WINAOS was working earlier on one PC (V. 4.0) but giving an error message on 
the other (V. 12.8).

Now I get error messages on both PC's with both versions:

V 4.0 - Listenindex uberschreitet das Maximum (0)
V 12.8 - Listenindex uberschreitet das Maximum (-1)

With these errors, I can no longer print out a list of satellites for a desired 
time period.
Any help  would be appreciated.

John Kopala
N7JK
jkop...@gmail.com
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT needs volunteers ???

2013-06-07 Thread John Stephensen
If AMSAT asks for volunteers its usually for newsletters, booth duty or web 
site maintenance. The AMSAT BoD raises money, provides it to groups doing 
development of amateur satellites and provides general services like this 
mailing list. In my experience, satellites are developed by dedicated teams 
that will ask for volunteers for specific tasks. For example, I was a 
volunteer for Eagle U-band receiver development. AMSAT might have passed on 
a name and the position had already been filled.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Tom Lubbers K8TL k...@earthlink.net

To: AMSAT BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 15:55 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT needs volunteers ???


Over the past half century I responded several times to AMSAT’s call for 
volunteers and never heard back from them.  I was happy to hear from my 
son when he volunteered his software talents to AMSAT and told me that 
they had asked when would be a good time to contact him.  His job title is 
Software Engineer with over 30 years experience, a number of published 
articles and winner of a number of design contests.  He is also 
comfortable with hardware and firmware.  If I mention a piece of hardware 
or software that I wish was a available in my ham shack it is usually 
available the next time he visits.


Oh by the way I see AMSAT is still looking for a software guy, they never 
followed up on their request of when they could contact him.  They sure 
blew an opportunity there.


Tom K8TL


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT needs volunteers ???

2013-06-07 Thread John Stephensen
Currently, the only way that AMSAT-NA seems to be able to work with non-US 
citizens is via NASA which can more easily obtain the required approvals.


73,

John
KD6OZH

- Original Message - 
From: Jaime Robles ja...@robles.es

To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 18:37 UTC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT needs volunteers ???


I answered last year to a call and I got an answer from AMSAT ... but it
was negative due to the ITAR regulations and my Spanish nationality :-)

Maybe if the US relax ITAR for hamradio satellites we (non-US hams) can
help in future projects. :-)

Just my 2 cents :-)

Jaime, EA4TV
El 07/06/2013 19:43, John Stephensen kd6...@comcast.net escribió:

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Help in Hearing ISS

2013-05-27 Thread John Spasojevich
Les,

Everyone has given good information.  Let me add a couple of other
suggestions specifically about ISS.  We are using the Erickson radio (
basically an HT) in the Columbus Module. This is due to a fault with the
Kenwood D-700.  Maximum output on the Erickson is 5 watts. The radio is
also used for ARISS school contacts in FM voice. The crew instructions for
each contact give instructions to reset from voice to packet after each
school contact. However there are activities aboard which require the ham
station to be powered down from time to time so there are times it may not
be active.

We are finding with the reduced output power of the Erickson and the
placement of the antennas on ISS that results will vary with ascending
versus descending passes as well as whether the station passes to the east
or west of your location, which means your signal will be going through the
superstructure or unobstructed to/from the antennas.

For the voice contacts we've always recommended a pre-amp at the antenna,
even more so now, but I'm not sure how packet has been effected if at all
with the change in radios.

Anyway, it sounds like you are having fun. Keep it up!

73,
John - AG9D
ARISS Operations Team


On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Les Rayburn l...@highnoonfilm.com wrote:

 I ran a Google search this morning, and there is still no known cure for
 operator error. So I resort to searching
 for more medicine on the list until a cure can be found. Please give
 generously until a cure can be found. :-)

 Been on satellites for about five weeks now, and have managed to work a
 few contacts through SO-50, FO-29, AO-7,
 and VO-52. Have copied CW beacons from other birds including a few of the
 small Cubesats. The system
 seems to be working well.

 Some bugs had to be worked out along the way, including adjusting Doppler
 correction on SATPC32,
 fixing an audio distortion problem, and desense in Mode J.

 But despite my best efforts, I've yet to hear a single peep out of the
 International Space Station. Not just in voice modes,
 mind you, but I can't seem to find the digipeater signals, or anything
 else. I'm clearly doing something wrong.

 So, here are my questions:


 1.) My IC-910H is controlled by SATPC32 in satellite mode. Simple
 enough. But when I make the ISS the active satellite it stays in V/U
 mode, and won't easily let me go into simplex mode to work the ISS voice
 circuits or FM repeater.

 Is there a fix for this? How do other IC-910H owners deal with this issue?

 2.) What frequency should I be looking for the packet signals on?

 I don't have a TNC, but do have a Rigblaster USB Advantage sound card
 interface. I know it's possible to use this to monitor (and possibly
 transmit signals to the ISS) Is there a link to a web site explaining how
 to configure the software, etc. for beginners?

 3.) How often is the ISS in FM repeater mode? Not often, I'm guessing.
 Anyone know why?

 4.) Any other tips on working the ISS? It would be quite a thrill for me!

 Please pardon the newbie questions. This list is great, and I really
 appreciate the help.

 We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming for smart,
 capable operators, already in
 progress.
 --
 --
 73,

 Les Rayburn, N1LF
 121 Mayfair Park
 Maylene, AL 35114
 EM63nf

 6M VUCC #1712
 AMSAT #38965
 Grid Bandits #222
 Southeastern VHF Society
 Central States VHF Society Life Member
 Six Club #2484

 Active on 6 Meters thru 1296, 10GHz  Light

 __**_
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: 
 http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bbhttp://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >