Re: pacman in testing can cause some issues for packagers

2024-03-15 Thread Robin Candau

On 3/14/24 21:45, Morten Linderud wrote:

Unless there is anything else that is cropping up pacman 6.1 is going to land in
the stable repositories tomorrow. I've added a -2 rebuild with patches from the
future 6.1.1 release of pacman.



Hey,

Do you think your bae9594a commit [1] can make it to a -3 rebuild before 
moving to stable?


Thanks!

[1] 
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/commit/bae9594ac1806ce30f2af1de27c49bb101a00d44


--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz



OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: pacman in testing can cause some issues for packagers

2024-03-14 Thread Morten Linderud
Unless there is anything else that is cropping up pacman 6.1 is going to land in
the stable repositories tomorrow. I've added a -2 rebuild with patches from the
future 6.1.1 release of pacman.

-- 
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


pacman in testing can cause some issues for packagers

2024-03-13 Thread Morten Linderud
Yo,

With `pacman` in testing `[core-testing]` there might be some issues for
packagers that use `makepkg --geninteg` or `updpkgsums` and submitting the
source packages to build.archlinux.org.

As the *sums=() array will contain an integrity check for git sources in pacman
6.1 and beyond the older pacman version on build.a.o is not going to understand
this and fail the build.

Just set the array to 'SKIP' as usual and it should build fine.

I'm not aware of any other packager issues as of writing.

-- 
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature