[android-developers] Re: What is a 512 by 512 App icon high resolution

2010-11-27 Thread ses
On Nov 27, 9:56 am, TreKing treking...@gmail.com wrote:
 The people that know the answer to those questions either don't read this
 list or won't bother to answer. We'll likely have to wait for the inevitably
 ridiculously belated blog post that will fill developers in when Google
 feels like it.

Cynical, but I fear also true.

The management of these developer updates seems rather odd - for
example with the new rating system, we get told the exact date when
new and updated apps will require a rating and that if we do not
provide one then 'in a few weeks' the app will be automatically rated
'mature'. However there is no indication as to the exact date and
whether we can rate apps without updating them.

If this was a business application in a corporate environment, changes
that affect the consumer would be clearly communicated to the consumer
prior to them actually happening and would not leave them wondering
what is really going on.

Some of these changes could be great, but to release them to
developers before they know what is going on seems strange to me. The
emails we received didn't really shed any more light on the nature of
the changes than we could glean ourselves.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en


[android-developers] Is uses-feature=false inferred by the Market if not included in manifest

2010-11-19 Thread ses
Seems like a straightforward question:

Does the Android Market treat your app as though you have set uses-
feature explicitly to false for each feature if you do not declare any
uses-feature in your android manifest?

Most of my apps so far don't use many hardware features so it would
seem a bit tedious to have to explicitly declare this every time to
avoid being filtered by the Market.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en


[android-developers] Re: Is uses-feature=false inferred by the Market if not included in manifest

2010-11-19 Thread ses
 You can test all that with aapt:

 http://developer.android.com/intl/fr/guide/topics/manifest/uses-featu...
 You can use the aapt tool, included in the Android SDK, to determine how
 Android Market will filter your application, based on its declared features 
 and
 permissions. To do so, run aapt with the dump badging command. This causes 
 aapt
 to parse your application's manifest and apply the same rules as used by 
 Android
 Market to determine the features that your application requires.

 --
   Olivier

Thanks that works... for anyone interested the command is simply:

aapt dump badging your_apk_here.apk

It seems for most apps that don't use hardware and don't have uses-
feature in the AndroidManifest only uses-
feature:android.hardware.touchscreen is included. I presume this means
the answer to my question is that no, Android Market doesn't filter
out apps that don't declare their lack of feature usage by default.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en


[android-developers] Re: Any proposed changes to the Android Market?

2010-10-08 Thread ses
String said:
 Also, app markets have (unfortunately) become a numbers game in the
 eyes of the public. It's important for Google to be able to say they
 have 150,000 (or whatever) apps in the Market; clearing the dregs
 would drop that number considerably, probably by an order of
 magnitude. Although this would probably be a better situation, for
 both devs and users, it's a net loss on the mindshare front. And
 that's not unimportant to the decision makers.

But that kind of marketing is even less sophisticated than quantity
over quality - all Google would be selling on is quantity alone, which
is non-sense. I give mobile application users and developers more
credit than to simply assume that most of them would only care about
how many apps exist on a market.

Once you've reached any figure over 10,000 - I think you've already
established yourself as a dominant market in terms of popularity as a
platform for publishing and downloading apps.

I agree with William Ferguson that Google should go for a more
sophisticated marketing approach for Android, and establish the
Android Market as a compelling user experience that delivers
professional apps that are not spam. Whether they do this through an
approach of moderation or introducing clever algorithms is up to them
- as long as it works I think it can only help to boost Android's
market share as a whole.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en


[android-developers] Any proposed changes to the Android Market?

2010-10-06 Thread ses
While Android as a platform and the Market itself offer some brilliant
features to genuine app developers who want to produce high quality
mobile applications, they also open up the Market to sub-standard apps
which obscure other, perhaps more worthwhile ones.

Of course the quality and appropriateness of apps are matters of
opinion, and I wouldn't want a dictatorial approach, but are there any
plans for a moderation of apps on the Market?

Do other developers agree that some apps which clearly don't work or
are so poor quality they could be deemed a waste of time should be
removed, and do they think this (or any other approach) might raise
the bar in terms of applications and stimulate Android app downloads?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en


[android-developers] Retrieving file path when using intent filter

2010-10-06 Thread ses
I realise one has to use an intent filter to associate a file format
with an application, but once this is done how does the app 'receive'
the path to the file that was chosen?

Is there a special method it calls on the Activity?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en


[android-developers] Re: Any proposed changes to the Android Market?

2010-10-06 Thread ses

 Rereading the OP, I think I veered a little OT (again). ses is talking about
 moderating quality (which is much more difficult and I don't think needs to
 be done or should be) while I'm specifically talking moderating the spam
 (which automatically implies poor quality).


Actually my main concern is those apps that you call 'spam', and I'm
glad my thread has prompted some interesting discussion. Obviously if
an app is fundamentally functional but has a few issues, it shouldn't
be removed. But apps that simply don't work or re-uploaded in
different forms in a spamming fashion should be removed.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en