[android-developers] Additional expansion files in standard obb/ directory
I've patched APK Expansion library so it can download additional .obb files from my server and store in shared-storage/Android/obb/package-name with main and patch files. At http://developer.android.com/google/play/expansion-files.html you can read strong limitation: do not save other data into your obb/ directory. APK Expansion library treats all additional files as it's own, so from it's point of view everything is ok. Do you know any potential pitfalls? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's clueless. In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only asking if that were so. As it is, I have pointed out that the exact same question on Stack Overflow remains unanswered, and he wasnt rude. I am no longer interested in the answer, because I, being better than all the trolls with nothing better to do other than cry about rudeness because of their ineptness at solving real problems and do nothing but derail from a solution seeking thread to a flaming thread, have found the solution to the problem. If you have a problem, troll, don't read. It's that simple, troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 9:27:27 PM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: *If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading.* I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called out on it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if you really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer. *In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities.* Given that your only response is to lash out at those calling you out on your behavior, perhaps you should take your own advice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* The only person responsible for derailing the thread is yourself, and how you have chosen to lash out at those that called you out on your rudeness. *As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow.* What does that matter? All that shows is that your particular problem is a rare one, and that it may take some time for someone to figure out, which in turn means you are probably going to have to wait a little bit. I've been on this forum since it was created. That doesn't really matter other than that I can tell you that people best get answers when they are patient, and not rude when they don't get an answer. As I said before, it is not uncommon for a period of 2-3 days before someone is able to answer a question. Can you post a follow-up to your question? Absolutely. Generally I would suggest at least waiting 2 days. And when you do, a very simple question like Has anyone seen anything like this before? should suffice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* Likewise, I do not appreciate your rudeness. C'est la vie. The only person truly responsible for the thread getting derailed is your own. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 PM Ristar rist...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading. In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities. I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread. As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow. Don't be a derailing troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:19:05 AM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: Rudeness is not defined by the question asked, but by how it was asked. And yes, your second post was rude. This list is answered by people who answer things in their spare time. They aren't sitting around getting paid by Google (or anyone for that matter) to answer questions. It is not uncommon for answers to take 2-3 days (our longer!) before being answered. So sit back, wait, grab a cup of coffee, perhaps apologize for being rude, and hopefully someone will see your question soon that knows how to help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
*If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading.* I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called out on it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if you really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer. *In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities.* Given that your only response is to lash out at those calling you out on your behavior, perhaps you should take your own advice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* The only person responsible for derailing the thread is yourself, and how you have chosen to lash out at those that called you out on your rudeness. *As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow.* What does that matter? All that shows is that your particular problem is a rare one, and that it may take some time for someone to figure out, which in turn means you are probably going to have to wait a little bit. I've been on this forum since it was created. That doesn't really matter other than that I can tell you that people best get answers when they are patient, and not rude when they don't get an answer. As I said before, it is not uncommon for a period of 2-3 days before someone is able to answer a question. Can you post a follow-up to your question? Absolutely. Generally I would suggest at least waiting 2 days. And when you do, a very simple question like Has anyone seen anything like this before? should suffice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* Likewise, I do not appreciate your rudeness. C'est la vie. The only person truly responsible for the thread getting derailed is your own. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 PM Ristar rista...@gmail.com wrote: If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading. In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities. I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread. As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow. Don't be a derailing troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:19:05 AM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: Rudeness is not defined by the question asked, but by how it was asked. And yes, your second post was rude. This list is answered by people who answer things in their spare time. They aren't sitting around getting paid by Google (or anyone for that matter) to answer questions. It is not uncommon for answers to take 2-3 days (our longer!) before being answered. So sit back, wait, grab a cup of coffee, perhaps apologize for being rude, and hopefully someone will see your question soon that knows how to help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [android-developers] Should we adhere holo design or material design for app running on Android below 5
Good point. I will have to start updating my apps now. :-) On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:59 AM Jose_GD jose.gonzale...@gmail.com wrote: +1. Google wouldn't take the effort to make AppCompat if they didn't intend to get Material Design on older devices. Cheers José https://play.google.com/store/apps/developer?id=José%20González%20D%27Amico https://play.google.com/store/apps/developer?id=Jos%C3%A9%20Gonz%C3%A1lez%20D%27Amico El lunes, 11 de mayo de 2015, 15:21:16 (UTC-3), TreKing escribió: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:17 AM, yccheok yanchen...@gmail.com wrote: However, if the app is running on Android 2.3 till Android 4, should I make the app having Holo look, or Material look? Does Google provide any official guideline on this? Google's put a huge amount of effort into Material and making it backward-portable in the app compat library. Considering that you can use this to get this theme on all of these platform versions, and considering how ass-ugly 2.3x looks now by comparison, you probably should just use the one theme on everything. Reference link for video for consistent design: http://youtu.be/5Be2mJzP-Uw - TreKing http://sites.google.com/site/rezmobileapps/treking - Chicago transit tracking app for Android-powered devices -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
Sorry if you don't like the truth, but you were being rude and impatient. When you post in this forum is it expected that somebody who knows the answer will enlighten you, not that people will search for the solution for you. It is also expected that if you should happen to solve the problem yourself then you will post the solution for the benefit of others, but apparently you didn't know that either. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Ristar rista...@gmail.com wrote: If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's clueless. In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only asking if that were so. As it is, I have pointed out that the exact same question on Stack Overflow remains unanswered, and he wasnt rude. I am no longer interested in the answer, because I, being better than all the trolls with nothing better to do other than cry about rudeness because of their ineptness at solving real problems and do nothing but derail from a solution seeking thread to a flaming thread, have found the solution to the problem. If you have a problem, troll, don't read. It's that simple, troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 9:27:27 PM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: *If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading.* I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called out on it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if you really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer. *In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities.* Given that your only response is to lash out at those calling you out on your behavior, perhaps you should take your own advice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* The only person responsible for derailing the thread is yourself, and how you have chosen to lash out at those that called you out on your rudeness. *As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow.* What does that matter? All that shows is that your particular problem is a rare one, and that it may take some time for someone to figure out, which in turn means you are probably going to have to wait a little bit. I've been on this forum since it was created. That doesn't really matter other than that I can tell you that people best get answers when they are patient, and not rude when they don't get an answer. As I said before, it is not uncommon for a period of 2-3 days before someone is able to answer a question. Can you post a follow-up to your question? Absolutely. Generally I would suggest at least waiting 2 days. And when you do, a very simple question like Has anyone seen anything like this before? should suffice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* Likewise, I do not appreciate your rudeness. C'est la vie. The only person truly responsible for the thread getting derailed is your own. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 PM Ristar rist...@gmail.com wrote: If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading. In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities. I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread. As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow. Don't be a derailing troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:19:05 AM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: Rudeness is not defined by the question asked, but by how it was asked. And yes, your second post was rude. This list is answered by people who answer things in their spare time. They aren't sitting around getting paid by Google (or anyone for that matter) to answer questions. It is not uncommon for answers to take 2-3 days (our longer!) before being answered. So sit back, wait, grab a cup of coffee, perhaps apologize for being rude, and hopefully someone will see your question soon that knows how to help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
Glad you found the solution to your problem. :-) On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM Ristar rista...@gmail.com wrote: If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's clueless. In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only asking if that were so. As it is, I have pointed out that the exact same question on Stack Overflow remains unanswered, and he wasnt rude. I am no longer interested in the answer, because I, being better than all the trolls with nothing better to do other than cry about rudeness because of their ineptness at solving real problems and do nothing but derail from a solution seeking thread to a flaming thread, have found the solution to the problem. If you have a problem, troll, don't read. It's that simple, troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 9:27:27 PM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: *If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading.* I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called out on it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if you really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer. *In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities.* Given that your only response is to lash out at those calling you out on your behavior, perhaps you should take your own advice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* The only person responsible for derailing the thread is yourself, and how you have chosen to lash out at those that called you out on your rudeness. *As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow.