cvs commit: apachen/src/main http_request.c

1997-12-31 Thread dgaudet 
dgaudet 97/12/31 13:39:27

  Modified:src/main http_request.c
  Log:
  change comment
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.96  +3 -3  apachen/src/main/http_request.c
  
  Index: http_request.c
  ===
  RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apachen/src/main/http_request.c,v
  retrieving revision 1.95
  retrieving revision 1.96
  diff -u -r1.95 -r1.96
  --- http_request.c1997/12/26 15:17:50 1.95
  +++ http_request.c1997/12/31 21:39:26 1.96
  @@ -447,9 +447,9 @@
   }
   
   /*
  - * now match the special sections (regex, and proxy: stuff).  But
  - * note that proxy: stuff doesn't get down this far, it's been handled
  - * earlier, so we'll just skip it.
  + * There's two types of IS_SPECIAL sections (see http_core.c), and we've
  + * already handled the proxy:-style stuff.  Now we'll deal with the
  + * regexes.
*/
   for (; j  num_sec; ++j) {
   void *entry_config = sec[j];

Re: cvs commit: apachen/src/main http_request.c

1997-12-31 Thread Marc Slemko 
On 31 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 dgaudet 97/12/31 13:39:27
 
   Modified:src/main http_request.c
   Log:
   change comment
   
   Revision  ChangesPath
   1.96  +3 -3  apachen/src/main/http_request.c
   
   Index: http_request.c
   ===
   RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apachen/src/main/http_request.c,v
   retrieving revision 1.95
   retrieving revision 1.96
   diff -u -r1.95 -r1.96
   --- http_request.c  1997/12/26 15:17:50 1.95
   +++ http_request.c  1997/12/31 21:39:26 1.96
   @@ -447,9 +447,9 @@
}

/*
   - * now match the special sections (regex, and proxy: stuff).  But
   - * note that proxy: stuff doesn't get down this far, it's been handled
   - * earlier, so we'll just skip it.
   + * There's two types of IS_SPECIAL sections (see http_core.c), and 
 we've
   + * already handled the proxy:-style stuff.  Now we'll deal with the
   + * regexes.

Does os_canonical_filename mess up r-filename for regex stuff here
under win32?  It has to be moved after the proxy section since it messes
it up.

Geck.  Some of that win32 code is ugly.  I don't want to fix it.  Perhaps
I will