[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 6 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * ca-certificates-20140325-1 (any) * python-setuptools-3.4-1 (any) * giflib-5.0.6-1 (i686) * glpk-4.54-1 (i686) * octave-3.8.1-1 (i686) * giflib-5.0.6-1 (x86_64) * glpk-4.54-1 (x86_64) * octave-3.8.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (7 total) == * ca-certificates-20140325-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * groff-1.22.2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * logrotate-3.8.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * man-db-2.6.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mlocate-0.26-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shadow-4.1.5.1-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * groff-1.22.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (12 total) == * pkgstats-2.3-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-setuptools-3.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * apr-util-1.5.3-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ghostscript-9.14-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * giflib-5.0.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glpk-4.54-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * octave-3.8.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apr-util-1.5.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ghostscript-9.14-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * giflib-5.0.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glpk-4.54-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * octave-3.8.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (6 total) == * file-5.18-1 (i686) * file-5.18-1 (x86_64) * logrotate-3.8.7-2 (x86_64) * man-db-2.6.6-2 (x86_64) * mlocate-0.26-2 (x86_64) * shadow-4.1.5.1-8 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 8 signoffs 2. thomas - 4 signoffs
Re: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: [arch-general] Java 8
On 30 March 2014 20:46, Guillaume Alaux guilla...@alaux.net wrote: On 30 March 2014 20:39, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: On Sun 30, March 20:03:51 Guillaume Alaux wrote: You might be talking about icedtea-web [0], the browser plugin that enables some Java interpretation inside browsers? This is yet another project provided by the IcedTea team. Indeed. Thank you for the clarification. Could you provide an openjdk8 package without IcedTea? Isn't necessary to put that in the repos, just to test what would be missing/broken. Cheers -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer Sure! I will need to finish it first of course and will let you know. Should not be long. I do not expect much breakerage if any. Also I asked on the IcedTea ML to get an idea of when they think this release could happen. Ok so answer from IcedTeam team [0] is they should relase Hopefully in the next month. It depends how involved the security errata is next month. I am thus going to keep on working on a package *without IceTea* in case we want to test/release it and prepare one *with IcedTea* ready when this release is out. [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2014-March/026974.html -- Guillaume
