Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Daniel Isenmann
>
>
> ## Still required
> gdata-sharp
> gudev-sharp
>
>
Will be removed from the repo soon, because I decided to remove banshee
from the repo (reason here:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2016-October/028361.html
)

As I stated in the other mail, I won't move it to the AUR.


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Daniel Isenmann
2016-10-20 14:25 GMT+02:00 Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org>:

> On 28.09.2016 15:37, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>
>
> daniel:
> extra/any/monodevelop
>
>
>
>
I'm on it. There is some compiing issues right now, that's the reason for
outdated. So don't move or orphan it, I will take care of this.

Cheers
Daniel


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public
On 20.10.2016 17:31, Levente Polyak wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 02:25 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> I'll start slowly dropping packages to AUR in a few weeks.
> 
> Well I'm not 100% sure but do you mean the already orphan packages or
> all not required packages?

I mean all non-required packages. I would have orphaned them already,
but archweb doesn't allow me to do that.

> Purely speaking about the "movable to AUR" (not the required) packages,
> but I would instantly pick up: avidemux, reaver, httpie, python-irc if
> they would be orphan.

Talk to their maintainers and adopt them if they don't want to maintain
them any more.

Florian



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2016-10-20 14:25, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> bpiotrowski:
> core/x86_64/ncurses
> core/x86_64/bash
> core/x86_64/readline

This trio requires some love that's currently reserved for fixing Boost
in staging (if I ever get more free time to debug it).

Bartłomiej



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Levente Polyak
On 10/20/2016 02:25 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> 
> I'll start slowly dropping packages to AUR in a few weeks.
> 

Well I'm not 100% sure but do you mean the already orphan packages or
all not required packages?
Most likely there is lot of stuff they will be dropper later on... but I
think they should first be orphaned before we start doing that.

Purely speaking about the "movable to AUR" (not the required) packages,
but I would instantly pick up: avidemux, reaver, httpie, python-irc if
they would be orphan.

maybe some of the useful stuff from that list would be picked up by
others too?


> anthraxx:
> community/x86_64/powerdns-recursor
> community/any/gufw
> 

Ups, I forgot powerdns-recursor in the [testing] repository, the
package is in that repo for quite a while. will move when arriving at home.

gufw requires more work and new dependencies + testing. It was an orphan
package and I picked that up like aprox. 1.5 weeks ago to mark that i
start working on that topic. Will accelerate and to that asap.

cheers,
Levente



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Maxime Gauduin
October 20 2016 3:49 PM, "Guillaume Alaux"  wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase  
> wrote:
> 
>> openvdb is updated as part of the boost rebuild.
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Allan McRae  wrote:
>>> On 20/10/16 22:25, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> 
>> allan:
>> extra/x86_64/fakechroot
>>> Updating this breaks the pacman testsuite (due to a fakechroot bug...).
> 
> I will take care of `openjfx` (hopefully soon) so please do not remove it.

I've been unable to build vbam since the last sfml update (though it's 
unrelated to sfml), and GTK 3.22 made things even worse. I've reached upstream 
in hope they can fix it quickly. If it takes too long, I'll demote it to AUR 
myself, we already have mgba which is cleaner, more accurate and faster anyway.

Also, unless someone wants to take over taskjuggler3, I'll demote it very soon.

Cheers,
-- 
Maxime


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Guillaume Alaux
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase  wrote:
> openvdb is updated as part of the boost rebuild.
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Allan McRae  wrote:
>> On 20/10/16 22:25, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>>>
>>> allan:
>>> extra/x86_64/fakechroot
>>
>> Updating this breaks the pacman testsuite (due to a fakechroot bug...).

I will take care of `openjfx` (hopefully soon) so please do not remove it.


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
openvdb is updated as part of the boost rebuild.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Allan McRae  wrote:
> On 20/10/16 22:25, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
>>
>> allan:
>> extra/x86_64/fakechroot
>
> Updating this breaks the pacman testsuite (due to a fakechroot bug...).


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread jan


jgc:
extra/x86_64/libxml++-docs
extra/x86_64/libxml++
extra/any/ttf-dejavu
extra/x86_64/libproxy
extra/x86_64/gnumeric


Please don't kill these. They still get active maintenance but I haven't 
gotten into these yet.


libxml++ is not out of date, the "new version" is a new ABI/API which is 
not compatible with any package that uses libxml++ at the moment. I can 
flag it as not out of date, but someone will flag it again tomorrow.


gnumeric is one version behind, I have a PKGBUILD ready (using the new 
gnome git stuff), but it doesn't build because gnumeric depends on 
deprecated features of gnome-common that have been removed over a year 
ago.


libproxy and ttf-dejavu are also one version behind, they will get 
updated soon.


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/10/16 22:25, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> 
> allan:
> extra/x86_64/fakechroot

Updating this breaks the pacman testsuite (due to a fakechroot bug...).