* What does that matter? All that shows is that your particular problem is a rare one, and that it may take some time for someone to figure out, which in turn means you are probably going to have to wait a little bit. I've been on this forum since it was created. That doesn't really matter other than that I can tell you that people best get answers when they are patient, and not rude when they don't get an answer. As I said before, it is not uncommon for a period of 2-3 days before someone is able to answer a question. Can you post a follow-up to your question? Absolutely. Generally I would suggest at least waiting 2 days. And when you do, a very simple question like Has anyone seen anything like this before? should suffice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* Likewise, I do not appreciate your rudeness. C'est la vie. The only person truly responsible for the thread getting derailed is your own. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 PM Ristar rist...@gmail.com wrote: If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading. In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities. I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread. As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow. Don't be a derailing troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:19:05 AM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: Rudeness is not defined by the question asked, but by how it was asked. And yes, your second post was rude. This list is answered by people who answer things in their spare time. They aren't sitting around getting paid by Google (or anyone for that matter) to answer questions. It is not uncommon for answers to take 2-3 days (our longer!) before being answered. So sit back, wait, grab a cup of coffee, perhaps apologize for being rude, and hopefully someone will see your question soon that knows how to help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
I can see that you are keeping up your trolling effort. Again, how do you explain a question that remained unanswered on StackOverflow for years? You can not. While I do not expect people to be at my beck and call, you insufferable troll, I do expect no one to know what the code means and how to resolve it. Don't give me the great crap when you were saying that I expect people to do everything for me. When I had to do everything myself AND deal with insufferable trolls like yourself. Good. I have absolutely no intention to share a damn thing on a forum with trolls like yourself. On Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 2:23:50 AM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: *Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have unlimited time to wait.* That is true, but no one made that assumption. Flip that around and you can't assume that people on this forum are here at your beck and call. *I have already done my due diligence.* Great. But that doesn't give you the right to carry on the way you have been without being called on it. *As it is, there were no helpful links and no one here helped, and you can get off your high horse because you did nothing but derail the damn thread.* Marina posted some very helpful information. And it came within the timeframe I initially mentioned to expect most answers... Most answers come within 2-3 days. Marina provided helpful information about 36 hours after your email came through on the forum thread. As for me, I was simply trying to help you understand how you were being rude, disrespectful, and belligerent. At every step of the way, you have done nothing but hurl insult after insult. I passed on many opportunities to return the favor, in the hopes of helping you better understand how the community around this forum operates. *I do not see why I should contribute to a forum full of trolls like yourself, and that is my choice.* Yes, it is your choice. And if you can't control your temper and be respectful and patient on here, then you have my full support in that choice. Thanks, Justin On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:59 PM Ristar rist...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have unlimited time to wait. I have already done my due diligence. As it is, there were no helpful links and no one here helped, and you can get off your high horse because you did nothing but derail the damn thread. Your link is pathetic. I was not the one asking for apologies, was I? I do not see why I should contribute to a forum full of trolls like yourself, and that is my choice. You are the one that can't get over it. So, take your own stupid advice, and get over it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
For the millionth time, before I posted the question, I have already tried searching for the answer, and all I found was an unanswered StackOverflow question. Do not try to make it sound like I expect anyone to do my work for me, and no one here did anything worth a damn for me. You people can blame me for being impatient, but what good would a solution be to me if it were given 1 or 2, or 10, or 100 years later? With members like the 3 of you, I shall make the conscious choice never to share anything here. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 10:28:46 PM UTC+8, Steve Gabrilowitz wrote: Sorry if you don't like the truth, but you were being rude and impatient. When you post in this forum is it expected that somebody who knows the answer will enlighten you, not that people will search for the solution for you. It is also expected that if you should happen to solve the problem yourself then you will post the solution for the benefit of others, but apparently you didn't know that either. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Ristar rist...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's clueless. In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only asking if that were so. As it is, I have pointed out that the exact same question on Stack Overflow remains unanswered, and he wasnt rude. I am no longer interested in the answer, because I, being better than all the trolls with nothing better to do other than cry about rudeness because of their ineptness at solving real problems and do nothing but derail from a solution seeking thread to a flaming thread, have found the solution to the problem. If you have a problem, troll, don't read. It's that simple, troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 9:27:27 PM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: *If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading.* I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called out on it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if you really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer. *In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities.