[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 10 fully signed off packages * 44 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * archlinux-keyring-20130224-1 (any) * mesa-9.1-2 (i686) * mesa-9.1-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (8 total) == * archlinux-keyring-20130224-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * file-5.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * krb5-1.11.1-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * linux-3.8-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * linux-lts-3.0.66-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * logrotate-3.8.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * file-5.13-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * krb5-1.11.1-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (35 total) == * efilinux-efi-1.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gummiboot-efi-23-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cairo-1.12.14-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnu-efi-libs-3.0t-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk3-3.6.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * intel-tbb-4.1_20130116-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kdelibs3-3.5.10-16 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * libx11-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lirc-1:0.9.0-38 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mesa-9.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mysql-5.5.30-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * network-manager-applet-0.9.8.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-0.9.8.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-openconnect-0.9.8.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-openvpn-0.9.8.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-pptp-0.9.8.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.8.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nvidia-313.18-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nvidia-304xx-304.64-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qemu-1.4.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cairo-1.12.14-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnu-efi-libs-3.0t-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * intel-tbb-4.1_20130116-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kdelibs3-3.5.10-16 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * lirc-1:0.9.0-38 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mesa-9.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mysql-5.5.30-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * network-manager-applet-0.9.8.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-0.9.8.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-openconnect-0.9.8.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-openvpn-0.9.8.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-pptp-0.9.8.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.8.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nvidia-304xx-304.64-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qemu-1.4.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * netctl-0.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (10 total) == * dhcpcd-5.6.7-1 (i686) * syslinux-5.01-1 (i686) * dhcpcd-5.6.7-1 (x86_64) * linux-3.8-1 (x86_64) * linux-lts-3.0.66-1 (x86_64) * logrotate-3.8.3-1 (x86_64) * syslinux-5.01-1 (x86_64) * gtk3-3.6.4-2 (x86_64) * libx11-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) * nvidia-313.18-4 (x86_64) == All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * syslinux-5.01-1 (x86_64), since 2013-02-01 * syslinux-5.01-1 (i686), since 2013-02-01 * netctl-0.5-1 (any), since 2013-02-07 * libx11-1.5.0-2 (i686), since 2013-02-09 * libx11-1.5.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-02-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 1 signoffs
Re: [arch-dev-public] Please provide Info for my talk!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: @Tom: I will ping you with what I got... In fact, you can also have a copy of my talk! Thanks! Disappointingly, I only have responses from 4 devs, 2 TU and 2 users. :(
Re: [arch-dev-public] Please provide Info for my talk!
On 25 February 2013 10:26, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: @Tom: I will ping you with what I got... In fact, you can also have a copy of my talk! Thanks! Disappointingly, I only have responses from 4 devs, 2 TU and 2 users. :( Disappointingly, I only have responses from 4 devs, 2 TU and 2 users. Do you mean you think some people have some commit access but did not (take the time to) answer or do you mean you thought more people had commit access?
Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing
Le lundi 25 février 2013 04:24:07 Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit : On 24.02.2013 23:31, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2013-02-24 17:16:42 +0100] Sven-Hendrik Haase: +1 for moving mesa quickly Do you have any more arguments than Andreas gave to support this? Or is the +1 entirely for free? Moving it quickly would seem like the simplest solution and the bugs I heard of seem only to concern wayland. I'd wager that for most our users, moving it now would be a fine idea. The other trickery suggested doesn't sit well with me. I agree. A quick move is the best solution. ++ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [arch-dev-public] Please provide Info for my talk!