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Christian Hesse
Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public  on Thu,
2016/10/20 14:25:
> f2fs-tools

Looks like f2fs-tools has a hard dependency on libselinux now... So we have
to move libselinux from AUR to [extra] if we want to keep f2fs support.

Tobias, are you going to handle this? Do you want me to do this? Any reason
not to do this?
-- 
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/*Best regards my address:*/=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/*Chriscc -ox -xc - && ./x*/b/42*2-3)*42);}


pgpO99Zf8ePQG.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public
On 28.09.2016 15:37, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I will look through the list in 2 weeks and start orphaning packages
> that do not have a reason for the holdup in the out of date message.

So it turns out archweb doesn't allow me to easily orphan packages the
way the AUR does so I've created a list. Feel free to adopt the packages
and ask the current maintainer to disown them.

I've created a list of packages that are required by others and of those
that could easily be moved to AUR. I've only looked if the required-by
list for each package is empty so if some of these are moved, more might
follow. I have also grouped some packages (like llvm) into one line.

I've also created a list of packages sorted by maintainers. This one is
created automatically, but it doesn't show any required-by data since
archweb doesn't list that in the package's JSON.

The manually created list might be out of date (I've started last week),
the automatic one is current.

The automatic list also contains packages that have a good reason for
being out of date (sometimes in the OOD message, sometimes not). If you
want to adopt any packages, please check the OOD reason first and check
if there has been a mail regarding the package in this thread.

I'll start slowly dropping packages to AUR in a few weeks.

Florian


# Manual list

## Still required
gdata-sharp
gudev-sharp
yp-tools
refind-efi
nasm
psmisc
geoip
scons
lib32-libxml2
libconfig
ocaml
confuse
enchant
krb5
netcdf
netcdf-fortran
netcdf-cxx
opencl-headers
gnu-efi-libs
sbcl
libc++
powerdns-recursor
python-html5lib
ttf-dejavu
xapian-core
f2fs-tools
protobuf
lib32-nss
python-django
ncurses
libproxy
python2-pydot
wxgtk
texlive-fontsextra
lib32-glib2
dkms
llvm
libc++abi
lib32-llvm
lib32-libpng
openvdb
monodevelop
java-openjfx
jack
lib32-gdk-pixbuf2
bash
readline


## moveable to AUR
avidemux
ypserv
python-irc
soundfont-fluid
syslog-ng
lib32-liblphobos
ovmf
libpgf
fvwm-crystal
hgsvn
hfsprogs
dvdisaster
firefox-firebug
supercollider
taskjuggler3
pd
reaver
xenstore
gap-packages
synthv1
samplv1
drumkv1
scrapy
bdf-unifont
wiznote
python-selenium
httpie
rosegarden
clawsker
git-annex
vbam
extremetuxracer
gcompris
intel-gpu-tools
gufw
gdc
gnumeric
qjackctl


# Automatic list

no maintainer:
extra/any/gdata-sharp
extra/any/gudev-sharp
multilib/x86_64/lib32-liblphobos
community/any/taskjuggler3
core/x86_64/krb5
community/x86_64/xe-guest-utilities
community/x86_64/xenstore


allan:
extra/x86_64/fakechroot


bpiotrowski:
core/x86_64/ncurses
core/x86_64/bash
core/x86_64/readline


remy:
extra/any/texlive-fontsextra


foutrelis:
community/x86_64/gcompris
extra/x86_64/llvm-libs
extra/x86_64/llvm
extra/x86_64/lldb
extra/x86_64/clang-tools-extra
extra/x86_64/llvm-ocaml
extra/x86_64/clang


seblu:
extra/any/dkms


schiv:
extra/x86_64/ardour
extra/x86_64/libffado
extra/x86_64/serd
extra/x86_64/sord
extra/x86_64/lilv
extra/x86_64/sratom
extra/x86_64/lv2


anthraxx:
community/x86_64/powerdns-recursor
community/any/gufw


bluewind:
community/x86_64/opencascade


ttoepper:
community/x86_64/confuse


lcarlier:
extra/any/opencl-headers
multilib/x86_64/lib32-llvm
multilib/x86_64/lib32-clang
multilib/x86_64/lib32-llvm-libs


thomas:
extra/any/ovmf


dan:
extra/any/python2-django
extra/any/python-django


tpowa:
extra/x86_64/gnu-efi-libs
extra/x86_64/f2fs-tools
extra/any/clawsker


jelle:
community/any/hgsvn
community/any/python2-html5lib
community/any/python-html5lib
community/x86_64/python-selenium
community/x86_64/python2-selenium


thestinger:
community/x86_64/libc++
community/any/httpie
community/x86_64/libc++abi
community/x86_64/intel-gpu-tools


alucryd:
community/x86_64/vbam-gtk
community/x86_64/vbam-wx
community/x86_64/vbam-sdl


