Re: [arch-dev-public] moving dhcpcd to [extra]?
Op wo 22 apr. 2020 19:29 schreef Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public < arch-dev-public@archlinux.org>: > Em abril 22, 2020 6:38 Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public escreveu: > > Is there any reason to keep dhcpcd in [core]? It's only an optional > > dependency of netctl in [core], it currently lacks an active maintainer, > it > > doesn't seem to be much used (given the slow pace of signoffs), and > there's > > already a basic dhcp tool in [core] (networkd). > > > > Any objections to move it to [extra]? > > > > I don't mind it being moved to [extra], but I use it still, so I'm willing > to help > maintain it. Is Ronald still active? > > Regards, > Giancarlo Razzolini Feel free to take it of my hands or co-maintain it. Ronald
Re: [arch-dev-public] moving dhcpcd to [extra]?
Em abril 22, 2020 6:38 Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public escreveu: Is there any reason to keep dhcpcd in [core]? It's only an optional dependency of netctl in [core], it currently lacks an active maintainer, it doesn't seem to be much used (given the slow pace of signoffs), and there's already a basic dhcp tool in [core] (networkd). Any objections to move it to [extra]? I don't mind it being moved to [extra], but I use it still, so I'm willing to help maintain it. Is Ronald still active? Regards, Giancarlo Razzolini pgp3Zf_WHPezL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-dev-public] moving dhcpcd to [extra]?
On 2020-04-22 11:38:33 (+0200), Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public wrote: > Is there any reason to keep dhcpcd in [core]? It's only an optional > dependency of netctl in [core], it currently lacks an active maintainer, it > doesn't seem to be much used (given the slow pace of signoffs), and there's > already a basic dhcp tool in [core] (networkd). > > Any objections to move it to [extra]? Not from my side! :) -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[arch-dev-public] moving dhcpcd to [extra]?
Is there any reason to keep dhcpcd in [core]? It's only an optional dependency of netctl in [core], it currently lacks an active maintainer, it doesn't seem to be much used (given the slow pace of signoffs), and there's already a basic dhcp tool in [core] (networkd). Any objections to move it to [extra]?
