Re: [Angstrom-devel] [meta-angstrom] angstrom-next: add versions to build for aarch64
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:30:09PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote: aarch64 needs gcc and egibc from meta-linaro to build for now. Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk --- conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf |5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf index a1bedbb..7dd57cd 100644 --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_bfin= 4.1.2 #avr32 only has support for gcc 4.2.2 ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_avr32 ?= 4.2.2 +#aarch64 needs linaro tools +ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_aarch64 ?= linaro-4.7% +PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc_aarch64 ?= 2.17 +PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc-initial_aarch64 ?= 2.17 + #Everybody else can just use this: ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION ?= 4.8% what does gcc 4.8 and eglibc 2.18 does not work ? eglibc 2.18 should support aarch64 gcc 4.8 both linaro and OE were unbuildable for arm64 when I tried. eglibc 2.18 produces bogus executeables for arm64. As arm64 developer I will monitor situation regularly and update these when stuff becomes working. Graeme ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
[Angstrom-devel] angstrom world build
Hi I have started a world build of angstrom for beaglebone and soon will extend it to more machines. Angstrom uses most layers in OE universe and nothing gives better coverage The wold log for bb is here http://sakrah.homelinux.org/files/world/beaglebone-world.log There are interesting failures. Feel free to peruse and lets fix them all ! -Khem ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
Re: [Angstrom-devel] [meta-angstrom] angstrom-next: add versions to build for aarch64
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:30:09PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk wrote: aarch64 needs gcc and egibc from meta-linaro to build for now. Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk --- conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf |5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf index a1bedbb..7dd57cd 100644 --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-next.conf @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_bfin= 4.1.2 #avr32 only has support for gcc 4.2.2 ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_avr32 ?= 4.2.2 +#aarch64 needs linaro tools +ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_aarch64 ?= linaro-4.7% +PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc_aarch64 ?= 2.17 +PREFERRED_VERSION_eglibc-initial_aarch64 ?= 2.17 + #Everybody else can just use this: ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION ?= 4.8% what does gcc 4.8 and eglibc 2.18 does not work ? eglibc 2.18 should support aarch64 gcc 4.8 both linaro and OE were unbuildable for arm64 when I tried. hmm interesting. I would be interested to know the failures, did you report them to OE-Core ml ? if not please do eglibc 2.18 produces bogus executeables for arm64. Thats interesting since the sole reason we were hung on release glibc 2.18 were some fixes needed for aarch64 so I think it should work better. We havent yet created eglibc 2.18 branch but when we do I will refresh the recipes to use them. As arm64 developer I will monitor situation regularly and update these when stuff becomes working. OK. Please do. Graeme ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