daniel:
extra/any/monodevelop


fyan:
community/any/soundfont-fluid
multilib/x86_64/lib32-libxml2
community/x86_64/reaver
community/any/scrapy
extra/x86_64/xapian-core
multilib/x86_64/lib32-nss
community/x86_64/wiznote
community/x86_64/git-annex
community/any/python2-pydot
multilib/x86_64/lib32-glib2
multilib/x86_64/lib32-libpng
multilib/x86_64/lib32-gdk-pixbuf2
community/x86_64/python2-matplotlib
community/x86_64/python-matplotlib


dicebot:
community/x86_64/libgphobos-devel
community/x86_64/gdc


juergen:
extra/x86_64/geoip
extra/x86_64/sbcl


kkeen:
community/any/python-irc
community/any/python2-irc


muflone:
community/x86_64/hfsprogs


speps:
community/any/firefox-firebug
community/x86_64/supercollider
community/x86_64/pd
community/x86_64/synthv1
community/x86_64/samplv1
community/x86_64/drumkv1


jgc:
extra/x86_64/libxml++-docs
extra/x86_64/libxml++
extra/any/ttf-dejavu
extra/x86_64/libproxy
extra/x86_64/gnumeric


arojas:
community/x86_64/gap
community/x86_64/gap-data
community/x86_64/gap-doc
community/x86_64/gap-packages

tomegun:
extra/x86_64/ypserv
extra/x86_64/yp-tools


ronald:
extra/x86_64/libpgf
extra/x86_64/netcdf-fortran
extra/x86_64/netcdf-cxx
extra/x86_64/netcdf
extra/any/bdf-unifont
community/x86_64/extremetuxracer
extra/x86_64/efl-docs

Re: [arch-dev-public] Long out of date packages

2016-10-20 Thread Antonio Rojas
El Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:24:10 +0600, Ray Rashif via arch-dev-public
escribió:

> - liblo: this was flagged by me as a reminder based on a user's e-mail
> [1]
> - ardour: awaiting testing - libffado: compilation issues, didn't dig
> [2]
> .
> [2] Help appreciated in identifying the patch or at least the cause.

Fedora patch:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libffado.git/tree/libffado-gcc6.patch


[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

2016-10-20 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 10 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 11 fully signed off packages
* 27 packages missing signoffs
* 9 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)


== New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) ==

* s-nail-14.8.13-1 (i686)
* s-nail-14.8.13-1 (x86_64)
* ardour-5.4-1 (i686)
* gparted-0.27.0-1 (i686)
* libpng-1.6.26-1 (i686)
* lv2-1.14.0-1 (i686)
* ardour-5.4-1 (x86_64)
* gparted-0.27.0-1 (x86_64)
* libpng-1.6.26-1 (x86_64)
* lv2-1.14.0-1 (x86_64)


== Incomplete signoffs for [core] (8 total) ==

* efibootmgr-14-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* efivar-28-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* nilfs-utils-2.2.5-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* s-nail-14.8.13-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* efibootmgr-14-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* efivar-28-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* nilfs-utils-2.2.5-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* s-nail-14.8.13-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs

== Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (19 total) ==

* python-pycparser-2.16-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* ardour-5.4-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* chromium-54.0.2840.59-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* gparted-0.27.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* jasper-1.900.5-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* libbluray-0.9.2-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* libpng-1.6.26-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* libxi-1.7.7-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* linux-zen-4.8.2-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* lv2-1.14.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* ardour-5.4-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* chromium-54.0.2840.59-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* gparted-0.27.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* jasper-1.900.5-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* libbluray-0.9.2-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* libpng-1.6.26-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libxi-1.7.7-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* linux-zen-4.8.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* lv2-1.14.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs


== Completed signoffs (11 total) ==

* dbus-1.10.12-1 (i686)
* nspr-4.13-1 (i686)
* nss-3.27.1-1 (i686)
* shadow-4.4-2 (i686)
* sudo-1.8.18.p1-1 (i686)
* dbus-1.10.12-1 (x86_64)
* nspr-4.13-1 (x86_64)
* nss-3.27.1-1 (x86_64)
* shadow-4.4-2 (x86_64)
* sudo-1.8.18.p1-1 (x86_64)
* django-1.10.1-1 (any)


== All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (9 total) ==

* libbluray-0.9.2-3 (i686), since 2016-05-08
* libbluray-0.9.2-3 (x86_64), since 2016-05-08
* django-1.10.1-1 (any), since 2016-09-18
* nilfs-utils-2.2.5-1 (i686), since 2016-09-18
* nilfs-utils-2.2.5-1 (x86_64), since 2016-09-18
* nspr-4.13-1 (i686), since 2016-10-01
* nspr-4.13-1 (x86_64), since 2016-10-01
* shadow-4.4-2 (i686), since 2016-10-04
* shadow-4.4-2 (x86_64), since 2016-10-04


== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. jgc - 3 signoffs
2. Tazmain - 2 signoffs
3. Irishluck83 - 2 signoffs