Re: [arch-dev-public] Transparency report May 2020

2020-06-03 Thread Lukas Fleischer via arch-dev-public
On Wed, 03 Jun 2020 at 13:05:50, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public wrote:
> # Transparency report May 2020

This is a great idea, thank you so much for all the work that went into
writing this!

> ### GitLab
> 
> We're in the process of switching our Git hosting from our custom cgit
> instance to GitLab! We created https://gitlab.archlinux.org [9] and have
> started moving some projects. We'll continue moving projects onto GitLab
> and will then get rid of our cgit instance.
> [...]
> The archiso project has been moved [10] to Arch Linux' GitLab instance
> [11]. Furthermore over the past weeks smaller and larger fixes found
> their way into the repository. In the future all merge requests and
> releases will be handled via GitLab. CI integration and more elaborate
> test suites are still being developed to ensure a more robust setup for
> our monthly release images and any custom use cases.

Small addition: aurweb has officially moved [13] to the GitLab instance
too and we are very happy with the new platform so far. Looking forward
to when it's going to open up to the public. Big shout-out to the DevOps
team!

Best,
Lukas

[13] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2020-May/004856.html


[arch-dev-public] Transparency report May 2020

2020-06-03 Thread Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public
# Transparency report May 2020


## Staff

### TU addition

We are happy to welcome Frederik aka freswa among the Trusted Users [0].
Some of you may already know him as one of our bug wranglers where he
joined forces in February 2020.


## Packaging

### Go

The Go package guidelines [1] have been overhauled and in conjunction
the go-pie package has been removed [2]. The major difference is a new
set of CGO/GOFLAGS that ensure all our distro flags are respected
appropriately, leading to Go binaries with RELRO, PIE and fortify
hardening. A to-do list to reflect these changes is pending.

### CMake

The CMake package guidelines [3] have been created which describe some
important bits to consider when packaging software using cmake. Most
notably appropriate release type option that may otherwise have
undesired effects, removal of non required RPATH usage as well as some
convenience options to build in subdirectories without manually creating
them. As CMake still does not respect CPPFLAGS itself, which results in
fortify hardening being ignored, a temporary patch [4] has been added to
circumvent this misbehavior, a to-do list to reflect these changes is
pending.


## Reproducible builds

You may have noticed a couple of large rebuilds that occurred recently.
These fixed issues of non-reproducible file ordering with old versions
of makepkg. This and other hard work by the team improving our tooling
and fixing packaging issues has resulted in 96% of [core] being
reproducible, and 90% of [extra]. You can see the status of which
packages are reproducible here [5]. A full progress report can be found
on the corresponding thread [6] on arch-dev-public.

We have set up a fleet of three rebuilderd [7] runners to continuously
test our distributed repository packages and populate our status page
[8]. Some integration into archweb to indicate the current
reproducibility status is planned.


## Infrastructure

### GitLab

We're in the process of switching our Git hosting from our custom cgit
instance to GitLab! We created https://gitlab.archlinux.org [9] and have
started moving some projects. We'll continue moving projects onto GitLab
and will then get rid of our cgit instance.

Users can currently not collaborate with us on GitLab as we still need
to get some monitoring in place to make sure we can keep a close eye on
usages to ward off abuse. However, we're planning on doing this soon and
then we'll open up GitLab to everyone. Finally you can collaborate on
Arch like it's 2020!

We're also going to use GitLab for other things such as bug tracker
(instead of Flyspray), Kanban board (instead of Kanboard), and service
desk (for GDPR requests and such).

### Single-sign-on/Keycloak

Arch operates many different services - all of which with their own
login systems and account databases. This is not ideal from a security
and convenience standpoint. We'd like to enforce the same security
requirements for all users while also allowing everyone to use the same
account to log in to all of our services. It'll also finally allow you
to use 2-factor authentication for all Arch services.

We still have a long way to go here in terms of integrating all services
via SAML/OIDC and figuring out how to let users continue using their old
accounts.

### SVN to Git migration

The git migration plans have been picked up again, and started working
towards a proof-of-concept implementation [9]. This would allow
packagers to avoid the SVN mono repository and manage each package as a
separate git repository, and facilitate some modernization of our
current tooling.
More information about the plans and implementation will hit the
[arch-dev-public] list in the upcoming week.


## Projects

### Archiso

The archiso project has been moved [10] to Arch Linux' GitLab instance
[11]. Furthermore over the past weeks smaller and larger fixes found
their way into the repository. In the future all merge requests and
releases will be handled via GitLab. CI integration and more elaborate
test suites are still being developed to ensure a more robust setup for
our monthly release images and any custom use cases.

### Pacman

Initial support for parallel downloads landed in the pacman [12] code
base, requiring large changes to the codebase. Many patches providing
the finishing to this feature have been submitted. Once the code churn
around this feature request has slowed, we will make a beta release for
wider testing.
Additionally, one obscure area of non-reproducility in packages was
discovered through the Arch Linux reproducible builds effort, and
subsequently fixed in makepkg. Furthermore, the move from using
autotools to meson for the pacman build system was completed. Discussion
is ongoing on moving the pacman codebase to the Arch Linux GitLab
instance, with initial CI setup being added to the codebase.


## SPI

For the upcoming SPI annual report 2019, a section about some of Arch
Linux achievements has been assembled to represent our project. A link
to 

Re: [arch-dev-public] HEADS UP: Qt 5.15 in [testing]

2020-06-03 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public
El miércoles, 3 de junio de 2020 0:23:38 (CEST), Konstantin Gizdov 
escribió:

On 6/2/20 10:43 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote:

On 6/2/20 3:35 PM, Ike Devolder via arch-dev-public wrote: ...


According to the AUR page for qt5-styleplugins [1], OpenSUSE came up
with a patch [2]. It's maybe worth a shot.


While it is true that the patch fixes the build, that was not the only (or 
the main) reason I wanted to get rid of this package. It is long dead 
upstream (last commit was 3 years ago) and most styles crash when you try 
to use a modern QML application. I've seen complaints from the KDE devs due 
to the amount of crash reports they're getting caused by this. These are 
just a few from the last couple of months:


https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418917
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419259
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420024
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420399
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421092
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421846