[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 46 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 8 fully signed off packages * 194 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (46 total) == * lvm2-2.02.95-6 (i686) * perl-5.16.0-2 (i686) * util-linux-2.21.2-1 (i686) * lvm2-2.02.95-6 (x86_64) * perl-5.16.0-2 (x86_64) * util-linux-2.21.2-1 (x86_64) * bluez-4.99-5 (i686) * chromium-19.0.1084.52-2 (i686) * consolekit-0.4.6-4 (i686) * gvfs-1.12.3-2 (i686) * kdelibs-4.8.3-2 (i686) * libatasmart-0.18-2 (i686) * libcanberra-0.28-5 (i686) * lighttpd-1.4.30-4 (i686) * mesa-8.0.3-2 (i686) * php-5.4.3-2 (i686) * pulseaudio-2.0-2 (i686) * slim-1.3.3-4 (i686) * system-config-printer-1.3.9-3 (i686) * systemd-183-3 (i686) * udisks-1.0.4-4 (i686) * vlc-2.0.1-2 (i686) * xf86-video-ati-6.14.99-1.20120517 (i686) * xf86-video-intel-2.19.0-2 (i686) * xf86-video-nouveau-0.0.16_git20120512-2 (i686) * xorg-server-1.12.1.902-2 (i686) * bluez-4.99-5 (x86_64) * chromium-19.0.1084.52-2 (x86_64) * consolekit-0.4.6-4 (x86_64) * gvfs-1.12.3-2 (x86_64) * kdelibs-4.8.3-2 (x86_64) * libatasmart-0.18-2 (x86_64) * libcanberra-0.28-5 (x86_64) * lighttpd-1.4.30-4 (x86_64) * mesa-8.0.3-2 (x86_64) * php-5.4.3-2 (x86_64) * pulseaudio-2.0-2 (x86_64) * slim-1.3.3-4 (x86_64) * system-config-printer-1.3.9-3 (x86_64) * systemd-183-3 (x86_64) * udisks-1.0.4-4 (x86_64) * vlc-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) * xf86-video-ati-6.14.99-1.20120517 (x86_64) * xf86-video-intel-2.19.0-2 (x86_64) * xf86-video-nouveau-0.0.16_git20120512-2 (x86_64) * xorg-server-1.12.1.902-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (19 total) == * btrfs-progs-0.19.20120328-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cryptsetup-1.4.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dmraid-1.0.0.rc16.3-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lvm2-2.02.95-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mdadm-3.2.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nfs-utils-1.2.6-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-5.16.0-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * pinentry-0.8.1-4 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * btrfs-progs-0.19.20120328-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * cryptsetup-1.4.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dmraid-1.0.0.rc16.3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * krb5-1.10.1-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * lvm2-2.02.95-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mdadm-3.2.5-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nfs-utils-1.2.6-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * perl-5.16.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * util-linux-2.21.2-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (175 total) == * bluez-4.99-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cairo-perl-1.082-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * chromium-19.0.1084.52-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * claws-mail-extra-plugins-3.8.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * consolekit-0.4.6-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcpci-31107-75 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcpcmcia-31107-70 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * frozen-bubble-2.2.1beta1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gc-7.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gconf-perl-1.044-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glade-perl-1.007-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glib-perl-1.260-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-perl-1.042-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-vfs-perl-1.081-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnomecanvas-perl-1.002-10 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnumeric-1.10.17-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * graphicsmagick-1.3.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * graphviz-2.28.0-10 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk2-perl-1.244-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gvfs-1.12.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * imagemagick-6.7.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * irssi-0.8.15-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kdebindings-perlkde-4.8.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kdebindings-perlqt-4.8.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kdelibs-4.8.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libatasmart-0.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libcanberra-0.28-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libproxy-0.4.7-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lighttpd-1.4.30-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lirc-1:0.9.0-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mesa-8.0.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mod_perl-2.0.6-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * net-snmp-5.7.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nvidia-295.53-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pango-perl-1.223-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-async-interrupt-1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-bit-vector-7.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-compress-bzip2-2.09-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-crypt-openssl-bignum-0.04-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-crypt-openssl-random-0.04-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-crypt-openssl-rsa-0.28-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-crypt-ssleay-0.58-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-dbd-mysql-4.020-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-dbd-sqlite-1.35-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * perl-dbi-1.618-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs *
Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] [NACK] linux 3.4-1
