[arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs-3.1.3-1
Hi bump to latest version, please signoff both arches, thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [arch-dev-public] mirror db died?
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 15:58, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Roman Kyrylych roman.kyryl...@gmail.com wrote: What happened with our mirror db? I go to the admin interfase and don't see it anymore. Please look harder next time, it may have moved but is definitely still there: https://www.archlinux.org/admin/mirrors/mirror/ The link is not on the admin page, so how could I guess it? http://img840.imageshack.us/img840/6261/screenshot1a.png Anyway I get 403 Forbidden on that URL. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
[arch-dev-public] [signoff] mlocate-0.23-1
Upstream update Signoff both, Allan
[arch-dev-public] [signoff] xz 4.999.9beta_17 4_g41bc-1
Hi all, this will hopefully the last update of xz for some time. :-) Maybe this is a sign for the final 5.0 version to be near. I am now using the (very strange) upstream versioning scheme. Please test it, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mlocate-0.23-1
On 09/09/2010 12:20 PM, Allan McRae wrote: Upstream update Signoff both, Allan you might want to push it first :P -- Ionuț
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mlocate-0.23-1
On 09/09/10 21:04, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 09/09/2010 12:20 PM, Allan McRae wrote: Upstream update Signoff both, Allan you might want to push it first :P Done...
Re: [arch-dev-public] mirror db died?
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Roman Kyrylych roman.kyryl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 15:58, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Roman Kyrylych roman.kyryl...@gmail.com wrote: What happened with our mirror db? I go to the admin interfase and don't see it anymore. Please look harder next time, it may have moved but is definitely still there: https://www.archlinux.org/admin/mirrors/mirror/ The link is not on the admin page, so how could I guess it? http://img840.imageshack.us/img840/6261/screenshot1a.png Anyway I get 403 Forbidden on that URL. Aha! Yes, I think some permissions items need fixing, sorry about that. My admin page shows a whole lot more than that so I didn't think otherwise. Should be fixed now, I just threw together the necessary updates to fix this. Sorry about all the weirdness and thanks for the picture. -Dan
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.7.4.p4
On 9 September 2010 07:30, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Upstream security fix release: This release fixes a security issue with respect to the handling of sudo's -g command line option when -u is also specified. The flaw may allow an attacker to run commands as a user that is not authorized by the sudoers file. For more details, see: http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/runas_group.html Some quick signoffs would be good... Signoff both, Allan signoff i686 -- Guillaume -- Guillaume
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mlocate-0.23-1
On 09/09/2010 02:09 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 09/09/10 21:04, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 09/09/2010 12:20 PM, Allan McRae wrote: Upstream update Signoff both, Allan you might want to push it first :P Done... signoff x86_64 -- Ionuț
Re: [arch-dev-public] The Great Python Rebuild of 2010 begins
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:05:47 +0200, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:48:06 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Just a reminder for people to look at their packages and rebuild them for this. We seem to of stalled majorly... Do you think a community-staging would be helpful? I could commit the needed changes to dbscripts and devtools; I'd like to do a new release soon anyway. FYI: support for community-staging was added to devtools 0.9.10 and dbscripts. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] sudo-1.7.4.p4
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Upstream security fix release: This release fixes a security issue with respect to the handling of sudo's -g command line option when -u is also specified. The flaw may allow an attacker to run commands as a user that is not authorized by the sudoers file. For more details, see: http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/runas_group.html Some quick signoffs would be good... Signoff both, Allan signoff x86_64
[arch-dev-public] tcp_wrappers- does anyone actually use it?
Guys, For the umpteenth time today I stared at ssh wondering why it wasn't accepting incoming connections until I remembered about tcp_wrappers junk, and put the standard sshd : ALL : allow line in hosts.allow. Does anyone use this for anything useful at all? 1. The package is now at version 7.6-12 (clearly it is getting a lot of upstream attention) 2. We have 11 patches applied to the package 3. It is inferior to iptables-based filtering 4. It is not very transparent Discussion welcome, but I am raising a vote to remove this dependency from packages currently using it (hopefully this is possible for all 21 of them, http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/tcp_wrappers/) and eventually remove it from core and the repositories. -Dan
[arch-dev-public] CJK fonts in [extra]?
Hi all, I'd like to add truetype fonts that provide Chinese/Japanese/Korean glyphs to [extra]. Besides TTF files, the packages would include a configuration file for /etc/fonts/conf.avail/ which would be linked to from /etc/fonts/conf.d/ by the install script, so that the font is automatically used for glyphs not provided by higher-priority fonts such as ttf-dejavu. For instance, I've adapted the AUR package ttf-sazanami which provides a nice font supporting Japanese characters: http://arch.vesath.org/ttf-sazanami-20040629-4.src.tar.xz Any comment or reason why I shouldn't do this is welcome! :) Best. -- Gaetan
