[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> Am 03.04.2023 um 17:27 schrieb Peter Boy : > > > >> Am 03.04.2023 um 17:05 schrieb Tom Callaway : >> >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/uboot-tools/2023.04/0.4.rc5.fc38/noarch/uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38.noarch.rpm > Works fine now on pine64 RockPro64 and Radxa Rock Pi 4. ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2023-04-04 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting. More information available at: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM) Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10455/ ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> Am 03.04.2023 um 17:05 schrieb Tom Callaway : > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/uboot-tools/2023.04/0.4.rc5.fc38/noarch/uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38.noarch.rpm Got it. Thanks a lot! One day, I hope to be familiar with the subtleties as well. -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora docs team contributor Java developer and enthusiast ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> Am 03.04.2023 um 14:39 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 1:01 PM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 03.04.2023 um 10:10 schrieb Peter Boy : >>> That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, >> >> Do yo have a direct link to the rpm? Sorry, for some reason all my searches >> and links end up with the uboot-tools rpm > > It's a subpackage of the uboot-tools package so if you go there and > look down the list you will find it: > > uboot-tools-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38 -> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2180089 > > It's in the noarch section > Thanks for the info. I followed every link without success. The Fedora build system is obviously still too much of a labyrinth for me. Anyway, put the devices aside and wait patiently for the next rc. -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora docs team contributor Java developer and enthusiast ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 1:01 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 03.04.2023 um 10:10 schrieb Peter Boy : > > > >> That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need > >> to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, > > Do yo have a direct link to the rpm? Sorry, for some reason all my searches > and links end up with the uboot-tools rpm It's a subpackage of the uboot-tools package so if you go there and look down the list you will find it: uboot-tools-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38 -> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2180089 It's in the noarch section > > > > > -- > Peter Boy > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy > p...@fedoraproject.org > > Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) > > > Fedora Server Edition Working Group member > Fedora docs team contributor > Java developer and enthusiast > > > ___ > arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> Am 03.04.2023 um 10:10 schrieb Peter Boy : > >> That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need >> to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, Do yo have a direct link to the rpm? Sorry, for some reason all my searches and links end up with the uboot-tools rpm -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora docs team contributor Java developer and enthusiast ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> Am 03.04.2023 um 10:18 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:10 AM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 03.04.2023 um 09:53 schrieb Peter Robinson : >>> > Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are > only needed for advanced use. OK, but with the currently distributed version (branched 2023-03-31 / u-boot 2023.04-rc4) I still get the message > Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > ## Error: "distro_bootcmd" not definded if I remember correctly and didn’t mess my notes and testing procedures. Will that get fixed with / before F38 release? >>> >>> That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need >>> to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, you're testing with >>> rc4. >> >> Well, I’m testing Fedora 38 release (beta / branched). Do you plan to get >> rc5 into the (initial) release media or will we start with a not-working arm >> installer in F38? Or what needs to be done to get in into the release media? >> Do we need testing? karma? …? > > I asked for karma and testing when I replied linking to the update in > this thread. > > I've already stated that I intend it to go into stable, which was why > I asked for testing. In fact we will ship with the GA release which is > due out today or tomorrow, we will request a FE to ensure this lands > (which we've done basically every release due to the upstream GA > generally landing on freeze day). > Thanks. I’ll use testing as soon as I get my box up and running again ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:10 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 03.04.2023 um 09:53 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > > >>> Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are > >>> only needed for advanced use. > >> > >> > >> OK, but with the currently distributed version (branched 2023-03-31 / > >> u-boot 2023.04-rc4) I still get the message > >>> Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > >>> ## Error: "distro_bootcmd" not definded > >> > >> if I remember correctly and didn’t mess my notes and testing procedures. > >> > >> Will that get fixed with / before F38 release? > > > > That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need > > to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, you're testing with > > rc4. > > Well, I’m testing Fedora 38 release (beta / branched). Do you plan to get rc5 > into the (initial) release media or will we start with a not-working arm > installer in F38? Or what needs to be done to get in into the release media? > Do we need testing? karma? …? I asked for karma and testing when I replied linking to the update in this thread. I've already stated that I intend it to go into stable, which was why I asked for testing. In fact we will ship with the GA release which is due out today or tomorrow, we will request a FE to ensure this lands (which we've done basically every release due to the upstream GA generally landing on freeze day). ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> Am 03.04.2023 um 09:53 schrieb Peter Robinson : > >>> Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are >>> only needed for advanced use. >> >> >> OK, but with the currently distributed version (branched 2023-03-31 / u-boot >> 2023.04-rc4) I still get the message >>> Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 >>> ## Error: "distro_bootcmd" not definded >> >> if I remember correctly and didn’t mess my notes and testing procedures. >> >> Will that get fixed with / before F38 release? > > That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need > to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, you're testing with > rc4. Well, I’m testing Fedora 38 release (beta / branched). Do you plan to get rc5 into the (initial) release media or will we start with a not-working arm installer in F38? Or what needs to be done to get in into the release media? Do we need testing? karma? …? -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora docs team contributor Java developer and enthusiast ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> > Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are > > only needed for advanced use. > > > OK, but with the currently distributed version (branched 2023-03-31 / u-boot > 2023.04-rc4) I still get the message > > Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > > ## Error: "distro_bootcmd" not definded > > if I remember correctly and didn’t mess my notes and testing procedures. > > Will that get fixed with / before F38 release? That is fixed with the rc5 build that's in updates-testing, you need to have uboot-images-armv8-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38, you're testing with rc4. ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> Am 03.04.2023 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:10 AM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 03.04.2023 um 00:35 schrieb Peter Robinson : >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Boy wrote: Fedora 37 aarch64 Server edition works just fine. With F38 beta 1 & branched 20230326 it starts: ... Sorry to be so late with testing. Would be nice to get it work, nevertheless. >>> >>> The F-38 build should now be fixed: >>> >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8ba62c0e8c >>> >>> If people could test and add karma that would be great. >> >> >> I hope, my question is not too uninitiated. With your link I get >> uboot-tools-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38.x86_64.rpm as far as I can see. But I >> didn’t (and didn’t need to) install uboot-tools on my x86-64 box to create >> the Fedora mSD using arm-image-installer so far. >> >> What I’m missing here? > > Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are > only needed for advanced use. OK, but with the currently distributed version (branched 2023-03-31 / u-boot 2023.04-rc4) I still get the message > Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > ## Error: "distro_bootcmd" not definded if I remember correctly and didn’t mess my notes and testing procedures. Will that get fixed with / before F38 release? -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora docs team contributor Java developer and enthusiast ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:10 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 03.04.2023 um 00:35 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Boy wrote: > >> > >> Fedora 37 aarch64 Server edition works just fine. > >> > >> > >> With F38 beta 1 & branched 20230326 it starts: > >> > >> ... > >> > >> Sorry to be so late with testing. Would be nice to get it work, > >> nevertheless. > > > > The F-38 build should now be fixed: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8ba62c0e8c > > > > If people could test and add karma that would be great. > > > I hope, my question is not too uninitiated. With your link I get > uboot-tools-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38.x86_64.rpm as far as I can see. But I didn’t > (and didn’t need to) install uboot-tools on my x86-64 box to create the > Fedora mSD using arm-image-installer so far. > > What I’m missing here? Nothing. In most cases these days the utilities in uboot-tools are only needed for advanced use. ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[fedora-arm] Re: Pine64 RockPro doesn't boot with F38 Beta 1 nor branched 20230326 nightly composed
> Am 03.04.2023 um 00:35 schrieb Peter Robinson : > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:08 PM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> Fedora 37 aarch64 Server edition works just fine. >> >> >> With F38 beta 1 & branched 20230326 it starts: >> >> ... >> >> Sorry to be so late with testing. Would be nice to get it work, nevertheless. > > The F-38 build should now be fixed: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8ba62c0e8c > > If people could test and add karma that would be great. I hope, my question is not too uninitiated. With your link I get uboot-tools-2023.04-0.4.rc5.fc38.x86_64.rpm as far as I can see. But I didn’t (and didn’t need to) install uboot-tools on my x86-64 box to create the Fedora mSD using arm-image-installer so far. What I’m missing here? -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora docs team contributor Java developer and enthusiast ___ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
