Re: [arch-dev-public] ImageMagick 7

2017-12-02 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public 
El Sat, 02 Dec 2017 20:18:44 +, Jan Alexander Steffens via
arch-dev-public escribió:

> 
> That's the question. I'm not even sure (but more confident) that we need
> libmagick6. I have the complete set ready, but we can still drop the
> packages that we later determine are not needed.

Last time a tried not a single package that links to libmagick was building 
with 7, so I'd be surprised if libmagick6 wasn't needed.

Re: [arch-dev-public] ImageMagick 7

2017-12-02 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public 
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:08 PM Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public <
arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote:

> El Sat, 02 Dec 2017 19:53:10 +, Jan Alexander Steffens via
> arch-dev-public escribió:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > if nobody objects I would like to start an upgrade to ImageMagick 7.
> >
> > The plan is:
> > - Split imagemagick into (libmagick imagemagick imagemagick-doc).
> > - Add imagemagick6, split into (libmagick6 imagemagick6). No docs.
> >
> > libmagick and libmagick6 contain the parallel-installable libraries.
> >
> > imagemagick and imagemagick6 conflict with each other, containing the
> > tools, the perl module and the conflicting build files.
> >
> > We'll need some rebuilds, of course.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Will imagemagick6 (the tools) still be needed after we ship IM7? I'd
> rather not ship two versions of the tools if that's possible.
>

That's the question. I'm not even sure (but more confident) that we need
libmagick6. I have the complete set ready, but we can still drop the
packages that we later determine are not needed.

Re: [arch-dev-public] ImageMagick 7

2017-12-02 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public 
El Sat, 02 Dec 2017 19:53:10 +, Jan Alexander Steffens via
arch-dev-public escribió:

> Hi list,
> 
> if nobody objects I would like to start an upgrade to ImageMagick 7.
> 
> The plan is:
> - Split imagemagick into (libmagick imagemagick imagemagick-doc).
> - Add imagemagick6, split into (libmagick6 imagemagick6). No docs.
> 
> libmagick and libmagick6 contain the parallel-installable libraries.
> 
> imagemagick and imagemagick6 conflict with each other, containing the
> tools, the perl module and the conflicting build files.
> 
> We'll need some rebuilds, of course.
> 
> Thoughts?

Will imagemagick6 (the tools) still be needed after we ship IM7? I'd rather not 
ship two versions of the tools if that's possible.

[arch-dev-public] ImageMagick 7

2017-12-02 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public 
Hi list,

if nobody objects I would like to start an upgrade to ImageMagick 7.

The plan is:
- Split imagemagick into (libmagick imagemagick imagemagick-doc).
- Add imagemagick6, split into (libmagick6 imagemagick6). No docs.

libmagick and libmagick6 contain the parallel-installable libraries.

imagemagick and imagemagick6 conflict with each other, containing the
tools, the perl module and the conflicting build files.

We'll need some rebuilds, of course.

Thoughts?

Greetings,
Jan