[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT857/897 on satellites

2009-08-13 Thread Howard Kowall
Good Morning John
I use a FT897D for satellite and also a FT817 for Full Duplex operation
I use them together so I can hear myself on the downlink (which is the 
proper way to do it).
It receives the satellite fine(both rigs)but I would not consider the Ft897D 
a upgrade or vise versa,the best upgrade to do as a first thing is the 
antenna and cable and quality connectors.The draw back that I don't like on 
the Yaesu rigs is that the cat system cannot work during transmit,so Doppler 
is not corrected when you transmit and can be a bit of a pain when trying to 
setup your software for calibration.Its not to big of a deal and you can 
work around it.I personal believe that upgrading to any one of the multi 
band and multi mode rigs wont show any improvement.I have learnt allot from 
this board over this year and I live buy this  rule (High Gain Low Loss).If 
I had an Icom and I wanted to buy another rig to run full duplex,I would buy 
a Icom,just for the fact that I mentioned above about Doppler correction and 
calibration.In order to upgrade your transceiver it  is best to buy a rig 
that is design for satellite operation (IC910H,TS2000,FT897D,FT736R,etc)
this is just my personal opinion.
Good Luck
Howard
VE4ISP
- Original Message - 
From: John Geiger aa...@yahoo.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; ya...@mailman.qth.net; ft...@yahoogroups.com; 
ft...@yahoogroups.com; ft-...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:57 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Yaesu FT857/897 on satellites


 Is anyone on the list using a Yaesu FT897 or FT857 on the LEO satellites 
 (both FM and SSB)?  I am currently using an Icom 706MKIIG with pretty good 
 results, but have been thinking about upgrading to a Yaesu FT897D or 
 maybe a FT857D.  I have used some Yaesu rigs on the sats before and the 
 706MKIIG seems to hear them better, especially AO27.

 I don't have a big setup-Cushcraft dualband yagi (5 elements on each band) 
 with no elevation, so signals are not rockcrushing from the satellites. 
 The QST reviews show that the Icom has better sensitivity on 70cm SSB (MDS 
 of -143 vs -139 dbm) and on FM (.16 vs .21 microvolts) but are those 
 differences really meaningful?  Do the 897 and 857 still receive the sats 
 really good with a minimal setup?

 73s John AA5JG




 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT857/897 on satellites

2009-08-13 Thread Howard Kowall
Sorry the list of rigs should read FT847 not FT897D
sorry about that
Howard
VE4ISP
- Original Message - 
From: Howard Kowall hkow...@shaw.ca
To: John Geiger aa...@yahoo.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 7:21 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT857/897 on satellites


 Good Morning John
 I use a FT897D for satellite and also a FT817 for Full Duplex operation
 I use them together so I can hear myself on the downlink (which is the
 proper way to do it).
 It receives the satellite fine(both rigs)but I would not consider the 
 Ft897D
 a upgrade or vise versa,the best upgrade to do as a first thing is the
 antenna and cable and quality connectors.The draw back that I don't like 
 on
 the Yaesu rigs is that the cat system cannot work during transmit,so 
 Doppler
 is not corrected when you transmit and can be a bit of a pain when trying 
 to
 setup your software for calibration.Its not to big of a deal and you can
 work around it.I personal believe that upgrading to any one of the multi
 band and multi mode rigs wont show any improvement.I have learnt allot 
 from
 this board over this year and I live buy this  rule (High Gain Low 
 Loss).If
 I had an Icom and I wanted to buy another rig to run full duplex,I would 
 buy
 a Icom,just for the fact that I mentioned above about Doppler correction 
 and
 calibration.In order to upgrade your transceiver it  is best to buy a rig
 that is design for satellite operation (IC910H,TS2000,FT897D,FT736R,etc)
 this is just my personal opinion.
 Good Luck
 Howard
 VE4ISP
 - Original Message - 
 From: John Geiger aa...@yahoo.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; ya...@mailman.qth.net; 
 ft...@yahoogroups.com;
 ft...@yahoogroups.com; ft-...@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:57 PM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Yaesu FT857/897 on satellites


 Is anyone on the list using a Yaesu FT897 or FT857 on the LEO satellites
 (both FM and SSB)?  I am currently using an Icom 706MKIIG with pretty 
 good
 results, but have been thinking about upgrading to a Yaesu FT897D or
 maybe a FT857D.  I have used some Yaesu rigs on the sats before and the
 706MKIIG seems to hear them better, especially AO27.

 I don't have a big setup-Cushcraft dualband yagi (5 elements on each 
 band)
 with no elevation, so signals are not rockcrushing from the satellites.
 The QST reviews show that the Icom has better sensitivity on 70cm SSB 
 (MDS
 of -143 vs -139 dbm) and on FM (.16 vs .21 microvolts) but are those
 differences really meaningful?  Do the 897 and 857 still receive the sats
 really good with a minimal setup?

 73s John AA5JG




 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
 program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb