[il-antlr-interest: 32769] [antlr-interest] Facing NoSuchMethodError:CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) after upgrating ANTLR V3.1.1 to ANTLR v3.3
Hi All, Currently I am using Antlr v3.1.1. Now I have upgraded it to Antlr v3.3 after that I am getting the following error while compiling my java files with the latest version Antlr. I am facing some compilation issues so not able to build. The error message is given below, UnexpectedException occurred: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: Org.antlr.runtime.CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(Ljava/lang/object;) I At *.expressoin.FocusCommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(FocusCommonTreeNodeS tream.java) Can you please suggest some solution for the above problem? Observation: As per my analysis CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) method is present till Antlr jar v3.1.2 but the releases after this version, does not contain the CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) method. So obviously v3.3 does not contain the method getNodeIndex(obj) so it is throwing NoSuchMethodError. Can you please clarify, is there any equivalent method available in the v3.3 for getNodeIndex(obj) method? Thanks in Advance!!! Regards, Meena. Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups il-antlr-interest group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 32770] Re: [antlr-interest] Facing NoSuchMethodError:CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) after upgrating ANTLR V3.1.1 to ANTLR v3.3
Meena, You appear to be running a v3.1 lexer parser with the run-time classes from v3.3. On Stackoverflow I recommended you generate a new lexer and parser using ANTLR v3.3 (and compile them!) which you can then use with the ANTLR v3.3 runt-time classes. Did you do that already? Bart. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:04 PM, meena.subraman...@wipro.com wrote: Hi All, Currently I am using Antlr v3.1.1. Now I have upgraded it to Antlr v3.3 after that I am getting the following error while compiling my java files with the latest version Antlr. I am facing some compilation issues so not able to build. The error message is given below, UnexpectedException occurred: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: Org.antlr.runtime.CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(Ljava/lang/object;) I At *.expressoin.FocusCommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(FocusCommonTreeNodeS tream.java) Can you please suggest some solution for the above problem? Observation: As per my analysis CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) method is present till Antlr jar v3.1.2 but the releases after this version, does not contain the CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) method. So obviously v3.3 does not contain the method getNodeIndex(obj) so it is throwing NoSuchMethodError. Can you please clarify, is there any equivalent method available in the v3.3 for getNodeIndex(obj) method? Thanks in Advance!!! Regards, Meena. Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups il-antlr-interest group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 32771] Re: [antlr-interest] Facing NoSuchMethodError:CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) after upgrating ANTLR V3.1.1 to ANTLR v3.3
Yes, you're running it all with v3.3, but did you generate a new lexer and parser from your grammar using v3.3? Bart. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:43 PM, meena.subraman...@wipro.com wrote: Bart, Yes brat, I have did the following to use Antlr v3.3. (we are downloading the ANTLR jars from maven.) 1. I have changed my *pom.xml* as below From : dependency groupIdorg.antlr/groupId artifactIdantlr-runtime/artifactId version3.1.1/version /dependency To : dependency groupIdorg.antlr/groupId artifactIdantlr-complete/artifactId version3.3/version /dependency 2. Rename the jar FROM antlr-3.3-complete TO antlr-complete-3.3 3. Run the below maven command to install the local repository with the new jar. mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.antlr -DartifactId=antlr-complete -Dversion=3.3 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=local\Path\to\antlr-complete-3.3.jar *4. *Run the below mvn command to compile: *mvn install -DskipTests=true* After following the above steps I got the below error: Build Failure : Compilation Error: NoSuchMethodError….and in the error message it clearly indicates that *getNodeIndex(obj)* Method is missing. Thanks, Meena. *From:* Bart Kiers [mailto:bki...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, June 14, 2011 4:38 PM *To:* Meena Subramanian (WT01 - Banking Financial Services) *Cc:* antlr-interest@antlr.org *Subject:* Re: [antlr-interest] Facing NoSuchMethodError:CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) after upgrating ANTLR V3.1.1 to ANTLR v3.3 Meena, You appear to be running a v3.1 lexer parser with the run-time classes from v3.3. On Stackoverflow I recommended you generate a new lexer and parser using ANTLR v3.3 (and compile them!) which you can then use with the ANTLR v3.3 runt-time classes. Did you do that already? Bart. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:04 PM, meena.subraman...@wipro.com wrote: Hi All, Currently I am using Antlr v3.1.1. Now I have upgraded it to Antlr v3.3 after that I am getting the following error while compiling my java files with the latest version Antlr. I am facing some compilation issues so not able to build. The error message is given below, UnexpectedException occurred: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: Org.antlr.runtime.CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(Ljava/lang/object;) I At *.expressoin.FocusCommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(FocusCommonTreeNodeS tream.java) Can you please suggest some solution for the above problem? Observation: As per my analysis CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) method is present till Antlr jar v3.1.2 but the releases after this version, does not contain the CommonTreeNodeStream.getNodeIndex(obj) method. So obviously v3.3 does not contain the method getNodeIndex(obj) so it is throwing NoSuchMethodError. Can you please clarify, is there any equivalent method available in the v3.3 for getNodeIndex(obj) method? Thanks in Advance!!! Regards, Meena. Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address * Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. * The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups il-antlr-interest group. To post to this group, send email to
[il-antlr-interest: 32776] Re: [antlr-interest] minimalistic grammar approach
Hi Arturo, I would start with Compilers Principles, Techniques, Tools by Aho, Lam, Sethi, and Ullman a.k.a the Dragon Book. If you don't have it you really should for a project of that level. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compilers:_Principles,_Techniques,_and_Tools Eric List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups il-antlr-interest group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 32777] [antlr-interest] Antlr, Errors, and the console
Hey folks,
Simple question. I want to turn off the default behavior of reporting
lexer/parser errors to the console. The most obvious way I could think
was to just override a few methods:
@lexer::members {
public void reportError(RecognitionException e) { //override and do nothing
}
}
@members{
public void reportError(RecognitionException e) {
}
}
This seems to work. While I don't immediately see a problem in my
application (with limited testing so far), is there a different/easier
way I am supposed to be doing this? Will this cause potential problems
(perhaps antlr uses this internally for something important)?
Stefik
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 32779] [antlr-interest] Parse guided by preceding input
With bison/flex the lexical analyzer pipelines tokens on demand to the parser as the grammar rules are processed. It appears in Antlr (3) that lexical analysis tokenizes the input stream before any grammar rules are activated. By pipelining, it's possible to influence the parse from preceding input at the lexical level. For example, an identifier rule ( 'a'..'z' )* can lookup the string in a table built from grammar rules of preceding input and return either an identifier-token or a table-token to guide subsequent rule activation. If Antlr does not pipeline, the equivalent would have to be done somehow in the grammar rules, not the lex rules. Is there a way to do this? List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups il-antlr-interest group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 32780] Re: [antlr-interest] gunit failing on update to ANTLR 3.3
Ping ! On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 19:52, Terence Parr pa...@cs.usfca.edu wrote: hi guys. at a conference for another day or two. if no response this week, ping me! a simple grammar / gunit test that fails should yield a quick fix :) Ter On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: I also have experienced some strange behavior with gunit, although it is the first time I use it. I sent a message about this on May 20 (http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/2011-May/041650.html) and have seen one or two other on the same subject. I would really like a follow-up on this ! Thanks, Simon On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 08:32, Jasper Floor jasperfl...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have a small DSL for the company I work for. I have used gunit to make some tests. I also have my own tests next to this but operating on a higher level. I recently made a small change to the language and decided to update Antlr to the latest version. Unfortunately most of my (g)unit tests broke. The reason in one case is that the following test (the first test in the file for whatever that is worth): $1=#1; OK Does not return OK. The output says parsing stopped at character 4. Tracing through the generated junit code I found out that the return value is not OK but the AST. So the test should pass with OK. This isn't consistent however. Or rather. FAIL seems to work and some AST pass. All tests pass with antlr 3.2. They also pass my own test suite which tests at a higher level from gunit. This implies a problem with gunit. mvg, Jasper List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups il-antlr-interest group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
[il-antlr-interest: 32782] Re: [antlr-interest] minimalistic grammar approach
Hello everybody,
Here is an informal draft of the (minimalist) Implementation Independent
grammar. It's not meant as a play grammar, but as a practical grammar to
specify transformations that are easy to translate to commercial grade
implemented languages. Object and unit support is conspicuously absent, not so
exceptions. Any criticism, references, ect.. are very welcome.
The language used for description in this email is not relevant, I am just
taking a shortcut to express the grammar.
type aaa integer;type sss record( aaa integer, bbb string);type xxx arrayof aaa
index by ;
integer ccc;var sss; //infer typeconst int ;
sss:=function(ref a, const b, c){};return ;
// pascal sugar inrecord xxx { .:=;} //equivalent to xxx.:=;
procedure(a, b, c) {};exit; //end proc
foreach item in collection {};foreach idx indexin collection {};for i is 1 to 4
step 2 {};while (exp) {};break (exp); //exit loop
if (exp) {};else (exp) {};elsif (exp) {};case (a) { const: {} const: {}
const: {} default: {}} //a is an expression const are constants
throw excep ss; //ss is a variable
try {};
exception {}; // after a try blockexception (integer ex) {};exception (var ex)
{}; // infer type
rethrow; // inside an exception block (benign if extra)
From: arther...@hotmail.com
To: antlr-interest@antlr.org
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:30:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] minimalistic grammar approach
Sergiy and Researcher,
Thanks for your answers.
The twist in this case is that I want to get the grammar first and then the
language should be very easy. I have gathered the utility of having
semicolons, thanks for that.
I would rather not start from scratch if I don't have to. I think I could
potentially find simple expression grammar in ANLTR.
I'll be posting some beginning grammar later today.
Arturo
-- I want to be part of the code generation! --
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:58:16 +0300
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] minimalistic grammar approach
From: sergiy.dubo...@gmail.com
To: arther...@hotmail.com
Hi,
I usually start with examples of target language I want to develop.
Write how to declare variables, structures, functions. Then identify
terminals: strings, integers, floats, operators, identifiers, keywords
and so on.
I start from arithmetic expressions, they are quite tricky because of
precedence. Then define boolean expressions, variable declaration,
assignments, functions. This process is very iterative you can make it
as complex as you wish. Use AntlrWorks, it can quickly run your
grammar on test input, also it can show how AST will look like in
debugger mode.
It's much easier to start with a grammar which has ending symbol for
each statement, in C it's ;. Ruby like grammars are more difficult
(at least i spent several days figuring out how to make it working)
because of new line which can be separator and whitespace.
Can't promise this will work for you.
br,
Sergiy
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Arturo Hernandez arther...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am making a spec for code generation that I am intending to use on my
own Information Systems development
My first step is to create a minimalistic implementation independent (II)
grammar with support for record types, nested records, typed arrays,
function calls and basic loop and contol logic. Such that expressions in
a language that implemented this II grammar would be easy to translate to
any language. And also easier to manipulate.
Hash arrays would also be supported and the typical collection loops.
Would also be supported.
Does anyone here have any suggestions. Is there such a thing or close to
it already implemented in ANTLR.
Any info will be greatly appreciated.
Arturo-- Object orientation works by hiding data behind more complex
data. --
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
il-antlr-interest group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
