Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.08-1
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:33:20 +0200 > Von: "Thomas Bächler" > An: Public mailing list for ArchLinux development > > Betreff: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.08-1 > I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, > especially because of > http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa1e0c73d0ad8da68ea213b79c69c5 > > I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to > change a few things first: > > 1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. > 2) Make initscripts a -any package. > > Any objections here? > Signoff i686. Runs without errors. About: 1) do whatever you think its best 2) initscript is just bash, so I think there is no objection here Cheers, Daniel -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 5/6] Convert install.sh to a Makefile
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Dan McGee schrieb: >>> >>> This allows building minilogd without installing the whole works, and is >>> just a bit more suited to the task. >> >> This doesn't create the empty /etc/conf.d/ and /etc/rc.d/functions/ >> directories which I'd like to have in there. Can you resend it, or should I >> just modify it and put my name on it? > > Apparently Aaron has a Makefile patch in the queue already, so maybe > wait and see. I was totally wrong about that. The makefile patch from Loui was for mkinitcpio :S > Isn't functions a file and not a directory? And I wouldn't mind > creating dirs, but you'll notice no other ones are created by the > script at the moment, so does that really make sense? He probably meant /etc/rc.d/functions.d/
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.08-1
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially > because of > http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa1e0c73d0ad8da68ea213b79c69c5 > > I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a > few things first: > > 1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. > 2) Make initscripts a -any package. > > Any objections here? Sounds like overkill to me. How about rewriting minilogd in bash? :)
Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 5/6] Convert install.sh to a Makefile
Dan McGee schrieb: On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Dan McGee schrieb: This allows building minilogd without installing the whole works, and is just a bit more suited to the task. This doesn't create the empty /etc/conf.d/ and /etc/rc.d/functions/ directories which I'd like to have in there. Can you resend it, or should I just modify it and put my name on it? Apparently Aaron has a Makefile patch in the queue already, so maybe wait and see. Isn't functions a file and not a directory? And I wouldn't mind creating dirs, but you'll notice no other ones are created by the script at the moment, so does that really make sense? I meant functions.d, not functions. There are four directories now: /etc/rc.d, /etc/conf.d, /etc/rc.d/functions.d/, /etc/cron.hourly/ Two of those are created because files are in there, only conf.d and functions.d are empty, but IMO should be present so people know they can use them. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.08-1
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 17:33, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially >> because of >> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa1e0c73d0ad8da68ea213b79c69c5 >> > > Signed off (x86_64). Another signoff for x86_64, real hardware. No issues with udev or date/time setting. >> I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a >> few things first: >> >> 1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. >> 2) Make initscripts a -any package. >> >> Any objections here? > > I'm fine with that. initscripts as -any package is logical. No objection if you are going to maintain it; just seems a bit overkill for what is only a 40KB package. -Dan
Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 5/6] Convert install.sh to a Makefile
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Dan McGee schrieb: >> >> This allows building minilogd without installing the whole works, and is >> just a bit more suited to the task. > > This doesn't create the empty /etc/conf.d/ and /etc/rc.d/functions/ > directories which I'd like to have in there. Can you resend it, or should I > just modify it and put my name on it? Apparently Aaron has a Makefile patch in the queue already, so maybe wait and see. Isn't functions a file and not a directory? And I wouldn't mind creating dirs, but you'll notice no other ones are created by the script at the moment, so does that really make sense? -Dan
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.08-1
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 17:33, Thomas Bächler wrote: > I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially > because of > http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa1e0c73d0ad8da68ea213b79c69c5 > Signed off (x86_64). > I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a > few things first: > > 1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. > 2) Make initscripts a -any package. > > Any objections here? I'm fine with that. initscripts as -any package is logical. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
[arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.08-1
I just released initscripts with all current changes from git, especially because of http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=634397e1c7fa1e0c73d0ad8da68ea213b79c69c5 I didn't add Dan's install.sh->Makefile patch for now, as I want to change a few things first: 1) Move minilogd to its own git repository, tarball and package. 2) Make initscripts a -any package. Any objections here? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 5/6] Convert install.sh to a Makefile
Dan McGee schrieb: This allows building minilogd without installing the whole works, and is just a bit more suited to the task. This doesn't create the empty /etc/conf.d/ and /etc/rc.d/functions/ directories which I'd like to have in there. Can you resend it, or should I just modify it and put my name on it? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
