[il-antlr-interest: 28745] [antlr-interest] antlr doubt
Hello,
I'm totally new to AntLR.
I created a simple grammar for a lexer in ANTLRWorks and generated it
via the Generate menu. However, when I'm going to compile the
generated Java code I get an error.
I'm compiling it using javac mygrammarLexer.java. I'm running Windows XP
and installed ANTLR via apt-get, the package manager of Ubuntu.
This is the error I get when I try to compile:
$ javac locoTokensLexer.java
locoTokensLexer.java:3: package org.antlr.runtime does not exist
import org.antlr.runtime.*;
^
locoTokensLexer.java:8: cannot find symbol
symbol: class Lexer
public class locoTokensLexer extends Lexer {
^
Then I get a lot of other errors.
Please some one help me out.
Regards,
Nishanth.
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 28747] Re: [antlr-interest] antlr doubt
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nishanth singh singh.nishan...@gmail.comwrote:
...
This is the error I get when I try to compile:
$ javac locoTokensLexer.java
locoTokensLexer.java:3: package org.antlr.runtime does not exist
import org.antlr.runtime.*;
^
locoTokensLexer.java:8: cannot find symbol
symbol: class Lexer
public class locoTokensLexer extends Lexer {
^
Then I get a lot of other errors.
Please some one help me out.
Regards,
Nishanth.
Nishanth, don't take this the wrong way, but this mailing list is not the
best place to ask your question. It seems you're struggling with the very
basics of Java (the classpath specifically). When compiling Java source
files from your command, you either must have all classes your source
file(s) use already in your classpath, or must provide all of them through
the command line parameter when invoking javac. I highly recommend doing
some basic tutorials:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/getStarted/index.html
and/or Google a bit about classpath issues. If you don't get past it, I
suggest you ask your question on a less specific forum (Stackoverflow.com is
hot these days), and post back here if you have specific ANTLR questions.
Best of luck!
Regards,
Bart.
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 28749] Re: [antlr-interest] Custom data in ANTLR3_BASE_TREE in C runtime
Dear Elvis, I think that I have changed this so it is NULLed in the current development version, but you should be able to do this: 1) Set it to NULL yourself at an appropriate place. 2) In the ANTLR source code, you will find: #ifndef ANTLR3_MALLOC /// Default definition of ANTLR3_MALLOC. You can override this before including /// antlr3.h if you wish to use your own implementation. /// #define ANTLR3_MALLOC(request) malloc ((size_t)(request)) #endif Change that to #ifndef ANTLR3_MALLOC /// Default definition of ANTLR3_MALLOC. You can override this before including /// antlr3.h if you wish to use your own implementation. /// #define ANTLR3_MALLOC(request) calloc (1, (size_t)(request)) #endif And rebuild the runtime and you will sacrifice a little performance for nulled space. 3) Find the code that creates new nodes from a tree factory (the function newPooltree in antlr3commontree.c) and before the return statement, add: tree-baseTree.u = NULL; This is essentially the fix in the current development branch. Jim -Original Message- From: antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest- boun...@antlr.org] On Behalf Of Elvis Presley Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:12 AM To: antlr-interest@antlr.org Subject: [antlr-interest] Custom data in ANTLR3_BASE_TREE in C runtime I'm using the ANTLR3 C runtime and I'd like to be able to add custom data to my AST. I see there is a u field in the ANTLR3_BASE_TREE, which I would like to use to point to my own struct that contains the data I need for that node in the tree. My problem is that it doesn't look like u is ever initialized to NULL so I don't have a way to determine if I need to allocate new memory for my struct or not. I can't quite figure out by looking at the code if there is a way to override the behavior in ANTLR3_BASE_TREE or in the adaptor so that I can always guarantee that u is always NULL or points to one of my custom structs. Any help here would be appreciated. Thanks --Bryce List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your- email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups il-antlr-interest group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 28750] Re: [antlr-interest] Error building from source: The scm url cannot be null
Thanks. Seems like a fairly old problem. I tried the solution proposed by one
poster, adding the scm tag to the top-level pom.
On Apr 13, 2010, at 15:27:57, Jim Idle wrote:
Please use:
antlr.markmail.org
Where you will find this explained many times.
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
boun...@antlr.org] On Behalf Of Rick Mann
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:18 PM
To: antlr-interest@antlr.org
Subject: [antlr-interest] Error building from source: The scm url
cannot be null
Hi all,
I just downloaded antlr-3.2, and installed Maven 2.2.1. After
downloading a bunch of jars, it ran into an error. The maven invocation
and error are below. Did I do something wrong?
$ mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true
...
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Storing buildNumber: Apr 13, 2010 15:13:46 at timestamp:
1271196826772
[INFO]
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] The scm url cannot be null.
[INFO]
[INFO] Trace
java.lang.NullPointerException: The scm url cannot be null.
at
org.apache.maven.scm.manager.AbstractScmManager.makeScmRepository(Abstr
actScmManager.java:181)
at
org.codehaus.mojo.build.CreateMojo.getScmRepository(CreateMojo.java:722
)
at
org.codehaus.mojo.build.CreateMojo.getScmBranch(CreateMojo.java:593)
at
org.codehaus.mojo.build.CreateMojo.execute(CreateMojo.java:452)
at
org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginM
anager.java:490)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(Defaul
tLifecycleExecutor.java:694)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLife
cycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:556)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(Default
LifecycleExecutor.java:535)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandl
eFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:387)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments
(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:348)
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLife
cycleExecutor.java:180)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:328)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:138)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:362)
at
org.apache.maven.cli.compat.CompatibleMain.main(CompatibleMain.java:60)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.ja
va:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccesso
rImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
at
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 1 minute 41 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Apr 13 15:13:46 PDT 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 20M/79M
[INFO]
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-
email-address
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 28751] Re: [antlr-interest] Error building from source: The scm url cannot be null
Sorry, ignore that last email from me. Meant to delete the draft. List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups il-antlr-interest group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 28752] [antlr-interest] TreeRewriter with Python
Hi,
Reading 'Language Implementation Patterns', enjoying it very much.
I wanted to try the rewriting e.g.s using Python.
I don't see a 3.2 version available, so wrote a quick and dirty rewriter
to work with version 3.1.3, it's attached.
Tested with the Reduce grammar from the book, it works.
- had to write a new Visitor to do the child replacement
- the Rewriter is not the same as java because 'failed' is not tracked
in the state object for 3.1.3
- I just catch Backtrackingfailed and ignore it.
The changed Reduce grammar from the walking chapter is below. (the
backtracking option doesn't work in Python generation; the generated
code doesn't compile. Because applyOnce sets backtracking, I assume it
is ok not set the backtracking option in the grammar). Simple Test below
it
Anybody tried Tree rewriting with Python? Does anybody see issues with
the attached Rewriter? I would like to use it in my Project, but wanted
to get feedback on this before diving deeper; especially if there is a
major issue with this approach.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Harish
treerewriter.py
The Grammar:
tree grammar Reduce;
options {
language=Python;
output=AST;
ASTLabelType=CommonTree;
tokenVocab=VecMath;
superClass=TreeRewriter;
//backtrack=true; // allow backtracking if it's needed
}
@header {
from antlr3.treerewriter import TreeRewriter
}
bottomup:
xPlusx |
multBy2 |
combineShifts
;
xPlusx: ^('+' i=INT j=INT {int($i.text) == int($j.text)}?) -
^(MULT[*] INT[2] $j);
multBy2
: ^('*' x=INT {int($x.text) == 2}? y=.) - ^(SHIFT[] $y
INT[1])
| ^('*' a=. b=INT {int($b.text)==2}?) - ^(SHIFT[] $a
INT[1])
;
combineShifts
: ^(SHIFT ^(SHIFT e=. n=INT) m=INT)
- ^(SHIFT[] $e INT[str(int($n.text) + int($m.text))])
;
Test Code:
---
from antlr3 import *
from antlr3.tree import *
from VecMathLexer import VecMathLexer
from VecMathParser import VecMathParser
from Reduce import Reduce
cStream = StringStream(print (3 + 3) * 2 * 2)
lexer = VecMathLexer(cStream)
tStream = CommonTokenStream(lexer)
parser = VecMathParser(tStream)
t = parser.prog().tree
print Original tree: + t.toStringTree()
nodes = CommonTreeNodeStream(t)
red = Reduce(nodes);
t = red.downup(t, False)
print Simplified tree: + t.toStringTree()
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
treerewriter.py
Description: treerewriter.py
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 28753] Re: [antlr-interest] Is parser control over the lexer possible?
Hey all,
OK, let me try a related but far less involved question:
ANTLR tokenizes all input into an internal list before parsing anything in
that list. (Right?) Hence, it runs out of memory trying to read my
6.2-million-line input file, because that list is huge. What's the ANTLR
way to handle such large input streams?
