Re: [Anima] New work item proposal / agenda request
Hi Toerless, Sounds great. Looking forward to the meeting. Best regards Steffen > -Original Message- > From: Toerless Eckert > Sent: Freitag, 8. Februar 2019 13:26 > To: Fries, Steffen (CT RDA ITS) > Cc: tte+an...@cs.fau.de; jiangsh...@huawei.com; anima@ietf.org; Brockhaus, > Hendrik (CT RDA ITS SEA-DE) > > Subject: Re: New work item proposal / agenda request > > Steffen, > > This should be fine on the agenda. Sheng usually runs the agenda, he is out > this week (chinese new year). Consider yourself top in > queue of new work items ;-) > > Cheers > Toerless > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:12:10PM +, Fries, Steffen wrote: > > Hello Toerless, hello Sheng, > > > > Based on the discussion we had in December about support of asynchronous > > operation/enrollment support in BRSKI on the mailing > list, I'm preparing a contribution for the next IETF meeting. The work is > based on requirements from industrial and IoT scenarios and > targets the proposal a supporting self-contained objects as an extension to > the currently defined BRSKI to support asynchronous > operation during enrolment. > > > > I'm currently preparing the draft contribution together with Hendrik ( a > > colleague) and would like to ask for a slot in the agenda. I > saw the agenda request for an ANIMA WG meeting and was not sure how far > advanced the planning of the meeting agenda already > is. Just wanted to ensure we're not too late. I will submit the draft in time > before the next meeting. > > > > Best regards > > Steffen > > ___ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
[Anima] Logging vouchers use case
Hello, I am reading the voucher artifact RFC 8366. I am confused about how the "audit voucher" (page 6) is supposed to be used. Specifically, the text says " The registrar mitigates a MiTM registrar by auditing that an unknown MiTM registrar does not appear in the log entries. " How can it do this? Any concrete example that clarifies this use case would help me understand. I am not sure if this is the correct mailing list for this question. Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Ranga -- M. Ranganathan ___ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Re: [Anima] New work item proposal / agenda request
Steffen, This should be fine on the agenda. Sheng usually runs the agenda, he is out this week (chinese new year). Consider yourself top in queue of new work items ;-) Cheers Toerless On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 07:12:10PM +, Fries, Steffen wrote: > Hello Toerless, hello Sheng, > > Based on the discussion we had in December about support of asynchronous > operation/enrollment support in BRSKI on the mailing list, I'm preparing a > contribution for the next IETF meeting. The work is based on requirements > from industrial and IoT scenarios and targets the proposal a supporting > self-contained objects as an extension to the currently defined BRSKI to > support asynchronous operation during enrolment. > > I'm currently preparing the draft contribution together with Hendrik ( a > colleague) and would like to ask for a slot in the agenda. I saw the agenda > request for an ANIMA WG meeting and was not sure how far advanced the > planning of the meeting agenda already is. Just wanted to ensure we're not > too late. I will submit the draft in time before the next meeting. > > Best regards > Steffen > ___ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