* Given that your only response is to lash out at those calling you out on your behavior, perhaps you should take your own advice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* The only person responsible for derailing the thread is yourself, and how you have chosen to lash out at those that called you out on your rudeness. *As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow.* What does that matter? All that shows is that your particular problem is a rare one, and that it may take some time for someone to figure out, which in turn means you are probably going to have to wait a little bit. I've been on this forum since it was created. That doesn't really matter other than that I can tell you that people best get answers when they are patient, and not rude when they don't get an answer. As I said before, it is not uncommon for a period of 2-3 days before someone is able to answer a question. Can you post a follow-up to your question? Absolutely. Generally I would suggest at least waiting 2 days. And when you do, a very simple question like Has anyone seen anything like this before? should suffice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* Likewise, I do not appreciate your rudeness. C'est la vie. The only person truly responsible for the thread getting derailed is your own. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 PM Ristar rist...@gmail.com wrote: If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading. In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities. I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread. As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow. Don't be a derailing troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:19:05 AM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: Rudeness is not defined by the question asked, but by how it was asked. And yes, your second post was rude. This list is answered by people who answer things in their spare time. They aren't sitting around getting paid by Google (or anyone for that matter) to answer questions. It is not uncommon for answers to take 2-3 days (our longer!) before being answered. So sit back, wait, grab a cup of coffee, perhaps apologize for being rude, and hopefully someone will see your question soon that knows how to help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
*For the millionth time, before I posted the question, I have already tried searching for the answer, and all I found was an unanswered StackOverflow question.* I've already addressed that. That just adds to the reason that you should be patient and wait a little longer. It also does nothing to account for the rude and belligerent behavior. *Do not try to make it sound like I expect anyone to do my work for me, and no one here did anything worth a damn for me.* Unfortunately you made it sound like you expected that, when you said *Like, come on, I already showed you the error code. Or is everyone clueless?* *You people can blame me for being impatient, but what good would a solution be to me if it were given 1 or 2, or 10, or 100 years later?* We are talking about a period of days, not years. We are simply talking about some basic internet etiquette. *With members like the 3 of you, I shall make the conscious choice never to share anything here.* I highly recommend reading this. The whole article is good, but I'm linking to a very specific section that applies to the interactions in this thread: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#not_losing On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:28 PM Ristar rista...@gmail.com wrote: For the millionth time, before I posted the question, I have already tried searching for the answer, and all I found was an unanswered StackOverflow question. Do not try to make it sound like I expect anyone to do my work for me, and no one here did anything worth a damn for me. You people can blame me for being impatient, but what good would a solution be to me if it were given 1 or 2, or 10, or 100 years later? With members like the 3 of you, I shall make the conscious choice never to share anything here. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 10:28:46 PM UTC+8, Steve Gabrilowitz wrote: Sorry if you don't like the truth, but you were being rude and impatient. When you post in this forum is it expected that somebody who knows the answer will enlighten you, not that people will search for the solution for you. It is also expected that if you should happen to solve the problem yourself then you will post the solution for the benefit of others, but apparently you didn't know that either. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Ristar rist...@gmail.com wrote: If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's clueless. In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only asking if that were so. As it is, I have pointed out that the exact same question on Stack Overflow remains unanswered, and he wasnt rude. I am no longer interested in the answer, because I, being better than all the trolls with nothing better to do other than cry about rudeness because of their ineptness at solving real problems and do nothing but derail from a solution seeking thread to a flaming thread, have found the solution to the problem. If you have a problem, troll, don't read. It's that simple, troll. On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 9:27:27 PM UTC+8, MagouyaWare wrote: *If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop reading.* I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called out on it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if you really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer. *In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities.* Given that your only response is to lash out at those calling you out on your behavior, perhaps you should take your own advice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* The only person responsible for derailing the thread is yourself, and how you have chosen to lash out at those that called you out on your rudeness. *As I have mentioned earlier the same question was not answered on Stack Overflow.* What does that matter? All that shows is that your particular problem is a rare one, and that it may take some time for someone to figure out, which in turn means you are probably going to have to wait a little bit. I've been on this forum since it was created. That doesn't really matter other than that I can tell you that people best get answers when they are patient, and not rude when they don't get an answer. As I said before, it is not uncommon for a period of 2-3 days before someone is able to answer a question. Can you post a follow-up to your question? Absolutely. Generally I would suggest at least waiting 2 days. And when you do, a very simple question like Has anyone seen anything like this before? should suffice. *I do not appreciate your derailing of the thread.* Likewise, I do not appreciate your rudeness. C'est la vie. The only person truly responsible for the thread getting derailed is your own. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19 PM Ristar rist...@gmail.com wrote: If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
*Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have unlimited time to wait.* That is true, but no one made that assumption. Flip that around and you can't assume that people on this forum are here at your beck and call. *I have already done my due diligence.* Great. But that doesn't give you the right to carry on the way you have been without being called on it. *As it is, there were no helpful links and no one here helped, and you can get off your high horse because you did nothing but derail the damn thread.* Marina posted some very helpful information. And it came within the timeframe I initially mentioned to expect most answers... Most answers come within 2-3 days. Marina provided helpful information about 36 hours after your email came through on the forum thread. As for me, I was simply trying to help you understand how you were being rude, disrespectful, and belligerent. At every step of the way, you have done nothing but hurl insult after insult. I passed on many opportunities to return the favor, in the hopes of helping you better understand how the community around this forum operates. *I do not see why I should contribute to a forum full of trolls like yourself, and that is my choice.* Yes, it is your choice. And if you can't control your temper and be respectful and patient on here, then you have my full support in that choice. Thanks, Justin On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:59 PM Ristar rista...@gmail.com wrote: Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have unlimited time to wait. I have already done my due diligence. As it is, there were no helpful links and no one here helped, and you can get off your high horse because you did nothing but derail the damn thread. Your link is pathetic. I was not the one asking for apologies, was I? I do not see why I should contribute to a forum full of trolls like yourself, and that is my choice. You are the one that can't get over it. So, take your own stupid advice, and get over it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
@Marina Thank you for that information. I had never encountered that problem before. If I encounter it in the future I will know how to start figuring out the root cause of the problem. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM Justin Anderson magouyaw...@gmail.com wrote: *Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have unlimited time to wait.* That is true, but no one made that assumption. Flip that around and you can't assume that people on this forum are here at your beck and call. *I have already done my due diligence.* Great. But that doesn't give you the right to carry on the way you have been without being called on it. *As it is, there were no helpful links and no one here helped, and you can get off your high horse because you did nothing but derail the damn thread.* Marina posted some very helpful information. And it came within the timeframe I initially mentioned to expect most answers... Most answers come within 2-3 days. Marina provided helpful information about 36 hours after your email came through on the forum thread. As for me, I was simply trying to help you understand how you were being rude, disrespectful, and belligerent. At every step of the way, you have done nothing but hurl insult after insult. I passed on many opportunities to return the favor, in the hopes of helping you better understand how the community around this forum operates. *I do not see why I should contribute to a forum full of trolls like yourself, and that is my choice.* Yes, it is your choice. And if you can't control your temper and be respectful and patient on here, then you have my full support in that choice. Thanks, Justin On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:59 PM Ristar rista...@gmail.com wrote: Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have unlimited time to wait. I have already done my due diligence. As it is, there were no helpful links and no one here helped, and you can get off your high horse because you did nothing but derail the damn thread. Your link is pathetic. I was not the one asking for apologies, was I? I do not see why I should contribute to a forum full of trolls like yourself, and that is my choice. You are the one that can't get over it. So, take your own stupid advice, and get over it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [android-developers] Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
Just in case anyone else encounters this kind of error: usually the actual error is somewhere upstream the Gradle Console log messages. Scroll up and you might find the answer or at least the root of your generic error. As the task is dexDebug, in this case I think it could be a repeated / inconsistent dependency --if you use two different versions of the same dependency in your modules--, or that you exceded the max 65k dex size and need to use the multidex option. There might be other reasons, I guess. Marina PS: I agree with some other members that think OP was a bit rude, but as English is not my first language and I know sometimes I sound harsh when translated, I'm giving OP the benefit of doubt :) On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Ristar rista...@gmail.com wrote: Error:Execution failed for task ':app:dexDebug'. com.android.ide.common.process.ProcessException: org.gradle.process.internal.ExecException: Process 'command 'C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_72\bin\java.exe'' finished with non-zero exit value 3 How to fix this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android studio inished with non-zero exit value 3 error
Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have unlimited time to wait. I have already done my due diligence. As it is, there were no helpful links and no one here helped, and you can get off your high horse because you did nothing but derail the damn thread. Your link is pathetic. I was not the one asking for apologies, was I? I do not see why I should contribute to a forum full of trolls like yourself, and that is my choice. You are the one that can't get over it. So, take your own stupid advice, and get over it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[android-developers] Re: Android Wear - is Google Maps API v2 available?
