Re: [Anima] Standards/specs using "YANG to CBOR" encoding

[Toerless Eckert]

Thanks, added to our notes for IETF119 for the moment.

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:29:27AM +, Esko Dijk wrote:
> Hi Toerless,
> 
> Yesterday in the design team call you asked if any specifications use the 
> "YANG to CBOR" mapping (RFC 9254), apart from us (cBRSKI).
> In the call we forgot to mention this user:  "CORECONF" 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-core-comi-17) , a 
> CoAP-with-CBOR version of NETCONF/RESTCONF.
> 
> Regards
> Esko
> 
> IoTconsultancy.nl  |  Email/Teams: esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl

___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

[Anima] Standards/specs using "YANG to CBOR" encoding

[Esko Dijk]

Hi Toerless,

Yesterday in the design team call you asked if any specifications use the "YANG 
to CBOR" mapping (RFC 9254), apart from us (cBRSKI).
In the call we forgot to mention this user:  "CORECONF" 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-core-comi-17) , a 
CoAP-with-CBOR version of NETCONF/RESTCONF.

Regards
Esko

IoTconsultancy.nl  |  Email/Teams: esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl


___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima