Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-13 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:04 AM, David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 06/12/12 01:40, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

 The site: trick [1] has worked for me quite well for long time:

 T400 site:http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/;

 site: I knew about and is good if you know which site will have the
 answer you're looking for. I don't always.

Mateusz's suggestion of 'site' was the answer to 'you can't easily
search the ML' issue.


 But what is 'T400'?

The search phrase.
It seems it's a type of Lenovo laptop.


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-13 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 12 June 2012 23:04, David Benfell benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote:
 On 06/12/12 01:40, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

 The site: trick [1] has worked for me quite well for long time:

 T400 site:http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/;

 Jeremiah's pointed on two front-ends to the same data,  best option
 I know too. It is not ideal in though, so it is not a problem to
 setup ML mirror on Gmane. Similarly, Nabble works fairly well as a
 Forum frontend to ML. [2]

 site: I knew about and is good if you know which site will have the
 answer you're looking for. I don't always.

Yes, this is true.
In case of ML, it may be also related to some configuration of mailman.
I found that the Google's site: trick does work pretty well with
for example OSGeo Foundation mailing lists that I use extensively,
e.g.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=jpeg+format+site%3Alists.osgeo.org%2Fpipermail%2Fgdal-dev%2F

 Sometimes, I'll find
 answers on the Ubuntu forums, for example, though I imagine this will
 be less true in the future as Ubuntu seems to be going down the toilet
 as a distribution.

:-)

 But what is 'T400'?

Model of Lenovo ThinkPad T400 which I use.

I used as example a needle being searched - as I've scanned
the MLs for T400 infos lately :)

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 13:16 +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
 On 12 June 2012 23:04, David Benfell benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote:
  On 06/12/12 01:40, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
 
  The site: trick [1] has worked for me quite well for long time:
 
  T400 site:http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/;
 
  Jeremiah's pointed on two front-ends to the same data,  best option
  I know too. It is not ideal in though, so it is not a problem to
  setup ML mirror on Gmane. Similarly, Nabble works fairly well as a
  Forum frontend to ML. [2]
 
  site: I knew about and is good if you know which site will have the
  answer you're looking for. I don't always.
 
 Yes, this is true.
 In case of ML, it may be also related to some configuration of mailman.
 I found that the Google's site: trick does work pretty well with
 for example OSGeo Foundation mailing lists that I use extensively,
 e.g.
 https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=jpeg+format+site%3Alists.osgeo.org%2Fpipermail%2Fgdal-dev%2F
 
  Sometimes, I'll find
  answers on the Ubuntu forums, for example, though I imagine this will
  be less true in the future as Ubuntu seems to be going down the toilet
  as a distribution.
 
 :-)
 
  But what is 'T400'?
 
 Model of Lenovo ThinkPad T400 which I use.
 
 I used as example a needle being searched - as I've scanned
 the MLs for T400 infos lately :)
 
 Best regards,

I collected mailing list mails with Mozilla mailers and their search
options where very helpful. Today I'm using Evolution (the mails are
also on my machine) and it's less good, but anyway better than searching
Archives by Google and other search engines.
Searching Archives is a PITA, but once you access the emails with a MUA,
it's very comfortable. Btw. usually Arch and Ubuntu Wikis are the best
sources for search engines. YMMV! - Ralf



Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-12 Thread Jeremiah Dodds
Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net writes:

 Hi,

 I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
 use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
 registered to the Arch Forums?

 Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?

 Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums traffic
 is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the lists.

 Best regards,


I also prefer mailing lists to forums.

The nicest setups I've seen, as far as making sure that relevant people
see relevant topics, have the mailing list and forum be two frontends to
the same set of data. This is a bit of a pain to set up if it's not done
from the get-go, but it's not all that hard of a thing to do.


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-12 Thread Jayesh Badwaik
On Monday 11 Jun 2012 22:35:15 Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
 The nicest setups I've seen, as far as making sure that relevant
 people see relevant topics, have the mailing list and forum be two
 frontends to the same set of data. This is a bit of a pain to set up
 if it's not done from the get-go, but it's not all that hard of a
 thing to do.

Even I am of the same opinion. Then, people would not miss something 
that was already present in the forums and would not have to invest time 
in watching the forums and the mailing list separately. 
-- 
Jayesh Badwaik
stop html mail  | always bottom-post
www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-12 Thread David Benfell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 06/10/12 11:14, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
 
 Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums
 traffic is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the
 lists.
 
In principle, I prefer mailing lists. They are not so nice, however,
when searching for information on the web, given what the various
sites that harvest the content of mailing lists do to it.

First, you'll find multiple copies of the exact same (useless, of
course, or else you would have stopped searching) posting. Second,
responses are often not even on the same page. It gets really ugly
really fast.

When I have a genuinely new situation, mailing lists can be excellent.
I just received some great help with DNSSEC on the unbound list. On
the other hand, I've sometimes received no response at all and I have
been told that the really helpful folks have all migrated to IRC (a
medium I personally just don't like).

- -- 
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=1Uxb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-12 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 12 June 2012 08:05, David Benfell benf...@parts-unknown.org wrote:
 On 06/10/12 11:14, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

 Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums
 traffic is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the
 lists.

 In principle, I prefer mailing lists. They are not so nice, however,
 when searching for information on the web, given what the various
 sites that harvest the content of mailing lists do to it.

The site: trick [1] has worked for me quite well for long time:

T400 site:http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/;

Jeremiah's pointed on two front-ends to the same data,  best option I know too.
It is not ideal in though, so it is not a problem to setup ML
mirror on Gmane. Similarly, Nabble works fairly well as a Forum
frontend to ML. [2]

I'm a member of OSGeo Foundation where mailing lists [3] only are provided.
For those who prefer forum frontent, we have the whole hierarchy mirrored
at Nabble. It's worked really well so far.

[1] http://goo.gl/clXUB
[2] http://wiki.list.org/display/DOC/How+do+I+make+the+archives+searchable
[3] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo
[4] http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-12 Thread David Benfell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 06/12/12 01:40, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
 
 The site: trick [1] has worked for me quite well for long time:
 
 T400 site:http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/;
 
 Jeremiah's pointed on two front-ends to the same data,  best option
 I know too. It is not ideal in though, so it is not a problem to
 setup ML mirror on Gmane. Similarly, Nabble works fairly well as a
 Forum frontend to ML. [2]

site: I knew about and is good if you know which site will have the
answer you're looking for. I don't always. Sometimes, I'll find
answers on the Ubuntu forums, for example, though I imagine this will
be less true in the future as Ubuntu seems to be going down the toilet
as a distribution.

But what is 'T400'?

thanks!
- -- 
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=t8iq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-11 Thread Martin Cigorraga
 Personally, I prefer mailing lists,


 So do I.
 Mailing list is, in my VERY humble opinion, the place where you find
 higher quality discussion than on web forums.

 But, that's just my opinion.


+1

I tend to use ML to catch up the news -I'm subscribed to all MLs- and ask
for help while in contrast I wander the forums trying to answer others
posts and help fellow archers.
I know it sounds weird but it's the *natural way* for me, lol  ^_^

-- 
-msx


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-11 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
miham...@rktmb.org wrote:
 On 06/10/2012 09:14 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

 Personally, I prefer mailing lists,


 So do I.
 Mailing list is, in my VERY humble opinion, the place where you find higher
 quality discussion than on web forums.

 But, that's just my opinion.

As a forum moderator I concur. Having said that however, I believe its
important that new users are directed to the forums first so that the
MLs can be kept as clean as possible (moderating a ML is a different
kettle of fish from moderating a forum).


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-11 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 11 June 2012 09:31, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
 miham...@rktmb.org wrote:
 On 06/10/2012 09:14 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

 Personally, I prefer mailing lists,

 So do I.
 Mailing list is, in my VERY humble opinion, the place where you find higher
 quality discussion than on web forums.

 But, that's just my opinion.

 As a forum moderator I concur. Having said that however, I believe its
 important that new users are directed to the forums first so that the
 MLs can be kept as clean as possible (moderating a ML is a different
 kettle of fish from moderating a forum).

IMO, that is a very good point indeed.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-11 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
 As a forum moderator I concur. Having said that however, I believe its
 important that new users are directed to the forums first so that the
 MLs can be kept as clean as possible (moderating a ML is a different
 kettle of fish from moderating a forum).

+1
I'm not using IRC so I don't know how does it stack against ML and the
forums in this regard.

One can subscribe to just a couple forum threads or sections to keep
the noise down. Such granularity is not available on the ML as there
are just a few Arch ML lists although you can ignore / mute on a
per-thread basis too.


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-11 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 11 June 2012 16:11, Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote:
 One can subscribe to just a couple forum threads or sections to keep
 the noise down. Such granularity is not available on the ML as there
 are just a few Arch ML lists although you can ignore / mute on a
 per-thread basis too.

Certainly, it's a matter of personal preference, so discussing it may
be pointless.

My preference to ML is due to this:

I find it quicker to use ML in comparison to Web forums.
For the forum, I have to do a few extra steps and clicks, for ML...
I check my inbox frequently anyway.
Also, clearing  filtering ML posts is light-speed fast by simply looking
at subject lines and removing or leaving unread for later.
Plus, I have more control to categorise/label/search ML posts.
(FluxBB search is ineffective.)

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net


[arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-10 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Hi,

I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
registered to the Arch Forums?

Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?

Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums traffic
is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the lists.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-10 Thread Jayesh Badwaik
On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
 use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
 registered to the Arch Forums?
 
 Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?
 
 Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums traffic
 is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the lists.
 
 Best regards,

I don't think I answer your question directly but still...
I believe people who use a desktop mail client prefer mailing list while 
those who use the web interface for mail like gmail.com etc prefer 
forums. This especially works if you are a long term mailing list user 
and use POP3 mail and hence can search for question using your mail 
client search. 
-- 
Jayesh Badwaik
stop html mail  | always bottom-post
www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-10 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:

 I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
 use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
 registered to the Arch Forums?

 Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?

 Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums traffic
 is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the lists.

 I don't think I answer your question directly but still...
 I believe people who use a desktop mail client prefer mailing list while
 those who use the web interface for mail like gmail.com etc prefer
 forums. This especially works if you are a long term mailing list user
 and use POP3 mail and hence can search for question using your mail
 client search.

The reason I posted request for some statistics, is that
users may be confused about where to send their requests
in order to reach the very core of the Arch community.
Certainly, variety is good as people have freedom of choice,
but freedom of choice has side effects too.

Anyway, I was just curious what part of developers and users
are subscribed to the mailing list and what part use forums.
Also, are all Arch developers subscribed to the mailing lists?

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-10 Thread Kwpolska
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
 On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:

 I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
 use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
 registered to the Arch Forums?

 Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?

 Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums traffic
 is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the lists.

 I don't think I answer your question directly but still...
 I believe people who use a desktop mail client prefer mailing list while
 those who use the web interface for mail like gmail.com etc prefer
 forums. This especially works if you are a long term mailing list user
 and use POP3 mail and hence can search for question using your mail
 client search.

 The reason I posted request for some statistics, is that
 users may be confused about where to send their requests
 in order to reach the very core of the Arch community.
 Certainly, variety is good as people have freedom of choice,
 but freedom of choice has side effects too.

 Anyway, I was just curious what part of developers and users
 are subscribed to the mailing list and what part use forums.

I, for one, am subscribed to the lists (arch-announce,
arch-dev-public, arch-general, aur-general) and also have a forums
account.  The difference is I read 90% of the mails I get (ignoring
the signoff reports or other useless messages) and I haven't been on
the forums since a few years.  Not quite sure how this works for
others.

 Also, are all Arch developers subscribed to the mailing lists?

Most likely, yes.


 Best regards,
 --
 Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net



-- 
Kwpolska http://kwpolska.tk
stop html mail      | always bottom-post
www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16   | Arch Linux x86_64, zsh, mutt, vim.
# vim:set textwidth=70:


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-10 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On 10 June 2012 20:40, Kwpolska kwpol...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
 wrote:
  On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
 
  I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
  use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
  registered to the Arch Forums?
 
  Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?
 
  Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums traffic
  is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the lists.
 
  I don't think I answer your question directly but still...
  I believe people who use a desktop mail client prefer mailing list
  while
  those who use the web interface for mail like gmail.com etc prefer
  forums. This especially works if you are a long term mailing list user
  and use POP3 mail and hence can search for question using your mail
  client search.
 
  The reason I posted request for some statistics, is that
  users may be confused about where to send their requests
  in order to reach the very core of the Arch community.
  Certainly, variety is good as people have freedom of choice,
  but freedom of choice has side effects too.
 
  Anyway, I was just curious what part of developers and users
  are subscribed to the mailing list and what part use forums.

 I, for one, am subscribed to the lists (arch-announce,
 arch-dev-public, arch-general, aur-general) and also have a forums
 account.  The difference is I read 90% of the mails I get (ignoring
 the signoff reports or other useless messages) and I haven't been on
 the forums since a few years.  Not quite sure how this works for
 others.

  Also, are all Arch developers subscribed to the mailing lists?

 Most likely, yes.

 
  Best regards,
  --
  Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net



 --
 Kwpolska http://kwpolska.tk
 stop html mail      | always bottom-post
 www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
 GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16   | Arch Linux x86_64, zsh, mutt, vim.
 # vim:set textwidth=70:

+1 here. I see most of the emails posted on the MLs and read some of
interest to me but I have not read forum for ages...

--
Guillaume


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-10 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 10 June 2012 19:40, Kwpolska kwpol...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
 On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik jayesh.badwai...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:

 I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
 use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
 registered to the Arch Forums?

 Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?

 Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums traffic
 is order of magnitude larger than the traffic on the lists.

 I don't think I answer your question directly but still...
 I believe people who use a desktop mail client prefer mailing list while
 those who use the web interface for mail like gmail.com etc prefer
 forums. This especially works if you are a long term mailing list user
 and use POP3 mail and hence can search for question using your mail
 client search.

 The reason I posted request for some statistics, is that
 users may be confused about where to send their requests
 in order to reach the very core of the Arch community.
 Certainly, variety is good as people have freedom of choice,
 but freedom of choice has side effects too.

 Anyway, I was just curious what part of developers and users
 are subscribed to the mailing list and what part use forums.

 I, for one, am subscribed to the lists (arch-announce,
 arch-dev-public, arch-general, aur-general) and also have a forums
 account.  The difference is I read 90% of the mails I get (ignoring
 the signoff reports or other useless messages) and I haven't been on
 the forums since a few years.

Thanks for the comment. Initially, I signed up and started using forums,
but it takes too much time to participate really (Web forums are always
more time consuming to me, so I'm not big fan of them, especially
if  heavy traffic occurs).

I think I'll switch to the lists only.

 Also, are all Arch developers subscribed to the mailing lists?

 Most likely, yes.

Good to know :)

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net


Re: [arch-general] Mailing lists vs Forums

2012-06-10 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby

On 06/10/2012 09:14 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

Personally, I prefer mailing lists,


So do I.
Mailing list is, in my VERY humble opinion, the place where you find 
higher quality discussion than on web forums.


But, that's just my opinion.

--
RMA.