[android-developers] Re: When will the Media classes be able to connect to telephone 'conversation' audio channels ?

2009-01-02 Thread mashpl...@gmail.com

This is a mistake.  There are many reasons why exposing in-call audio
to the apps process is a good idea.  Please reconsider your position
on this.

Kind Regards,

Vince

On Jan 3, 1:27 am, Dave Sparks davidspa...@android.com wrote:
 There are no plans for exposing in-call audio to the apps processor.
 In-call audio is controlled by the radio and typically not accessible
 to the apps processor.

 On Dec 26 2008, 10:00 pm, StevenS shearer_ste...@hotmail.com wrote:

  If I'm reading the API documentation correctly, neither the
  MediaRecorder.AudioSource nor the  MediaPlayer.AudioSource can connect
  to the telephone conversation audio channels - eg. the TELEPHONE
  CONVERSATION microphone  speaker 'lines'.

  Both of these would be required to support advanced call handling
  applications ON THE DEVICE.

  Are there any plans to support this type of functionality ?

  When might it be available ?

  Thanks,
  Steven.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[android-developers] Re: Locking Down Root Access - Same Sh.., Different Vendor

2008-12-21 Thread mashpl...@gmail.com

The phone mindset is wrong, consumers are not like they were in the
80's, now the average user is quickly growing into a terminal window
and root access.  The kid's are into mashing everything just look at
the sites they make on facebook.  Not only are they comfortable with
terminal windows and root access but they can code.

Phones for dummy's is old school.  It for a time when nerds were
uncool and users were computer illiterate.  The world has changed but
the telecom mindset has not

- V

On Dec 21, 5:50 pm, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
 I'd prefer to see more Android 'phones in the hands of users than to see
 every Android phone have a developer mode.

 The G1 is a consumer device and should be designed as such (including
 things like minimising/eliminating the possibility for users to brick
 the device by using a home-brew firmware). The DP1 is the dev 'phone
 which you can brick to your hearts content if you so wish.

 Yes it's annoying that the DP1 was only announced after many of us had
 bought G1s, yes it would be nice to have a G1 that we could use like a
 DP1, but that's not the main purpose the G1 is designed to serve.

 Al.



 mashpl...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Thanks for responding, sorry for posting in the wrong place but
  this is the group that's impacted.  I think the open community can
  respond possibly using a open source license that does not allow
  TIVO style hardware lock-down.  In addition Google can provide
  certification programs that require device manufacturers to
  demonstrate open implementations of Android in order to use the
  Android logo.   Last Google could market their unlocked developer
  phone for general use.

  ps.  is your book available yet?  I just looked at your website, good
  luck with your business model.

  On Dec 21, 10:37 am, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:

  First, this sort of topic belongs on [android-discuss], since this list
  is for assistance on application development.

  mashpl...@gmail.com wrote:

  Please do not allow the carriers to lock the phones down.

  Android is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Hardware manufacturers
  and carriers can do what they wish within the confines of that license.

  If you want to complain about locked-down phones, complain to carriers
  and device makers. Hope that some innovative device makers make devices
  that are not locked down, and that the market rewards them for it.

  --
  Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com
  _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 1.9 Published!

 --
 ==
 Funky Android Limited is registered in England  Wales with the
 company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.

 The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
 necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
 subsidiaries.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[android-developers] Re: Locking Down Root Access - Same Sh.., Different Vendor

2008-12-20 Thread mashpl...@gmail.com

Hi Thanks for responding, sorry for posting in the wrong place but
this is the group that's impacted.  I think the open community can
respond possibly using a open source license that does not allow
TIVO style hardware lock-down.  In addition Google can provide
certification programs that require device manufacturers to
demonstrate open implementations of Android in order to use the
Android logo.   Last Google could market their unlocked developer
phone for general use.

ps.  is your book available yet?  I just looked at your website, good
luck with your business model.

On Dec 21, 10:37 am, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:
 First, this sort of topic belongs on [android-discuss], since this list
 is for assistance on application development.

 mashpl...@gmail.com wrote:
  Please do not allow the carriers to lock the phones down.

 Android is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Hardware manufacturers
 and carriers can do what they wish within the confines of that license.

 If you want to complain about locked-down phones, complain to carriers
 and device makers. Hope that some innovative device makers make devices
 that are not locked down, and that the market rewards them for it.

 --
 Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com
 _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 1.9 Published!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---