Thanks,
-Chris
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Chris verBurg cheetomons...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey guys,
A question was posted a few days ago about dealing with an infinite input
stream, and the suggestion was to subclass TokenStream so that it didn't
read in all of the input upfront.
I'm running into a similar problem, but before I go run off and subclass
things I thought I'd see if there's a best practice for my situation. It
also overlaps with the how do I use keywords as
identifiershttp://www.antlr.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1741
FAQ.
I have a data-file grammar that recognizes strings, numbers, and a ton of
keywords. Pretending VERSION and LIMIT are two keywords, here's (part
of) the .g file:
data_file:
'VERSION' STRING ';'
| 'LIMIT' NUMBER ';'
;
NUMBER:
('-'|'+')? ('0'..'9')+
| ('-'|'+')? ('0'..'9')* '.' ('0'..'9')*
;
STRING:
('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '_' | '.' | '0'..'9')+ ;
Problem input #1:
VERSION 1.2 ;
The 1.2 is lexed as a number instead of a string, so I get a parse error.
Problem input #2:
VERSION LIMIT ;
The LIMIT is lexed as a keyword instead of a string, so I get a parse
error.
I saw the FAQ about keywords-as-identifiers, but I don't think it's helpful
for me. For the NUMBER-that-should-be-a-STRING problem, there's no exact
string I could pass to input.LT(1).getText().equals(), because it requires
a regex to match a NUMBER. The other solution was to make an identifier
rule to match all possibilities -- is the best solution here really to
change the rule to 'VERSION' (STRING | NUMBER) ';'?
For the keyword-that-should-be-a-STRING problem, I'm hesitant to use either
of those solutions because of the sheer number of keywords in this grammar.
Ideally what I'd like to do is what I did in Flex and Bison (which I'm
porting this grammar from). What I did there was have the parser control
how the lexer interpreted subsequent tokens. I embedded a rule in the
parser, immediately after the 'VERSION' token, to tell Flex to enter a
force-the-next-token-to-be-a-STRING-no-matter-what start state. It worked
beautifully. I got most of the way through implementing that in my ANTLR
grammar when I found out that ANTLRFileStream reads all the tokens in before
the parser even starts up -- which means the parser can't give the lexer any
direction over token interpretation.
Thoughts, suggestions, outrageous flames? Is there a good way to do
this, or maybe is there a completely different approach I should take?
Thanks!
-Chris
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 28754] Re: [antlr-interest] Is parser control over the lexer possible?
Hi Chris,
Yes, antlr reads the whole file into memory. I don't know how to stop
it from doing that.
Cheers
./m
Chris verBurg wrote:
Hey all,
OK, let me try a related but far less involved question:
ANTLR tokenizes all input into an internal list before parsing anything in
that list. (Right?) Hence, it runs out of memory trying to read my
6.2-million-line input file, because that list is huge. What's the ANTLR
way to handle such large input streams?
Thanks,
-Chris
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Chris verBurg cheetomons...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey guys,
A question was posted a few days ago about dealing with an infinite input
stream, and the suggestion was to subclass TokenStream so that it didn't
read in all of the input upfront.
I'm running into a similar problem, but before I go run off and subclass
things I thought I'd see if there's a best practice for my situation. It
also overlaps with the how do I use keywords as
identifiershttp://www.antlr.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1741
FAQ.
I have a data-file grammar that recognizes strings, numbers, and a ton of
keywords. Pretending VERSION and LIMIT are two keywords, here's (part
of) the .g file:
data_file:
'VERSION' STRING ';'
| 'LIMIT' NUMBER ';'
;
NUMBER:
('-'|'+')? ('0'..'9')+
| ('-'|'+')? ('0'..'9')* '.' ('0'..'9')*
;
STRING:
('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '_' | '.' | '0'..'9')+ ;
Problem input #1:
VERSION 1.2 ;
The 1.2 is lexed as a number instead of a string, so I get a parse error.
Problem input #2:
VERSION LIMIT ;
The LIMIT is lexed as a keyword instead of a string, so I get a parse
error.
I saw the FAQ about keywords-as-identifiers, but I don't think it's helpful
for me. For the NUMBER-that-should-be-a-STRING problem, there's no exact
string I could pass to input.LT(1).getText().equals(), because it requires
a regex to match a NUMBER. The other solution was to make an identifier
rule to match all possibilities -- is the best solution here really to
change the rule to 'VERSION' (STRING | NUMBER) ';'?
