[amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris:

2010-04-29 Thread Phil Karn
Stephen Melachrinos wrote:

 were a major hazard to everyone, themselves included. So they must
 have allocated more resources to the problem, as this is a massive
 undertaking. (Note that some reports say that the US has about 20,000
 objects that are tracked and cataloged. In theory, this means
 propagating the ephemeris of all of these for some number of days and
 comparing all possible combinations across the ti! me period of the
 analysis.)

Computers are cheap, so actually propagating the ephemerides of those 
objects is the easy part.

The hard part is that the published elements are simply not accurate 
enough to reliably predict collisions -- or give sufficient reassurances 
that a collision won't occur.

TS Kelso has written some stuff about this on his website. See

http://www.celestrak.com/events/collision/

He's been doing his own conflict predicts for some time. He shows many 
close approaches that never result in a collision. Yet he did not rate a 
Iridium 33/Cosmos 2251 collision as especially probable before it 
happened because the TLE numbers simply aren't accurate enough.

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris:

2010-04-14 Thread John Heath
hi steve,
thanks for an informative post.
good to see the bb doing what it does best.

73 john g7hia





From: Stephen Melachrinos melac...@verizon.net
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Wednesday, 14 April, 2010 0:22:34
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris:

Greg -

I didn't see anyone else reply, so I'll try.

No, it's not coincidence. After the Iridium collision last year, the US Air 
Force decided it was in everyone's best interest for them to run conjunction 
analyses against many more space objects than they had previously analyzed, and 
report their predictions to system owners. Previously, their concern was 
primarily the US government's spacecraft, so we (in the amateur community) and 
many commercial operators never knew what was happening to our birds unless we 
did (or paid for) the work ourselves. But the collision (as well as the Chinese 
ASAT demonstration) showed that the resulting debris fields were a major hazard 
to everyone, themselves included. So they must have allocated more resources to 
the problem, as this is a massive undertaking. (Note that some reports say that 
the US has about 20,000 objects that are tracked and cataloged. In theory, this 
means propagating the ephemeris of all of these for some number of days and 
comparing all possible
 combinations across the ti!
me period of the analysis.)

Unfortunately, many (if not most) of the objects no longer have maneuvering 
capability. If a vehicle can maneuver, these warnings give them time to try and 
increase the separation prior to the predicted close approach. (You might have 
heard of some times when a space shuttle does one of these maneuvers.) But if 
you can't maneuver (as is the case with AO-51), all we can do is watch and wait.

Steve
W3HF


Apr 13, 2010 01:45:32 AM, ko6th_g...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Is it just a coincidence that these warnings seem to be coming pretty often 
 recently, or did NORAD change their reporting procedures, or is 
 all the junk up there getting to critical mass where nothing is safe? It 
 seems like we're heading into a situation like nuclear fission, where 
 you get enough stuff interacting, and it sets up a chain reaction of 
 collisions.

 Greg KO6TH

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris: Predicted near impact for AO-51

2010-04-13 Thread Larry Teran
Did AO-51 survived the approach?

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Greg D. ko6th_g...@hotmail.com wrote:


 Is it just a coincidence that these warnings seem to be coming pretty often
 recently, or did NORAD change their reporting procedures, or is all the junk
 up there getting to critical mass where nothing is safe?  It seems like
 we're heading into a situation like nuclear fission, where you get enough
 stuff interacting, and it sets up a chain reaction of collisions.

 Greg  KO6TH


  Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:16:59 -0400
  From: k...@verizon.net
  To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
  Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris: Predicted near impact for AO-51
 
  On 4/11/2010 11:45 PM, Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:
   The Joint Space Operations Center at Vandenberg AFB has reported that
   AO-51 will have a ~200 meter (i.e. 2 football fields) approach to
   object #34890 at 08:51Z on April 13th.
  The Joint Space Command sent an update -- their latest prediction has
  reduced the 200 meter miss distance to ~135 meters
 
  73, Tom
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
 program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

 _
 Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your
 inbox.

 http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris: Predicted near impact for AO-51

2010-04-13 Thread B J


--- On Tue, 4/13/10, Larry Teran ki6...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Larry Teran ki6...@gmail.com
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris: Predicted near impact for AO-51
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Received: Tuesday, April 13, 2010, 1:33 PM
 Did AO-51 survived the approach?

snip

There were several stations operating over it during today's 1400 UTC pass over 
western North America.

Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris: Predicted near impact for AO-51

2010-04-12 Thread wouter weggelaar
It seems to me that everyone in LEO is getting warnings now.
Unfortunately that crash caused a lot of debris.
Delfi-C3 made it through ok, as well as the other cubes on our launch.
so good luck to AO-51!

Wouter Weggelaar PA3WEG
Delfi-C3 mission ops team

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Tom Clark, K3IO k...@verizon.net wrote:
 The Joint Space Operations Center at Vandenberg AFB has reported that
 AO-51 will have a ~200 meter (i.e. 2 football fields) approach to object
 #34890 at 08:51Z on April 13th.

 Object #34890 (see http://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=34890 and
 http://celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/iridium-33-debris.txt) is one piece
 of the more than 500 pieces of debris left over after the Iridium-33 --
 Kosmos-2251 collision on Feb. 10,2009 (see
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision). The total mass
 of the two spacecraft was about 1600 kg (well over one ton).

 You can get an HD movie animation of the Iridium/Kosmos collision here
 (warning -- 50 MB ZIP file).

 73, Tom


 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris: Predicted near impact for AO-51

2010-04-12 Thread Luc Leblanc
On 12 Apr 2010 at 12:20, wouter weggelaar wrote:

Date sent:  Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:20:23 +0200
From:   wouter weggelaar pa3...@amsat.org
Subject:[amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris: Predicted near impact for 
AO-51
To: k...@verizon.net
Copies to:  AMSAT BB amsat-bb@amsat.org

 It seems to me that everyone in LEO is getting warnings now.
 Unfortunately that crash caused a lot of debris.
 Delfi-C3 made it through ok, as well as the other cubes on our launch.
 so good luck to AO-51!
 
 Wouter Weggelaar PA3WEG
 Delfi-C3 mission ops team
 
A general question is there is some sort of validation done when a satellite is 
put on an orbit? Could be due to the low orbit there is no 
collision avoidance calculus made? The doomed day already happen but is it 
possible another collision trigger a billard effect in space as 
per the following site:http://science.nasa.gov/realtime/Jtrack/3D/Jtrack3D.html



-


Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
Skype VE2DWE
www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
DSTAR urcall VE2DWE
WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE

 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Space Debris: Predicted near impact for AO-51

2010-04-12 Thread Tom Clark, K3IO
On 4/11/2010 11:45 PM, Tom Clark, K3IO wrote:
 The Joint Space Operations Center at Vandenberg AFB has reported that 
 AO-51 will have a ~200 meter (i.e. 2 football fields) approach to 
 object #34890 at 08:51Z on April 13th.
The Joint Space Command sent an update -- their latest prediction has 
reduced the 200 meter miss distance to ~135 meters

73, Tom
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb