This hast not been my experience. In several of my proposals to the ARIN PDP, I was tied to follow the shepherds inputs, and I’m convinced that those proposals failed because that.
And I recall one specific case, that the AC edits resulted in a major problem, requiring a new policy proposal to amend it back. That’s why I don’t really see the ARIN PDP as a “real” PDP compared to the other regions. > In my experience, the AC works very hard to remain true to the author’s > original intent and involve author(s) in the editorial process of a policy. > The AC is also extremely receptive to whatever community input is > available on a policy in most cases. > ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