For the keyword-that-should-be-a-STRING problem, I'm hesitant to use either
of those solutions because of the sheer number of keywords in this grammar.
Ideally what I'd like to do is what I did in Flex and Bison (which I'm
porting this grammar from). What I did there was have the parser control
how the lexer interpreted subsequent tokens. I embedded a rule in the
parser, immediately after the 'VERSION' token, to tell Flex to enter a
force-the-next-token-to-be-a-STRING-no-matter-what start state. It worked
beautifully. I got most of the way through implementing that in my ANTLR
grammar when I found out that ANTLRFileStream reads all the tokens in before
the parser even starts up -- which means the parser can't give the lexer any
direction over token interpretation.
Thoughts, suggestions, outrageous flames? Is there a good way to do
this, or maybe is there a completely different approach I should take?
Thanks!
-Chris
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named
recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary,
privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments.
Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 28755] Re: [antlr-interest] Is parser control over the lexer possible?
I too would be interested in changing that behavior. I use ANTLR as a
command parser, so instantiating everything for every new command is a lot
of overhead. I think ANTLR needs a mode in where it only fetches one line
at a time, by calling a GetInput routine that we supply
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org
[mailto:antlr-interest-boun...@antlr.org] On Behalf Of Mike Matera
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 10:13
To: Chris verBurg
Cc: antlr-interest@antlr.org
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Is parser control over the lexer possible?
Hi Chris,
Yes, antlr reads the whole file into memory. I don't know how to stop it
from doing that.
Cheers
./m
Chris verBurg wrote:
Hey all,
OK, let me try a related but far less involved question:
ANTLR tokenizes all input into an internal list before parsing
anything in that list. (Right?) Hence, it runs out of memory trying
to read my 6.2-million-line input file, because that list is huge.
What's the ANTLR way to handle such large input streams?
Thanks,
-Chris
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Chris verBurg
cheetomons...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey guys,
A question was posted a few days ago about dealing with an infinite
input stream, and the suggestion was to subclass TokenStream so that
it didn't read in all of the input upfront.
I'm running into a similar problem, but before I go run off and
subclass things I thought I'd see if there's a best practice for my
situation. It also overlaps with the how do I use keywords as
identifiershttp://www.antlr.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1741
FAQ.
I have a data-file grammar that recognizes strings, numbers, and a
ton of keywords. Pretending VERSION and LIMIT are two keywords,
here's (part
of) the .g file:
data_file:
'VERSION' STRING ';'
| 'LIMIT' NUMBER ';'
;
NUMBER:
('-'|'+')? ('0'..'9')+
| ('-'|'+')? ('0'..'9')* '.' ('0'..'9')*
;
STRING:
('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z' | '_' | '.' | '0'..'9')+ ;
Problem input #1:
VERSION 1.2 ;
The 1.2 is lexed as a number instead of a string, so I get a parse
error.
Problem input #2:
VERSION LIMIT ;
The LIMIT is lexed as a keyword instead of a string, so I get a
parse error.
I saw the FAQ about keywords-as-identifiers, but I don't think it's
helpful for me. For the NUMBER-that-should-be-a-STRING problem,
there's no exact string I could pass to
input.LT(1).getText().equals(), because it requires a regex to match a
NUMBER. The other solution was to make an identifier
rule to match all possibilities -- is the best solution here really
to change the rule to 'VERSION' (STRING | NUMBER) ';'?
For the keyword-that-should-be-a-STRING problem, I'm hesitant to use
either of those solutions because of the sheer number of keywords in this
grammar.
Ideally what I'd like to do is what I did in Flex and Bison (which
I'm porting this grammar from). What I did there was have the parser
control how the lexer interpreted subsequent tokens. I embedded a
rule in the parser, immediately after the 'VERSION' token, to tell
Flex to enter a force-the-next-token-to-be-a-STRING-no-matter-what
start state. It worked beautifully. I got most of the way through
implementing that in my ANTLR grammar when I found out that
ANTLRFileStream reads all the tokens in before the parser even starts
up -- which means the parser can't give the lexer any direction over
token interpretation.
Thoughts, suggestions, outrageous flames? Is there a good way to
do this, or maybe is there a completely different approach I should take?
Thanks!
-Chris
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named
recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be
proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or
any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