On 22 February 2013 07:14, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 20/02/13 00:15, Allan McRae wrote: Any further responses to this? I had (maybe not so...) surprisingly few so far. Allan Hi Allan, while I do have commit access to hugin and enblend, I don't know if it's worth mentioning, because I didn't do any development for these projects lately. I still watch closely the development though. I also have a few projects of mine, like eilin (driver for EIZO monitors), minidlna-transcode (fork of minidlna that adds full transcoding support) and most importantly FotoSHOCK, which is a bitmap editor mostly aimed at photo editing that supports many bit depths (from 1bit to 64bits), colorspaces and has quite inovative UI, but I don't advertise this project very much yet. Lukas
Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing
Am Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:56:37 +0100 schrieb Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com: Le lundi 25 février 2013 04:24:07 Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit : On 24.02.2013 23:31, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2013-02-24 17:16:42 +0100] Sven-Hendrik Haase: +1 for moving mesa quickly Do you have any more arguments than Andreas gave to support this? Or is the +1 entirely for free? Moving it quickly would seem like the simplest solution and the bugs I heard of seem only to concern wayland. I'd wager that for most our users, moving it now would be a fine idea. The other trickery suggested doesn't sit well with me. I agree. A quick move is the best solution. ++ Already done. -Andy signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing
On 02/25/2013 11:03 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: Am Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:56:37 +0100 schrieb Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com: Le lundi 25 février 2013 04:24:07 Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit : On 24.02.2013 23:31, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2013-02-24 17:16:42 +0100] Sven-Hendrik Haase: +1 for moving mesa quickly Do you have any more arguments than Andreas gave to support this? Or is the +1 entirely for free? Moving it quickly would seem like the simplest solution and the bugs I heard of seem only to concern wayland. I'd wager that for most our users, moving it now would be a fine idea. The other trickery suggested doesn't sit well with me. I agree. A quick move is the best solution. ++ Already done. -Andy i just removed libgl from extra. -- Ionuț signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] Mesa 9.1 in testing
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 02/25/2013 11:03 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: Am Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:56:37 +0100 schrieb Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com: Le lundi 25 février 2013 04:24:07 Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit : On 24.02.2013 23:31, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2013-02-24 17:16:42 +0100] Sven-Hendrik Haase: +1 for moving mesa quickly Do you have any more arguments than Andreas gave to support this? Or is the +1 entirely for free? Moving it quickly would seem like the simplest solution and the bugs I heard of seem only to concern wayland. I'd wager that for most our users, moving it now would be a fine idea. The other trickery suggested doesn't sit well with me. I agree. A quick move is the best solution. ++ Already done. -Andy i just removed libgl from extra. I did this upgrade today on a non-desktop, and was very unpleasantly surprised. Did we really mean to suck this many dependencies onto machines that aren't even running X11, let alone 3D graphics and such? Cairo is used by several packages for font-rendering (rrdtool here pulls this in on this box), and now the dependencies have ballooned by ~130 MB. I can always fall back to using a cairo sans X11 package out of the AUR like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cairo-dfb/, but just wanted to make sure this was known. dmcgee@toofishes ~ $ pacSyu :: Synchronizing package databases... core is up to date extra is up to date community is up to date :: Starting full system upgrade... warning: postgis: ignoring package upgrade (1.5.3-2 = 2.0.2-1) resolving dependencies... :: There are 4 providers available for libgl: :: Repository extra 1) mesa-libgl 2) nvidia-304xx-utils 3) nvidia-utils :: Repository community 4) catalyst-utils Enter a number (default=1): 1 looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (13): Name Old Version New Version Net Change Download Size cairo 1.12.12-11.12.14-30.11 MiB damageproto1.2.1-2 0.07 MiB fixesproto 5.0-20.10 MiB libdrm 2.4.42-1 0.67 MiB libpciaccess 0.13.1-1 0.11 MiB libvdpau 0.6-10.24 MiB libxdamage 1.1.4-1 0.03 MiB libxfixes 5.0-20.09 MiB libxxf86vm 1.1.2-1 0.13 MiB mesa 9.1-2127.40 MiB mesa-libgl 9.1-20.00 MiB wayland1.0.5-1 0.57 MiB xf86vidmodeproto 2.3.1-2 0.07 MiB Total Installed Size: 133.02 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 129.60 MiB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] n -Dan