Am Sat, 26 May 2012 21:10:28 +0200 schrieb Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at: Hi, Starting with linux 3.4-1 I'm getting random corruptions when reading files from my file server over nfs and we've also seen problems with packages downloaded from our mirror on brynhild. The files on disk validate just fine (md5sum), it's just the transfer that seems to break. linux-lts 3.032-1 and linux 3.3.7-1 are good. Similar NFS issues here every now and then: NFS: v4 server 192.168.1.90 does not accept raw uid/gids. Reenabling the idmapper. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00656d6f IP: [00656d6f] 0x656d6e PGD 428e84067 PUD 420f04067 PMD 420f00067 PTE 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU 1 Modules linked in: usb_storage uas fuse rfcomm bnep btusb bluetooth rfkill usbhid hid nfsd exportfs nfs nfs_acl lockd auth_rpcgss fscache sunrpc reiserfs nvidia(PO) evdev snd_hda_codec_realtek sr_mod cdrom aesni_intel aes_x86_64 aes_generic ghash_clmulni_intel cryptd coretemp crc32c_intel r8169 i2c_i801 pcspkr mii xhci_hcd snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer snd i2c_core ehci_hcd soundcore usbcore mei(C) usb_common button microcode st w83627ehf hwmon_vid acpi_cpufreq mperf processor sd_mod ahci libahci libata scsi_mod ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache Pid: 527, comm: rpc.idmapd Tainted: P C O 3.4.0-1-ARCH #1 System manufacturer System Product Name/P8P67 RIP: 0010:[00656d6f] [00656d6f] 0x656d6e RSP: 0018:880421431d40 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 880420ee7650 RBX: 8804278c0a80 RCX: 88041faf7900 RDX: 0005 RSI: 880421431de9 RDI: 880420ee7860 RBP: 880421431d88 R08: R09: R10: R11: R12: 88041faf7900 R13: 880420ee7860 R14: 880421431de9 R15: 0005 FS: 7fa14d884700() GS:88043f44() knlGS: CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00656d6f CR3: 00042777e000 CR4: 000407e0 DR0: DR1: DR2: DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Process rpc.idmapd (pid: 527, threadinfo 88042143, task 880423e66730) Stack: 811f010c 880421431db0 880421431db0 880420ee75f0 88041faf7900 880420ee7860 880421431de9 0005 8804278c0a80 880421431dd8 811f0213 880421431de8 Call Trace: [811f010c] ? __key_instantiate_and_link+0x5c/0x100 [811f0213] key_instantiate_and_link+0x63/0xa0 [a0fb37bd] idmap_pipe_downcall+0x1bd/0x1e0 [nfs] [a0f6eca9] rpc_pipe_write+0x69/0x90 [sunrpc] [8116e798] vfs_write+0xa8/0x180 [8116eada] sys_write+0x4a/0xa0 [8146a3e9] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: Bad RIP value. RIP [00656d6f] 0x656d6e RSP 880421431d40 CR2: 00656d6f ---[ end trace e9ae93e3e7f737b5 ]--- -Andy signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[arch-dev-public] udev replaced by systemd-tools
Hey all, Just an FYI -- we came across some minor nags in testing last night with udev containing rules that it couldn't support (due to a missing systemd-sysctl binary). After some nagging from Tom, we decided that it was best to simply merge the udev and systemd-tools packages together. There's a few reasons for this: - systemd-tools is meant to be a package that everyone can benefit from (regardless of PID 1) - everyone will eventually have systemd-tools installed anyways, as initscripts will be using it - lower maintenance for the PKGBUILD. It's getting ugly with all the splitting and juggling required. systemd-tools doesn't yet belong to the base group, but I'll fix this today with some other minor changes to the package. Dave What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet.
Re: [arch-dev-public] udev replaced by systemd-tools
On 2012/5/28 Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: Hey all, Just an FYI -- we came across some minor nags in testing last night with udev containing rules that it couldn't support (due to a missing systemd-sysctl binary). After some nagging from Tom, we decided that it was best to simply merge the udev and systemd-tools packages together. I was a bit puzzled/surprised by the announcement, and by the version number. It all became clearer when I read that upstream udev was actually merged into upstream systemd sources, which makes the packaging changes much more logical. Rémy.
[arch-dev-public] New Java library packages
Hello, I would like to create some new packages in [extra]. They are all core Java libraries (JARs). I say core because they are all basic libraries used by a lot of Java projects. I am posting here to see if someone has something to say against officially supporting these in Arch and also so that devs/TUs who maintain Java apps know they could officially rely on these libs. Here is a first list based on what *I* would need for 'apache-ant' (names are as used by upstream projects. I plan to prepend them with 'java-') - activation.jar - bcel.jar (already pushed in extra as 'java-bcel') - bsf.jar - gnumail.jar - inetlib.jar - jdepend.jar - log4j-1.2.jar - xml-resolver-1.2.jar - commons-net.jar - jsch.jar Some are in the AUR but on various states (some OOD, orphans, adopted by me). -- Guillaume
Re: [arch-dev-public] udev replaced by systemd-tools
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: Hey all, Just an FYI -- we came across some minor nags in testing last night with udev containing rules that it couldn't support (due to a missing systemd-sysctl binary). After some nagging from Tom, we decided that it was best to simply merge the udev and systemd-tools packages together. There's a few reasons for this: - systemd-tools is meant to be a package that everyone can benefit from (regardless of PID 1) - everyone will eventually have systemd-tools installed anyways, as initscripts will be using it - lower maintenance for the PKGBUILD. It's getting ugly with all the splitting and juggling required. at the beginning it was libsystemd, now is systemd-tools. the next step is systemd. lets stop lying ourself and move directly to systemd, lower the maintenance of packages by merging back all the stuff split from systemd back and lets move forward. systemd-tools doesn't yet belong to the base group, but I'll fix this today with some other minor changes to the package. Dave What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. -- Ionut
Re: [arch-dev-public] udev replaced by systemd-tools
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Ionuț Bîru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: Hey all, Just an FYI -- we came across some minor nags in testing last night with udev containing rules that it couldn't support (due to a missing systemd-sysctl binary). After some nagging from Tom, we decided that it was best to simply merge the udev and systemd-tools packages together. There's a few reasons for this: - systemd-tools is meant to be a package that everyone can benefit from (regardless of PID 1) - everyone will eventually have systemd-tools installed anyways, as initscripts will be using it - lower maintenance for the PKGBUILD. It's getting ugly with all the splitting and juggling required. at the beginning it was libsystemd, now is systemd-tools. the next step is systemd. Regarding systemd-tools. I requested this package (which essentially contains all the bits of systemd that can be used without the systemd daemon) so that we can use it from initscripts. Lots of stuff in initscripts and systemd are the same, so this should allow us to delete a lot of code :-) I'll post patches to arch-projects for review shortly. Cheers, Tom