Hello.
The latest version of Google Play Services (7.3) on the Play Store
indicates in What's new : Maps API v2 for Android Wear.
However, it still doesn't seem to work.
Can we expect an update of Android Wear to support this soon?
Thank you.
Le mercredi 4 février 2015 09:27:24 UTC+1, ps-geolives a écrit :
Hello,
I'm trying to display a Google map (Google Maps API V2 for Android) on my
Sony SmartWatch3.
In my wear layout, i'm using a MapFragment with this code :
fragment
android:layout_width=match_parent
android:layout_height=match_parent
android:id=@+id/mapFragment
class=com.google.android.gms.maps.MapFragment/
My wear main activity implements OnMapReadyCallback :
@Override
public void onMapReady(GoogleMap map) {
SupportMapFragment fragment = ( SupportMapFragment)
getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentById(R.id.mapFragment);
// Getting Google Map
GoogleMap googleMap = fragment.getMap();
When I compile the program with Google Play Services for wearable in the
classpath, it doesn't compile.
When I compile the program with full Google Play Services in the
classpath, it compiles successfully but when I execute the program on the
smartwatch, I get this exception:
02-03 16:44:23.456 2377-2377/com.example.andy.myfirstwearablemapapplication
E/AndroidRuntime﹕ FATAL EXCEPTION: main
Process: com.example.andy.myfirstwearablemapapplication, PID: 2377
android.view.InflateException: Binary XML file line #7: Error inflating
class fragment
at android.view.LayoutInflater.createViewFromTag(LayoutInflater.java:763)
at android.view.LayoutInflater.rInflate(LayoutInflater.java:806)
at android.view.LayoutInflater.inflate(LayoutInflater.java:504)
at android.view.LayoutInflater.inflate(LayoutInflater.java:414)
at android.view.LayoutInflater.inflate(LayoutInflater.java:365)
at android.support.wearable.view.WatchViewStub.inflate(WatchViewStub.java:
179)
at android.support.wearable.view.WatchViewStub.onApplyWindowInsets(
WatchViewStub.java:148)
at android.view.View.dispatchApplyWindowInsets(View.java:6514)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchApplyWindowInsets(ViewGroup.java:5782)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchApplyWindowInsets(ViewGroup.java:5786)
at android.view.ViewGroup.dispatchApplyWindowInsets(ViewGroup.java:5786)
at com.android.internal.policy.impl.PhoneWindow$DecorView.
dispatchApplyWindowInsets(PhoneWindow.java:2335)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl.dispatchApplyInsets(ViewRootImpl.java:1205)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl.performTraversals(ViewRootImpl.java:1423)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl.doTraversal(ViewRootImpl.java:1054)
at android.view.ViewRootImpl$TraversalRunnable.run(ViewRootImpl.java:5779)
at android.view.Choreographer$CallbackRecord.run(Choreographer.java:767)
at android.view.Choreographer.doCallbacks(Choreographer.java:580)
at android.view.Choreographer.doFrame(Choreographer.java:550)
at android.view.Choreographer$FrameDisplayEventReceiver.run(Choreographer.
java:753)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5221)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.
java:899)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:694)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Unable to find dynamic class
com.google.android.gms.maps.internal.CreatorImpl
at com.google.android.gms.maps.internal.x.a(Unknown
...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Android Developers group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
